All reviews
Home / Reviews / Isagenix
Nutrition and meal-replacement · Binary MLM with an enrollment-tree overlay

Isagenix International, LLC

The company publishes that more than 96% of its 2024 US joiners opened Customer-only accounts - and, in the same year, that the average US Associate earned $986.74 against roughly $2,009 a year to stay eligible.

Reviewed August 1, 2026 Founded Established in 2002 in Gilbert, Arizona · twenty-four years of continuous trading, through a 2022 lender forbearance and a 2023 recapitalization Confidence: Medium-High
C-GRADE
5.99/10
Weighted composite

REAL CUSTOMER BASE, NEGATIVE AVERAGE

Twenty-four years, no pyramid finding anywhere, more than 96% of new US joiners buying as customers only - attached to an average Associate earning less than half the cost of qualifying, and a Team Builders Bonus that pays only in months when you enroll at least two new subscription Customers.

The question you came with

Can you actually make money with Isagenix?

GO, WITH CONDITIONS Only under conditions, and they are specific

Yes, under conditions, and the strongest thing in this file is a number the company puts on the front page of its own disclosure: more than 96% of the people who joined in the US in 2024 opened Customer accounts only and were not eligible to earn income. Roughly twenty-four of every twenty-five new enrollments were pure consumers. In this category that is a rare thing to be able to point at.

The plan also pays several ways on genuine outside customers, including a downline-free Brand Partner track paying 20% to 30% on customer sales with no fee, no purchase requirement and no quota attached to it. That track averaged $69.86 in 2024 on a zero cost base, which makes it the only version of this opportunity where the average participant is not underwater.

The Associate side is where it turns. The company's own 2024 US disclosure puts average annual earnings across all US Associates at $986.74 before expenses. Staying eligible for team income takes 100 QV every rolling thirty days, about $165 of product, which with the $29 fee is roughly $2,009 a year. The average sits about $1,022 below the cost of qualifying, and roughly 78% earned nothing at all.

One mechanism cuts against everything above it. The Team Builders Bonus, which runs to 27 December 2026, pays on Customer purchases down to four levels but only in months when the Associate enrolls at least two new Customers on a 100 QV subscription. From 29 September 2025 to 28 June 2026 a multiplier promotion paid Managers and above 2x that bonus on the first 90 days of new Customers’ purchases at three to five qualifying enrollments a month, 3x at six to nine and 4x at ten or more, with company-supplied referrals excluded. That multiplier was a step function on headcount, and the monthly enrollment gate remains.

What it costs to be in
$29

annual Associate membership fee. No purchase required to join, no pack requirement and no autoship condition - but 100 QV every rolling thirty days, about $165 of product, to be Active for anything beyond retail profit and the 20% Product Introduction Bonus

What has to be true for this to work for you
  • You want the products at the subscription price and would keep buying them with no income offer attached at all. Twenty-four of every twenty-five US joiners in 2024 did exactly that, and it is the version that does not cost $2,009 a year.
  • You would take the Brand Partner track seriously instead of treating it as the small option. It costs nothing, carries no quota, and it is the only route here where the published average sits above the cost base.
  • You can put roughly $165 of product a month through your own account or your retail-direct customers’ orders, every month, indefinitely, and still be ahead. That is what Active means for team income, and it is the figure the average Associate did not clear.
  • You read the re-entry rules before you build anything. Wait-outs run six, twelve and twenty-four months by prior rank, the clock resets on any prospecting activity, and you may never enroll anyone from your former organization.

That call is computed, not chosen - the rule reads three of the nine published dimension scores and is printed on the methodology page. It describes this company's plan and the figures it publishes about the people already in it. It is not a prediction about you, and nothing on this site is advice.

>96%
2024 US joiners who opened Customer-only accounts
the company’s own published figure - it counts joins, not volume
$986.74
Average 2024 earnings, all US Associates
before expenses, against roughly $2,009 a year to stay Active
~78%
US Associates who earned nothing in 2024
derived from the company’s own two published averages
~$54
One Cycle on 900 BV, paid from a pool capped at 50% of BV
6.0% of the volume it consumes; about 27 members at $165/month to break even

Legal status

LEGAL - no court or regulator has ever found Isagenix to be a pyramid scheme, and in twenty-four years of trading no FTC complaint, consent order, civil penalty or Section 13(b) action, no state Attorney General action, no securities action and no criminal proceeding against the company or any principal could be located in any source reviewed. The file contains: an FTC warning letter dated 5 June 2020, sent as one of six in a category sweep and citing posts by field participants rather than the company, with no action following; two self-regulatory earnings-claim inquiries at BBB National Programs’ DSSRC, in 2023 and closing 5 August 2025, both administratively closed after the company had the posts removed or revised, with no referral to the FTC or any Attorney General; a 2012–13 stipulated consent judgment in a private California Proposition 65 citizen-enforcement suit brought by a non-profit, settled for $350,000 with an express denial of liability and a court-entered lead-testing regime, in which the California Attorney General did not sue; CFIA Class 1 food recall warnings in Canada between October and November 2020, and a follow-up advisory in January 2021, triggered by the regulator’s own inspection activities, with reported associated illnesses and no prosecution located; and a 2025 putative class action by a former Associate claiming worker misclassification, not certified, whose claims a federal court compelled to confidential individual arbitration on 30 December 2025.

Confidence: Medium-High

Primary sources fetched directly where possible. Everything we could not verify is listed at the bottom of this page by name.

What this actually is

Follow the money

An Arizona nutrition and meal-replacement company founded in March 2002, selling shakes, bars, supplements and multi-week systems through independent Associates on a binary compensation plan with a separate enrollment tree layered over it. Group volume accumulates in a left and a right leg; when 900 BV has banked with at least 300 on the weaker side and 600 on the stronger, the Associate earns one Cycle, which the plan says equates to about $54; Cycles are paid from a weekly pool capped at 50% of commissionable BV, so the exact value is the pool divided by the Cycles earned.

The customer evidence is real and it belongs first. The company’s own 2024 US Earnings Disclosure Statement states on its front page that more than 96% of those who joined in the US that year opened Customer accounts only and were not eligible to earn income - up from more than 89% in the 2022 edition. The plan pays on genuine outside customers in several ways: a 20% Product Introduction Bonus on a new Customer’s first order, retail profit on the spread between member and guest prices, retail-direct profit on orders through an Associate’s own site, customer volume flowing up the binary like any other volume, and a Brand Partner affiliate track paying 20-30% on customer sales with no fee, no purchase requirement, no quota and no downline at all. Autoship is expressly not a condition of participation, in three separate jurisdictional documents. Joining costs $29 a year with no purchase required, which is one of the cheapest entries in this category. And the entire price list is public, with three price tiers and the Business Volume shown for roughly 150 SKUs, so the true cost of qualifying can be calculated before signing anything.

Then the economics, from the same document. The average annual earnings across all US Associates in 2024, active and inactive, was $986.74 before expenses. Remaining eligible for anything beyond retail profit requires 100 QV every rolling thirty days - about $165 of product at subscription pricing, derived from the price list’s own consistent 0.60 BV per subscription dollar and consistent with a distributor post quoted in the self-regulatory file at "roughly $170 monthly on your own products". With the $29 fee that is about $2,009 a year. The average is below the cost of qualifying. The share earning nothing is not published but follows from the two averages that are: $986.74 across everyone against $4,594 across those who earned anything implies about 78% earned nothing at all in 2024, about the same as the 78% the same derivation gives for 2022. The company’s later 2025 averages, $943.61 and $4,556, put it at about 79%.

The most damaging items sit in the promotions layered on the plan. The Team Builders Bonus, which runs to 27 December 2026, pays on Customer purchases down to four levels, but only in a month when the Associate enrolls at least two new Customers on a 100 QV subscription, about $165 a head; enrollments supplied through the company’s own customer-referral program are excluded. From 29 September 2025 to 28 June 2026 a multiplier promotion made that a step function on headcount for Managers and above: three to five qualifying monthly enrollments doubled the bonus on new Customers’ first 90 days of purchases, six to nine tripled it, ten or more quadrupled it. Alongside it, rank qualification above Consultant counts personally enrolled paid-as Consultants (two for Manager, six for Director, ten for Executive) rather than sales, the UK/EU plan pays a promotional £74/€88 for each personally enrolled Associate you help advance to Consultant, up to twenty, and holdover volume resets to zero if Active status lapses.

The financial position is the fourth thing to understand, and it is not an allegation. No company revenue figure appears in any document saved for this report. The company’s own releases record a lender forbearance on 23 September 2022 and a recapitalization on 17 April 2023 that eliminated about $170 million of debt and moved majority ownership to a group of the company’s investors including four investment managers, with the founders contributing $95 million and retaining a minority. A restructuring is a financial event, not a finding of wrongdoing - but every plan value is reserved to the company’s discretion, and the owner has changed.

Where US Associates landed in 2024

From the company’s own 2024 US Earnings Disclosure Statement, which publishes an average for all Associates and an average for those who earned anything. The zero-earner share is not stated by the company; it is derived here by arithmetic from those two published averages. All figures are before expenses, which the disclosure lists but does not deduct.

79% 21%
Earned nothing at all - derived, roughly 78%Earned something, below the top 1% of earners (roughly 21.3%; all earners averaged $4,594)Top 1% of earners, about 0.2% of all Associates - average $245,581, median $121,351
ProductPricePays
Associate annual membership
US$39 a year for Associates who choose not to open a Customer account, under the Canadian-resident policies. No purchase required to join, no pack condition, no autoship condition. Genuinely one of the cheapest entries in this category, and it should be said plainly. Renewal is charged to the card on file five to seven days before the anniversary unless the participant opts out by telephone.
$29/yr (US)
annual
—
100 QV Active requirement
Required every rolling thirty days (plus a five-day grace period) for anything beyond retail profit and Product Introduction Bonuses. About $1,980 a year, or roughly $2,009 with the membership fee. Satisfiable by retail-direct customer orders through the Associate’s own site as well as by personal purchase - and in Italy alone the company permits Active status on personally enrolled volume with zero personal purchase, which shows a purely retail qualification is technically possible.
~$165/mo
recurring
—
IsaLean Shake (whey), 14 meals
33 BV. $3.93 to $5.21 per meal. The $18 spread from subscription to guest is a 32.7% margin on cost, or 24.7% of the sale price - a workable retail rate.
$55 sub / $62 preferred / $73 guest
per unit
retail spread $18
30-Day Reset system
The flagship multi-week system. Works out at $11.00 to $14.63 a day. No efficacy claim of any kind is made or endorsed here; this entry records price and volume only.
$330 sub / $439 guest
one-time
BV 201
Weight Loss Ultimate Pack
The largest single pack on the August 2026 price list. Nobody is required to buy a pack, and the 20% Product Introduction Bonus is paid on a new Member’s first order of any qualifying products, so a larger first order pays the enroller more.
$1,095 sub / $1,432 guest
one-time
BV 594
Builder Value Pack
Listed on the company’s own price list under a product category headed "Financial Wellbeing Packs" - a group of $357 to $1,095 items that includes the highest-BV item in the catalog and categorized by their function in the income opportunity rather than by any nutritional purpose. That is compensation-plan evidence appearing in a product catalog.
$506 sub / $672 guest
one-time
BV 336
Collagen Elixir, 30 count
$4.70 to $6.30 per one-ounce shot. With the new BĒA Glow at $5.60 to $7.60 a can, these are the sharpest price lines in the catalog relative to anything on an open shelf.
$141 sub / $189 guest
per unit
BV 87
IsaPro Whey Protein, 30 servings
The cheapest serving among the list’s protein products that state a serving count: $1.63 at subscription, $2.17 at retail. It carries the same 0.6 BV-per-dollar ratio as everything else, so it is not a loss-leader.
$49 sub / $65 guest
per unit
BV 30
Background check

Who runs it, and what they ran before

JW
John W. Anderson
Named as a founder in the company’s history; no saved document covers his role or exit

No regulatory action, fraud judgment or criminal proceeding against him could be located in any source reviewed.

JC
Jim Coover
Co-founder

Co-founder with Kathy Coover; the company’s 2023 releases record that the two contributed $95 million of value to the recapitalization and kept minority ownership. No finding, regulatory action or criminal proceeding against him could be located in any source reviewed.

KC
Kathy Coover
Co-founder

Co-founder; with Jim Coover she contributed $95 million of value to the 2023 recapitalization and kept minority ownership, per the company’s releases. No regulatory or criminal action against her could be located.

Gn
Governance note
Founders put in $95 million - and still lost majority control

In the February 2023 restructuring support agreement the Coovers contributed $95 million of value through new cash plus forgiveness of debt they were personally owed, rather than walking away. That is the single most creditable fact in the ownership file and it is not a small one. It was not enough to keep control: on 17 April 2023 majority ownership passed to a group of the company’s investors including Arbour Lane, Cerberus, Crescent and Summit House, with the founders retaining a minority. The release said a new board would be announced "in the coming weeks"; whether any Coover holds a seat on it could not be established.

Registered address

Gilbert, Arizona, USA
Privately held. No company revenue figure appears in any document saved for this report. The company’s own releases record a forbearance agreement with an ad hoc group of secured lenders on 23 September 2022, a restructuring support agreement on 27 February 2023, and a recapitalization completed on 17 April 2023 that eliminated approximately $130 million of senior secured debt and approximately $40 million of unsecured debt and moved majority ownership to a group of the company’s investors including four investment managers, with the founders contributing $95 million and keeping a minority. None of that is a finding of wrongdoing - a restructuring is a financial event - but it is a fact about who now owns the company that sets the plan.

Compensation plan

What has to be true for you to get paid

To coverYou need
Hold an Associate license for a year $29
annual membership fee, no purchase required, no autoship condition
Stay Active for team income every month ~$165/mo
100 QV in a rolling 30 days at the published 0.60 BV per subscription dollar - about $2,009 a year with the fee
Cover that $2,009 from Cycles alone ~37 Cycles a year
about $54 a Cycle, each consuming 900 BV - roughly $4,590 of monthly organizational volume, split 600/300 across two legs
Fund your own qualification from a downline ~27 members at $165/mo
correctly split across both legs and sustained; the company-published average Associate earned $986.74, about 0.35 Cycles a week

Read this twice

Every input here comes from the company’s own documents. The Associate fee is $29 and the compensation plan says in terms that no purchase is required to enroll - genuinely low, and it should be said before anything else. What costs money is staying eligible. Active status requires 100 Qualifying Volume (QV) in the prior thirty days, every thirty days, or you receive nothing beyond retail profit and Product Introduction Bonuses; QV is stated alongside BV and typically matches it unless a product is discounted. The published price list runs at a strikingly consistent 0.60 BV per subscription dollar across the catalog - 33 BV on a $55 shake, 201 BV on a $330 system, 52 BV on an $85 daily pack - so 100 QV is about $165 at subscription pricing, roughly $185 at preferred-customer pricing and about $220 at guest retail. A distributor post quoted in the 2025 self-regulatory file puts the same figure to prospects as "roughly $170 monthly on your own products". Annualized with the fee, about $2,009. Two honest caveats cut in the company’s favor. The 100 QV can be satisfied by retail-direct customer orders placed through the Associate’s own website rather than by personal purchase, and in Italy the company already permits Active status with zero personal volume, which proves a purely retail qualification is technically possible. Someone with a genuine customer base is not spending that money at all. Against that, the Cycle arithmetic is unforgiving: one Cycle pays about $54 on 900 BV of group volume, which is 6.0% of the volume it consumes and about 3.6% of the dollars, so covering $165 a month takes just over three Cycles, which takes roughly $4,590 of monthly organizational volume correctly split across two legs - about 27 other people each buying $165 a month, of which only your own $165 is yours. And the banked holdover volume that gets you there flushes if Active status lapses. The company’s own 2024 disclosure closes the loop: the average Associate earned $986.74, about $1,022 short of the cost of qualifying, and roughly 78% earned nothing at all.

Run your own numbers

Drag the sliders. Nothing here is stored or sent.

-
Cumulative net, after costs
Retained retained customers -
Commission that month -
Total commissions earned -
Total you paid in -
Net -

Six dollars a month is derived from the plan’s own unit of account rather than from a retail percentage: one Cycle pays about $54 on 900 business volume, which is 6.0% of volume, and a customer subscribing at about $165 a month generates roughly 99 BV at the company’s corroborated 0.60 volume-per-dollar ratio. The cost line is that same $165, being the 100 qualifying volume every thirty days required to stay Active - close to the "$170 monthly" a distributor post in the self-regulatory file put to prospects. The Team Builders Bonus is excluded from the slider because it pays only in months with at least two new subscription Customer enrollments, and its 2×, 3× and 4× multiplier, which ran to 28 June 2026, was keyed to how many people you enrolled in a month rather than to anything sold. The genuine strength here goes in the other direction and belongs on the page rather than the slider: the company reports that more than 96% of its 2024 United States joiners opened customer-only accounts. Break-even needs roughly 27 people subscribing at $165 a month. For calibration, the company’s own 2024 disclosure puts average annual earnings for all United States Associates at $986.74, before expenses, against roughly $2,009 a year to stay Active. Your own subscription cost of $165/mo is included.

Your money

What it costs to replace this yourself

Isagenix’s own August 2026 US price list against Huel’s own published subscription prices, the one comparator saved for this report. Formulations and pack sizes differ, so the rows compare a meal with a meal. Nothing here is a statement about what any product does - only about what a comparable serving costs.

What they sell youWhat you'd use insteadYour cost
IsaLean Shake - $3.93 subscription, $5.21 guest, per mealHuel Powder v3 or Huel Black Edition on subscription$2.21-$2.65
IsaLean Performance Protein - $4.50-$6.00 per mealHuel Black Edition on subscription$2.65
30-Day Reset system - $11.00-$14.63 a dayTwo Huel Essential meals a day$2.98/day
100 QV Active requirement - about $1,980 a yearNo requirement, no rank, no flush: buy what you actually use$0
Total as sold
~$2,009 a year to stay Active: about $165 a month of product at subscription prices plus the $29 fee
Total, built yourself
~$810-$1,090 a year: one Huel Powder v3 meal a day ($2.21) up to two Huel Essential meals a day ($2.98), our arithmetic

Price-to-value

On the meal shakes the premium is roughly 1.5× to 3.5× against Huel’s published subscription prices - real, but not absurd for a premium direct-to-consumer position, and the company earns genuine credit for publishing every price tier and the BV so that a buyer can do this arithmetic before joining. One caveat belongs here in fairness: the court-ordered lead-testing regime on covered products is a quality obligation the shelf brands do not carry. What decides the exercise is not the per-serving gap but the structural one. A customer who simply likes the shakes can buy them at the subscription price with a free account, no fee and no quota - and more than 96% of 2024 US joiners did exactly that. The Associate is the only person paying about $2,009 a year for the right to be paid on other people’s volume, and the company’s own disclosure says the average one collected $986.74.

Odds of profit

Three operators, five horizons

Probability of cumulative net profit

Hover any point for median, top decile and bottom quartile.

0% 25% 50% 75% 100%3 mo6 mo1 yr3 yr5 yr 50% 13% 15%
Brand Partner - the free affiliate track - no fee, no purchase, no quota, no downline, 20-30% on customer salesPart-time Associate - $29 fee, holds 100 QV a month, a handful of customers, some sponsoringFull-time builder - 30+ hrs/wk, entry pack, events, driving Cycles and the Team Builders multiplier

Brand Partner

the free affiliate track - no fee, no purchase, no quota, no downline, 20-30% on customer sales

HorizonP(profit)Median
3 mo 54% +$8
6 mo 54% +$18
1 yr 54% +$35
3 yr 52% +$95
5 yr 50% +$150

Part-time Associate

$29 fee, holds 100 QV a month, a handful of customers, some sponsoring

HorizonP(profit)Median
3 mo 6% −$520
6 mo 8% −$1,010
1 yr 10% −$1,900
3 yr 12% −$5,400
5 yr 13% −$8,700

Full-time builder

30+ hrs/wk, entry pack, events, driving Cycles and the Team Builders multiplier

HorizonP(profit)Median
3 mo 3% −$1,400
6 mo 6% −$2,700
1 yr 9% −$4,900
3 yr 13% −$11,000
5 yr 15% −$16,500

Methodology note. These are modeled outcome ranges, not claims, and not company figures. ANCHORED to what Isagenix publishes: the 2024 US average across all Associates of $986.74 before expenses; the $4,594 average across those who earned anything, from which the roughly 78% zero-earner share is derived arithmetically; the top-1% average of $245,581 with a $121,351 median, the top-10% pair at $37,765 and $10,906, the top-50% pair at $8,921 and $1,686; the Brand Partner all-participant average of $69.86 with a top-50% median of $468 and a top-1% figure where average and median are identical at $17,327, which is the statistical signature of a very small population; the $29 fee; the 100 QV Active requirement at about $165 a month from the published 0.60 BV-per-dollar ratio; and the roughly $54 Cycle on 900 BV. MODELED by us: the cohort definitions, which the company does not segment; the share of each cohort in cumulative profit at each horizon; and the expense side beyond the published qualification cost, because the disclosure lists advertising, training, rent, travel, telephone and internet as costs it has not deducted without putting a figure on any of them. The Brand Partner row is the one that deserves a second look, and it cuts in the company’s favor: because that track costs nothing at all, an average of $69.86 is a positive return, which makes it the only version of this opportunity where the typical participant is not underwater. The Associate rows are negative at every horizon for the arithmetic reason set out above - the published average is below the published cost of qualifying - and not because any cohort is assumed to fail.

Go-to-market

Where you are actually allowed to promote this

Platform policy reads, not verifications. Check every one before you spend a dollar - enforcement changes faster than the written policy does.

Channel
Status
Notes
Amazon, eBay, Shopify and any third-party e-commerce
PROHIBITED
The policies bar offering, displaying or selling products "in any manner (including online auctions websites, such as eBay or Amazon, e-commerce websites, retail websites, social media sites or apps, infomercials, and television)" except through the company-provided Associate website. You cannot build a storefront, you cannot liquidate through a marketplace, and no Associate or Customer may supply product to a third party for resale.
Selling in gyms, salons, spas and weight-loss clinics
EXPRESSLY PERMITTED
The same clause carves out service-related and by-appointment businesses where the primary income is from services rather than product. That is a genuine, workable retail channel written into the policy rather than tolerated informally, and it is more than several companies graded here allow.
Self-created marketing material
PRIOR WRITTEN APPROVAL REQUIRED
Creation of your own materials is "discouraged"; anything self-created must be submitted to corporate for review, may not be used before written approval, and the company "may refuse to approve any materials at its sole discretion." Defensible for a company with an income-claims history, and a real constraint on anyone who markets for a living.
Social media and paid advertising
ORGANIC PERMITTED; PAID ADS BANNED IN THE UK AND EU
The policies permit social media "in a responsible manner". The UK/EU Rules of Membership go further: organic promotion is "permitted and encouraged", but "paid advertisements that are part of an effort to promote Isagenix products or the Isagenix income opportunity are strictly prohibited", naming search ads, social ads, pay-per-click, display and banner ads. The US Brand Partner terms separately let the company withhold commissions for using "Isagenix" as a paid-search keyword. The US Associate supplement on internet advertising sits behind the compliance portal; get it in writing before spending money on ads.
Domains containing "ISA" or "GENIX"
TRANSFER ON DEMAND - AND IT SURVIVES TERMINATION
You "agree to immediately transfer to Isagenix, upon Isagenix’s request, any Internet domain name or other registration or application containing an Isagenix trademark, including any word combinations using the prefix ‘ISA’ or the suffix ‘GENIX’," and the provision expressly survives the end of the relationship. Any search equity you build on such a domain is not yours, ever.
Email, SMS and fax
PRE-APPROVAL PLUS STATUTORY COMPLIANCE
All commercial email, SMS and fax must be pre-approved under the marketing-materials clause and separately comply with CAN-SPAM or CASL - functioning return address, functioning opt-out, clear advertisement disclosure, no deceptive subject lines, all opt-outs honored. The statutory half is simply the law; the pre-approval half is the company’s own gate.
Income claims
WELL DRAFTED, POORLY FOLLOWED
The policy requires any earnings representation to be "based on documented facts, placed in the appropriate context, and accompanied by the appropriate disclosures, including the Income Disclaimers and the most current Isagenix Annual Earnings Disclosure Statement," and to make clear that profits are not guaranteed. It is a good policy. The self-regulatory file shows field posts from 2021 to 2025 using "a wealthy business," "unlimited income opportunities" and "financial freedom" anyway - and a 2019 Canadian edition of the plan, still on the company’s document server, prints the Prime Minister slide.
Product and disease claims
EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED
Associates must describe products only consistently with official materials and "will not represent that any Isagenix product is intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any diseases or health conditions" unless approved for the country in question. For a nutrition company that received a warning letter over field health claims, this is the right rule written in the right words.
Selling into unopened markets
PROHIBITED, AND THE MAP IS THE COMPANY’S TO DRAW
You may not sell or promote in territories the company has not opened, nor use one jurisdiction’s literature in another, on pain of fines, prohibitions or termination at the company’s sole discretion. That matters because the map is the company’s to change: an international organization can be cut off by a corporate decision you had no part in.
The evidence

Red flags and green flags

Red flags

15
1The average US Associate earned less than half of what it costs to stay eligible
The company’s own 2024 disclosure: $986.74 average across all US Associates, before expenses, against roughly $2,009 a year to hold Active status (100 QV a month at about $165, plus the $29 fee). The average participant is about $1,022 underwater.
2Roughly 78% of US Associates earned nothing at all in 2024
Not stated by the company, but it follows from the two averages the company does publish: $986.74 across everyone divided by $4,594 across those who earned anything gives about 21.5% earning something. The same derivation gives about 78% for 2022, and the company’s 2025 averages ($943.61 and $4,556) give about 79%.
3A bonus gated on monthly enrollment count, and a multiplier that ran on it
The Team Builders Bonus, which runs to 27 December 2026, pays on Customer purchases only in months when the Associate enrolls at least two new Customers on a 100 QV subscription; enrollments from the company’s own customer-referral program are excluded. From 29 September 2025 to 28 June 2026 a multiplier paid Managers and above 2× at three to five qualifying monthly enrollments, 3× at six to nine and 4× at ten or more, capped at $20,000 a month.
4Rank above Consultant is a headcount, not a sales figure
Manager needs two personally enrolled Associates who are themselves paid-as Consultants, Director needs six, Executive needs ten with at least five on each leg. Plus, in the UK/EU plan, a promotional £74/€88 for each personally enrolled Associate you help advance to Consultant, up to twenty - the clearest per-head payment on the company’s own documents.
5A 2019 Canadian plan edition still on the company’s server prints "Prime Minister — 112 Cycles — CA$347,400"
A slide headed "What is your time worth?" tabulates Cycles-per-week against named occupations, topping out at a head of government’s salary; a companion table presents 100 Cycles a week as equivalent to owning $9,360,000 of capital. Set against a disclosed all-Associate average of $986.74, which is about 0.35 Cycles a week.
6The Cycle is a share of a capped pool, and no revenue figure is published
The plan pays Cycles from 50% of each week’s commissionable BV after Product Introduction Bonuses, dividing the remaining pool by the total Cycles earned; the plan says a Cycle equates to about $54. No company revenue figure appears in any document saved for this report, so nobody outside the company can size that pool.
7Majority control now sits with investment managers after a recapitalization
Arbour Lane, Cerberus, Crescent and Summit House took the majority on 17 April 2023; the founders retained a minority after contributing $95 million. This is not wrongdoing and no allegation is made - but the Cycle pool, the rank bonuses and the price tiers are all at the company’s discretion, and the company changed hands.
8A lender forbearance in 2022 before the recapitalization
On 23 September 2022 the company announced a forbearance agreement with an ad hoc group of its secured lenders, the first step toward the 2023 recapitalization that eliminated about $170 million of debt. A forbearance is a financial event, not a court finding.
9CFIA Class 1 recalls with reported illnesses - and the usual mitigation does not apply
Between 31 October and 24 November 2020 the Canadian Food Inspection Agency issued Class 1 food recall warnings over vitamin over-fortification, followed by a January 2021 warning about recalled product still sold online. Class 1 is the highest hazard classification, meaning a reasonable probability of serious health consequences. A company-initiated voluntary recall made with a regulator’s knowledge would be the system working; the CFIA’s own notices state these were triggered by its inspection activities, that there were reported associated illnesses, and that recalled product continued to be sold up to 16 November 2020. No prosecution followed that could be located.
10Holdover volume flushes when Active status lapses
Holdover volume "will continue to accumulate as long as you remain active", and Associates who are not active "will have any holdover volume reset to zero." Miss 100 QV in a rolling thirty-day window (plus five days’ grace) and it is gone - which is what converts a $165 monthly purchase from a choice into a treadmill with a forfeiture attached.
11A product category on the official price list headed "Financial Wellbeing Packs"
Items from $357 to $1,095, including the highest-BV item in the catalog, grouped by their function in the income opportunity rather than by any nutritional purpose. That is compensation-plan content printed in a product catalog.
12Confidential Arizona arbitration, enforced across state lines
All disputes go to confidential AAA arbitration under Arizona law. On 30 December 2025 a federal judge compelled a California resident’s misclassification claims into individual arbitration on that clause. No outcome of any dispute will ever be public - which is precisely why a prospective participant cannot research the ones that came before.
13Re-entry wait-outs of up to 24 months, with a clock that resets on prospecting
Six months for a customer or a small earner, twelve for anyone who earned $500 or more, twenty-four for anyone who ever reached Director - and the clock restarts on "any solicitation or prospecting activity." Volume from your own purchases keeps crediting your old sponsor throughout, and you may never enroll anyone from your former organization.
14The company owns the customer, and the obligation survives termination
Customer and Associate identities and contact details are declared an Isagenix trade secret belonging to Isagenix, enforceable by injunction with fee-shifting, surviving the end of the relationship. Whatever you build, you do not take it with you.
15Field income claims drew an FTC warning letter and two self-regulatory inquiries in five years
The FTC in a June 2020 warning letter citing participant posts, and the self-regulator in 2023 and again in a case closing 5 August 2025. None of those is a government finding and both self-regulatory matters were administratively closed - but the recurrence, on the same theme, against a well-drafted internal policy, is the pattern.

Green flags

10
1It publishes the customer split, in plain English, on the front page of the disclosure
"Over 96% of those Members who joined Isagenix in the U.S. in 2024, opened Customer accounts only and were not eligible to earn income from Isagenix" - up from over 89% in the 2022 edition. Very few companies in this category publish that ratio at all. It counts joins rather than volume, and the household boundary is undefined, but as published evidence about who actually buys this it is among the strongest available anywhere on this site.
2The plan pays several ways on genuine outside customers
A 20% Product Introduction Bonus on a new Customer’s first order, retail profit on the member-to-guest spread, retail-direct profit on orders through the Associate’s own website, customer volume flowing up the binary and paying Cycles like any other volume, and a Brand Partner affiliate track paying 20-30% on customer sales. The disclosure states in terms that "there is no income earned from the mere act of sponsoring or recruiting others."
3A genuinely free retail-only track where the average participant is not underwater
Brand Partners pay no fee, buy nothing, hold no quota and have no downline, and are paid weekly with recurring commission on repeat customer orders. The 2024 average across all US Brand Partners was $69.86 on a $0 cost base - small, but positive, which is more than can be said for the Associate side.
4Autoship is genuinely not a condition of anything, and three documents say so
The Canadian-resident policies state Associates "are not required to participate in the Autoship program in order to join, fully participate in, or earn bonuses or commissions"; the UK/EU Rules of Membership say Associates need not buy anything or join Subscription Rewards "to become or remain an Associate", and the customer terms call autoship optional. Joining costs $29 with no purchase required at all.
5Medians are published alongside averages, including unflattering ones
Top 1% at $245,581 average against a $121,351 median; top 10% at $37,765 against $10,906; top 50% at $8,921 against $1,686. Publishing the median next to the average is a real transparency choice, and the top-50% figure is not flattering. The disclosure also uses an inclusive denominator that counts Associates who did nothing all year.
6The entire price list is public, with three tiers and the BV for every SKU
Roughly 150 items with subscription, preferred-customer and guest prices and the Business Volume shown. That is what makes it possible to compute the real cost of the 100 QV requirement before joining - the arithmetic in this report is done from the company’s own published document. Hardware such as the shaker bottle carries zero BV, which is the honest treatment.
7A 90% buyback for twelve months after termination
On currently marketable inventory bought within twelve months of leaving, less commissions already paid, with a 30-day return window outside termination and the UK and EU editions refunding the full price on anything bought within ninety days. Above the category baseline.
8A specific, operational anti-manipulation policy
The policies enumerate fictitious enrollments, gratuitous enrollments "in exchange for some other benefit, such as free products," uninformed enrollments of "individuals who wished to be Customers only and were enrolled as Associates," and stacking - together with the operational tells of a shared payment method, shipping address, email or phone. That is the language of a company that has actually gone looking for plan manipulation.
9Prompt, documented cooperation with the self-regulator, twice
The 2023 inquiry was resolved with all offending posts and videos removed within 48 hours; the 2025 inquiry closed on 5 August with all thirteen posts revised or removed and the company proactively emailing the self-regulator’s own earnings-claims guidance to every affected salesforce member. Both were administratively closed, with no referral to the FTC or any Attorney General, in years when other companies were referred.
10Twenty-four years with no pyramid adjudication and no government enforcement action anywhere
No FTC complaint, consent order or civil penalty; no state Attorney General action; no securities action; no criminal proceeding against the company or any principal; and no court or regulator has ever found this to be a pyramid scheme. For a nutrition MLM of this age that is a genuine and material absence. Add that in the 2023 restructuring the founders put in $95 million of value rather than walking.
What would move this grade

We would like to be wrong about this

Upward

  • Leaving the enrollment-count multiplier retired after its June 2026 end, dropping the two-enrollments-a-month gate from the Team Builders Bonus so it pays on customer sales volume alone, and letting retail-direct customer sales alone satisfy Active status everywhere - which the company already permits in Italy, so it knows the mechanism works.
  • Publishing an overall median, an Associate headcount and the percentage earning nothing outright rather than leaving it to be derived from two averages - plus an actual company revenue figure for 2024 or 2025, audited or not.
  • Removing the "Prime Minister — 112 Cycles" and "residual value equals $9,360,000 of capital" slides from the 2019 Canadian plan edition still on the company’s document server, or withdrawing it, dropping the confidentiality requirement from the arbitration clause, and cutting the Director-and-above re-entry wait-out from twenty-four months to twelve with no reset on prospecting activity.

Downward

  • Any FTC complaint, consent order or civil penalty, as distinct from the 2020 warning letter, or a self-regulatory referral to the FTC or a state Attorney General on the next inquiry.
  • A certified class action or a court finding on tested product, or a further Class 1 recall with reported illnesses.
  • Introduction of any minimum autoship or entry-pack purchase as a condition of commission eligibility, a cut in the 50% of BV the plan sets aside for the field or a narrowing of the 90% buyback, or a second credit event at the operating company.
The better trade

Grade is C−. The strongest published customer evidence in this category, attached to an average Associate earning $986.74 against roughly $2,009 a year to qualify.

Start with what is real, because it genuinely is. The company publishes, on the front page of its own earnings disclosure, that more than 96% of those who joined in the US in 2024 opened Customer accounts only - twenty-four in twenty-five new enrollments taking no income offer at all, up from more than 89% two years earlier. It pays several ways on genuine outside customers, including a Brand Partner track with no fee, no purchase requirement, no quota and no downline. It states in terms that nothing is earned from the mere act of sponsoring. It publishes medians beside averages, an inclusive denominator that counts people who did nothing all year, and a complete price list with three tiers and the volume value of every SKU - which is why the arithmetic in this report could be done from the company’s own documents rather than guessed. Autoship is not a condition of anything and $29 buys the license. And in twenty-four years there is no pyramid finding, no FTC enforcement action, no consent order, no state Attorney General action and no criminal proceeding against anyone. Those are not decorations. They are the reason this file grades in the C band rather than lower.

The economics are where it turns. The average across all US Associates in 2024 was $986.74 before expenses. Staying eligible for team income costs about $165 a month - 100 QV at the price list’s own consistent 0.60 BV per subscription dollar, the same figure a distributor post in the self-regulatory file put to prospects as "roughly $170 monthly" - or about $2,009 a year with the fee. The average is below the cost of qualifying, by roughly $1,022. The company does not publish how many earned nothing, but the two averages it does publish imply about 78% did, the same share the method gives for 2022. One Cycle pays about $54 on 900 BV, which is 6.0% of the volume it consumes; covering your own qualification takes just over three Cycles a month, which takes roughly $4,590 of organizational volume - about twenty-seven other people each buying $165 a month, split correctly across two legs, with the banked volume flushing if you ever fall out of Active status. And the Team Builders Bonus pays only in months when you enroll at least two new subscription Customers, excluding the referrals the company supplies; from September 2025 to 28 June 2026 a multiplier paid Managers 2×, 3× or 4× on how many you enrolled that month. That is a headcount incentive, on the company’s own promotion terms.

The last thing to weigh is the payer, and it must be said carefully because none of it is wrongdoing. No company revenue figure appears in any document saved for this report. The company’s own releases record a lender forbearance in September 2022 and a recapitalization on 17 April 2023 that eliminated about $170 million of debt and handed majority ownership to a group of the company’s investors including four investment managers. The founders put $95 million of value into making it happen. A debt restructuring is a financial event, not a finding of wrongdoing, and nothing here alleges otherwise. What it changes is who decides the plan. A Cycle is a share of a weekly pool capped at 50% of BV, the promotions can be changed or ended at any time, and the company is now controlled by investment managers rather than by its founders.

1

Be a customer, which is what almost everyone already is

A Preferred Customer account requires no autoship and pays $62 for the IsaLean shake against $55 on subscription and $73 at guest retail. More than 96% of 2024 US joiners took exactly that route. If you like the shakes, buy the shakes. It costs nothing, commits you to nothing, and leaves you free to price them against Huel, Soylent, Orgain or a grocery own-brand any month you feel like it.

2

If you want to earn, take the Brand Partner track first

No fee, no purchase requirement, no quota, no downline, 20-30% on customer sales paid weekly with recurring commission on reorders. The 2024 average was $69.86, which is small - but on a zero cost base it is positive, and it is the only version of this opportunity in which the typical participant is not underwater. If you cannot make retail work there, the Associate side will not fix it; it will only add about $2,009 a year of cost.

3

Do the $986.74-against-$2,009 sum before you sign anything

Both numbers come from the company: the average from its own disclosure, the cost from its own price list at 100 QV a month plus the $29 fee. Then ask your sponsor the two questions the documents do not answer - what share of your group volume comes from people who are not Associates, and what your own Active requirement has cost you over the last twelve months. If the answer to either is vague, that is the answer.

4

Sell nutrition without the flush, the wait-out or the domain clause

The category is enormous and the search intent around meal replacement, protein per dollar and ingredient comparison is genuine. Honest, sourced comparison content - cost per serving, protein per dollar, third-party heavy-metals testing - is a merchant business with real demand and no counterparty. It requires no $29 license, no 100 QV a month, no prior written approval for your own marketing, no twenty-four-month wait-out, and it does not end with you handing over a domain you built.

More than 96% of 2024 US joiners bought as customers only - and the average Associate earned $986.74 against roughly $2,009 a year to stay eligible. Both figures come from the same company document.
Scorecard

Nine dimensions, weighted

Comp structure & KoscotDoes the plan pay for recruitment or for sales to real customers?
20%
6.0
The customer evidence goes first, because it is real and it is the company’s own. The 2024 US Earnings Disclosure Statement states on its front page that "over 96% of those Members who joined Isagenix in the U.S. in 2024, opened Customer accounts only and were not eligible to earn income from Isagenix" - roughly twenty-four of every twenty-five new enrollments were pure consumers, up from "over 89%" two years earlier. And the plan pays several ways on genuine outside customers: retail profit on a $55-to-$73 spread, a 20% Product Introduction Bonus on a new Customer’s first order, retail-direct profit on orders placed through the Associate’s own website, customer BV flowing up the binary and paying Cycles like any other volume, and a downline-free Brand Partner track paying 20-30% on customer sales with no fee, no purchase requirement and no quota. That is materially better Koscot evidence than most of this category can produce. Now what the figure does not establish. It counts joins, not volume - it says nothing about what share of dollars moved to non-participants, which is the number that actually decides the question and which is not published. And the disclosure does not define whether those Customer accounts include ones opened by Associates’ own households; that boundary could not be confirmed, and it is the most load-bearing unverified assumption in this report. Against the credit sits the deduction. The Team Builders Bonus, which runs to 27 December 2026, pays on Customer purchases but only in months when the Associate enrolls at least two new Customers on a 100 QV subscription, with company-supplied referrals excluded; and from 29 September 2025 to 28 June 2026 a multiplier promotion paid Managers and above 2× that bonus at three to five qualifying monthly enrollments, 3× at six to nine and 4× at ten or more - a step function on headcount, not on volume. Add rank gates above Consultant that count personally enrolled paid-as Consultants (two, six, ten) rather than sales, a promotional per-head bonus in the UK/EU plan of £74/€88 for each personally enrolled Associate you help advance to Consultant, up to twenty, and a price-list category headed "Financial Wellbeing Packs" running to $1,095. The multiplier ended before this review, so the deduction is smaller than a live one would be; the monthly enrollment gate and the headcount ranks keep this line at 6.
Securities exposureAny passive return on capital? Howey, staking, tokens, withdrawal friction.
15%
10.0
No capital is taken from a participant against any promised return, and that is the whole of this dimension. There is no investment contract, no token, no staking, no pool, no revenue-share, no managed account and no passive-return instrument of any kind, because nothing is taken to invest. The $29 annual fee buys a license to sell, not a return on money. Product packs are inventory purchases carrying a 90% buyback for twelve months, which makes them a trading position rather than capital at risk against a promise. Nothing else moves this number and nothing else has been allowed to: the 2022 forbearance and the 2023 recapitalization are debt events between a company and its lenders, not securities offered to recruits. Credit-fund ownership is irrelevant here. Inventory positions and commission clawbacks are debt-type exposures and they are priced in participant economics and terms, where they belong. There is genuinely nothing to deduct for, so the number is 10 - and a reader looking at a 10 on this line beside a C− overall should read it as narrowly as it is meant: it says your money is not being taken against a promise, not that the opportunity is a good one.
Ownership & track recordWho runs it, what did they run before, and what happened to it.
15%
6.0
The founders are named and public, the company has traded since 2002, and no criminal or regulatory proceeding against any principal could be located anywhere. Weigh heavily in their favor that when the capital structure failed the founders put $95 million of their own money - new cash plus forgiveness of debt they were owed - into the 2023 rescue rather than walking away from it. Against that, the capital structure needed a lender forbearance in September 2022, and majority control then passed to a group of the company’s investors including four investment managers, so the people who now own the company are not the people who founded it. With the unsupported history removed, what remains is a clean principal record against a change of control, which puts this line at 6.
Product reality & demandWould a rational buyer purchase this if no income offer existed?
12%
6.5
These are real consumables with real specifications, sold to people who reorder. Roughly 150 SKUs appear on a public price list with three price tiers and the Business Volume shown for every line; manufacture is outsourced to third parties; and the Proposition 65 consent judgment imposed a court-entered obligation to reformulate to no more than 0.5 micrograms of lead per maximum daily serving or warn, plus annual third-party lead testing of five random samples per covered product - an ongoing quality obligation that most open-market comparators do not carry. The strongest single piece of demand evidence is again the company’s own: more than 96% of 2024 US joiners bought as customers only, without taking the income offer at all, and the Brand Partner track pays recurring commission on repeat customer orders, which only functions if customers reorder. No therapeutic or efficacy claim is made or endorsed anywhere in this report. The deduction is the Canadian recall sequence, and it needs stage-labeling precisely because the usual mitigation does not apply. A company-initiated voluntary recall made with the regulator’s knowledge is the system working and would barely register here. These were not that: the CFIA’s own notices state the recall "was triggered by the Canadian Food Inspection Agency’s inspection activities", the recall warnings were graded Class 1 - the agency’s highest hazard classification, meaning a reasonable probability of serious health consequences - they recorded that "there have been reported illnesses associated with the consumption of these products", and the 24 November 2020 update records that recalled product continued to be sold up to and including 16 November. No prosecution followed that could be located, and a recall is not a court finding.
Participant economicsReal cost in, realistic money out, and whether they publish the numbers.
10%
3.5
The company’s own 2024 US disclosure puts the average annual earnings of all US Associates, active and inactive, at $986.74 before expenses. Staying eligible for team income requires 100 QV every rolling thirty days - about $165 of product at the subscription price, derived from the price list’s own consistent ratio of 0.60 BV per subscription dollar, and consistent with a distributor post quoted in the self-regulatory file telling prospects that "roughly $170 monthly on your own products" is enough to earn. Annualized with the $29 fee that is about $2,009 a year. The average is therefore below the cost of qualifying, by roughly $1,022, before a single expense the disclosure lists but does not deduct. The share earning nothing is not published, but it follows arithmetically from the two averages the company does publish: $986.74 across all Associates against $4,594 across those who earned anything means about 21.5% earned something and about 78% earned nothing at all, against about 78% on the same derivation for 2022 ($892 against $3,994). The company has since published 2025 averages of $943.61 and $4,556, which on the same arithmetic put about 79% at zero. Because roughly four in five earned zero, the true population median is $0, and no overall median is published. Nor is any Associate headcount or rank breakdown. What must be said alongside all of that is that this company publishes more than most of the category and deserves credit for it: an inclusive denominator that counts people who did nothing all year, paired medians alongside averages at the top 1%, 10% and 50% bands, an unflattering top-50% median of $1,686 published anyway, a Legacy Club count with a stated typical seven years to reach it, and an explicit statement that such success should not form the basis of a decision to join. One genuinely positive finding sits inside the same document: the unpaid Brand Partner track averaged $69.86 on a $0 cost base, which is the only version of this opportunity where the average participant is not underwater.
Price-to-valueWhat the same capability costs on the open market.
8%
3.5
The IsaLean shake costs $3.93 per meal at the best available subscription price and $5.21 at guest retail, with IsaLean Performance Protein at $4.50 to $6.00, on the company’s August 2026 price list. Against Huel’s own published subscription prices - Essential from $1.49 a meal, Powder v3 $2.21 and Black Edition $2.65 - that is a multiple of roughly 1.5× to 3.5× (our arithmetic). The flagship 30-Day Reset at $330 subscription or $439 retail works out at $11.00 to $14.63 a day against $2.98 for two Huel Essential meals. Collagen Elixir at $4.70 to $6.30 a shot and the new BĒA Glow at $5.60 to $7.60 a can are the sharpest lines in the catalog. Two things are owed to the other side of the ledger: the entire price list with all three tiers and per-SKU BV is public, so a buyer can price-compare before joining, which very few in this category permit; and the court-ordered lead-testing regime is a real quality obligation the comparators do not carry. IsaPro whey, at $1.63 a serving on subscription, is the cheapest serving among the list’s protein products that state a serving count.
Payout sustainabilityCan the company fund the plan out of margin, or only out of inflow?
8%
5.5
The plan does not commit a fixed Cycle value. Its "50% Payout Guarantee" sets aside 50% of each week’s commissionable BV, pays the 20% Product Introduction Bonuses first, and divides the rest among all Cycles and 10% Executive matching bonuses earned that week, with a stated maximum of 50% of BV paid out; a Cycle "equates to about US$54" in the plan’s own words. Rank Advancement and Crystal bonuses (US$250, US$750 and US$1,000 for fast Manager, Director and Executive) are promotions the company may change or end at any time. That design ties the payout to product sales by construction, which is the strongest thing on this line. Against it, the payer’s balance sheet needed a lender forbearance in September 2022 and a recapitalization on 17 April 2023 that eliminated about $170 million of debt and moved majority control to a group of the company’s investors including four investment managers. A debt restructuring is not a finding of wrongdoing, and nothing in that sequence is an allegation against anyone. The residual deduction is that no revenue figure is published, so nobody outside the company can size the pool the Cycle is drawn from. A sales-funded pool with a hard 50% ceiling, against a payer that has already needed its lenders’ forbearance, is a 5.5.
Marketing conductIncome claims, regulator run-ins, hype, deadline stacking.
7%
4.5
Three items in the public file are routinely overstated and each is stated here at its exact stage. The FTC letter of 5 June 2020 was a warning letter, one of six sent in a category sweep, citing social-media posts by business-opportunity participants rather than by the company - an FTC warning letter sent in a mass category sweep is not an allegation, charge or finding against any recipient, and no complaint, consent order, civil penalty or Section 13(b) action followed against this company, then or since. The DSSRC matters of 2023 and 2025 are self-regulatory rather than government, and both inquiries were administratively closed, the route DSSRC takes when a company commits within 15 business days of its notice to discontinue or significantly modify the claims. Isagenix was not referred to the FTC or to any Attorney General in either year, in years when other companies were. The substantive deduction is none of those. It is a July 2019 Canadian edition of the company’s compensation plan, still hosted on the company’s own document server, which prints a slide headed "What is your time worth?" tabulating how many Cycles a week match named occupations and ending with "Prime Minister — 112 Cycles — CA$347,400", alongside a second table presenting 100 Cycles a week as equivalent to owning $9,360,000 of capital at a 3% return. Set that against the company’s own disclosed all-Associate average of $986.74, which is about 0.35 Cycles a week. Credit where it is owed: the written income-claims policy requires any earnings representation to be documented, contextualized and accompanied by the current disclosure; all self-created marketing material needs prior written approval; disease claims are prohibited by name; and the company acted within 48 hours in 2023 and emailed the self-regulator’s own earnings guidance to every affected salesforce member in 2025. The policy is well drafted. The field posts of 2021 to 2025 show it was not being followed, and because the Prime Minister slide sits in a 2019 Canadian edition rather than the current US plan, the line stands at 4.5.
Operator terms & exitWho owns the customer, what you forfeit, how hard it is to leave.
5%
4.5
The buyback is genuinely above category baseline and it is written down: 90% of the original purchase price on currently marketable inventory bought within twelve months of termination, less commissions already paid, with the UK and EU editions reimbursing the full price on anything bought within ninety days. Add a 30-day satisfaction guarantee, an express statement that an Associate may take part in business ventures that compete directly with Isagenix, and correct application of the UK’s £200 seven-day statutory spend cap for new joiners. Against that sits a set of terms that all run one way. Every dispute goes to confidential arbitration under Arizona law before the American Arbitration Association - enforced against a California resident by order of 30 December 2025 - so no outcome will ever be public. Re-entry wait-outs run six, twelve and twenty-four months by prior status, with anyone who ever reached Director facing the full twenty-four, a clock that resets on "any solicitation or prospecting activity", volume continuing to credit the old sponsor throughout, and a bar on ever enrolling anyone from the former organization. The company may terminate a customer account at any time for any reason, with or without notice; renewal is charged to the card five to seven days before the anniversary for an Active Associate who ordered in the prior ninety days, unless the participant opts out by telephone; a subscription substitution ships automatically unless manually canceled; and cancellation missing the deadline by one business day rolls to the next month. Most consequentially, the company owns the customer: identities and contact details of Associates and Customers are declared an Isagenix trade secret surviving termination and enforceable by injunction with fee-shifting. Selling a position needs six months at Executive and company consent, with a reserved right to buy it instead; on death the company may purchase the position at a fair market value it determines, or terminate it without remuneration.
Weighted composite
5.99
C-

Dimension profile

Further from center is better. Hover any point.

Comp structure& Koscot 6.0 Securitiesexposure 10.0 Ownership &track record 6.0 Product reality& demand 6.5 Participanteconomics 3.5 Price-to-value 3.5 Payoutsustainability 5.5 Marketingconduct 4.5 Operator terms& exit 4.5

Hard caps that bind here

Non-binding ceiling at C− nothing caps this file. The nine weighted numbers land at 5.99 on their own arithmetic, one hundredth below the C floor, which is C− before any ceiling is applied, so the cap here describes where the evidence already sits rather than pulling the grade anywhere. It is worth naming what would have to be true for a cap to bite, because a reader is entitled to know what this grade does not rest on. There is no FTC enforcement action of any kind - the June 2020 item is a warning letter sent in a category sweep, which is not an allegation, charge or finding against any recipient, and nothing followed it. There is no consent order. No state Attorney General action could be located in any US state. There is no conviction, no admission and no adjudicated pyramid finding anywhere in twenty-four years - a genuine and material absence for a company of this age in this category. And the 2023 recapitalization, which is the most dramatic-sounding item in the file, is a financial event between a company and its lenders and investors rather than a finding of wrongdoing. A cap would bind here on an FTC complaint or consent order, on a pyramid adjudication, on class certification producing a finding about the product, or on the introduction of a purchase or autoship condition on commission eligibility. None of those exists today. The grade is what the nine numbers say it is.

The lowest binding cap wins, regardless of the weighted arithmetic.

Sources consulted

What we read

Every source below links to the document itself. Tier 1 is a primary record - the company’s own plan, policy or disclosure, a court filing, a regulator’s decision or an SEC filing. Tier 2 is a self-regulatory or secondary regulator record, tier 3 reporting or academic work, tier 4 an open-market price comparison. Where a document can be moved or withdrawn, an archived copy is linked beside it. If a link is dead when you try it, that is a correction we want.

  1. Isagenix Earnings Disclosure Statement - 2024 data (current live document): $986.74 average across all US Associates, $4,594 across those who earned, top 1% / 10% / 50% at $245,581/$121,351, $37,765/$10,906 and $8,921/$1,686
    Income disclosureTier 1Isagenix International, LLC · 2024archived copy

    Isagenix US Earnings Disclosure Statement, 2024 data (doc 3513_102025) - $986.74 average across all US Associates and $4,594 across those who earned; top 1% / 10% / 50% averages and medians at $245,581/$121,351, $37,765/$10,906 and $8,921/$1,686; Brand Partner average of $69.86; Legacy Club at 434 global and 305 US; "over 96% of those Members who joined Isagenix in the U.S. in 2024, opened Customer accounts only"; and the 2022 edition at "over 89%"

  2. Isagenix Earnings Disclosure Statement - 2022 edition (PDF, company CDN): $892 average across all US Associates, $3,994 across those who earned
    Income disclosureTier 1Isagenix International, LLC · 2022archived copy
  3. Isagenix Earnings Disclosure Statement, 2022 edition (archived copy, Sequence Inc. Fraud Files)
    Archived copyTier 1Isagenix International, LLC (copy hosted by Sequence Inc.) · 2022archived copy
  4. Isagenix - "How to Make Compliant Earnings Claims" (EU compliance guidance, 2024), citing the 2023 all-Associate average of US$787 before expenses and directing readers to IsagenixEarnings.com
    Company documentTier 1Isagenix International, LLC · 2024-08archived copy
  5. Isagenix Team Compensation Plan (PDF, company CDN) - Cycle mechanics, the $54 Cycle, and the "Possible Residual Value of an Isagenix Business" / "What is your time worth?" tables
    Compensation planTier 1Isagenix International, LLCarchived copy

    Isagenix Team Compensation Plan, Canadian edition dated July 2019 (5540_CA_en_TeamCompPlan_072219) - the binary structure and enrollment tree, 100 PV Active status, the Consultant gate, rank qualifications at two/six/ten personally enrolled Consultants, the $54 Cycle on 900 BV split 600/300, the 10% Executive match, Product Introduction Bonuses, the CA$11,709 Rank Advancement schedule, the £74/€88 per-Consultant-developed bonus, and the "What is your time worth? / Prime Minister — 112 Cycles — CA$347,400" and residual-value slides

    Not established by this document: This is a July 2019 Canadian edition still served from the company CDN; the current US/Canada plan overview (effective 13 November 2023) is listed separately, and the UK/EU edition is the October 2022 document below.

  6. "Welcome To The Isagenix Team Compensation Plan" (PDF, company CDN) - UK/EU edition effective October 2022, covering rank qualifications, the Isagenix Millionaire pin and the Legacy Club
    Compensation planTier 1Isagenix International, LLCarchived copy
  7. Isagenix Compensation Plan (PDF, company CDN) - Taiwan edition, 2021 (5524_TW_en)
    Compensation planTier 1Isagenix International, LLCarchived copy
  8. Isagenix Policies and Procedures for Residents of Canada, effective 20 August 2020 (PDF, company CDN) - §4.5 sales-channel restrictions, §4.8 buy-back at 90% for twelve months, §5.2 customer identities, §5.4 non-solicit, §6.1–6.2 domain and prior-approval regime, ¶9.10 confidential AAA arbitration under Arizona law
    Policies & proceduresTier 1Isagenix International, LLCarchived copy

    Isagenix Policies and Procedures, Terms and Conditions, UK/EU Rules of Membership - the optional-autoship statements, §4.5 sales-channel restrictions, §4.8 buyback at 90% for twelve months, §5.2 customer identities as trade secret, §5.4 one-year non-solicit, §6.1 domain transfer surviving termination, §6.2 prior-approval regime, §3.5 re-entry wait-outs, and ¶9.10 confidential AAA arbitration under Arizona law

  9. Isagenix Terms and Conditions for Canada Residents, customer accounts, effective 27 March 2017 (PDF, company CDN)
    Policies & proceduresTier 1Isagenix International, LLCarchived copy
  10. Isagenix Independent Associate Rules of Membership - UK/EU edition (April 2025)
    Policies & proceduresTier 1Isagenix International, LLC · 2025-04-30archived copy
  11. Isagenix (European Union) B.V. Independent Associate Application & Agreement, updated 30 April 2025 (PDF, company CDN)
    Policies & proceduresTier 1Isagenix International, LLCarchived copy
  12. FTC Warning Letter to Isagenix International LLC, 5 June 2020 (PDF) - health and earnings claims by business-opportunity participants, reply required within 48 hours
    RegulatorTier 1U.S. Federal Trade Commission · 2020-06-05archived copy

    FTC warning letter to Isagenix International LLC, 5 June 2020, and the FTC press release and business blog for that second round of MLM warning letters - one of six letters in a category sweep, citing posts by business-opportunity participants; no complaint, consent order or civil penalty against the company located in the FTC press releases, cases-and-proceedings database or legal library

    Not established by this document: The negative finding (no FTC complaint, consent order, stipulated judgment or civil penalty against Isagenix in 24 years) rests on searches of the FTC press-release archive, the cases-and-proceedings database and the legal library, all of which returned only the 5 June 2020 warning letter. A null result cannot be evidenced by a document; the search surfaces are linked instead.

  13. FTC Legal Library - Warning Letter to Isagenix International LLC (case page)
    RegulatorTier 1U.S. Federal Trade Commission · 2020-06-05archived copy
  14. "FTC Sends Second Round of Warning Letters to Multi-Level Marketers Regarding Coronavirus-Related Health and Earnings Claims" - press release naming the six recipients, 5 June 2020
    RegulatorTier 1U.S. Federal Trade Commission · 2020-06-05archived copy
  15. FTC Business Blog - "FTC again warns multi-level marketers about unproven health and earnings claims," quoting the Isagenix claims at issue
    RegulatorTier 1U.S. Federal Trade Commission · 2020-06-05archived copy
  16. FTC Legal Library - cases and proceedings search interface, the database in which no complaint, consent order or civil penalty against Isagenix was found
    RegulatorTier 1U.S. Federal Trade Commissionarchived copy
  17. DSSRC Case #226-2025: Administrative Closure - Isagenix International, LLC (closed 5 August 2025; thirteen posts revised or removed)
    Self-regulatoryTier 2BBB National Programs - Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council · 2025-08-05archived copy

    BBB National Programs DSSRC Case #226-2025, closed 5 August 2025, and the 2023 and 2025 year-end activity reports - thirteen posts revised or removed, administrative closure, no referral to the FTC or any Attorney General; DSSRC Policies and Procedures §V on participation not constituting an admission and determinations not constituting legal findings

  18. DSSRC 2025 Year-End Activity Report (PDF)
    Self-regulatoryTier 2BBB National Programs - Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council · 2025archived copy
  19. DSSRC 2023 Year-End Activity Report (PDF)
    Self-regulatoryTier 2BBB National Programs - Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council · 2023archived copy
  20. Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council program page - when an inquiry results in an administrative closure, and the status of participation and determinations
    Self-regulatoryTier 2BBB National Programs - Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Councilarchived copy
  21. Isagenix Int'l LLC v. Hodgin, No. CV-25-01587-PHX-DGC (D. Ariz.) - Order of 30 December 2025 compelling individual arbitration and denying the motion to dismiss (Doc. 50, PDF)
    Court recordTier 1U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona · 2025-12-30archived copy

    Isagenix Int’l v. Hodgin, No. CV-25-01587-PHX-DGC (D. Ariz.), order of 30 December 2025 compelling individual arbitration of a worker-misclassification claim; Hodgin v. Isagenix International LLC, No. 8:25-cv-00616 (C.D. Cal.)

  22. Isagenix International LLC et al v. Hodgin, No. 2:25-cv-01587 (D. Ariz.) - docket, filed 8 May 2025, terminated 30 December 2025
    Court recordTier 1U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona (via PacerMonitor) · 2025archived copy
  23. Noah Hodgin v. Isagenix International LLC et al, No. 8:25-cv-00616 (C.D. Cal.) - docket, removed from Orange County Superior Court, stayed pending the Ninth Circuit appeal
    Court recordTier 1U.S. District Court for the Central District of California (via PacerMonitor) · 2025archived copy
  24. Isagenix International, LLC, et al. v. Hodgin, No. 26-307 (9th Cir., docketed 15 January 2026) - appeal from the order compelling arbitration, administratively closed 17 April 2026
    Court recordTier 1U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (via UniCourt) · 2026-01-15archived copy
  25. CFIA Food Recall Warning, 31 October 2020 - "Certain Isagenix brand Isalean Bars may be unsafe due to over fortification of vitamins" (Class 1, reference number 14054, triggered by CFIA inspection activities, reported associated illnesses)
    RegulatorTier 1Canadian Food Inspection Agency · 2020-10-31archived copy

    Canadian Food Inspection Agency food recall warnings of 31 October, 7 November and 24 November 2020 and the advisory of 29 January 2021 (Class 1 recall warnings for 31 October, 7 November and 24 November 2020, and a Food Safety Warning without a hazard class on 29 January 2021; vitamin over-fortification, triggered by CFIA inspection activities, reported associated illnesses); Environmental Research Center v. Isagenix International, LLC, California Proposition 65 notice 2010-00743 and the stipulated consent judgment - $350,000, express denial of liability, 0.5 µg/day lead threshold and four years of annual third-party testing

  26. CFIA Updated Food Recall Warning, 7 November 2020 - "Certain Isagenix brand Isalean products may be unsafe due to over-fortification of vitamins" (Class 1, reference number 14085)
    RegulatorTier 1Canadian Food Inspection Agency · 2020-11-07archived copy
  27. CFIA Updated Food Recall Warning, 24 November 2020 - recalled product found still on sale up to and including 16 November 2020
    RegulatorTier 1Canadian Food Inspection Agency · 2020-11-24archived copy
  28. CFIA Food Safety Warning, 29 January 2021 - recalled Isagenix products still being sold through internet sites not affiliated with the company
    RegulatorTier 1Canadian Food Inspection Agency · 2021-01-29archived copy
  29. Environmental Research Center v. Isagenix International, LLC - stipulated consent judgment, Proposition 65 notice 2010-00743 (PDF): $350,000 total payments, express denial of liability, 0.5 µg/day lead reformulation threshold, four years of annual third-party testing
    Court recordTier 1California Office of the Attorney General (Proposition 65 settlements register)archived copy
  30. California Attorney General - Proposition 65 60-Day Notice 2010-00743, Environmental Research Center v. Isagenix International, LLC (settlement summary, $350,000 total)
    RegulatorTier 1California Office of the Attorney General · 2010-12-30archived copy
  31. "Isagenix Completes Recapitalization Transaction and Transition to New Ownership" - company press release, 17 April 2023 (~$170m of debt eliminated; $95m contributed by the Coovers; Arbour Lane, Cerberus, Crescent and Summit House taking majority ownership)
    ReportingTier 1Isagenix International, LLC (via PR Newswire) · 2023-04-17archived copy

    Company press releases of 23 September 2022 (forbearance), 27 February 2023 (restructuring support agreement) and 17 April 2023 (recapitalization completed, ~$170M debt eliminated, $95M from the founders, a group of investors including four investment managers taking the majority)

    Not established by this document: The Moody's downgrades of February 2020 and September 2022 and the S&P 'D' rating of April 2021 sit behind rating-agency paywalls and no free primary copy could be located; none of those rating figures is in a saved document. The 23 September 2022 forbearance release and the February and April 2023 company releases are saved.

  32. "Isagenix Reaches Agreement with Financial Stakeholders" - company press release announcing the Restructuring Support Agreement, 27 February 2023
    ReportingTier 1Isagenix International, LLC (via PR Newswire) · 2023-02-27archived copy
  33. Phoenix Business Journal - "Gilbert-based Isagenix completes recapitalization, has new owners," 20 April 2023
    ReportingTier 3Phoenix Business Journal · 2023-04-20archived copy
  34. AZ Big Media - "Isagenix completes transition to new ownership," 18 April 2023
    ReportingTier 3AZ Big Media · 2023-04-18archived copy
  35. Huel Black Edition product page - comparative per-meal subscription pricing (Essential $1.52, Powder v3 $2.21, Black Edition $2.65 per 400-calorie meal)
    Open-market comparisonTier 4Huel Ltd. · 2026archived copy

    Comparator pricing, 2026 - Huel product pages (Essential $1.49 to $1.52, Powder v3 $2.21, Black Edition $2.65 per meal on subscription), Soylent cost-per-meal analyzes ($1.91-$2.60 powder), Forbes Health "Best Protein Powders of 2026," verified Optimum Nutrition Gold Standard per-serving pricing ($1.06 at 5 lb, $1.72 at 2 lb), Kirkland Signature whey at Costco (~$1.00 per 25 g), Nutricost (from $0.87), Premier Protein and Ensure ready-to-drink retail surveys, and Orgain and Ka’Chava per-serving surveys

    Not established by this document: The Soylent cost-per-meal analyzes, the Forbes Health "Best Protein Powders of 2026" list, and the Optimum Nutrition, Kirkland Signature, Nutricost, Premier Protein, Ensure, Orgain and Ka'Chava per-serving surveys are open-market price captures rather than single retrievable documents; one good primary comparator (Huel's own published per-meal pricing) is linked rather than several weak ones.

  36. Huel meal-replacement powder collection - per-meal price list across the range
    Open-market comparisonTier 4Huel Ltd. · 2026archived copy
  37. The Isagenix Team Compensation Plan Overview (US/Canada), effective 13 November 2023 (PDF, company CDN) - 20% Product Introduction Bonus, 100 QV Active status, Cycle "about US$54", 50% Payout Guarantee pool, MegaCycle, 2025 averages $943.61 / $4,556
    Compensation planTier 1Isagenix International, LLC · 2023-11-13

    Document 3504_en_111723; file last modified June 2026. Cycle value is the remaining pool after PIBs divided by total Cycles, capped at 50% of commissionable BV.

  38. Isagenix Price List as of August 2026 (US/Canada, PDF) - subscription, preferred and guest prices with BV for every SKU
    Company documentTier 1Isagenix International, LLC · 2026-08

    IsaLean shake US$55/62/73, 33 BV; 30-Day Reset US$330/373/439, 201 BV; Financial Wellbeing Packs US$357 to US$1,095.

  39. Team Builders Bonus and Team Builders Bonus Multiplier Promotion terms (Isagenix Business, EU site)
    Company documentTier 1Isagenix International, LLC · 2026-05-22

    Bonus valid until 27 December 2026; qualify by enrolling two new Customers on 100 QV Subscription Rewards a month; multiplier promotion 29 September 2025 to 28 June 2026, Manager and above, 2x/3x/4x at 3-5/6-9/10+ enrollments, capped at US$20,000 a month; available in the US, Puerto Rico, Canada, ANZ, UK and EU.

  40. Isagenix Brand Partner Benefits page (Wayback copy, 1 August 2025) - 20-30% commission, no sign-up fees, no purchase requirements, no quotas
    Company documentTier 1Isagenix International, LLC · 2025-08-01archived copy

    Live page answers 403 to automated requests; the Wayback copy is saved.

  41. "Isagenix Continues Positive Discussions with Financial Stakeholders" - company press release announcing a forbearance agreement with an ad hoc group of secured lenders, 23 September 2022
    ReportingTier 1Isagenix International, LLC (via PR Newswire) · 2022-09-23
  42. IX Brand Partner Agreement Terms and Conditions (U.S./Puerto Rico) (PDF)
    Policies & proceduresTier 1Isagenix International, LLC · 2022-04

    Document 3552_en_040522. Commissions on the sale price under a schedule Isagenix may change at any time; paid weekly; US$10 minimum; paid-search bidding on Isagenix is grounds to withhold commissions; confidential arbitration clause.

Unable to verify

What we could not get

  • THE WATCHLIST PREMISE, REVISED. The premise was "declining but durable search demand; risk sits in historic income-claim actions." On durability: no company revenue figure appears in any document saved for this report, so durability cannot be sized. On the income-claim file: it is current, not historic - a self-regulatory inquiry closed on 5 August 2025, two years after the previous one, on the same category of claims, five years after the FTC warning letter.
  • Whether the ">96% Customer-only" figure counts Preferred Customer accounts opened by Associates’ own households. The disclosure does not define the boundary, and it is the single most load-bearing unverified assumption in this report - both the compensation-structure and product scores lean on it. It also counts joins rather than volume: the share of dollars moving to non-participants is not published in any year.
  • The Supplement to the Policies and Procedures on Internet Advertising and Social Media, referenced in the policies but hosted behind the company’s compliance portal, which could not be reached. The operative rules on paid social advertising, lead buying and paid-search bidding on the company’s own trademarks are in that document. The UK/EU Rules of Membership ban paid advertising outright, and the US Brand Partner terms bar paid-search bidding on "Isagenix"; whether the US Associate supplement says the same is a "could not retrieve," not a "does not exist."
  • Company revenue and headcount. No revenue figure, profit or loss figure, Associate or Brand Partner headcount, active-versus-inactive split or attrition rate appears in any document saved for this report. The company’s April 2023 release listed 24 markets.
  • The full 2025-data Earnings Disclosure Statement. The latest full disclosure saved here covers 2024 (doc 3513_102025); the company’s June 2026 plan document and its disclaimers page already quote 2025 averages of $943.61 for all US Associates and $4,556 for those who earned, but the 2025 bands, Brand Partner figures and Customer-only share were not retrieved. Company guidance quotes a 2023 all-Associate average of $787; no 2023 full statement was retrieved.
  • The status of the stayed California misclassification class action after the order compelling individual arbitration; the federal appeal docket records an administrative closure on 17 April 2026, and the California court’s stay and status reports continue.
  • The composition of the post-2023 board, including whether any Coover holds a seat. The company said a new board would be announced "in the coming weeks" after April 2023 and no announcement could be found.
  • The Manager and Director-and-Above bonus-pool percentages, which are back-office only; and the ticket and travel cost of the company’s annual events, which is not published externally. Also unverified: advertising self-regulatory decisions outside the US, searched generally with nothing found but without querying each national case database directly.

Not advice

This is independent analysis for decision-making, not legal, financial or investment advice. Allegations reported by third parties should be verified against primary court and regulatory records before any decision.

Who writes this

Researched by Claude. Reviewed by an editor.

Every report is researched and written by Claude, Anthropic’s AI assistant, from the company’s own plan documents, policies, terms and regulatory file - then reviewed before publication by Rob Fore, who checks the sources and the stage-label on every allegation.

  • Nine weighted dimensions, published with their weights
  • The editor checks the evidence and cannot change the number - the build rejects any page whose grade does not reconcile to its own arithmetic
  • Every affiliate position we hold is disclosed on the report it touches
  • No company has paid for a grade, and no report carries an affiliate link
Read the About page

Looking at something else?

Enter any company name or website. If a report exists it opens instantly; if not, we start one.

Try:
Common questions

Isagenix - frequently asked

QIs Isagenix a pyramid scheme?
No court or regulator has ever found it to be one, and in twenty-four years there is no FTC complaint, no consent order, no state Attorney General action and no pyramid adjudication anywhere. The strongest evidence on the company’s side is its own published figure that more than 96% of those who joined in the US in 2024 opened Customer accounts only and were not eligible to earn income - and the plan does pay several ways on genuine outside customers, including a Brand Partner track with no fee, no purchase requirement and no downline. Two qualifications belong with that figure: it counts joins rather than sales volume, and the disclosure does not define whether those accounts include ones opened by Associates’ own households. On the other side, the structural criticisms are specific and current. The Team Builders Bonus pays only in months when you enroll at least two new subscription Customers, and from September 2025 to 28 June 2026 a multiplier paid Managers two-, three- or four-fold on how many they enrolled in a month, excluding referrals the company supplies; ranks above Consultant are qualified by a count of personally enrolled paid-as Consultants rather than by sales; and the UK/EU plan pays a promotional £74/€88 for each personally enrolled Associate you help advance to Consultant, up to twenty.
QHow much do Isagenix Associates actually earn?
The company publishes this itself. Across all US Associates in 2024, active and inactive, the average was $986.74 before expenses; across only those who earned anything, $4,594. Those two numbers together imply that about 21.5% earned something and roughly 78% earned nothing at all - a derivation from the company’s own figures, not a company statement, and about the same as the 78% the method gives for 2022. The company has since quoted 2025 averages of $943.61 and $4,556, which put the zero share near 79%. Because roughly four in five earned zero, the true population median is $0; the disclosure publishes medians only within the top 1%, 10% and 50% bands, at $121,351, $10,906 and $1,686. All figures are before expenses, which the document lists - advertising, training, rent, travel, telephone and internet - without deducting them. Set that against about $2,009 a year to remain eligible and the average Associate is roughly $1,022 underwater. The one exception is the free Brand Partner track: an average of $69.86 on a zero cost base is small but positive.
QHow much does it cost to join Isagenix?
The headline is genuinely one of the cheapest in this category: $29 a year for a US Associate account, with no purchase required to enroll, no pack condition and no autoship requirement - and the policies say so in three separate jurisdictional documents. What costs money is staying eligible for team income. Active status requires 100 Qualifying Volume in every rolling thirty-day period, which the company’s own August 2026 price list puts at about $165 at subscription pricing, roughly $185 at preferred-customer pricing and about $220 at guest retail, using the consistent ratio of 0.60 BV per subscription dollar across the catalog. Annualized with the fee that is about $2,009. Packs are optional and nobody is required to buy one, but they run up to $1,095 at subscription pricing and the enroller earns a 20% Product Introduction Bonus on a new Member’s first order, which is where the pull toward larger first orders comes from.
QDid Isagenix go bankrupt or get taken over?
Majority ownership changed hands in a 2023 recapitalization. The company announced a forbearance agreement with an ad hoc group of its secured lenders on 23 September 2022, a restructuring support agreement on 27 February 2023, and on 17 April 2023 a completed recapitalization that eliminated approximately $130 million of senior secured debt and $40 million of unsecured debt. Majority ownership passed to a group of the company’s investors including four investment managers, with the founders contributing $95 million of new cash and forgiven debt and retaining a minority. A debt restructuring is a financial event, not a finding of wrongdoing, and none is alleged. It does mean the discretionary parts of the plan are now set by different owners.
QHas Isagenix been in trouble with the FTC or any regulator?
Stage-labeling matters here more than anywhere else in this report. The FTC sent a warning letter on 5 June 2020, one of six in a category sweep, citing health and earnings claims made on social media by business-opportunity participants rather than by the company. A warning letter sent in a mass category sweep is not an allegation, charge or finding against any recipient, and no FTC complaint, consent order, civil penalty or Section 13(b) action against this company has ever followed. Two earnings-claim inquiries at BBB National Programs’ DSSRC, in 2023 and closing 5 August 2025, are self-regulatory rather than government, and both were administratively closed after the posts were removed or revised, with no referral to the FTC or any Attorney General. Separately, the Canadian Food Inspection Agency issued Class 1 recall warnings in October and November 2020, with a follow-up warning in January 2021, over vitamin over-fortification, triggered by its own inspection activities and recording reported associated illnesses; no prosecution followed that could be located. A 2012-13 California Proposition 65 matter was a private citizen suit settled by stipulated consent judgment with an express denial of liability, in which the state Attorney General did not sue.
Who wrote this report

Author, editor and publisher

C
Written by Claude AI
Reviewed by Rob Fore · Published by Listech Inc · August 1, 2026

This report was researched and written by Claude, Anthropic’s AI assistant, working from primary documents - Isagenix’s own compensation plan, its policies and procedures, its terms of service, its income disclosure statement where one exists, and its regulatory and self-regulatory file. It was scored against nine weighted dimensions that are published in full, with their weights, on the methodology page.

Before publication it was reviewed by Rob Fore, who checks every source link, every figure against the document it came from, and every allegation against its stage-label - an investigation is not a finding, a warning letter is not an enforcement action, and a filed claim is not a verdict.

The editor does not set the grade. The published score is the weighted composite of the nine dimension scores, and the build refuses to emit a page where the two disagree by more than 0.06. A grade moves when the evidence moves it and not otherwise.

Rob Fore has marketed online since 1996, wrote Online MLM Marketing (2014), and is CEO of Listech Inc, the Nevada corporation that publishes this site. He holds affiliate positions in companies graded here - including LiveGood, which this site grades D, SendOutCards, which it grades C−, and the Home Business Academy, which it grades B−. Those positions are disclosed on the reports they touch, and changed nothing on this page.

About the author and our conflicts  ·  Contact the editor  ·  Corrections: corrections@opportunitygrade.com

Stay with it

Tell me if this grade changes

Isagenix is graded C- as of August 1, 2026. Grades move when the evidence moves - a new income disclosure, a regulatory action, a rewritten compensation plan. Leave your address and you will get one email if this one does.

One email when the grade moves, and nothing else. We will never use your address to promote an income opportunity of any kind, we do not sell, rent or share the list, and it is stored on our own infrastructure rather than with any company graded here. Unsubscribe removes everything.

Right of reply

Corrections

Every factual claim on this page is sourced, and the ones we could not stand up are named in the unable to verify list above. If something here is wrong, we want to know, and we would rather hear it from Isagenix than from a reader.

Write to corrections@opportunitygrade.com. Point at the specific sentence and send the document that contradicts it - a plan document, a filing, an income disclosure, a policy page. We will check it against the primary source, correct the page if it is wrong, and keep a dated record of the change. A grade moves if the evidence moves it.

This address reaches a person, not a form. We do not require a takedown demand, an NDA or a lawyer to accept a correction, and we do not remove a report because a company disputes its conclusion - only because the underlying facts turn out to be wrong.

Other published reports

Every report is written to stand alone. Graded on the same nine weighted dimensions and the same six legal tests. Twelve of 113, spread across the grade bands.

See all 113 published reports →