All reviews
Home / Reviews / Faberlic
Cosmetics, perfumery and household goods · Stepped-discount unilevel MLM (Russia/CIS)

JSC Faberlic

A 28-year-old Russian cosmetics manufacturer whose catalog prices genuinely undercut named Western drugstore brands, sold through a plan whose sole owner is sanctioned in at least nine jurisdictions and whose US recruiting arm was referred to the FTC in January 2026.

Reviewed August 1, 2026 Founded Founded 1997 as "Russian Line" by Alexey Nechaev and Alexander Davankov; rebranded Faberlic in October 2001; current-form legal entity registered 6 August 2002 Confidence: Medium
D+GRADE
5.1/10
Weighted composite

REAL FACTORY, SANCTIONED OWNERSHIP

A genuine 28-year-old manufacturer with competitively priced products, sold under a plan whose sole owner and whose corporate entity are separately sanctioned by multiple governments, with no income disclosure ever published and a live, unresolved US earnings-claims referral.

The question you came with

Can you actually make money with Faberlic?

NO No - not on the numbers this company publishes

No - and for a reader in the United States, Britain or the European Union the answer arrives before the compensation plan does. The official consultant sign-up page listed twelve countries when it was checked on 1 August 2026, and none of them is yours. No source describes how a Western participant would actually be paid through ordinary banking rails after the 2022 disruption, and faberlic.com publishes its consultant rules and a services contract in Russian, plus a returns page that takes back unused items marked as returnable within 14 days, but no buyback of a consultant’s unsold stock was found in them.

There has never been an income disclosure. The company’s own plan tables state an average yearly income for each rank from Director up, 720,000 RUB at Director, but give no count of who holds each rank, no median and no method, so the figure cannot be checked. What exists beside it is live and unresolved: on 16 January 2026 the industry's self-regulatory body referred Faberlic, LLC to the Federal Trade Commission and the Texas Attorney General over nine unsubstantiated earnings claims, after the company failed to respond to two contact attempts. No FTC or state action has followed, and none should be read into it.

The plan itself starts as ordinary retail trading: a consultant buys at 20% or 26% off catalog price, may not resell below it, and earns a further Volume Discount of 3% to 23% on personal-group turnover. Three things pull against it. The qualification bonuses, which the plan calls one-time payments, run from 80,000 RUB at Director to 80,000,000 RUB at General Partner and are triggered by personal-group volume and, from Senior Director up, by the number of 23% downline groups rather than by any disclosed volume of sales to non-participants. They are paid only under the company’s services contract, which the company suspends when a consultant has not recruited at least five new first-line consultants with 500 points of combined volume over nine periods. And the rates of the Director Bonuses paid on downline Director groups sit on a separate page of the plan that is not among the pages reviewed.

Say what is real, because much of it is. A genuine 28-year-old manufacturer with its own plants, roughly 1,500 employees, a new dietary-supplement facility announced in April 2026, and catalog prices that genuinely undercut named Western drugstore comparators. Registration is free and no mandatory kit fee was found in the official materials. And the sanctions on the founder and on the corporate entity are executive designations in at least nine jurisdictions - not convictions, not charges, and not findings of liability by any court.

What it costs to be in
Free registration

no mandatory kit fee or upfront buy-in was found in the official registration materials; a new registrant receives an immediate ~20% discount off catalog price, but holding any tier above the base level requires ongoing Personal and Group Volume purchase activity every catalog period

What would have to change
  • An income disclosure, after twenty-eight years. The company states an average yearly income for each rank from Director up but publishes no count of who holds each rank, no median and no method in any market, so nothing anybody says about earning here can be checked from outside the company.
  • The Director Bonus rates in a retrievable document. They are the numbers a builder-track participant needs most, they sit on a separate plan page that is not among the pages reviewed, and without them an honest break-even calculation cannot be finished.
  • A consultant buyback policy. The rules faberlic.com publishes in Russian cover conduct, sponsorship and a services contract, and its returns page takes back unused items marked as returnable within 14 days, but no buyback of a consultant’s unsold stock was found in them.
  • Clarity about the United States operation. Official registration excludes that market outright while salesforce posts recruiting consultants there, cited by the self-regulatory referral, are dated as recently as October 2025, and whether that is corporately authorized is unresolved.

That call is computed, not chosen - the rule reads three of the nine published dimension scores and is printed on the methodology page. It describes this company's plan and the figures it publishes about the people already in it. It is not a prediction about you, and nothing on this site is advice.

≈$450M
FY2025 revenue (≈36bn RUB)
at 79.038 RUB/USD, dated 26 December 2025 - a registry-aggregator figure, not an audited statement
9+
Jurisdictions sanctioning founder Alexey Nechaev
US OFAC SDN, EU, UK, Switzerland, France, Canada and others - executive measures, not convictions
12
Countries on the official consultant sign-up page
no US, UK or EU market listed, checked 1 August 2026
4.9/5
Consumer rating across 10,278 reviews
a single Russian bank’s company-review platform

Legal status

LEGAL BUT - no court or regulator anywhere has found Faberlic’s compensation plan to be an illegal pyramid, and no criminal conviction, indictment or civil finding of liability exists against the founder or the company in any jurisdiction searched. The file instead contains: US OFAC SDN, EU, UK, Swiss, French and Canadian sanctions designations against founder Alexey Nechaev, an executive measure tied to his 2022 vote as a sitting State Duma member to ratify Russia’s recognition of the Donetsk and Luhansk "people’s republics" - a political act, not a business-conduct finding; separate sanctions designations against the JSC Faberlic entity itself by Ukraine (first captured 5 December 2023) and Poland (25 April 2022), and against two European subsidiaries (Faberlic Baltija, Faberlic Europe); and a Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC) referral of a US entity, "Faberlic, LLC," to the Federal Trade Commission and the Texas Attorney General on 16 January 2026 over nine unsubstantiated earnings claims, after the company failed to respond to two contact attempts. None of this is a conviction, an indictment, a civil finding, or an FTC action - say so plainly, and say equally plainly that a sanctions designation is not a finding that a business is fraudulent.

Confidence: Medium

Primary sources fetched directly where possible. Everything we could not verify is listed at the bottom of this page by name.

What this actually is

Follow the money

A Moscow-registered cosmetics, perfumery and household-goods manufacturer, founded in 1997 and rebranded Faberlic in 2001, selling through Consultants on a stepped-discount unilevel plan: a 20% or 26% personal discount off catalog price, a Volume Discount of 3% to 23% on personal-group turnover, qualification bonuses at each Director and Partner rank, and a Stability Bonus paid twice a year to Directors who hold their rank.

The manufacturing side is real and should be said first. This is a 28-year-old company with its own production plants, a reported output above 150 million cosmetic items in a recent year, roughly 1,500 corporate staff, and a genuine new capital-expenditure commitment: a roughly 985 million RUB dietary-supplement plant announced in April 2026, independently reported by multiple Russian trade outlets. Confirmed catalog prices for everyday shampoos and a facial serum, converted to US dollars, undercut named Western drugstore equivalents - on a per-100ml basis, Faberlic’s basic shampoo lines were cheaper than every named comparator checked, including a large club-store own-brand. Consumer sentiment on a Russian review platform sits at 4.9 out of 5 across 10,278 ratings, which this report treats as a genuine, if single-source, satisfaction signal rather than an independent audit.

Then the ownership picture. The company’s sole shareholder, Alexey Nechaev, is a sitting Russian State Duma member and the founder of a political party; he is designated on the US OFAC SDN list and by the EU, the UK, Switzerland, France and Canada, on stated grounds that he voted as a legislator to ratify Russia’s February 2022 recognition of the Donetsk and Luhansk "people’s republics" - an executive measure, not a criminal conviction, and not a finding about Faberlic’s products or plan. The JSC Faberlic entity itself, and two European subsidiaries, are separately designated by Ukraine and Poland. In October 2021 Russian business press reported, citing Nechaev’s own account, that he had placed his stake in trust with the company’s brand director under a five-year contract that may be extended; no source reports whether it was extended, and no register document confirming it was located.

No income disclosure statement has ever been published for Faberlic in any market; the plan’s own tables state an average yearly income for each rank from Director up without saying how many people earn it. Set against that silence, a self-regulatory body referred a US entity trading as "Faberlic, LLC" to the FTC and the Texas Attorney General in January 2026 over nine unsubstantiated earnings claims circulating on Facebook, after the company did not respond to two contact attempts - a live, unresolved, non-cooperative posture in the one Western market this report could examine most closely.

And the market-access picture is genuinely ambiguous rather than settled in either direction. Faberlic’s own official registration page lists twelve countries and excludes the US, the UK and every EU state - but a US legal entity and an associated recruiting apparatus using the Faberlic name were active enough, in salesforce posts dated as recently as October 2025, to trigger the referral above. A company can be officially withdrawn from a market’s storefront while still gradeable as live for recruitment purposes in that same market, and that is Faberlic’s current US posture; this report states that tension rather than resolving it.

Where each catalog ruble goes, on the plan’s own figures

No official revenue-allocation breakdown exists. Three shares are computed from sourced figures and the rest is one undivided remainder: the personal discount is the midpoint of the 20% and 26% tiers; the Volume Discount is its 23% ceiling paid at 72 RUB a point (on our reading of the payout point price in the company’s February 2024 announcement) on a 120 RUB catalog point (23% x 72 / 120 = 13.8%); net profit is 4.1 billion of 36 billion RUB of company revenue (11.4%) applied to the 77% of the catalog price the company keeps. Qualification and stability bonuses, cost of goods, logistics, staff, marketing and taxes are not broken out in any source.

23% 14% 9% 54%
Consultant personal discount, 20% or 26% of catalog price (midpoint ≈23%)Volume Discount at its 23% ceiling, paid at 72 RUB a point (≈13.8%)Net profit retained by the company (≈8.8%)Everything else, including bonuses, cost of goods, logistics, staff, marketing and taxes (≈54.4%)
ProductPricePays
Anti-hair-loss shampoo "Black Cumin" #10319
Counts toward Personal/Group Volume points; the consultant captures the applicable ladder discount on the wholesale/catalog spread plus any rank override.
139 RUB (≈$1.76)
per unit
3–23% ladder discount
Honey shampoo "Nutrition" #2920
Same discount mechanism as the rest of the shampoo line.
139 RUB (≈$1.76)
per unit
3–23% ladder discount
Aloe shampoo "Restoration" #2915
Same mechanism.
139 RUB (≈$1.76)
per unit
3–23% ladder discount
Dry shampoo "Volume & Style" #2702
Same mechanism.
179 RUB (≈$2.27)
per unit
3–23% ladder discount
Anti-dandruff shampoo "Mac-Kinley" #2759
On a per-100ml basis this undercuts every named Western drugstore anti-dandruff comparator checked.
199 RUB (≈$2.52)
per unit
3–23% ladder discount
Shampoo "3D-Volume," Expert Hair line #1888
Same mechanism; higher-value SKU within the core shampoo range.
269 RUB (≈$3.40)
per unit
3–23% ladder discount
Active face serum "SMAS-lifting," Expert line #12044
Higher-value SKU generating proportionally more Group Volume points per unit sold.
749 RUB (≈$9.48)
per unit
3–23% ladder discount
Face serum "Against All Wrinkles," One Week Miracle line #0653
The flagship anti-aging serum positioning; priced well below the named premium Western comparator checked, though its premium over Faberlic’s own basic lines is not independently justified by efficacy evidence.
999 RUB (≈$12.64)
per unit
3–23% ladder discount
Background check

Who runs it, and what they ran before

AN
Alexey Nechaev
Co-founder; sole shareholder; stake placed in trust management in 2021

Built the business from a 1997 start-up into a 28-year manufacturer with its own factories and, as of April 2026, a genuine new capital-expenditure program. No criminal conviction, indictment, fraud judgment or collapsed prior venture could be located against him anywhere. He is separately a sitting Russian State Duma member and the founder of the "New People" party, elected September 2021. He is designated on the US OFAC SDN list and by the EU, UK, Switzerland, France and Canada, on stated grounds that he voted as a legislator to ratify Russia’s recognition of the Donetsk and Luhansk "people’s republics" in February 2022 - an executive/administrative measure, not a judicial finding, and not a finding related to Faberlic’s products, marketing or compensation plan.

AD
Alexander Davankov
Co-founder (1997); now a State Duma deputy and deputy chairman of Nechaev’s party

Co-founded the business with Nechaev before it was renamed Faberlic in 2001. A 2022 Polish sanctions notice describes Nechaev as sole shareholder at that date; no source located explains when or how any residual Davankov stake was divested. He remains Nechaev’s close political partner, which is relevant context for "who runs it" even though it does not change the ownership finding.

KB
Konstantin Barmashov
General Director since 26 May 2021

Listed as director of record in the current Russian state registry (EGRUL) extract, cross-referenced against an independent registry aggregator. No adverse regulatory or criminal finding against him was located.

Gn
Governance note
The 2021 trust arrangement

When Nechaev took his Duma seat in September 2021, Russian conflict-of-interest rules required him to divest day-to-day control; multiple Russian outlets reported in October 2021, citing Nechaev’s own account, that he placed his stake in trust management rather than selling it, with the company’s brand director as trustee under a five-year contract that may be extended and that covers voting rights only; no register document confirms it, no source reports whether it was extended, and no source describes what decision rights, if any, Nechaev retains in practice. A reader cannot establish, from any public source, who is actually making operating decisions at the company today.

Registered address

Moscow, Russia
No audited public accounts exist; FY2025 revenue of approximately 36 billion RUB (≈$450 million at 79.038 RUB/USD, the rate dated 26 December 2025) and net profit of approximately 4.1 billion RUB come from a corporate-registry aggregator, not a filed statement, and a separate e-commerce tracker puts 2025 "sales" at only $283 million - a discrepancy this report cannot resolve and states rather than resolves. Sole shareholder Alexey Nechaev placed his stake in trust management in October 2021 after winning a State Duma seat: Forbes Russia, Kommersant and Kompaniya reported, citing his own account, a five-year contract with the company’s brand director, with an option to extend, covering voting rights only and no right to dispose of the stake; no source reports whether it was extended; no register document confirming the trust was located, and no source describes the practical limits on his residual influence.

Compensation plan

What has to be true for you to get paid

To coverYou need
Hold the base "Consultant" tier for one period 50 personal points and 100 group points a period, which the plan’s own table values at about 6,000 RUB (≈$76) and 12,000 RUB (≈$152) of catalog orders
that earns a Volume Discount of 3% on personal-group turnover, about 360 RUB (≈$4.55) on a 12,000 RUB group, credited as a discount on product unless the consultant signs the services contract; the retail margin at any tier is the 20% or 26% personal discount, about 28 to 36 RUB on a 139 RUB shampoo
Qualify as Director, one catalog period 3,000+ personal-group points and 50 personal points a period, which the plan’s own table values at about 360,000 RUB (≈$4,555) of group catalog orders
held in any 8 catalog periods within the past year, unlocking the 23% Volume Discount, less what passes to each lower tier inside the group, plus an 80,000 RUB (≈$1,012) qualification bonus, paid only under the company’s services contract to consultants registered as sole proprietors
Reach Gold Director and hold it three first-line 23% groups of 3,000+ points each, about 360,000 RUB of catalog orders each a period on the plan’s average point value, plus 3,000 points in the personal group for the full bonus (1,000 for a partial one)
unlocks a 200,000 RUB (≈$2,530) qualification bonus plus Director Bonuses on the downline groups, whose rates sit on a separate plan page that is not among the pages reviewed - break-even here cannot be finished with confidence while those rates are missing
A Western participant: register and get paid at all a working official registration channel and a working cross-border payout mechanism
neither could be confirmed; the official page lists 12 countries and excludes the US, UK and EU, and no source describes how a Western consultant could receive a commission through ordinary banking rails given sanctions-era disruption - effective break-even for this participant class is incalculable, because the preconditions are themselves unverified

Read this twice

These figures come from the official Russian-language plan pages on faberlic.com. The plan’s own table values a point at an average of 120 RUB of catalog price, and from period 2/24 the company set the point at 90 RUB when buying and 72 RUB when paid out, so every point threshold above is a large sum: 3,000 points is about 360,000 RUB of group orders a period. The qualification bonuses, which the plan calls one-time payments, are paid only under the company’s services contract, which is open to consultants registered as sole proprietors and which the company suspends when a consultant has not recruited at least five new first-line consultants with 500 points of combined volume over nine periods; the company’s own transition example for period 2/24 computes the Director bonus as 80,000 RUB divided over 8 qualifying periods. The rates of the Director Bonuses on downline Director groups sit on a separate plan page that is not among the pages reviewed, and this report treats that gap as material rather than filling it with an assumption. For participants who never reach Director, the entry cost is genuinely low (no kit fee was found) and the realistic margin is the 20% or 26% personal discount: about 28 to 36 RUB on a 139 RUB shampoo. No income disclosure exists to show what fraction of the field ever reaches a tier where the arithmetic turns favorable.

Run your own numbers

Drag the sliders. Nothing here is stored or sent.

-
Cumulative net, after costs
Retained catalog customers -
Commission that month -
Total commissions earned -
Total you paid in -
Net -

Every figure on this slider is converted from RUB at 79.038 to the dollar, the rate on 26 December 2025, and the plan’s own thresholds are fixed in points and RUB rather than in dollars - so a reader in a hard-currency country should treat the whole calculator as a snapshot rather than as a forecast. The unit is a catalog customer, because retail resale is what this plan pays first: a consultant buys at 20% off catalog price, or 26% after a period with 50 or more personal points, on orders of at least 1,000 RUB, and may not resell below catalog price, so the difference is the income. The $3.91 is that 20% margin on a monthly basket of 1,546 RUB, about $19.56, built from four items in the company’s own catalog; at 26% the same basket returns about $5.09. The Volume Discount of 3% to 23% on personal-group turnover is excluded: it is credited as a discount on product unless the consultant signs the company’s services contract, and it grows with the volume of the whole personal group, downline included, rather than with this consultant’s retail margin. The qualification bonuses, 80,000 RUB at Director and rising with each rank, are excluded for the same reason: they are paid for reaching a rank defined by personal-group volume and, above Director, by the number of 23% groups below the consultant. The cost line is approximate and is not a joining fee, because registration is free. The plan values a point at an average of 120 RUB of catalog price, so the 50 personal points needed for the 26% tier and for any Volume Discount mean about 6,000 RUB (≈$76) of catalog orders each three-week catalog period. The company states an average yearly income for each rank from Director up, 720,000 RUB at Director, but has never published an income disclosure showing how many participants earn what, so nothing on this slider can be calibrated against a company distribution. Your own subscription cost of $20/mo is included.

Your money

What it costs to replace this yourself

Faberlic’s own published retail prices, converted at 79.038 RUB/USD (December 2025), against named mainstream Western drugstore and warehouse-club equivalents at real 2026 prices. Comparators are given as bands because formulations and bottle sizes differ.

What they sell youWhat you'd use insteadYour cost
Anti-dandruff shampoo "Mac-Kinley" - 199 RUB (≈$2.52), ~350–400mlHead & Shoulders Classic Clean, ~400ml≈$6–8
Botanica shampoo, 400ml - 179 RUB (≈$2.27)Garnier Fructis shampoo, ~370ml≈$5–7
Honey/aloe nourishing shampoo - 139 RUB (≈$1.76)Nivea shampoo range≈$4–6
"3D-Volume" volumising shampoo - 269 RUB (≈$3.40)Pantene Pro-V shampoo, ~375ml≈$5–7
Everyday shampoo line, per 400ml equivalentKirkland Signature hair-care, club-store multi-pack≈$10–15 per pack
Active face serum "SMAS-lifting" - 749 RUB (≈$9.48)CeraVe Skin Renewing Vitamin C Serum, 30ml≈$20
Face serum "Against All Wrinkles" - 999 RUB (≈$12.64)The Ordinary Niacinamide 10% serum, 30ml≈$8–18
Basic anti-aging serum positioninge.l.f. Cosmetics or a major pharmacy-chain private-label facial serum≈$10–15
Total as sold
≈1,546 RUB (≈$19.56) for two 139 RUB shampoos, the 269 RUB 3D-Volume shampoo and the 999 RUB Against All Wrinkles serum
Total, built yourself
≈$28 for the same four-item basket at named Western drugstore prices

Price-to-value

On this checked basket, Faberlic’s own catalog retail price is genuinely cheaper than the equivalent named Western drugstore basket, and on a strict per-100ml basis its basic shampoo lines undercut every named comparator here, including the club-store own-brand. That is a real, favorable finding and it is not diminished by anything else in this file. Two honest limits belong beside it: the comparison rests on rouble prices converted at a single date and rate, so it is a snapshot rather than a durable measure given rouble volatility; and a Western buyer could not straightforwardly obtain Faberlic product at these prices at all, given the market-access findings above, so the comparison is more theoretical than actionable for that reader. Some of the price gap likely reflects genuine differences in Russian labor and distribution costs rather than Faberlic-specific efficiency, and this file cannot cleanly separate the two effects.

Odds of profit

Three operators, five horizons

Probability of cumulative net profit

Hover any point for median, top decile and bottom quartile.

0% 25% 50% 75% 100%3 mo6 mo1 yr3 yr5 yr 55% 25% 55%
Retail seller - registers free, buys at 20% off and resells about two 1,546 RUB baskets a month at catalog price; builds no groupPart-time group builder - buys the 50-point personal minimum every period, resells half of it, and holds a 200-point personal group at the 6% Volume DiscountDirector-track builder - full-time; as the part-time builder until month 6, then holds a 600-point Leader group at 9%

Retail seller

registers free, buys at 20% off and resells about two 1,546 RUB baskets a month at catalog price; builds no group

HorizonP(profit)Median
3 mo 55% +$23
6 mo 55% +$47
1 yr 55% +$94
3 yr 55% +$282
5 yr 55% +$469

Part-time group builder

buys the 50-point personal minimum every period, resells half of it, and holds a 200-point personal group at the 6% Volume Discount

HorizonP(profit)Median
3 mo 25% −$32
6 mo 25% −$63
1 yr 25% −$126
3 yr 25% −$379
5 yr 25% −$632

Director-track builder

full-time; as the part-time builder until month 6, then holds a 600-point Leader group at 9%

HorizonP(profit)Median
3 mo 40% −$32
6 mo 40% −$63
1 yr 52% +$205
3 yr 55% +$1,279
5 yr 55% +$2,353

Methodology note. MODELED: Faberlic has never published an income disclosure statement, so no distribution of actual participant earnings anchors these rows. Each row is arithmetic on the plan’s own figures: a point worth 120 RUB of catalog orders and, on our reading, 72 RUB when the Volume Discount is paid (the payout point price stated in the company’s February 2024 announcement), a personal discount of 20% (26% after a 50-point period) on resale at catalog price, Volume Discount rates of 6% at 200 points, 9% at 600, 15% at 1,500 and 23% at 3,000, an 80,000 RUB Director qualification bonus, a Stability Bonus of 6,600 RUB twice a year at Director on 100 personal points, about 17.3 three-week catalog periods a year, and 79.038 RUB to the dollar. Retail seller: the median resells two 1,546 RUB baskets a month at 20% (618 RUB a month); the top decile resells six at 26% (2,412 RUB a month); the bottom quartile is left holding one unsold basket (1,237 RUB). Part-time group builder: the median buys 50 points a period at 26% off (4,440 RUB), resells half at catalog (3,000 RUB) and earns a 6% Volume Discount of 864 RUB, a net loss of 576 RUB a period; the top decile resells everything and earns 9% (3,888 RUB a period) from the start and 15% (16,200 RUB) from month 3; the bottom quartile resells nothing, a loss of 3,576 RUB a period. Director-track builder: the median matches the part-time builder until month 6, then earns 9% on a 600-point group (3,888 RUB, net 2,448 RUB a period); the top decile resells all personal volume, reaches 15% at month 3 and a 3,000-point group at the 23% ceiling (49,680 RUB a period) at month 6, takes the 80,000 RUB bonus at one year and the Stability Bonus from year two on 100 personal points; the bottom quartile buys 100 points a period (8,880 RUB) and resells none against an 864 RUB Volume Discount. Every Volume Discount figure is the ceiling for a group whose other members earn nothing themselves, and it is credited as a discount on product unless the consultant signs the services contract. Unsold product counts as a loss even when the participant uses it. The share in profit at each horizon (P) is this report’s assumption, set below 50% wherever the median row is negative; no source measures it.

Go-to-market

Where you are actually allowed to promote this

Platform policy reads, not verifications. Check every one before you spend a dollar - enforcement changes faster than the written policy does.

Channel
Status
Notes
Official corporate registration funnel (faberlic.com)
EXCLUDES THE US, UK AND EU
The company’s own new-consultant sign-up page, checked 1 August 2026, lists exactly 12 countries - Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Mexico, Mongolia, Russia, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan. No US, UK or EU state appears anywhere on it.
Earnings claims by the US salesforce on Facebook
REFERRED TO THE FTC AND A STATE AG
DSSRC identified nine representative claims - including specific dollar figures presented without context and phrases such as "unlimited potential earnings" and "financial freedom" - dated from August 2021 to October 2025, and referred the matter on 16 January 2026 after the company did not respond.
US-facing recruiting posts on Facebook
AUTHORIZATION STATUS UNCLEAR
Salesforce posts cited by DSSRC invited US readers to "Start growing your business in the U.S. today Be one of the first and build your financial independence through Faberlic" (October 2021), and the claims it cites run to October 2025. Whether this recruiting is run by Faberlic corporate, by an independent field leader, or by an unaffiliated promoter is not established by the sources reviewed.
Written consultant rules, contract and returns
PUBLISHED IN RUSSIAN, NO BUYBACK FOUND
faberlic.com publishes its rules of cooperation in Russian: a code of ethics, consultant rights and obligations (no sales below catalog price or through retail outlets), sponsorship rules, and a services contract that the company may end on notice in the consultant’s online account. A separate returns page takes back unused items marked as returnable within 14 days. No buyback of a consultant’s unsold stock was found in them.
Retail-to-non-participant sales verification
NOT PUBLISHED
The plan document reviewed contains no disclosed requirement that a defined share of qualifying volume be sold to verified non-participant customers, the kind of guardrail some plans publish to defend against a pay-for-recruiting characterization.
Income disclosure statement
DOES NOT EXIST IN ANY MARKET
The plan tables state an average yearly income for each rank from Director up, from 720,000 RUB at Director to 76,000,000 RUB and up at General Partner, with no count of participants, no median and no method; no dated disclosure of how earnings are distributed across participants was located anywhere, in twenty-eight years of operation.
"Oxygen cosmetics" efficacy marketing
UNSUBSTANTIATED FOR COSMETIC USE
The underlying perfluorocarbon oxygen-carrier chemistry is real, published medical science; no independent peer-reviewed study validating the specific cosmetic product’s claimed skin-rejuvenation effect was located.
Direct catalog and online retail storefront (Russia/CIS)
ACTIVE AND COMPETITIVELY PRICED
Confirmed catalog prices for everyday shampoos and a facial serum undercut named Western drugstore equivalents, and the storefront serves a reported multi-million-customer base with a 4.9/5 rating across 10,278 reviews on one Russian platform.
Rospotrebnadzor / FAS domestic enforcement record
NONE FOUND - LIMITED VISIBILITY
No confirmed enforcement action, fine or public warning specifically against Faberlic was located from either regulator. This is recorded as "nothing found," not as a clean record, given the practical limits of English-language search access to Russian regulatory dockets.
The evidence

Red flags and green flags

Red flags

14
1The sole shareholder is sanctioned in at least nine jurisdictions
US OFAC SDN, EU, UK, Switzerland, France, Canada and others, on stated grounds tied to his vote as a State Duma member to ratify Russia’s recognition of the Donetsk and Luhansk "people’s republics" in February 2022 - an executive/administrative designation, not a criminal conviction.
2The company entity itself, and two European subsidiaries, are separately sanctioned
JSC Faberlic appears on Ukraine’s NSDC sanctions register (first captured December 2023); Poland’s Interior Ministry named AO Faberlik together with Faberlic Baltija and Faberlic Europe on its first 2022 sanctions list; Latvia also lists both subsidiaries, and Lithuania lists Faberlic Baltija. This is the company’s own corporate structure being listed, not merely "the owner is sanctioned."
3A live, unresolved US regulatory referral
DSSRC referred "Faberlic, LLC" to the FTC and the Texas Attorney General on 16 January 2026 over nine unsubstantiated earnings claims, after the company failed to respond to two contact attempts. No subsequent FTC or state action has been located.
4No income disclosure statement exists in any market
Searched specifically and not found, in twenty-eight years of operation. The only earnings figures the company publishes are an average yearly income for each rank from Director up in its plan tables, with no count of who earns it, no median and no method.
5Ambiguous, possibly unauthorized US market presence
Official corporate registration excludes the US outright, yet a US entity and a social-media recruiting operation using the Faberlic name posted recruiting claims dated as recently as October 2025 - raising an unresolved question of corporate authorization and sanctions-compliance oversight.
6Unresolved payment-rail question for Western participants
No source confirms how, or whether, a Western consultant could actually receive a commission payout given post-2022 disruption to Western-Russian banking rails.
7"Oxygen cosmetics" marketing borrows real medical science without cosmetic-specific proof
The underlying perfluorocarbon oxygen-carrier chemistry has genuine peer-reviewed medical literature; no independent study validates the specific cosmetic product’s claimed rejuvenation effect.
8The founder placed the company into a trust no register document confirms
Following his 2021 election to the State Duma, Nechaev transferred Faberlic into trust management. The trustee is known only from press reports of his own account, which name the company’s brand director; no source describes the practical limits, if any, on his residual influence.
9The founder’s political party has been reported as Kremlin-organized
Investigative journalism (relying on anonymous sourcing, not a documentary or judicial finding) describes the party as conceived by the presidential administration and organizationally directed by Kremlin-linked figures; the founder has publicly denied this. Neither claim is adjudicated.
10The Director Bonus rates are not among the plan pages reviewed
The numbers that matter most for a builder-track participant, the Director Bonus rates paid on downline Director groups, sit on a separate page of the company’s plan that is not among the pages reviewed; those pages state only that a Director’s 23% group discount is split by difference with lower tiers inside the group, for example 8% over a 15% Vice-Director. Without the rates, an honest break-even analysis for the most committed participant track cannot be completed with confidence.
11Rank-achievement bonuses are tied to downline structure, not verified retail sales
The qualification bonuses, 80,000 RUB at Director and rising with each rank, reward personal-group volume and, from Senior Director up, the number of 23% downline groups a consultant has built, and are paid only under a services contract that the company suspends when the consultant stops recruiting; no retail-to-non-participant verification threshold was found in the plan document.
12No confirmed Russian regulatory enforcement record could be found
This reflects limited public searchability of Russian regulatory dockets in English rather than a confirmed clean record - a transparency gap in its own right.
13EU/UK cosmetic notification status could not be verified either way
Neither the EU’s CPNP nor the UK’s SCPN portal is publicly searchable by brand name, leaving legal-sale status for any specific SKU in those markets an open question.
14Ongoing volume-maintenance requirements function as a soft, indefinite spend obligation
Holding any discount tier above the base level, and Director status specifically, requires sustained Personal and Group Volume in most catalog periods indefinitely - at least 50 personal points, about 6,000 RUB of catalog orders on the plan’s average point value, every three-week period - a less transparent, ongoing commitment distinct from a simple one-time kit fee.

Green flags

8
1A real, decades-old, profitable manufacturing business
Founded 1997, roughly 1,500 employees, company-owned production plants, reported revenue growth of roughly 20% year-on-year in 2025 and real net profit of approximately 4.1 billion RUB - not a recruiting shell.
2Genuine new capital investment
A roughly 985 million RUB dietary-supplement plant announced in April 2026, independently reported by multiple Russian trade outlets - a real capex signal a pure recruitment-driven scheme would have little reason to make.
3No mandatory kit fee or large upfront buy-in was found
Registration appears to be free, with an immediate ~20% new-customer discount, in the official starting-program materials reviewed.
4Confirmed retail pricing undercuts named Western drugstore equivalents
Everyday shampoos and a facial serum, converted to US dollars, are broadly comparable to or cheaper than named comparators, including on a per-100ml basis against a large club-store own-brand.
5No investment, staking or token feature anywhere in the plan
The entire structure is a product-purchase-and-resale discount ladder - the reason `sec` scores at the ceiling under this site’s strict test.
6No conviction or adjudicated wrongdoing finding anywhere
No criminal conviction, indictment, or civil-standard adjudicated finding against the founder or the company was located in any jurisdiction searched; every adverse item found is either an administrative sanctions designation or an unresolved, unadjudicated self-regulatory referral.
7A genuine historical EU retail footprint
The Polish subsidiary reported approximately 1.146 billion PLN in 2020 revenue - evidence of a real, previously functioning Western consumer business, not solely a domestic-market operation, before sanctions degraded it.
8Real medical science underlies the over-extended marketing claim
Perfluorocarbon emulsions as oxygen carriers are a genuine, peer-reviewed medical research field; the company is over-extending a real technology’s reputation rather than inventing chemistry from nothing.
What would move this grade

We would like to be wrong about this

Upward

  • Publication of a dated, market-specific income disclosure statement showing the actual distribution of participant earnings by rank, plus the Director Bonus rates in a public document and a verifiable retail-to-non-participant sales requirement.
  • A clear, documented resolution of the DSSRC/FTC/Texas AG referral, and a clear corporate statement on whether "Faberlic, LLC" and the associated US recruiting activity are officially authorized and sanctions-compliant.
  • Independent, peer-reviewed clinical evidence specifically validating the "Aquaphtem" cosmetic line’s claimed skin-rejuvenation effect, and a documented record of the trust arrangement and the founder’s actual residual decision rights.

Downward

  • Any FTC or Texas Attorney General enforcement action following the pending January 2026 referral, or the JSC Faberlic entity being added to the US SDN List by name.
  • Discovery of a mandatory kit fee or an inventory-loading requirement, or a tightening of the services contract’s recruiting condition, which already requires five new first-line consultants with 500 points of combined volume over nine periods.
  • Any adjudicated finding - by any court or regulator, anywhere - against the founder or the company on the merits of the compensation plan itself, as opposed to an executive sanctions designation or a pending self-regulatory referral.
The better trade

Grade is D+. A real 28-year-old manufacturer with genuinely competitive pricing, attached to a sole owner sanctioned in nine-plus jurisdictions, a company entity separately sanctioned by two governments, and no income disclosure ever published.

Two things about this company are genuinely better than a quick read of the sanctions file would suggest. The manufacturing is real: a 28-year-old business with its own factories, reported output above 150 million cosmetic items in a recent year, and a new capital-expenditure commitment - a roughly 985 million RUB dietary-supplement plant announced in April 2026 - that a pure recruitment scheme would have little rational reason to build. And the pricing is real too: confirmed catalog prices for everyday shampoos and a facial serum undercut named Western drugstore equivalents even before any consultant discount is applied, and on a strict per-100ml basis the basic shampoo lines beat every named comparator checked. Consumer sentiment on a Russian review platform sits at 4.9 out of 5 across 10,278 ratings. None of that is manufactured credibility; it describes a company people who buy the product genuinely seem to like.

The ownership picture is where the file turns, and it has to be read precisely rather than flattened into an accusation. The sole shareholder, Alexey Nechaev, is a sitting Russian State Duma member who is designated on the US OFAC SDN list and by the EU, the UK, Switzerland, France and Canada - every stated basis located in this research ties back to his vote as a legislator to ratify Russia’s February 2022 recognition of the Donetsk and Luhansk "people’s republics." That is an executive measure taken over a political act, not a criminal conviction and not a finding about Faberlic’s products, marketing or compensation plan. What makes this more than a personal matter for the founder is that JSC Faberlic itself, and two European subsidiaries, are separately designated by Ukraine and Poland - the company’s own corporate structure is listed, not merely its owner. And the stake was reported in October 2021 to sit in a five-year trust contract that may be extended, known only from press reports of Nechaev’s own account, so a reader genuinely cannot establish who is directing the company today.

Set beside that, the compensation-plan and disclosure picture is the more conventional MLM finding: no income disclosure statement has ever been published for Faberlic, in any market, in twenty-eight years, and the numbers that matter most for a builder-track participant - the Director Bonus rates on downline Director groups - are not among the plan pages reviewed. A self-regulatory body referred a US entity trading under the Faberlic name to the FTC and the Texas Attorney General in January 2026 over nine unsubstantiated earnings claims, after the company did not respond to two contact attempts - a real governance failure in the one Western market this file could examine most closely, and one made worse by the fact that the official corporate registration funnel excludes the US entirely, leaving the relationship between that recruiting operation and the Russian parent unresolved.

1

Buy the product, skip the plan

If the everyday shampoos and serums genuinely undercut what you would pay for a comparable named Western drugstore product - and the checked pricing here says they do - that is a reason to consider Faberlic as a customer, not as a reason to become a Consultant chasing a discount ladder whose Director Bonus rates are not among the plan pages reviewed.

2

Get the US authorization question answered in writing before you send anyone a link

The official corporate registration page excludes the US, the UK and the EU. If someone is recruiting you into a "Faberlic USA" opportunity, ask them directly whether that operation is authorized by JSC Faberlic and how, specifically, a US-based participant would be paid - and get the answer in writing before you spend any time on it.

3

Treat the sanctions file as a compliance question, not a verdict

No conviction exists against the founder or the company anywhere. But a sole owner designated in nine-plus jurisdictions, with the company entity itself separately sanctioned by two governments, is a serious open compliance question for any Western person considering a commercial relationship - get independent legal advice before assuming the answer either way.

4

Ask for the income disclosure that does not exist

Twenty-eight years of operation and no published distribution of participant earnings, anywhere. Before committing meaningful time to the builder track, ask your prospective sponsor for the Director Bonus rates and any retail-to-non-participant sales requirement; if the answer is vague, that is the answer.

The founder is sanctioned in at least nine jurisdictions for a vote he cast in the Russian parliament - not for anything a court or regulator has ever found wrong with the product or the plan.
Scorecard

Nine dimensions, weighted

Comp structure & KoscotDoes the plan pay for recruitment or for sales to real customers?
20%
4.5
The retail side is real: a consultant buys at 20% or 26% off catalog price, depending on whether personal volume reached 50 points in the previous period, may not resell below catalog price, and keeps the difference - genuine retail activity, and the reason this dimension does not sit lower. The structure side pulls against it. The Volume Discount of 3% to 23% rises with the turnover of the whole personal group, so a consultant’s rate depends on downline buying as much as on the consultant’s own selling, and without the company’s services contract it is credited only as a discount on more product. The qualification bonuses, which the plan calls one-time payments, run from 80,000 RUB at Director through 200,000 RUB at Gold Director to 80,000,000 RUB at General Partner; they are triggered by personal-group volume and, from Senior Director up, by the number of 23% downline groups, and they are paid only under the services contract, which the company suspends when a consultant has not recruited at least five new first-line consultants with 500 points of combined volume over nine periods. That is a recruiting condition attached to cash pay. No version of the plan reviewed contains a retail-verification rule showing that qualifying volume reflects resale to non-participants rather than downline purchases made to clear a threshold, the company has never published a split between product sold to outside customers and product bought by participants, and the Director Bonus rates on downline Director groups sit on a plan page that is not among the pages reviewed.
Securities exposureAny passive return on capital? Howey, staking, tokens, withdrawal friction.
15%
10.0
Nothing is taken from a participant against a promised return anywhere in this plan. Registration is free; there is no note, no token, no staking mechanism, no pooled investment vehicle, and no revenue-share or passive-return promise of any kind. The entire economic relationship is buy product at a discount, optionally resell it, optionally earn an override on a downline’s purchases - a product-commerce relationship, not a securities-style one. It is important to be explicit about what this 10 does not mean: the sanctions designations against the founder and the company, Nechaev’s sitting political office, and Faberlic’s market position in Russia and the CIS are not securities-exposure facts, and none of them is scored here - they are graded under `owner` and `terms` instead. A 10 on this dimension is not a statement that the opportunity is good; it is a statement that no capital was taken from a participant against a marketed return.
Ownership & track recordWho runs it, what did they run before, and what happened to it.
15%
3.5
The genuine credit has to be stated first and plainly: one founder, one company, twenty-eight years of continuous operation, no insolvency, no collapsed prior venture, and no finding of wrongdoing by any court or regulator anywhere against either founder or the company itself. That is a materially better starting point than the modal founder profile in this category. Set against it, the deductions are specific and concentrated. The sole shareholder is designated on the US OFAC SDN list and by the EU, the UK, Switzerland, Canada and France - executive measures taken over his ratification votes as a sitting legislator, not convictions and not judicial findings of any kind, but real, operative asset-freeze and dealing-restriction measures nonetheless. The operating entity itself, JSC Faberlic, and two of its European subsidiaries (Faberlic Baltija and Faberlic Europe) are separately designated by Ukraine (2023) and Poland (2022) - this is not merely "the owner is sanctioned," it is the company’s own corporate structure being separately listed by two governments. And beneficial ownership was placed in a trust arrangement in 2021, reported on Nechaev’s own account as a five-year contract with the company’s brand director that may be extended; no register document confirms the trust, no source reports whether it was extended, and no source describes what control the founder retains in practice, so a reader cannot establish who ultimately directs the company today.
Product reality & demandWould a rational buyer purchase this if no income offer existed?
12%
6.0
This is a real manufacturer selling into a genuine consumer market: a broad catalog of shampoos, serums, perfumery and household goods, the company’s own production plants, a reported 2020 output above 150 million cosmetic items, and confirmed retail prices that undercut named Western drugstore equivalents on a like-for-like basis. That combination - real factories, real everyday pricing, a large reported customer base - earns a genuinely above-midpoint score. It is held down from a higher one for two reasons. The flagship "oxygen cosmetics" line rests on a perfluorocarbon emulsion the company brands Aquaphtem; the underlying oxygen-carrier chemistry is real, published medical science used in blood-substitute and wound-care research, but no independent peer-reviewed study validating the specific cosmetic product’s skin-rejuvenation claim could be located - the marketing borrows the credibility of adjacent medicine without product-specific proof. And demonstrable demand is confined to Russia and the CIS: the confirmed pricing advantage and the review-sentiment figures both describe that market, not a market this report can verify the product performs in.
Participant economicsReal cost in, realistic money out, and whether they publish the numbers.
10%
2.0
The one thing genuinely in the participant’s favor is that the entry cost is low: registration is free, with no mandatory kit purchase located in any source reviewed. Staying active costs more than the sign-up suggests: the 26% discount and any Volume Discount need 50 personal points a period, about 6,000 RUB of catalog orders on the plan’s average point value. Everything else on this dimension weighs the other way. No income disclosure statement has ever been published for Faberlic in any market, in twenty-eight years of operation: the plan tables state an average yearly income for each rank from Director up, 720,000 RUB at Director, but no count of participants at any rank, no median and no method behind the figure. And for a reader in the US, the UK or the EU, there is no established route to being paid at all: the official registration funnel excludes those markets outright, and no source describes how, or whether, a Western participant could receive a commission through ordinary banking rails given post-2022 sanctions-era disruption to Russian payment access. A low entry cost does not offset having no data on outcomes and no confirmed way to collect one.
Price-to-valueWhat the same capability costs on the open market.
8%
6.0
This is one of the higher price-to-value numbers on this site, and it is earned rather than assumed: the checked basket of everyday shampoos and a facial serum, converted from rouble catalog prices, undercuts the equivalent named Western drugstore basket - and it does so at the plain catalog retail price, before any consultant discount is even applied. On a strict per-100ml basis the basic shampoo lines also undercut every named comparator checked, including a large club-store own-brand. The deduction from a still-higher score reflects two limits on how far that comparison can be pushed: it rests on rouble catalog prices converted at a single date and rate, which is a snapshot rather than a durable measure given rouble volatility, and it rests on a narrow basket of everyday SKUs rather than the full catalog - the flagship "oxygen cosmetics" serum line’s own price premium is not independently justified by the same evidence.
Payout sustainabilityCan the company fund the plan out of margin, or only out of inflow?
8%
6.0
The plan reads as funded out of manufacturing and catalog margin rather than out of new-entrant fees: this is a real, profitable business on roughly 36 billion RUB (≈$450 million at 79.038 RUB/USD, December 2025) of reported FY2025 revenue, with genuine new capital expenditure - a roughly 985 million RUB dietary-supplement plant announced in April 2026 - which is a real signal of a company reinvesting from real margin rather than one dependent on ever-expanding recruitment. The deduction reflects three limits on how much confidence that supports: the business is concentrated in a single market (Russia and the CIS, with a historical EU footprint now degraded by sanctions), the revenue is earned in a currency subject to capital controls and sanctions-era banking disruption, and the figures behind all of this are registry filings and trade-press estimates rather than an audited financial statement - no bond prospectus, IFRS statement or independently audited account was located for the company.
Marketing conductIncome claims, regulator run-ins, hype, deadline stacking.
7%
2.5
Two things carry this score. The first is the company’s own: its plan tables state an average yearly income for every rank from Director up, 720,000 RUB at Director rising to 76,000,000 RUB and up at General Partner, with no count of how many people hold any rank, no median and no method. That is an earnings representation by the company itself, presented without the context a reader would need to judge how typical it is. The second is the field’s: a self-regulatory body - the Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC), a division of BBB National Programs - referred a US entity trading under the Faberlic name, "Faberlic, LLC," to the Federal Trade Commission and the Texas Attorney General’s Office on 16 January 2026, over nine earnings claims made by its salesforce on Facebook between August 2021 and October 2025, including dollar figures presented without context and language such as "unlimited potential earnings" and "financial freedom." This must be stage-labeled precisely: a self-regulatory referral is not an FTC action, is not an indictment, and carries no admission by the company - no government body has acted on this referral as of this writing, and the matter remains pending. The company answered neither of DSSRC’s two notices, sent in November and December 2025. The referral concerns a US limited liability company; DSSRC’s decision describes it as the company founded in Moscow in 1997 and sent its notice to email addresses listed on faberlic.com, but no corporate record linking it to the Russian joint-stock company was located.
Operator terms & exitWho owns the customer, what you forfeit, how hard it is to leave.
5%
3.0
The company publishes its consultant rules in Russian on faberlic.com - a code of ethics, consultant rights and obligations, sponsorship rules, Director duties and a services contract - and a separate returns page takes back unused items marked as returnable within 14 days. Publishing them is the credit; what they say is mostly adverse. The services contract, the only route to cash pay, lets the company end it unilaterally by notice in the consultant’s online account, and the company suspends it when a consultant has not recruited at least five new first-line consultants with 500 points of combined volume over nine periods. The rights-and-obligations page bars a consultant from giving any interview about the company, in any media including the internet, without the company’s prior written consent, and treats negative statements about the company or its consultants in the media, including the internet, as a gross breach of its ethics. The company reserves the right to change the plan, rank requirements and rules, and to change prices without notice. No buyback of a consultant’s unsold stock was found in any of these pages. Beyond the documents: the official registration funnel excludes the US, the UK and the EU outright, while a separate US-facing recruiting effort - Facebook posts by salesforce members, cited by the self-regulatory referral - ran from August 2021 to at least October 2025, and no source establishes whether that operation is corporately authorized or sanctions-compliant. And the sanctions position over the ownership chain means a Western participant cannot establish, from anything published, that participation is lawful for them at all, or whether or how they could be paid through ordinary banking channels.
Weighted composite
5.13
D+

Dimension profile

Further from center is better. Hover any point.

Comp structure& Koscot 4.5 Securitiesexposure 10.0 Ownership &track record 3.5 Product reality& demand 6.0 Participanteconomics 2.0 Price-to-value 6.0 Payoutsustainability 6.0 Marketingconduct 2.5 Operator terms& exit 3.0

Hard caps that bind here

Non-binding ceiling - does not move the grade the weighted arithmetic on this file’s own nine numbers already lands at 5.13, a D+, and nothing here caps it lower. For a cap to bite, this report would need one of three things: a government enforcement action against the company or the founder (as opposed to a sanctions designation or a pending self-regulatory referral); an adjudicated finding against the company or its owner by any court or regulator; or evidence that participants’ funds were taken against a promised return. None of those exists. To be precise about what this ceiling does not rest on: there is no conviction anywhere, no criminal charge, no civil finding of liability, no regulator proceeding of any kind in any jurisdiction, no product-safety alert against any Faberlic item, and no court has ever considered this compensation plan’s legality. The sanctions designations against the founder and the company are real and are already fully reflected in `owner` and `terms`; they are executive measures, not adjudications, and this report does not treat them as though they were.

The lowest binding cap wins, regardless of the weighted arithmetic.

Sources consulted

What we read

Every source below links to the document itself. Tier 1 is a primary record - the company’s own plan, policy or disclosure, a court filing, a regulator’s decision or an SEC filing. Tier 2 is a self-regulatory or secondary regulator record, tier 3 reporting or academic work, tier 4 an open-market price comparison. Where a document can be moved or withdrawn, an archived copy is linked beside it. If a link is dead when you try it, that is a correction we want.

  1. Rusprofile registry record - АО «Фаберлик», INN 5001026970, OGRN 1025000507399, registered 25 March 1998, General Director Konstantin Sergeyevich Barmashov since 26 May 2021, charter capital RUB 35,562,000
    Corporate registryTier 3Rusprofile (aggregator of the Russian Federal Tax Service EGRUL register)archived copy

    Corporate registry: rusprofile.ru registry aggregator (INN 5001026970, OGRN 1025000507399, founded 25 March 1998, General Director Konstantin Barmashov since 26 May 2021), cross-referenced against checko.ru

    Not established by this document: The checko.ru cross-reference page named in the prose was not located; Kontur.Focus and T-Bank counterparty records are supplied as equivalent independent aggregators of the same EGRUL data.

  2. Kontur.Focus registry record - АО «ФАБЕРЛИК», INN 5001026970, OGRN 1025000507399
    Corporate registryTier 3SKB Kontur (Kontur.Focus)archived copy
  3. T-Bank counterparty record - АО «ФАБЕРЛИК», INN 5001026970, OGRN 1025000507399, 117403 Moscow, ul. Nikopolskaya 4
    Corporate registryTier 3T-Bank (Tinkoff) Businessarchived copy

    T-Bank (Tinkoff) company page, cited for a company-review rating of 4.9/5 across 10,278 ratings that the archived page does not show; currency conversion at 79.038 RUB/USD dated 26 December 2025

    Not established by this document: The specific rating panel behind the report's figures (10,278 total ratings at 4.9/5) was not visible in the retrieved page, which surfaces registry and risk data rather than the consumer-review count. No source was retrieved for the RUB/USD conversion rate of 79.038 dated 26 December 2025.

  4. Interfax-Russia, "«Фаберлик» запустит новое производство за 1 млрд руб. в Ступинском округе" (2 April 2026) - Faberlic Natural Labs, Stupino Kvadrat SEZ, ≥8,500 sq m, RUB 985m investment, completion autumn 2027
    ReportingTier 3Interfax-Russia · 2026-04-02archived copy

    Capital-expenditure reporting on the ≈985 million RUB dietary-supplement plant, April 2026, from multiple independent Russian trade outlets

  5. Vedomosti (press release of the Moscow Region Ministry of Investment, Industry and Science), "«Фаберлик» инвестирует 1 млрд рублей в строительство нового завода по производству БАДов в Подмосковье" (2 April 2026)
    RegulatorTier 1Ministry of Investment, Industry and Science of the Moscow Region (published by Vedomosti) · 2026-04-02archived copy
  6. Retail.ru, "Faberlic инвестирует 985 млн рублей в строительство завода БАДов в Подмосковье" (3 April 2026)
    ReportingTier 3Retail.ru · 2026-04-03archived copy
  7. GxP News, "Faberlic займется производством БАД в Подмосковье" (2 April 2026)
    ReportingTier 3GxP News · 2026-04-02archived copy
  8. OpenSanctions entity record - Alexey Nechayev (Q107311193): sanctioned, PEP, EU Reg. 269/2014 Annex I item 608, plus UK, Ukraine, Switzerland, Canada, Australia, Japan and New Zealand listings
    RegulatorTier 2OpenSanctions (OpenSanctions Datenbanken GmbH)archived copy

    Sanctions data: OpenSanctions entity records for Alexey Nechaev and for JSC Faberlic, Faberlic Baltija SIA and Faberlic Europe sp. z o.o.; Polish Ministry of Internal Affairs and Administration sanctions notice (25 April 2022) via a Polish cosmetics-trade publication

    Not established by this document: The prose dates the Polish notice 25 April 2022; the retrieved MSWiA decision records the ABW application as 22 April 2022 and OpenSanctions records the sanction start date as 26 April 2022. The Polish cosmetics-trade publication that reported the notice was not located and is not needed - the ministry's own decision is cited instead.

  9. OpenSanctions entity record - FABERLIC EUROPE SP. Z O.O.: Polish MSWiA sanction from 26 April 2022; Latvia FIU listing under Reg. 269/2014 from 17 April 2024
    RegulatorTier 2OpenSanctions (OpenSanctions Datenbanken GmbH) · 2022-04-26archived copy
  10. OpenSanctions entity record - „FABERLIC BALTIJA SIA" Sp. z o.o. Oddział w Polsce / SIA Faberlic Baltija: Polish, Latvian and Lithuanian listings; ownership chain to AO Faberlik
    RegulatorTier 2OpenSanctions (OpenSanctions Datenbanken GmbH) · 2022-04-26archived copy
  11. Decision of the Polish Minister of Internal Affairs and Administration listing FABERLIC EUROPE Sp. z o.o. (KRS 0000824564, NIP 5252815483) under the Act of 13 April 2022, on the application of the Head of the ABW dated 22 April 2022 (PDF)
    RegulatorTier 1Ministerstwo Spraw Wewnętrznych i Administracji (Poland) · 2022-04archived copy
  12. Polish MSWiA sanctions-list decisions index - "Decyzje ministra SWiA w sprawie wpisu na listę sankcyjną"
    RegulatorTier 1Ministerstwo Spraw Wewnętrznych i Administracji (Poland)archived copy
  13. Forbes.ru, "Лидер новой думской партии Нечаев передал Faberlic в доверительное управление" (5 October 2021) - 99.9% stake placed with brand director Natalia Binat under a five-year trust-management contract
    ReportingTier 3Forbes Russia · 2021-10-05archived copy

    Ownership/trust transfer reporting, October 2021, from multiple Russian business-press outlets

    Not established by this document: The identity is press-reported by Forbes, Kommersant and Kompaniya from Nechaev's own account to RBC; no register document confirming the trust was retrieved.

  14. Kommersant, "Лидер «Новых людей» Нечаев после избрания в Госдуму передал Faberlic в доверительное управление" (5 October 2021) - 99.99% stake, five-year trust contract that may be extended, voting rights only
    ReportingTier 3Kommersant · 2021-10-05archived copy
  15. Kompaniya (ko.ru), "Лидер партии «Новые люди» передал Faberlic в доверительное управление" (5 October 2021) - voting rights only, no right of disposal or alienation
    ReportingTier 3Kompaniya (Компания) · 2021-10-05archived copy
  16. DSSRC Case #246-2026: Government Referral – Faberlic, LLC - full case decision (closed 16 January 2026; referred to the FTC and the Texas Attorney General's Office after the company failed to respond)
    Self-regulatoryTier 2BBB National Programs - Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council · 2026-01-16archived copy

    BBB National Programs Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (DSSRC), Case #246-2026, "Government Referral – Faberlic, LLC," referred to the FTC and the Texas Attorney General 16 January 2026

  17. BBB National Programs press release, "Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Refers Faberlic to the FTC and Texas Attorney General Over Unsubstantiated Earnings Claims" (29 January 2026)
    Self-regulatoryTier 2BBB National Programs · 2026-01-29archived copy
  18. Faberlic official page, "How to register a Representative" - free registration on faberlic.com, differentiated discount of 20% and more, three registration routes
    Company documentTier 1Faberlic (АО «Фаберлик»)archived copy

    Faberlic’s own official new-consultant registration page (faberlic.com), checked 1 August 2026, and individual product catalog pages for the SKUs priced in this report

    Not established by this document: The individual product-catalog pages for the specific SKUs priced in the report were not identified, so no per-SKU URL is given.

  19. Faberlic official page, "Online registration with Faberlic (link for New Consultants)"
    Company documentTier 1Faberlic (АО «Фаберлик»)archived copy
  20. Faberlic official Registration Rules - minimum age 14, parental consent under 18, Collection Point ID verification
    Policies & proceduresTier 1Faberlic (АО «Фаберлик»)archived copy
  21. Faberlic official compensation-plan page, "Leader's Earnings" / «Доходы Лидера и квалификационные бонусы» - 20%/26% personal discount, group Volume Discount ladder to 23%, Director bonuses, Qualification Bonuses, Stability Bonus, Development Bonus, Maternity Bonus
    Compensation planTier 1Faberlic (АО «Фаберлик»)archived copy

    Faberlic’s official Russian-language plan page: 20% or 26% personal discount, Volume Discount of 3% to 23% on personal-group turnover, a point valued at an average of 120 RUB in the plan table, Director qualification in any 8 periods within the past year, and rank tables giving qualification bonuses, Stability Bonus and an average yearly income for each Director rank

    Not established by this document: The Director Bonus rates paid on downline Director groups are on a separate plan page («Директорские бонусы», id=287, Itemid=2339) that was not captured; this page gives only the split-by-difference rule inside a Director’s own group.

  22. Faberlic official announcement, «Увеличение Бонусов по маркетинг-плану в РФ!» - increases to qualification, stability and maternity bonuses from period 2/24, with the transitional calculation rule
    Compensation planTier 1Faberlic (АО «Фаберлик»)archived copy
  23. Independent Faberlic informational site, «Маркетинг-план Фаберлик» - discount ladder, Director qualification over 8 of 18 catalog periods, Stability Bonus amounts by rank
    Compensation planTier 3faberlic-rus.ru (independent consultant site) · 2019-09-23archived copy
  24. Faberlic Ukraine, «Маркетинговий план Faberlic» - full rank table (Privileged Buyer to General Partner), Volume Discount percentages 0–23%, one-off qualification bonuses and Stability Bonus schedule
    Compensation planTier 3Faberlic Ukraine · 2019-02-07archived copy
  25. Faberlic official page, «Права и обязанности Консультанта» - consultant rights and obligations: no sales through retail outlets or below catalog prices; consultant is not an employee; no interviews about the company in any media without prior written consent (item 9); negative statements about the company online treated as a gross ethics breach (item 10)
    Policies & proceduresTier 1Faberlic (АО «Фаберлик») · 2026-10-26
  26. Faberlic official page, «Договор на оказание услуг» - services contract for consultants at 3% and above registered as sole proprietors; qualification bonus paid only under it; suspended unless 5 first-line newcomers with 500 points in 9 periods; company may terminate on notice
    Policies & proceduresTier 1Faberlic (АО «Фаберлик») · 2026-10-26
  27. Faberlic official page, «Как вернуть товар» - 14-day return of unused items marked as returnable (7 days for DENAS devices), defective goods within 30 days
    Policies & proceduresTier 1Faberlic (АО «Фаберлик») · 2026-10-26
  28. Положение о программе лояльности АО «ФАБЕРЛИК» «Дифференцированная скидка», edition of 1 October 2025 - 20% discount below 50 points in the previous catalog, 26% at 50 points or more, minimum order 1,000 RUB
    Compensation planTier 1Faberlic (АО «Фаберлик») · 2025-10-01
  29. Faberlic official page, «Другие правила и принципы» - the company may change prices without notice (item 6) and may change the marketing plan, rank requirements, Code and Rules (item 7)
    Policies & proceduresTier 1Faberlic (АО «Фаберлик») · 2026-10-26
Unable to verify

What we could not get

  • This report’s starting premise - that Faberlic is a Russian cosmetics MLM with a live sanctions and market-access question - was confirmed rather than overturned; what the research added was that the ownership is routed through a trust no register document confirms, that the company entity itself (not just the founder) is separately designated by two governments, and that a self-regulatory referral over US earnings claims was made in January 2026
  • Exact, audited FY revenue and profit figures - the primary trade-press article could not be retrieved (a 403 error on fetch); the rouble figures used here come from a registry-aggregator summary, not a filed financial statement
  • Register confirmation of the trustee holding Nechaev’s Faberlic stake (press-reported in October 2021 as the company’s brand director under a five-year contract that may be extended), whether that contract was extended,, and the practical extent of his residual influence over operating decisions
  • The Director Bonus rates paid on downline Director groups - on a separate page of the company’s plan that is not among the pages reviewed
  • Whether "Faberlic, LLC" and its associated US recruiting activity are corporately authorized by JSC Faberlic and sanctions-compliant - no statement from either side resolves this
  • CPNP (EU) and SCPN (UK) cosmetic-notification status for any specific Faberlic SKU - neither portal is publicly searchable by brand name, so this could not be checked in either direction, and a notification would in any case not be a safety approval
  • The mechanism, if any, by which a Western-based consultant could receive a commission payout given post-2022 disruption to Western-Russian banking rails
  • Any Rospotrebnadzor or FAS enforcement history specific to Faberlic in its home Russian market - nothing was found, which this report treats as a search-access limitation, not a confirmed clean record

Not advice

This is independent analysis for decision-making, not legal, financial or investment advice. Allegations reported by third parties should be verified against primary court and regulatory records before any decision.

Who writes this

Researched by Claude. Reviewed by an editor.

Every report is researched and written by Claude, Anthropic’s AI assistant, from the company’s own plan documents, policies, terms and regulatory file - then reviewed before publication by Rob Fore, who checks the sources and the stage-label on every allegation.

  • Nine weighted dimensions, published with their weights
  • The editor checks the evidence and cannot change the number - the build rejects any page whose grade does not reconcile to its own arithmetic
  • Every affiliate position we hold is disclosed on the report it touches
  • No company has paid for a grade, and no report carries an affiliate link
Read the About page

Looking at something else?

Enter any company name or website. If a report exists it opens instantly; if not, we start one.

Try:
Common questions

Faberlic - frequently asked

QIs Faberlic a pyramid scheme?
No court or regulator anywhere has found Faberlic’s compensation plan to be an illegal pyramid. The plan is a stepped-discount unilevel: consultants buy at 20% or 26% off catalog price, may not resell below it, and earn a further Volume Discount of 3% to 23% on personal-group turnover, which is genuine retail activity. The specific structural concern is that qualification bonuses, 80,000 RUB at Director and rising with each rank, reward the size of a consultant’s downline groups, and the plan document reviewed contains no disclosed requirement that qualifying volume be verified as sold to non-participant customers.
QIs Faberlic under US sanctions?
The founder and sole shareholder, Alexey Nechaev, is designated on the US OFAC SDN list and by the EU, the UK, Switzerland, France and Canada, on stated grounds tied to a 2022 legislative vote, not a business-conduct finding. The JSC Faberlic entity itself, and two European subsidiaries, are separately sanctioned by Ukraine and Poland - not by the United States by name. None of this is a criminal conviction.
QCan I join Faberlic as a consultant in the US, UK or EU?
Faberlic’s own official registration page lists 12 countries and excludes the US, the UK and every EU state. A US legal entity and a recruiting operation using the Faberlic name were nonetheless active, in salesforce posts dated as recently as October 2025, enough to trigger a self-regulatory referral to the FTC and the Texas Attorney General in January 2026. Whether that operation is officially authorized, and whether a Western participant could be paid at all, could not be confirmed.
QWhat happened with the FTC and Faberlic?
A self-regulatory body, the Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council, referred a US entity, "Faberlic, LLC," to the FTC and the Texas Attorney General on 16 January 2026 over nine unsubstantiated earnings claims made on Facebook, after the company did not respond to two contact attempts. This is a referral, not an FTC action - no government body has acted on the referral as of this writing.
QDoes Faberlic publish an income disclosure?
No. No dated, market-specific income disclosure statement exists in any market, in twenty-eight years of operation; the plan tables state an average yearly income for each rank from Director up without saying how many people earn it. The Director Bonus rates that would let a builder-track participant judge sustained profitability are not among the plan pages reviewed.
Who wrote this report

Author, editor and publisher

C
Written by Claude AI
Reviewed by Rob Fore · Published by Listech Inc · August 1, 2026

This report was researched and written by Claude, Anthropic’s AI assistant, working from primary documents - Faberlic’s own compensation plan, its policies and procedures, its terms of service, its income disclosure statement where one exists, and its regulatory and self-regulatory file. It was scored against nine weighted dimensions that are published in full, with their weights, on the methodology page.

Before publication it was reviewed by Rob Fore, who checks every source link, every figure against the document it came from, and every allegation against its stage-label - an investigation is not a finding, a warning letter is not an enforcement action, and a filed claim is not a verdict.

The editor does not set the grade. The published score is the weighted composite of the nine dimension scores, and the build refuses to emit a page where the two disagree by more than 0.06. A grade moves when the evidence moves it and not otherwise.

Rob Fore has marketed online since 1996, wrote Online MLM Marketing (2014), and is CEO of Listech Inc, the Nevada corporation that publishes this site. He holds affiliate positions in companies graded here - including LiveGood, which this site grades D, SendOutCards, which it grades C−, and the Home Business Academy, which it grades B−. Those positions are disclosed on the reports they touch, and changed nothing on this page.

About the author and our conflicts  ·  Contact the editor  ·  Corrections: corrections@opportunitygrade.com

Stay with it

Tell me if this grade changes

Faberlic is graded D+ as of August 1, 2026. Grades move when the evidence moves - a new income disclosure, a regulatory action, a rewritten compensation plan. Leave your address and you will get one email if this one does.

One email when the grade moves, and nothing else. We will never use your address to promote an income opportunity of any kind, we do not sell, rent or share the list, and it is stored on our own infrastructure rather than with any company graded here. Unsubscribe removes everything.

Right of reply

Corrections

Every factual claim on this page is sourced, and the ones we could not stand up are named in the unable to verify list above. If something here is wrong, we want to know, and we would rather hear it from Faberlic than from a reader.

Write to corrections@opportunitygrade.com. Point at the specific sentence and send the document that contradicts it - a plan document, a filing, an income disclosure, a policy page. We will check it against the primary source, correct the page if it is wrong, and keep a dated record of the change. A grade moves if the evidence moves it.

This address reaches a person, not a form. We do not require a takedown demand, an NDA or a lawyer to accept a correction, and we do not remove a report because a company disputes its conclusion - only because the underlying facts turn out to be wrong.

Other published reports

Every report is written to stand alone. Graded on the same nine weighted dimensions and the same six legal tests. Twelve of 113, spread across the grade bands.

See all 113 published reports →