All reviews
Home / Reviews / QNET
Global wellness and luxury-goods MLM · Hong Kong parent with an India sub-franchisee structure

QNET Ltd

A decades-old, Manchester City-sponsoring direct seller with a genuine 2017 Indian court win on the money-circulation question - operating alongside fresh criminal arrests tied to its India franchisee as recently as March 2026, and no income disclosure of any kind.

Reviewed September 14, 2026 Founded 1998, as GoldQuest (a gold-coin direct-selling company) in the Philippines, co-founded by Vijay Eswaran and Joseph Bismark; renamed QuestNet, then shortened to QNet/QNET around 2010. QI Group, the parent conglomerate, was co-founded the same year. Confidence: Medium
DGRADE
4.4/10
Weighted composite

REAL BUSINESS, UNRESOLVED ENFORCEMENT PATTERN

A real product company with genuine sponsorships and one substantive Indian court win sits alongside an unusually large, current, multi-country enforcement file - including fresh Indian arrests in March 2026 - that the company has never fully resolved.

No IDS
No income disclosure statement exists
only a legal "Earnings and Income Disclaimer" was located, despite decades of scale and DSA/WFDSA membership
32
Fresh arrests tied to the India franchisee, March 2026
three states, four new cases, under the Prize Chits and Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act
₹350cr+
India ED assets frozen/attached since 2014
multiple rounds of preventive seizure under PMLA; no PMLA conviction located
2017
Karnataka High Court quashed a money-circulation chargesheet
a genuine, on-the-merits ruling for QNET/Vihaan on one statute in one case

Legal status

CONTESTED - no conviction of the corporate entity (QNET Ltd or Vihaan) has been found in any jurisdiction; a 2017 Karnataka High Court judgment (Criminal Petition No. 9308/2016) ruled specifically that the model does not meet India’s statutory definition of a "Money Circulation Scheme" and quashed a chargesheet on that basis; separately, active and ongoing Indian criminal, money-laundering and consumer-protection proceedings continue, including fresh arrests as recently as March 2026, an Enforcement Directorate PMLA investigation with asset freezes exceeding ₹350 crore since 2014, an unresolved December 2024 CCPA notice, and an unresolved NCLT winding-up petition against Vihaan; individual (not corporate) field-agent criminal convictions exist in Senegal.

Confidence: Medium

Primary sources fetched directly where possible. Everything we could not verify is listed at the bottom of this page by name.

What this actually is

Follow the money

A Hong Kong-incorporated direct-selling company, founded in 1998 as GoldQuest and renamed QuestNet then QNET, selling a genuinely diversified physical-product catalog - Kent-co-branded water purifiers, Amezcua wellness/energy pendants, Bernhard H. Mayer Swiss-branded watches, personal care and skincare, and QVI Club holiday products - through independently incorporated national franchisees, the largest and most legally active of which is Vihaan Direct Selling (India) Private Limited.

What is real and should be said first: decades of continuous operation with shippable products, not a bare recruitment shell; genuine, sustained, top-tier sports sponsorships (Official Direct Selling Partner of Manchester City FC since 2014); a real, government-partnered university (Quest International University, Malaysia, roughly 15,000 students from 50 countries) under the same QI Group parent; membership in good standing in the Direct Selling Associations of Malaysia, Singapore and the Philippines; and a genuine, on-the-merits judicial win - the Karnataka High Court’s 2017 ruling that the model does not meet India’s statutory definition of a money-circulation scheme.

Against that, an unusually large and currently active enforcement file, concentrated in India but echoed across Nepal, Indonesia, Sri Lanka, Bhutan and Senegal, that has continued generating fresh criminal activity for more than a decade - including 32 arrests across three Indian states in March 2026, six months before this report’s research date.

No confirmed transparent entry-fee price exists, an ongoing monthly repurchase requirement is needed to keep earning, and no income disclosure statement of any kind has ever been located - only a legal earnings disclaimer.

The compensation plan itself, as currently written, is an ordinary retail/repeat-sales/rank-ladder MLM structure without a Howey-type promised return baked into the paper design - a genuinely important distinction this report keeps separate from the securities-adjacent language used by regulators describing field-level conduct.

QNET’s own claimed aggregate payout ratio on a $100 product sale

Built from the one figure QNET itself has put into circulation - its 2015 "Q10" launch press release and current marketing copy state the plan pays out "up to 50% of sales" across its 8/10 Ways to Earn. This is the company’s own maximum theoretical aggregate ratio across the whole compensation pool, not a per-IR guarantee, and QNET does not publish how that 50% is actually distributed between Retail Profit, Repeat Sales Commission and Step Commission, or how concentrated it is toward the top of the rank ladder - a real disclosure gap this row split cannot resolve.

50% 50%
Retained by the company and cost of goods, per QNET’s own "up to 50%" ceiling claimPaid out in commissions across the entire IR network, per QNET’s own claim (distribution by rank not disclosed)
ProductPricePays
HomePure Nova (premium water purifier)
The most expensive confirmed product in the catalog; priced roughly 4-6x a comparable A-brand alkaline RO unit at ordinary retail (see replacementStack).
₹1,50,550 (~US$1,800) incl. tax, plus ₹2,100 shipping
one-time purchase
retail profit + RSP-based repeat-sales commission (rate unconfirmed)
KENT-QNET Smart Alkaline RO+UV+UF+TDS purifier
Co-branded with Kent, an established non-MLM Indian appliance manufacturer - a real commercial partnership, priced roughly double a comparable non-QNET Kent unit at ordinary retail.
₹42,230 (~US$505) incl. tax, plus ₹3,000 shipping (a reseller listing shows ~₹38,500)
one-time purchase
retail profit + RSP-based repeat-sales commission (rate unconfirmed)
Amezcua wellness/energy line (Chi Pendant, Bio Disc, Himalayan Crystal and others)
Marketed on "energy field" and bio-resonance-type claims with no mainstream clinical support; no honest priced substitute product exists for this specific category.
US$150-US$670 per item
one-time purchase
retail profit + RSP-based repeat-sales commission (rate unconfirmed)
Bernhard H. Mayer watches (Mecanique Collection and others)
Swiss-branded luxury watches; priced above a genuine Japanese automatic at the low end and above a genuine Swiss-made automatic even at the high end of the range.
US$700-US$3,500 per watch
one-time purchase
retail profit + RSP-based repeat-sales commission (rate unconfirmed)
Physio Radiance (personal care/skincare line)
Brand existence confirmed via company-portal listings; itemised pricing could not be located in this research.
Unconfirmed - not located to a specific figure
one-time or repeat purchase (unconfirmed)
unconfirmed
QVI Club holiday/travel packages
Brand existence confirmed across multiple company-portal search snippets; pricing not located.
Unconfirmed
one-time purchase (package)
unconfirmed
Monthly Repeat Purchase Program volume
Ongoing personal or team purchasing volume required to remain "Active" for Repeat Sales Commission - a mandatory recurring cost, not an optional add-on.
Amount unconfirmed but structurally required
monthly (per some material, quarterly)
generates Repeat Sales Points feeding RSC
Background check

Who runs it, and what they ran before

VE
Vijay Eswaran
Co-founder and Executive Chairman, QI Group

London School of Economics graduate (1984) and Southern Illinois University MBA (1986); worked in manual labor across Europe and later as an information-systems engineer, including at IBM, before co-founding GoldQuest/QNET and QI Group in 1998 with Joseph Bismark. A published author (claimed 500,000+ copies of "In the Sphere of Silence") and founder of the RYTHM Foundation philanthropic arm and Quest International University. Personally named in a February 2014 Indian Enforcement Directorate PMLA money-laundering case registration alongside QNet, Vihaan and Michael Ferreira - an investigation/case-registration stage, not a conviction. Separately reported to have been the subject of a May 2007 Interpol Red Notice and a roughly three-week Jakarta detention arising from a Philippine business dispute, with the underlying charge later dismissed by a Manila court and no conviction resulting. No source located in this research shows Vijay Eswaran ever convicted of a crime anywhere.

JB
Joseph Bismark
Co-founder and Deputy Chairman, QI Group

Born 1962 in the Philippines; a 3rd Dan Taekwondo black belt and former Philippine national-team member. Ran a Philippine figurine-manufacturing venture in the early 1990s before co-founding GoldQuest/QNET and QI Group with Eswaran in 1998, and remains Deputy Chairman of QI Group. No independent criminal or regulatory action naming Bismark individually, as opposed to the company or Vihaan collectively, was located in this research.

Gn
Governance note
The two-entity structure this report treats as load-bearing

QNET Ltd (Hong Kong) is the brand owner and global compensation-plan licensor; Vihaan Direct Selling (India) Private Limited is a separately incorporated Indian company operating under license, not a subsidiary or branch. This is standard, lawful international-franchise practice, and it is also the structural reason most India-specific criminal and regulatory liability below attaches formally to Vihaan rather than to the Hong Kong parent - even though QNet Ltd and Eswaran personally have both been named in at least one Indian federal proceeding (the 2014 ED case). A reader should hold both facts at once: the corporate design is lawful, and it has not fully insulated the QNET brand or its founder from India’s federal enforcement apparatus.

Registered address

Hong Kong (QNET Ltd, the brand-owning direct-selling subsidiary); QI Group maintains regional offices across Hong Kong, Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand and the Philippines
QNET Ltd licenses its business model to independently incorporated national franchisees rather than operating every market directly. In India - by far the largest source of the enforcement file below - the licensed operator is Vihaan Direct Selling (India) Private Limited, registered in Karnataka (CIN referenced as U52399KA2011PTC060730 in company-registry aggregator listings), headquartered in Bengaluru. Vihaan is a separately incorporated Indian private company, not a branch office of the Hong Kong parent, and nearly every Indian criminal FIR, ED money-laundering case, MCA/NCLT proceeding and the December 2024 CCPA notice names Vihaan as the primary respondent - though several filings, including the 2014 ED case, also name "QNet Ltd." and founder Vijay Eswaran personally alongside Vihaan. QI Group’s wider portfolio (education, hospitality, luxury manufacturing) has no located public audited financial statements; it is a private conglomerate.

Compensation plan

What has to be true for you to get paid

To coverYou need
Minimal participant: starter pack only, no personal product purchase beyond minimum, thin resale network the starter-pack price itself, which could not be confirmed
if this participant makes zero retail sales and recruits no one, 100% of spend is a loss; break-even requires enough retail margin or downline RSC to exceed the pack cost plus any minimum monthly repurchase volume - with no confirmed pack price or monthly minimum, this is reported as a component-level illustration, not an invented dollar figure.
"Personal use" participant who also buys one flagship product to demonstrate it credibly starter pack (unconfirmed) plus one KENT-QNET RO purifier (~$505) or one Amezcua item (~$150-670)
a plausible all-in year-one spend in the $700-2,500 range before any resale; break-even requires reselling that unit at a typical MLM retail-versus-wholesale spread or earning equivalent RSC from a small downline, which industry-wide MLM income-disclosure data (generic, not QNET-specific) consistently shows most entrants do not achieve.
Aspiring builder investing in the premium watch line to "wear the brand" starter pack (unconfirmed) plus one Bernhard H. Mayer watch at the low end (~$700) or high end (~$3,500)
at least ~$700-1,000+ exposure at the low end; at the high end, a single-item exposure of $3,500+ that requires reselling that specific high-ticket item at a profitable spread, or recruiting/selling substantially more broadly, to recover cost within a year.
Rank-chasing participant maintaining monthly Repeat Purchase Program volume to stay RSC-active a conservative ~$50-150/month in qualifying volume, structurally confirmed to exist though the exact threshold is unconfirmed
compounds to roughly $600-1,800/year in ongoing repurchase spend on top of the initial pack/product purchase, meaning realistic total year-one break-even could sit well above $1,500-3,000 once qualification volume is included, before any travel or seminar costs.

Read this twice

All four scenarios are built from confirmed component prices with explicitly stated gaps, not from an official QNET break-even disclosure, because no such document exists. The single largest unknown in every scenario is the starter-pack/registration-fee price itself, which could not be confirmed via extensive targeted search - a defensible headline "cost to join" figure would require sourcing the current official price directly from a country-specific QNET portal at time of reading, or presenting the ₹30,000-₹7,00,000 range found in Indian case filings explicitly labeled as total alleged historical exposure per complainant in fraud cases, not as the price to join.

Run your own numbers

Drag the sliders. Nothing here is stored or sent.

-
Cumulative net, after costs
Total completed 6-step Step Commission cycles -
Commission that month -
Total commissions earned -
Total you paid in -
Net -

QNET does not publish a per-product or per-customer commission rate anywhere this report could locate, so this slider is built on the one concrete unit-economics figure the compensation-plan material does disclose: one full Step Commission cycle - six Step Commissions - pays a combined $1,250 plus 10 eVoucher Points. Completing even one full cycle a month is a genuinely demanding pace, which is why the realistic preset starts at zero. The cost line is a labeled estimate, not a company figure: QNET requires ongoing personal or team purchase volume through its monthly Repeat Purchase Program to remain commission-active, but the exact dollar threshold is not published anywhere this report could find; $100 a month sits inside the report’s own break-even Scenario D range and should be read as illustrative rather than official. Retail profit and Repeat Sales Commission on individual product sales are excluded entirely because QNET has not disclosed the underlying percentages for either. Your own subscription cost of $100/mo is included.

Your money

What it costs to replace this yourself

QNET’s own confirmed prices against ordinary retail equivalents for the same product categories, at real 2026 market prices, with no MLM markup and no joining requirement of any kind.

What they sell youWhat you'd use insteadYour cost
KENT-QNET Smart Alkaline RO+UV+UF purifier (~₹42,230 / ~$505)Kent Grand Plus RO+UV+UF purifier, ordinary non-QNET retail~₹15,000-20,000 (~$180-240)
HomePure Nova premium purifier (~₹1,50,550 / ~$1,800)A-brand RO+alkaline unit (mid-range Livpure/AO Smith-tier alkaline model), ordinary retail~₹25,000-35,000 (~$300-420)
Amezcua Chi Pendant wellness/energy item (~$150-670)Ordinary stainless-steel or silver pendant jewelry, no health claim~$15-60
Amezcua Bio Disc-type bio-resonance/crystal wellness productNo mainstream medical-device or nutrition-science equivalent exists at any price - the underlying "energy field" claim has no mainstream clinical supportN/A - honest replacement is $0, no purchase
Bernhard H. Mayer Mecanique automatic watch, mid-tier (~$700-3,500)Seiko Presage or Orient Bambino automatic watch, genuine Japanese movement, ordinary retail~$150-450
Bernhard H. Mayer watch, higher tier (~$3,000+)Tissot or Hamilton Swiss-made automatic watch, genuine Swiss movement, ordinary retail~$500-1,200
QNET wellness-range supplement item (price unconfirmed)Store-brand or NSF-certified multivitamin/supplement, a major pharmacy or supermarket private label~$10-25/month
Physio Radiance skincare set (price unconfirmed)A well-reviewed drugstore-brand skincare routine with comparable actives (e.g. CeraVe or Neutrogena-tier)~$30-80
Total as sold
confirmed component prices run roughly $505-$3,500+ per flagship item, before any starter pack or ongoing repurchase volume
Total, built yourself
real-vendor equivalents for the same categories run roughly $15-$1,200 per item, at ordinary retail with no joining requirement

Price-to-value

On every confirmed comparison where a real-vendor equivalent exists, QNET’s price runs roughly double to several times the ordinary-retail figure for comparable capability. In one category - the Amezcua bio-resonance/crystal wellness line - no honest substitute product exists at any price, because the underlying "energy field" claim itself has no mainstream clinical support; the fair comparison there is not a cheaper product but no purchase at all.

Odds of profit

Three operators, five horizons

Probability of cumulative net profit

Hover any point for median, top decile and bottom quartile.

0% 25% 50% 75% 100%3 mo6 mo1 yr3 yr5 yr 8% 3% 0.5%
The Retail-Only Hobbyist - buys a starter pack plus one low-end Amezcua item and sells casually to friends and family, modeled from confirmed component prices - not a QNET-published case studyThe Small-Team Builder - buys a starter pack plus a KENT-QNET RO purifier and recruits a handful of IRs in year one, modeled from the confirmed six-step, $1,250 commission-cycle figure - not a QNET-published case studyThe Watch-Line Aspirant Chasing Rank - buys a starter pack plus a high-end Bernhard H. Mayer watch and pursues mid-tier rank, modeled from confirmed component prices and reported ongoing qualification volume - not a QNET-published case study

The Retail-Only Hobbyist

buys a starter pack plus one low-end Amezcua item and sells casually to friends and family, modeled from confirmed component prices - not a QNET-published case study

HorizonP(profit)Median
3 mo 40% -$500
6 mo 30% -$550
1 yr 22% -$500
3 yr 12% -$400
5 yr 8% -$300

The Small-Team Builder

buys a starter pack plus a KENT-QNET RO purifier and recruits a handful of IRs in year one, modeled from the confirmed six-step, $1,250 commission-cycle figure - not a QNET-published case study

HorizonP(profit)Median
3 mo 15% -$800
6 mo 12% -$400
1 yr 9% $0
3 yr 5% $300
5 yr 3% $500

The Watch-Line Aspirant Chasing Rank

buys a starter pack plus a high-end Bernhard H. Mayer watch and pursues mid-tier rank, modeled from confirmed component prices and reported ongoing qualification volume - not a QNET-published case study

HorizonP(profit)Median
3 mo 4% -$3,200
6 mo 3% -$3,000
1 yr 2% -$2,800
3 yr 1% -$1,500
5 yr 0.5% -$800

Methodology note. These are modeled illustrative outcome ranges, not claims and not a QNET-published case study - QNET publishes no percentile- or cohort-based earnings table of any kind. They are built from the brief’s confirmed component prices (starter-pack cost unconfirmed; flagship product prices confirmed; the $1,250 six-step commission-cycle figure confirmed; ongoing monthly qualification volume structurally confirmed but its exact threshold unconfirmed) and from the generic, industry-wide MLM pattern that most entrants do not recover their initial spend - not from any QNET-specific disclosure, because none exists. The declining "p" values reflect assumed attrition consistent with the rank-ladder structure described in comp above, not a QNET-published retention figure.

Go-to-market

Where you are actually allowed to promote this

Platform policy reads, not verifications. Check every one before you spend a dollar - enforcement changes faster than the written policy does.

Channel
Status
Notes
Income and "get rich quick" claims to prospects
PROHIBITED IN WRITING
QNET’s Policies & Procedures explicitly prohibit IRs from making potential or actual income claims, from using their own or others’ incomes as an indication of assured success, and from representing the business as an investment or a get-rich-quick scheme.
Field-level income and health-claim conduct in practice
RECURRING VIOLATIONS DOCUMENTED ACROSS A DECADE-PLUS
Despite the written ban, the Mumbai EOW’s original allegation described IRs selling products claimed to cure diseases including cancer, and the Cyberabad/Hyderabad thread describes false job-offer recruitment of unemployed youth, in cases running from 2013 through fresh March 2026 arrests - a persistent gap between policy and field practice.
Distributor self-identification and use of QNET trademarks on social media
GOVERNED BY WRITTEN POLICY
The Social Media Policy requires IRs to identify as "Independent Distributor," bars incorporating QNET trademarks into usernames or handles, and requires testimonials to be truthful and supported as "typical results," treating an unsupported "non-typical" claim as a policy violation.
Monthly (or, per some material, quarterly) repeat-purchase requirement to stay commission-active
MANDATORY
Continued personal or team purchasing volume is required under the Repeat Purchase Program to keep earning Repeat Sales Commission - an autoship-style mechanic that can mask a net-negative cash position as "still earning."
Recruitment and event/seminar culture
ACTIVE BUT SCALE UNCONFIRMED
Sources describe an active rank-recognition and conference culture, including presentation-style compensation-plan materials designed for live seminar use and a pattern of celebrity appearances at QNET-linked programs (several Bollywood actors reportedly received notices connected to past event appearances) - current event branding, frequency and scale could not be confirmed to a citable standard.
Starter-pack/entry-fee price disclosure to a prospect before joining
NOT LOCATED
No current global or India-specific starter-pack price could be confirmed via extensive search - a basic pre-purchase transparency gap for a prospective participant trying to know total cost before enrolling.
DSA/WFDSA code-of-ethics membership obligations
MEMBER IN GOOD STANDING (MALAYSIA, SINGAPORE, PHILIPPINES)
QNET (M) Sdn Bhd has been a Direct Selling Association of Malaysia member since 2010, itself a WFDSA member subject to an ethics code; QNET is also listed as a member of Singapore’s and the Philippines’ associations. Whether Indonesian APLI membership survived the 2019 regulatory action there could not be confirmed.
The evidence

Red flags and green flags

Red flags

14
1Fresh criminal arrests as recently as March 2026
Hyderabad Police Special Investigation Team arrested 32 people across four new cases in coordinated raids across Telangana, Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka, charged under the Prize Chits and Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act, 1978 - six months before this report’s research date. This enforcement file is current, not historical.
2No income disclosure statement exists
Only a legal "Earnings and Income Disclaimer" was located across every country portal searched - no average, median, or percentage-profitable figure of any kind, despite decades of scale and Direct Selling Association membership that typically encourages such transparency.
3Starter-pack/entry-fee pricing could not be confirmed anywhere
A basic transparency failure for a prospective participant trying to know total cost before joining - repeated targeted searches returned only retail product price lists, not an enrollment fee.
4Five independent national regulators have each characterized the model as investment/money-circulation-like
India’s CCPA and ED, Indonesia’s OJK Satgas Waspada Investasi, Sri Lanka’s Central Bank, Bhutan’s consumer-protection authority and Nepal’s Home Ministry have each, independently and across two decades, reached this characterisation - a pattern harder to dismiss as one country’s misunderstanding.
5India’s Enforcement Directorate has frozen or attached well over ₹350 crore since 2014
Multiple separate PMLA actions (2014, 2019, January 2023 and others) against Vihaan/QNET/Gold Quest-linked assets - a serious, repeated, high-dollar preventive-seizure record, even though no PMLA conviction was located.
6Mainstream logistics providers suspended courier service to the India franchisee
Both India Post and Blue Dart stopped carrying Vihaan’s parcels following a Registrar-of-Companies letter citing multiple pending criminal cases - a real commercial vote of no confidence from neutral third parties, separate from any court, though a March 2024 Karnataka High Court order later allowed India Post service to continue.
7The Ministry of Corporate Affairs sought to wind up Vihaan via the NCLT
Following a Registrar-of-Companies book inspection reportedly finding indications of fraudulent activity intended to dupe investors - a serious corporate-governance-level regulatory action, not merely field-agent misconduct, with the petition’s final outcome unconfirmed.
8Actual criminal convictions of individual QNET-linked agents exist
A Thiès, Senegal court has convicted multiple individual QNET-network agents after trial (2025/2026-dated verdicts, sentences including imprisonment and fines) - not merely investigations. No conviction of the corporate entity itself was found anywhere.
9Founder Vijay Eswaran was personally named in a 2014 Indian PMLA case registration
Alongside QNet, Vihaan, Michael Ferreira and three IRs, and was separately the subject of a 2007 Interpol Red Notice and roughly three-week Jakarta detention, later dismissed with no conviction - leadership has faced personal, not only corporate, legal exposure.
10The founding product itself was treated as an investment vehicle by multiple regulators
GoldQuest gold coins, marketed as numismatic collectibles, were treated by Nepal, Bhutan (both 2003) and Australia’s consumer-affairs office (2002) as functionally an investment/money-circulation vehicle - directly relevant to the sec dimension even though the current product mix has diversified.
11A mandatory ongoing repurchase requirement is needed simply to keep earning
The monthly (per some material, quarterly) Repeat Purchase Program requires continued personal or team spend to remain "Active" for Repeat Sales Commission - a classic autoship mechanic that can mask a net-negative cash position as "still earning."
12Field-level income and health-claim misconduct recurs specifically, despite a written ban
The Mumbai EOW’s original allegation described products marketed as curing diseases including cancer; the Cyberabad thread describes false job-offer recruitment of unemployed youth - a policy-versus-practice gap spanning more than a decade.
13The scheme reportedly persisted after formal bans in at least two countries
Local reporting in Bhutan and Nepal describes continued losses to the scheme after formal prohibition, indicating a ban alone has not stopped recruitment activity in at least some markets.
14The two-tier corporate structure genuinely complicates accountability
Even India’s CCPA, ED, MCA and multiple state police forces have needed years of parallel, overlapping proceedings across at least four institutions to pursue essentially the same underlying conduct - a real-world cost of the structure regardless of its legality.

Green flags

8
1Decades of continuous operation with real, shippable physical products
Since 1998, across multiple confirmed categories - water purifiers, wellness devices, watches, personal care - rather than a purely digital or recruitment-only offering.
2Genuine, long-running, top-tier sports sponsorships
Official Direct Selling Partner of Manchester City FC since 2014 and Manchester City Women’s FC since 2018, plus CAF competition sponsorship - a sustained, high-visibility marketing investment inconsistent with a fly-by-night operation.
3A real, accredited, government-partnered university under the same parent group
Quest International University, Ipoh, Malaysia, established 2011 in partnership with the Perak State Government, with a confirmed student body of roughly 15,000+ from about 50 countries - a genuine, non-MLM institutional asset.
4A specific, on-the-merits judicial win in its largest single market
The Karnataka High Court’s 2017 finding, after a full Section 482 CrPC hearing, that the model does not meet India’s statutory definition of a money-circulation scheme - a real legal determination, not merely a procedural delay.
5Membership in good standing in multiple national Direct Selling Associations
Malaysia’s DSAM since 2010, Singapore’s DSAS, and the Philippines’ DSAP, with DSAM itself a WFDSA member subject to a Code of Ethics.
6A written, correctly drafted compliance framework exists on paper
Policies & Procedures and a Social Media Policy that explicitly ban income guarantees, get-rich-quick framing and investment-style claims - the right rules exist, whatever field enforcement has or has not achieved.
7A diversified, real corporate parent beyond direct selling
QI Group operates confirmed businesses in education, hospitality and luxury manufacturing alongside QNET, reducing - though not eliminating - dependence on recruitment-driven cash flow alone.
8Mainstream co-branding with an established non-MLM Indian appliance manufacturer
The Kent-QNET water-purifier line is a real commercial partnership with a company outside the MLM industry, imposing at least some external brand-reputation discipline on product quality.
What would move this grade

We would like to be wrong about this

Upward

  • Publication of a genuine, audited income disclosure statement with average and median figures, an active-versus-total participant definition, and a stated methodology.
  • A confirmed, transparent, single global or clearly country-by-country starter-pack price published prominently before purchase.
  • A sustained multi-year period - three years or more - with no fresh criminal arrests tied to the India franchisee, against the current pattern of arrests recurring roughly annually through March 2026.

Downward

  • A criminal conviction of the corporate entity itself - QNET Ltd or Vihaan - as opposed to individual agents, in any jurisdiction.
  • A confirmed PMLA conviction or a confirmed adverse NCLT winding-up order against Vihaan.
  • A confirmed CCPA finding of unfair trade practice, or a fine, against Vihaan arising from the December 2024 notice.
The better trade

Grade is D. A real, decades-old operating company with genuine products, sponsorships and one substantive legal win coexists with an unusually large and currently active enforcement file that the company has never fully resolved.

What is genuinely real here should be said first. QNET is not a bare recruitment shell: it has sold shippable physical products continuously since 1998, sustains a Premier League-level sponsorship (Manchester City FC, since 2014) that a fraud operation would be unlikely to fund for over a decade, and its parent group runs a real, government-partnered university educating roughly 15,000 students. Its founders are credentialed, published and publicly documented, not anonymous. And in its largest single market, the Karnataka High Court ruled in 2017, after a full hearing, that the company’s model does not meet India’s statutory definition of a money-circulation scheme - a genuine, on-the-merits legal win, not spin.

That legal win, however, addressed one specific chargesheet under one specific statute, and it has not stopped fresh criminal cases from being filed against the same India franchisee, Vihaan, by different police forces in different states in the years since - including 32 arrests across three states as recently as March 2026. Independently of each other and across two decades, regulators in India, Nepal, Indonesia, Sri Lanka and Bhutan have each characterised some version of the model as investment- or money-circulation-like. India’s Enforcement Directorate has frozen or attached more than ₹350 crore in assets since 2014 under money-laundering law, and both India Post and Blue Dart at one point suspended courier service to the franchisee following a regulator letter. None of this amounts to a conviction of the corporate entity anywhere - the confirmed criminal convictions in this file belong to individual field agents in Senegal, not to QNET Ltd or Vihaan - but the pattern is current, large, and geographically wide, not a closed historical chapter.

The economics compound the legal picture. No confirmed starter-pack price exists anywhere, an ongoing mandatory monthly repurchase is required simply to stay commission-active, no income disclosure statement of any kind has ever been published, and confirmed retail prices - a $505 water purifier, watches running $700-3,500 - sit well above real-market equivalents for comparable capability. A written policy correctly bans income and health claims, but field-level enforcement has not reliably held that line for over a decade. Taken together, the nine scored dimensions already reflect this record without needing an additional cap: a real company, with a real and unresolved problem.

1

Do not treat the 2017 Karnataka HC ruling as a blanket clearance

It resolved one chargesheet under one statute; it has not stopped fresh criminal cases from being filed against the same India franchisee in different states, including arrests as recently as March 2026.

2

Get the actual starter-pack price in writing before paying anything

No confirmed current figure exists publicly for any market; ask for it directly and in writing, and treat a reluctance to provide it as itself informative.

3

Price the mandatory monthly repurchase into any return calculation

Ongoing personal or team volume is required simply to remain commission-active - model it as a recurring cost against any expected commission, not as an optional extra.

4

If buying the product, compare it against the real-vendor equivalent first

Confirmed prices for the water-purifier and watch lines run roughly double to several times ordinary retail for comparable capability - buy the product only at a price you would pay knowing that.

A genuine 2017 Indian court win on the money-circulation question and fresh criminal arrests tied to the same franchisee in March 2026 are both true at once.
Scorecard

Nine dimensions, weighted

Comp structure & KoscotDoes the plan pay for recruitment or for sales to real customers?
20%
4.5
QNET’s plan is an ordinary retail/repeat-sales/step-commission MLM structure rather than a bare pay-for-recruitment scheme on paper: Retail Profit is earned on the margin between IR and retail price, Repeat Sales Commission is paid on Repeat Sales Points that accrue from actual repurchase activity up to ten paid levels deep, and Step Commission is calculated from a two-leg placement tree in cycles reported at US$1,250 plus 10 eVoucher Points per full six-step cycle. None of that is Koscot-style pay-for-recruiting in its written form. But the structure still gates ongoing earning behind a monthly (per some material, quarterly) Repeat Purchase Program requirement to stay "Active," and the rank ladder - IR through Bronze, Silver, Gold, Sapphire, Platinum, Diamond and Blue Diamond Star - concentrates the "up to 50% of sales" aggregate payout claim toward the top of that ladder, which is the typical MLM skew this dimension is built to catch. The score reflects a standard-shape MLM comp plan with autoship-gated qualification, not a uniquely predatory design and not a clean one either.
Securities exposureAny passive return on capital? Howey, staking, tokens, withdrawal friction.
15%
7.5
On the current, as-designed global compensation plan, Howey-type investment exposure is genuinely low: commissions are tied to actual product movement - repeat-sales points from real repurchases, retail markup, and rank-qualifying business volume - not to a promised rate of return on a static "position," and nothing in this research describes a QNET product marketed with a stated or implied payout independent of retail resale or personal use. That is why this dimension scores well above the floor rather than at zero. It is docked from a perfect 10 for two specific, evidence-based reasons that must both be said. First, QNET’s founding product line, GoldQuest gold coins (1998-early 2000s), was marketed as numismatic collectibles but was treated by multiple regulators at the time - Nepal and Bhutan in 2003, and Australia’s consumer-affairs office in a 2002 list of 61 alleged pyramid schemes - as functionally an investment/money-circulation vehicle rather than genuine collectibles retail. Second, the pattern has recurred well beyond that founding product: India, Nepal, Indonesia and Bhutan regulators have each, independently and across two decades, characterized field-level implementation of the model as investment- or money-circulation-like, even though the Karnataka High Court found in 2017 that the written plan does not meet India’s statutory money-circulation definition. Both things are true together - a clean paper design on capital exposure, and a real, repeated, cross-jurisdictional echo of investment-style framing at the point of sale.
Ownership & track recordWho runs it, what did they run before, and what happened to it.
15%
3.5
The founders are real, credentialed and publicly documented, and that should be said plainly: Vijay Eswaran holds a genuine LSE degree and a Southern Illinois University MBA, worked as an information-systems engineer including at IBM, has published books that legitimately sold in volume, and founded a real, government-partnered university (Quest International University) and an active philanthropic vehicle (the RYTHM Foundation). Joseph Bismark has no located adverse regulatory or criminal history at all. That track record earns real credit and keeps this score off the floor. It is held at 3.5 because founder Vijay Eswaran carries genuine personal legal exposure beyond the corporate entity: he was personally named in a February 2014 Indian Enforcement Directorate PMLA money-laundering case registration alongside QNet, Vihaan and Michael Ferreira, and he was separately the subject of a 2007 Interpol Red Notice and an approximately three-week Jakarta arrest and detention arising from a Philippine business dispute - later dismissed by a Manila court with no conviction. No conviction of either founder was found anywhere in this research; the score reflects the scale and recurrence of personal legal exposure a leader of this profile has accumulated, not a finding of guilt.
Product reality & demandWould a rational buyer purchase this if no income offer existed?
12%
6.0
The product line is real, diversified and shippable, and deserves credit before the price and claims problems are addressed. QNET sells home-care water purifiers co-branded with Kent, an established non-MLM Indian appliance manufacturer; Amezcua wellness/energy pendants and discs; Bernhard H. Mayer Swiss-branded watches and jewelry; personal-care and skincare lines; and QVI Club holiday products - a genuine multi-category retail catalog, not a recruitment-only shell. The company also sustains real, long-running, top-tier sports sponsorships (Manchester City FC since 2014, Manchester City Women’s FC since 2018, CAF competitions) - a level and duration of marketing investment inconsistent with a fly-by-night operation, and a real green flag in its own right. The deduction is for two things. First, confirmed pricing sits well above real-market equivalents for comparable capability (see ptv below). Second, the Amezcua wellness-energy line rests on "energy field" and bio-resonance-type claims with no mainstream clinical support, and no honest substitute product exists at any price for that specific category - the honest replacement is "$0, no purchase," which is itself informative about what is being sold.
Participant economicsReal cost in, realistic money out, and whether they publish the numbers.
10%
2.5
No confirmed, transparent starter-pack or entry-fee price could be located anywhere for QNET globally or in India specifically, despite extensive targeted searching - a real transparency failure for a prospective participant trying to know total cost before joining. On top of that unconfirmed entry cost, an ongoing monthly (or, per some material, quarterly) Repeat Purchase Program requirement must be maintained to stay commission-active, meaning continued personal spend, not a one-time purchase, is needed simply to keep earning. Building a defensible year-one cost from confirmed adjacent data points - a starter pack plus one flagship product used for personal demonstration (a $505 co-branded RO purifier or a $150-670 Amezcua item or a $700+ watch) plus several months of qualifying repurchase volume - plausibly runs into the low-to-mid four figures USD, and the report’s own component-built break-even scenarios (Section 11 below) skew negative for realistic participant profiles once ongoing qualification volume is included. The combination of an unknown entry price and a mandatory ongoing repurchase requirement is what drives this score toward the bottom of the scale.
Price-to-valueWhat the same capability costs on the open market.
8%
3.0
Confirmed retail prices sit far above real-vendor market equivalents for comparable capability. The KENT-QNET Smart Alkaline RO+UV+UF purifier runs roughly ₹42,230 (about US$505) including tax, against a real-market equivalent - a comparable non-QNET Kent Grand Plus RO+UV+UF unit sold at ordinary retail - priced at roughly ₹15,000-20,000 (about $180-240): more than double. The premium HomePure Nova purifier runs roughly ₹1,50,550 (about $1,800) against an A-brand alkaline RO unit at ordinary retail running roughly ₹25,000-35,000 (about $300-420). Bernhard H. Mayer watches at $700-3,500 sit well above a genuine Japanese automatic (a Seiko Presage or Orient Bambino, roughly $150-450) at the low end and a genuine Swiss automatic (a Tissot or Hamilton, roughly $500-1,200) even at the high end. The Amezcua energy-pendant line, priced at $150-670 per item, has no mainstream clinical or scientific basis for its "energy field" positioning at all, meaning there is no honest priced substitute - the real comparison is an ordinary stainless-steel or silver pendant with no health claim, at roughly $15-60.
Payout sustainabilityCan the company fund the plan out of margin, or only out of inflow?
8%
3.0
No income disclosure statement exists in the form this rubric looks for. What QNET actually publishes, across multiple country portals (qnet.net, qnetindia.in, qiportal.net, qnetindia.co), is a document titled "Earnings and Income Disclaimer" - a legal disclaimer stating that income examples are estimates with no guarantee and that testimonials reflect exceptional, non-typical results. It contains no average or median income figure, no percentage of IRs who are profit-positive, no active-versus-total-enrolled distinction, and no cohort or tenure breakdown. This is an affirmative finding after extensive targeted searching, not an assumption: repeated searches for a QNET income disclosure statement PDF returned no company-published statistical document. That absence is unusual for a company of QNET’s scale and its membership in good standing in the Direct Selling Associations of Malaysia, Singapore and the Philippines, whose parent body (the World Federation of Direct Selling Associations) generally encourages income-claim transparency through its Code of Ethics. The company’s own marketing claim of paying "up to 50% of sales" across its "8/10 Ways to Earn" is a maximum theoretical aggregate payout ratio across the whole compensation pool, not a guarantee to any individual, and it says nothing about how concentrated that payout is toward the top of the rank ladder.
Marketing conductIncome claims, regulator run-ins, hype, deadline stacking.
7%
3.0
QNET’s written Policies & Procedures and Social Media Policy are correctly drafted, standard-form MLM compliance guardrails: they explicitly prohibit income guarantees, "get rich quick" claims, portraying the business as an investment, and using internal commission documentation as marketing collateral, and they require distributors to identify themselves as independent, not employees. Credit belongs there - the right rules exist on paper. The score reflects a persistent, decade-plus, multi-jurisdiction gap between that written policy and field conduct. The Mumbai EOW’s original 2013 allegation described IRs selling "plastic and glass products" claimed to cure diseases including cancer; the Cyberabad/Hyderabad thread describes IRs cheating unemployed youth under false job-offer pretexts across cases running from 2016 through fresh March 2026 arrests. That is not one isolated bad actor - it is a recurring pattern, across different Indian states and over more than a decade, of exactly the income- and health-claim misconduct the written policy exists to prevent. The company’s policy is real; its enforcement in the field has not reliably held the line.
Operator terms & exitWho owns the customer, what you forfeit, how hard it is to leave.
5%
3.5
The two-tier corporate structure - a Hong Kong brand-owning parent licensing an independently incorporated national franchisee - is lawful international-franchise practice, and it is not, by itself, evidence of wrongdoing. But it genuinely complicates accountability in practice: even India’s own sophisticated institutions - the CCPA, the Enforcement Directorate, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs, and multiple state police forces (Maharashtra, Telangana, Karnataka) - have needed years of parallel, overlapping proceedings across at least four different bodies to pursue what is substantially the same underlying conduct. That coordination cost is a real consequence of the structure, regardless of the structure’s legality. A concrete instance: following a Registrar-of-Companies letter citing multiple pending criminal cases against Vihaan, both India Post and Blue Dart - mainstream national logistics providers - suspended courier service to the company, a genuine third-party commercial consequence rather than merely an allegation. That specific dispute was later litigated and resolved in Vihaan’s favor: a 13 March 2024 Karnataka High Court order (W.P. 7603/2024) is reported to have allowed India Post service to continue. Both facts belong in this score together - a real commercial consequence, and a real, later, favorable resolution of that one specific point.
Weighted composite
4.39
D

Dimension profile

Further from center is better. Hover any point.

Comp structure& Koscot 4.5 Securitiesexposure 7.5 Ownership &track record 3.5 Product reality& demand 6.0 Participanteconomics 2.5 Price-to-value 3.0 Payoutsustainability 3.0 Marketingconduct 3.0 Operator terms& exit 3.5

Hard caps that bind here

Cap at D (non-binding) the nine scored dimensions already reflect the severity of the enforcement record - largely through owner, mktg and terms - and the composite lands at D on its own arithmetic without any additional ceiling being applied. Nothing here is holding the grade down beyond what the numbers already carry.
What would force a binding cap below D in the future a criminal conviction of the corporate entity itself - QNET Ltd or Vihaan, as distinct from individual field agents (the Senegal convictions were of individual agents only, never the company) - a confirmed adverse NCLT winding-up order against Vihaan, or a confirmed CCPA finding of unfair trade practice arising from the December 2024 notice. Any of those would represent a step beyond what the current scorecard already prices in.
What the ceiling does NOT rest on not the 2003 or 2022 historical Nepal/Bhutan bans standing alone, not any single country’s action taken in isolation from the rest of the file, and not the unproven "operating under aliases" allegation reported by a single Bhutanese outlet (The Bhutanese) that could not be independently corroborated against a second source in this research.

The lowest binding cap wins, regardless of the weighted arithmetic.

Sources consulted

What we read

Every source below links to the document itself. Tier 1 is a primary record - the company’s own plan, policy or disclosure, a court filing, a regulator’s decision or an SEC filing. Tier 2 is a self-regulatory or secondary regulator record, tier 3 reporting or academic work, tier 4 an open-market price comparison. Where a document can be moved or withdrawn, an archived copy is linked beside it. If a link is dead when you try it, that is a correction we want.

  1. Criminal Petition No. 9308 of 2016 - QNET/Vihaan v. State of Karnataka (Karnataka High Court judgment text)
    Court recordTier 1Karnataka High Court (via Indian Kanoon) · 2017-02-24

    Justice Anand Byrareddy’s written judgment quashing chargesheet C.C. No. 23238/2016 against QNET/Vihaan, holding the direct-selling model does not meet the statutory definition of a "Money Circulation Scheme" or "Prize Chit" under the Prize Chits and Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act, 1978 - the single strongest legal win in this file, addressing one chargesheet under one statute.

    Not established by this document: Seen via a search-result citation to the case text on Indian Kanoon, not independently re-fetched and read in full in this research; full text nuance beyond the holding described here is unverified.

  2. Central Consumer Protection Authority issues notices to 17 direct-selling entities (press release reference)
    RegulatorTier 1Press Information Bureau, Government of India · 2024-12-13

    The CCPA’s own 13 December 2024 notice to 17 direct-selling entities including Vihaan Direct Selling (India) Pvt Ltd, described as "a sub-franchise of QNet Group, Hong Kong," for alleged unfair trade practices, service deficiencies and violations of the Consumer Protection (Direct Selling) Rules, 2021.

    Not established by this document: The full PDF/press-release text could not be directly fetched in this research; relied on secondary reporting of its contents. Vihaan’s specific status within the "13 under investigation / 3 replies awaited" split, and any resolution since, is unconfirmed.

  3. QNET Policies & Procedures (PDF)
    Policies & proceduresTier 1QNET Ltd · 2021-09

    QNET’s own written compliance framework: explicitly prohibits IRs from making income claims, using their own or others’ incomes as an indication of assured success, or representing the business as an investment or get-rich-quick scheme.

    Not established by this document: A country-portal-hosted copy referenced via search; a fully current global version was not independently re-verified.

  4. QNET Earnings and Income Disclaimer
    Company documentTier 1QNET Ltd · 2026

    Establishes the central payout-dimension finding of this report: the document at this URL is a legal disclaimer stating income examples are estimates with no guarantee and testimonials reflect exceptional results, not a statistical income disclosure statement - no average, median or percentage-profitable figure appears anywhere on it.

    Not established by this document: Page content confirmed via search-result summary of its text, not an independent full re-fetch; identical disclaimer pages exist on multiple country portals and were not each separately verified.

  5. Thiès Magistrates’ Court: seven presumed members of a QNET network convicted
    Court recordTier 1Seneweb · 2025

    Reports a Thiès, Senegal court convicting seven individuals of criminal conspiracy and fraud tied to QNET network marketing, sentencing each to six months’ imprisonment, suspended - the clearest confirmed individual criminal convictions of QNET-linked agents located in this research.

    Not established by this document: Seen as a news report of the court’s finding, not the court record itself; exact docket details are unconfirmed.

  6. QNET and Manchester City partnership page
    Company documentTier 1Manchester City Football Club · 2026

    Manchester City’s own partner page confirming QNET as Official Direct Selling Partner since 2014 and sleeve sponsor of Manchester City Women’s FC since 2018 - independent, first-party confirmation of the sponsorship green flag.

    Not established by this document: None material; the club’s own page is the primary confirmation of an ongoing commercial relationship.

  7. CAF announces QNET sponsorship of Total CAF Champions League and Total CAF Confederation Cup
    Company documentTier 1Confederation of African Football (CAF) · 2020

    CAF’s own announcement of a QNET sponsorship of its flagship club competitions, corroborating the sustained sports-sponsorship pattern beyond Manchester City alone.

    Not established by this document: Exact sponsorship term and value not stated in the located material.

  8. Supreme Court of India rules in favor of QNET
    ReportingTier 3Business For Home · 2017-04

    Reports the March 2017 Supreme Court stay of coercive action following the Karnataka HC quashing, and a further reported January 2019 no-coercive-action direction covering 60-plus pending FIRs - a procedural stay, not a merits ruling on those FIRs.

    Not established by this document: A trade/industry-adjacent outlet, not a court record; case numbers for the stay orders are not independently confirmed.

  9. QNET’s decade in Indian courts: Supreme Court stay, 2025 defamation victory
    ReportingTier 3Lawyer Herald · 2026-04-24

    Reports the 2 April 2024 Bangalore City Civil and Sessions Court interim injunction for Vihaan against a victims’-association group, and the 13 March 2024 Karnataka High Court order (W.P. 7603/2024) allowing India Post courier service to Vihaan to continue.

    Not established by this document: A legal-news aggregator; exact case numbers and full judgment text for both 2024 items are not independently confirmed beyond this single source.

  10. QNET EOW freezes Rs.45 crore in two bank accounts of the MLM
    ReportingTier 3Moneylife · 2013

    Reports the August 2013 Maharashtra Economic Offenses Wing cheating case alleging QNET sold disease-cure-claiming products and collected roughly ₹425 crore via a banned binary-pyramid model, with ₹45 crore frozen across two accounts.

    Not established by this document: No final trial verdict in this case was located anywhere in this research; status remains chargesheet-filed/bail-granted per the most recent confirmable reporting.

  11. QNET: Bombay HC asks five including Michael Ferreira and Suresh Thimiri to surrender
    ReportingTier 3Moneylife · 2016

    Reports the Bombay High Court, Division Bench, refusing relief on a petition to quash the FIR and ordering five named accused including Michael Ferreira to surrender in the Mumbai EOW ₹425-crore case.

    Not established by this document: Final disposition of the underlying case beyond bail/surrender orders is unconfirmed.

  12. Hyderabad: 32 arrested in QNET fraud case, police conduct raids across three states
    ReportingTier 3ETV Bharat · 2026-03-24

    Reports the March 2026 Hyderabad Police SIT arrest of 32 people across four new cases in coordinated raids across Telangana, Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka, charged under the Prize Chits and Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act - the most recent, and most significant, "current state" fact in this file.

    Not established by this document: None material to the arrest fact itself; any subsequent trial outcome postdates this research.

  13. 32 arrested in massive fraud case linked to QNET franchisee
    ReportingTier 3Newsable (Asianet News) · 2026-03

    A second independent outlet corroborating the March 2026 32-arrest, three-state raid described above.

    Not established by this document: Corroborating source only; no additional facts beyond the ETV Bharat report used.

  14. Hyderabad Cyberabad police commissioner says no stay orders on QNET probe
    ReportingTier 3Deccan Chronicle · 2019-02-26

    The Cyberabad police commissioner’s public statement that no stay orders blocked the QNET probe as of February 2019, implying continued investigative activity past the 2017 Supreme Court stay of specific named proceedings.

    Not established by this document: None material.

  15. QNET Enforcement Directorate registers case against the MLM
    ReportingTier 3Moneylife · 2014

    Reports the February 2014 ED PMLA case registration for an alleged ₹425 crore scam, naming "QNet, Vihaan Direct Selling, Ferreira and QNet founder Vijay Eswaran and three other independent representatives" - the source for Eswaran’s personal naming in a federal money-laundering case.

    Not established by this document: Investigation/registration stage only; no PMLA conviction confirmed anywhere in this research.

  16. QNET ED freezes 36 bank accounts connected to Vihaan Direct Selling in a money-laundering case
    ReportingTier 3Moneylife · 2023-01

    Reports January 2023 ED searches across Mumbai, Bengaluru and Chennai freezing 36 bank accounts holding more than ₹90 crore, connected to Vihaan - part of the cumulative ₹350 crore-plus preventive-seizure total cited in this report.

    Not established by this document: None material.

  17. QNET ED attaches assets worth Rs.150 crore of Gold Quest
    ReportingTier 3Moneylife · 2016

    Reports an ED asset attachment of ₹150 crore connected to "Gold Quest," QNET’s predecessor brand - a separate but connected preventive-seizure action contributing to the cumulative ED total cited in this report.

    Not established by this document: None material.

  18. QNET MCA files winding-up petition against Vihaan Direct Selling, initiates penal action
    RegulatorTier 1Moneylife · 2019-08

    Reports the Registrar of Companies (Karnataka) inspecting Vihaan’s books, finding indications of activity intended to dupe investors, and filing a Section 271 Companies Act winding-up petition before the NCLT Bengaluru bench, plus Look Out Circulars against twelve named individuals including Michael Ferreira.

    Not established by this document: Final NCLT order/outcome not located anywhere in this research; petition status as of September 2026 is unconfirmed.

  19. QNET: India Post and Blue Dart stop courier services to Vihaan Direct Selling after RoC letter
    ReportingTier 3Moneylife · 2019

    Reports both India Post and Blue Dart suspending courier/parcel services to Vihaan following the Registrar-of-Companies letter citing pending criminal cases - a real, material third-party commercial consequence separate from any court ruling.

    Not established by this document: None material; later resolved on this specific point per the March 2024 Karnataka HC order cited separately above.

  20. Over 100 nabbed over illegal network business
    ReportingTier 3The Kathmandu Post · 2017-06-13

    Reports Nepal’s Central Investigation Bureau raiding a QNET meeting, detaining 102 people and subsequently charging 14, with a reported joining fee of Rs 350,000 per member marketed via holiday-tour packages.

    Not established by this document: No confirmed final trial verdict for the 14 charged was located.

  21. OJK Satgas Waspada Investasi: QNET violates rules
    ReportingTier 3CNBC Indonesia · 2019-10-31

    Reports Indonesia’s Financial Services Authority (OJK) investment-alert task force publicly stating PT QNet violated its direct-selling permit terms and characterizing its operation as pyramid-style with unusually high promised returns.

    Not established by this document: An executive/regulatory designation, not a criminal court finding; company denial is on the record separately.

  22. OJK releases 182 illegal businesses, QNET one of them
    RegulatorTier 1Kumparan · 2019-11

    Reports OJK’s Satgas Waspada Investasi press release listing PT QN International Indonesia (QNet) among 182 illegal investment entities ordered to cease operations - the regulator’s own designation, reported via the news outlet.

    Not established by this document: Full OJK press-release text not independently re-fetched; relied on this outlet’s reporting of its contents.

  23. QNET denies conducting a bogus investment practice and using a Ponzi scheme
    Company documentTier 3Detik Finance · 2019

    QNET’s own on-the-record denial of the OJK characterisation - included here for fairness/balance alongside the Indonesian regulatory finding.

    Not established by this document: None material.

  24. Central Bank of Sri Lanka updated list of prohibited pyramid schemes includes QNET
    RegulatorTier 1Ada Derana · 2025-01-20

    Reports the Central Bank of Sri Lanka’s 20 January 2025 updated prohibited-pyramid-scheme list including QNET - a current, dated regulatory designation, not a criminal conviction.

    Not established by this document: Full CBSL list/notice text not independently re-fetched; relied on this outlet’s reporting.

  25. Many Bhutanese still losing millions to QNET despite the ban
    ReportingTier 3The Bhutanese · 2022

    Reports Bhutan’s Office of Consumer Protection naming "QNET, operated in Bhutan by Vihaan Direct Selling Pvt. Ltd., India" as a pyramid promotional scheme in a 26 August 2022 public notice, and describes continued losses despite the ban - one of the clearest instances of a foreign regulator naming Vihaan directly as the operator.

    Not established by this document: The article’s further claim that the scheme persisted under aliases ("E-commerce," "Bi Global," "Beyond Infiniti") is single-sourced to this outlet and could not be independently cross-verified; it is not treated as established fact in this report and is listed in unverified.

  26. QNET agent sentenced to prison, Thiès court
    Court recordTier 1Seneweb · 2025

    Reports a Thiès court convicting two QNET agents of defrauding a student, sentencing one to one year’s imprisonment and the other to six months suspended plus a fine - a second, separate Senegal conviction corroborating the individual-agent conviction pattern.

    Not established by this document: Seen as a news report of the court’s finding, not the court record itself.

  27. Scheme subverted curbs on Iran
    ReportingTier 3The Asian Age (via PressReader) · 2017-12-02

    Reports 30 members arrested in Iran, including 13 in Tehran, on charges of defrauding people of more than 5 trillion rials, in connection with GoldQuest/QNET-linked activity, with QNET disputing the characterisation.

    Not established by this document: Exact date of the underlying arrest episode is not clearly stated in the located reporting; no confirmed trial verdict was located.

  28. What is QI Group?
    Company documentTier 1QNET Ltd (India portal) · 2026

    QNET’s own description of QI Group as the multinational holding conglomerate founded in 1998, umbrella for direct selling, education, hospitality, luxury goods and retail.

    Not established by this document: Company-authored source; independent QI Group financial statements do not exist publicly.

  29. Vihaan Direct Selling (India) Private Limited company registry listing
    Corporate registryTier 2Tofler (Indian company-registry aggregator) · 2026

    Confirms Vihaan Direct Selling (India) Private Limited as a separately incorporated Karnataka-registered company (CIN U52399KA2011PTC060730), headquartered in Bengaluru - the primary registry-level confirmation of the two-entity structure this report treats as central.

    Not established by this document: A registry-aggregator listing, not the Ministry of Corporate Affairs’ own filing portal, though the CIN and registration details are of the kind such aggregators reproduce directly from official filings.

  30. Vijay Eswaran career profile
    ReportingTier 3Leaders Magazine · 2018-07

    Confirms Eswaran’s LSE degree (1984), Southern Illinois University MBA (1986), IBM information-systems engineering background, and the 1998 founding of GoldQuest/QNET and QI Group with Joseph Bismark.

    Not established by this document: None material.

  31. Direct Selling Association of Malaysia: QNET (M) Sdn Bhd member portfolio
    Self-regulatoryTier 2Direct Selling Association of Malaysia (DSAM) · 2026

    DSAM’s own membership listing for QNET (M) Sdn Bhd, member since 2010 - independent confirmation of the DSA-membership green flag.

    Not established by this document: None material.

  32. QNET launches new global compensation plan (Q10)
    Compensation planTier 1QNET Ltd (via Mynewsdesk press-release distribution) · 2015

    QNET’s own 2015 press release for the "Q10" plan launch, the source of the company’s own "up to 50% of sales" aggregate payout claim used in payoutSplit above.

    Not established by this document: A distributed press release, not the full compensation-plan document itself; per-SKU or per-rank commission distribution underlying the aggregate 50% figure is not disclosed here or elsewhere located.

Unable to verify

What we could not get

  • The current, exact global or India-specific QNET starter-pack/enrollment-fee price - not located despite multiple targeted searches; a material gap for any "true cost to join" figure.
  • Vihaan’s specific individual status within the December 2024 CCPA notice’s reported "13 under investigation / 3 replies awaited" split, and whether that notice has since been resolved, fined, or closed - no confirmed 2025/2026 resolution was located.
  • The final outcome of the Mumbai EOW ₹425-crore case - a chargesheet was filed and bail granted, but no confirmed final trial verdict (conviction or acquittal) was located anywhere in this research.
  • The final outcome or current status of the NCLT winding-up petition against Vihaan - the petition was confirmed filed (reported August 2019) but its resolution is unconfirmed.
  • The claim, from a single Bhutanese outlet (The Bhutanese), that QNET has continued operating in Bhutan after its ban under aliases including "E-commerce," "Bi Global" and "Beyond Infiniti" - this could not be cross-verified against a second independent source and is not treated as established fact in this report.
  • Reported regulatory actions or bans in Egypt, Rwanda, Sudan, Saudi Arabia, China, Turkey, Ghana and Afghanistan - sourced only to secondary aggregation or listicle-style content in this research, with no primary or near-primary institutional source identified for any of them.
  • Whether QNET/PT QN International Indonesia’s APLI (Indonesian direct-selling association) membership, once reportedly granted, survived the 2019 OJK Satgas regulatory action.
  • Exact current (2026) compensation-plan percentage tables, RSP-to-value thresholds and Group Business Volume minimums by rank - only partial or historical figures were retrievable, and current country-specific plan PDFs could not be directly fetched in this research.

Not advice

This is independent analysis for decision-making, not legal, financial or investment advice. Allegations reported by third parties should be verified against primary court and regulatory records before any decision.

Who writes this

Researched by Claude. Reviewed by an editor.

Every report is researched and written by Claude, Anthropic’s AI assistant, from the company’s own plan documents, policies, terms and regulatory file - then reviewed before publication by Rob Fore, who checks the sources and the stage-label on every allegation.

  • Nine weighted dimensions, published with their weights
  • The editor checks the evidence and cannot change the number - the build rejects any page whose grade does not reconcile to its own arithmetic
  • Every affiliate position we hold is disclosed on the report it touches
  • No company has paid for a grade, and no report carries an affiliate link
Read the About page

Looking at something else?

Enter any company name or website. If a report exists it opens instantly; if not, we start one.

Try:
Common questions

QNET - frequently asked

QIs QNET the same company as Vihaan Direct Selling?
No. QNET Ltd is the Hong Kong-incorporated parent brand and compensation-plan licensor; Vihaan Direct Selling (India) Private Limited is an independently incorporated Indian company that operates as QNET’s licensed sub-franchisee in India. Almost every India-specific criminal case, ED money-laundering action, and the December 2024 CCPA notice names Vihaan - sometimes alongside "QNet Ltd." as a co-named party, and in at least one federal case, founder Vijay Eswaran personally - not a differently branded local entity operating entirely apart from the parent.
QHas QNET ever been convicted of a crime?
No conviction of the corporate entity - QNET Ltd or Vihaan - was found in this research, in India or elsewhere. Individual QNET-linked field agents have been criminally convicted after trial in Senegal (Thiès court, multiple 2025 verdicts). Founder Vijay Eswaran was personally named in a 2014 Indian PMLA case registration and was arrested and released in Jakarta in 2007, with the underlying charge later dismissed by a Manila court, but has not been convicted per any source located here.
QDoes QNET publish an income disclosure statement?
No. QNET publishes an "Earnings and Income Disclaimer" - a legal disclaimer stating that income examples are not guaranteed and that testimonials reflect exceptional results - but no statistical disclosure with an average income, median income, or percentage of profitable participants was located despite extensive searching.
QIs the December 2024 India CCPA notice against QNET’s franchisee still open?
As of this report’s research date (September 2026), no confirmed public resolution - penalty, cease-and-desist order, or clearance - of the December 2024 CCPA notice against Vihaan was located. At the time of the notice, 13 of the 17 named entities were reported under active investigation with replies from 3 still awaited; Vihaan’s specific position within that split was not independently confirmed.
QHas any court ever ruled that QNET’s business model is legal?
Yes, at least once, substantively: the Karnataka High Court ruled in 2017 that QNET/Vihaan’s direct-selling model does not meet India’s statutory definition of a "Money Circulation Scheme" under the Prize Chits and Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act, 1978, and quashed a chargesheet on that basis. That is a genuine, on-the-merits ruling addressing one specific chargesheet under one statute - it has not stopped fresh criminal cases, including arrests as recently as March 2026, from being filed against the same India franchisee under the same Act by different police forces in different states.
Who wrote this report

Author, editor and publisher

C
Written by Claude AI
Reviewed by Rob Fore · Published by Listech Inc · September 14, 2026

This report was researched and written by Claude, Anthropic’s AI assistant, working from primary documents - QNET’s own compensation plan, its policies and procedures, its terms of service, its income disclosure statement where one exists, and its regulatory and self-regulatory file. It was scored against nine weighted dimensions that are published in full, with their weights, on the methodology page.

Before publication it was reviewed by Rob Fore, who checks every source link, every figure against the document it came from, and every allegation against its stage-label - an investigation is not a finding, a warning letter is not an enforcement action, and a filed claim is not a verdict.

The editor does not set the grade. The published score is the weighted composite of the nine dimension scores, and the build refuses to emit a page where the two disagree by more than 0.06. A grade moves when the evidence moves it and not otherwise.

Rob Fore has marketed online since 1996, wrote Online MLM Marketing (2014), and is CEO of Listech Inc, the Nevada corporation that publishes this site. He holds affiliate positions in companies graded here - including LiveGood, which this site grades D, SendOutCards, which it grades C−, and the Home Business Academy, which it grades B−. Those positions are disclosed on the reports they touch, and changed nothing on this page.

About the author and our conflicts  ·  Contact the editor  ·  Corrections: corrections@opportunitygrade.com

Stay with it

Tell me if this grade changes

QNET is graded D as of September 14, 2026. Grades move when the evidence moves - a new income disclosure, a regulatory action, a rewritten compensation plan. Leave your address and you will get one email if this one does.

One email when the grade moves, and nothing else. We will never use your address to promote an income opportunity of any kind, we do not sell, rent or share the list, and it is stored on our own infrastructure rather than with any company graded here. Unsubscribe removes everything.

Right of reply

Corrections

Every factual claim on this page is sourced, and the ones we could not stand up are named in the unable to verify list above. If something here is wrong, we want to know, and we would rather hear it from QNET than from a reader.

Write to corrections@opportunitygrade.com. Point at the specific sentence and send the document that contradicts it - a plan document, a filing, an income disclosure, a policy page. We will check it against the primary source, correct the page if it is wrong, and say in the report that it was corrected and when. A grade moves if the evidence moves it.

This address reaches a person, not a form. We do not require a takedown demand, an NDA or a lawyer to accept a correction, and we do not remove a report because a company disputes its conclusion - only because the underlying facts turn out to be wrong.

Other published reports

Every report is written to stand alone. Graded on the same nine weighted dimensions and the same six legal tests. Twelve of 107, spread across the grade bands.

See all 107 published reports →