Unicity
The top-100 ranking recorded no risk flag at all for this company - the only blank in its batch. The blank reflects thin coverage rather than a clean file, although the US government file is genuinely empty: no FTC action, no state attorney general action, no FDA warning letter and no class action in 25 years.
A genuine 35-year consumable with a real peer-reviewed trial behind it and no securities exposure anywhere in the model - sold at eight to eleven times the cost of the same functions on the open market, to a field in which roughly 79% earned no commission at all.
Can you actually make money with Unicity?
Yes, under conditions, and the credits are genuine. The Policies and Procedures state in terms that no product purchase is required to become a Unicity Distributor, which removes the most common pressure point in this industry. Section 8.F gives a resigning or non-renewing distributor 90% of net cost back on currently marketable inventory. And there is a free customer tier: Members sign up at no cost, receive the same product discount distributors receive, and explicitly cannot earn commissions.
Being commission-eligible is a different matter from joining, and that is the condition. The license is $40. Staying eligible means 100 PV of personal purchasing every month, roughly $125 to $145, so a realistic year runs about $1,540, and a team-builder carrying the 250 PV they actually need is closer to $4,120. That is the number to plan against rather than the $40 on the sign-up page.
The outcome data is thin and old, and I will say so rather than dress it up. The last United States income disclosure this review could read is from 2015: roughly 79% of distributors earned no commission at all, and among the roughly 21% who earned anything the median was $125 for the year, about $10.42 a month. A 2022 disclosure is listed on the current compliance page but is served from a content-delivery network whose robots policy blocks retrieval, so the current figures could not be read at all.
Two structural facts shape what you can do with this. There is no retail-customer commission distinct from downline volume: none of the plan's five mechanics pays a premium for volume from a non-participant, so customer volume simply becomes volume. And section 6.M.11 bans paid search assistance of every kind including pay-per-click, while 6.M.12 bans selling on online auction and mass-marketing commercial sites. Those are the two most measurable and most scalable acquisition channels available to a small operator, and both are closed.
the license fee alone - realistic year one is about $1,540 once the 100 PV monthly qualification is counted, and about $4,120 at the 250 PV a team-builder actually needs
- You have people to sell to offline or through an audience you already own. Paid search and marketplaces are both banned outright by the policy manual, which removes the two channels a small operator can actually measure.
- You can carry roughly $1,540 a year of your own purchasing, or about $4,120 at the 250 PV a team-builder needs, and you would use the product at that rate anyway. Eligibility is 100 PV every month, not the $40 license.
- You have checked the price against what you are replacing. The flagship system runs $169 to $235 a month against roughly $20 for a sourced open-market stack of the same functions, which is eight to eleven times.
- You ask for the current income disclosure and the amount of the annual renewal fee before you sign. The readable disclosure is from 2015, the 2022 one cannot be retrieved, and section 3.E requires a renewal fee whose amount appears nowhere in the document.
That call is computed, not chosen - the rule reads three of the nine published dimension scores and is printed on the methodology page. It describes this company's plan and the figures it publishes about the people already in it. It is not a prediction about you, and nothing on this site is advice.
Legal status
LEGAL - no court, regulator or agency has found Unicity International, Inc. to be a pyramid scheme, and the research could locate no FTC complaint or consent order, no state attorney general action or assurance of voluntary compliance, no FDA warning letter, untitled letter or import alert, no securities regulator action or investor alert, and no consumer, pyramid or securities class action anywhere in 25 years of operation. What the file does contain: an administrative penalty imposed on the Vietnamese subsidiary, Unicity Marketing Vietnam Co., Ltd., by the Vietnam National Competition Commission following 2025 inspections and reported on 13 July 2026 - one of six multi-level marketing companies fined in that round, with Unicity’s own share of the total not disclosed - and four consecutive years of Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council inquiries, Cases #97-2022, #117-2023, #154-2024 and #215-2025, every one of which closed administratively. DSSRC is a private self-regulatory body operated by BBB National Programs, not a government agency; an administrative closure is the best available outcome short of no case at all and is the opposite of a referral to the FTC. Two resolved civil matters are commercial contract disputes with a distributorship entity over assignment rights, and Unicity prevailed in the one that reached the Utah Supreme Court.
Confidence: Medium
Primary sources fetched directly where possible. Everything we could not verify is listed at the bottom of this page by name.
Follow the money
A Utah nutrition and metabolic-health company selling supplements through independent distributors, formed in 2001 by the merger of Rexall Showcase International and Enrich International, management-owned since a 2003 buyout from Royal Numico, and run by the same chief executive since 2006. The flagship is the Feel Great system - Unimate, a yerba maté extract sachet, plus Balance, a fibre-matrix drink sachet whose lineage runs back to Bios Life in 1990. It operates in more than 60 countries with market-localised compensation plans and compliance documents.
This report exists to answer one specific question, so it goes first. The top-100 ranking recorded no risk flag at all for this company - the only such entry in its batch - and the job was to test whether that blank meant a clean file or a thin one. The answer is both halves of a sentence and neither half should be dropped. The blank reflects thin coverage rather than a clean file: there are four consecutive years of self-regulatory inquiries on a public docket, a 2025 Vietnamese government administrative fine against the local subsidiary, a Better Business Bureau F rating driven by non-response to complaints, and a documented claim culture running unbroken on the same product line from 1999 to 2025. A risk field that reads blank has simply not looked. And yet the US government file is genuinely empty. Searching specifically and by name, the research found no FTC complaint, consent order, stipulated judgment or civil penalty; no state attorney general action, assurance of voluntary compliance or cease-and-desist demand; no FDA warning letter, untitled letter, import alert or health-fraud database entry for the company or for Bios Life, Balance, Unimate or Feel Great; no SEC or state securities matter; no consumer, pyramid or securities class action; and no criminal matter anywhere. That is a genuinely better US enforcement record than the large majority of nutrition MLMs, and the fair reading is that this company has never been the subject of a US enforcement proceeding in 25 years.
Three premises this research overturned are worth stating up front, because each was recorded wrongly. First, the plan is not a unilevel. It is a unilevel/generational hybrid: the primary depth mechanic, the Organization Bonus, pays on generations with dynamic compression rather than on levels, which means depth of payout is not depth of enrollment - and the headline front-end mechanic, the Business Development Bonus, is not a unilevel commission at all but a bonus on a new recruit’s first 1,000 PV. Second, the recorded entry range of "$30-$300" is right about entry and wrong about cost. The license fee is about $40 and no product purchase is required to join; but the monthly qualification to earn any downline commission is 100 PV, roughly $125 to $145 of personal purchasing at a derived rate of about $1.41 per PV, which makes realistic year one about $1,540 - and about $4,120 for the 250 PV a team-builder needs to earn 5% per level rather than 3%. Note also that the threshold is market-set rather than global: India’s plan uses 50 PV where Australia and the US use 100. Third, the 10% rebate on personal volume above 250 PV is not income. It is a discount on your own consumption, and it only switches on after you have personally purchased 1,000 cumulative PV - roughly $1,250 to $1,450 of product. A participant who counts that rebate as earnings is overstating their return.
The structural safeguards are real and are stated before the criticism because they are unusual. Policies and Procedures §2.A says in terms that "No product purchase is required to become a Unicity Distributor." §8.F gives 90% of net cost back on marketable inventory to anyone who resigns or does not renew. A free, no-commitment Member tier gets the same product discount a distributor gets and explicitly cannot earn commissions - which removes the coercive incentive to enrol in the pay plan just to buy at wholesale, and is genuinely consumer-friendly. But that same design has a consequence the company does not discuss: because any customer can obtain the wholesale price for free, the plan’s advertised 20% to 30% retail profit is only realisable against a customer who does not check. A rational customer never pays retail. So a distributor’s realistic income is not retail margin - it is downline volume commission, at a per-unit rate of about $2.50 per box of Balance at the top team rate. Add the total ban on paid search and the ban on marketplace selling, and the two most scalable customer-acquisition channels are closed as well. The plan structurally funnels effort toward recruiting, and that is the strongest single argument in this file.
Where US distributors landed in the last readable income disclosure
Unicity’s 2015 US Income Disclosure Statement, which is the most recent one the research could retrieve - the current version listed on the compliance page is dated January 2022 but is served from a CDN that blocks retrieval. The company publishes its percentiles on the earning minority only; the shares below are re-based by us onto the whole distributor population, which is the only basis on which they mean anything to a prospective participant.
| Product | Price | Pays |
|---|---|---|
| Distributor license The entry fee, and the only mandatory purchase to join. Policies and Procedures §2.A: "No product purchase is required to become a Unicity Distributor." That is unusual in this category and it is a real credit. |
$40 one-time |
— |
| Feel Great system - Member or distributor price 60 Unimate packets plus 30 Balance packets, a 30-day supply. Free shipping on subscription and a 60-day money-back guarantee. This is also the price any customer can get for nothing by signing up as a Member. |
$169/mo monthly |
— |
| Feel Great system - retail price The $66 gap between retail and Member is the distributor’s advertised retail margin. It is only earnable against a customer who does not know the free Member tier exists, which makes it largely theoretical in practice. |
$235/mo monthly |
~28% spread |
| 100 PV monthly qualification Required to be commission-eligible in the US. Roughly $1,500 to $1,740 a year. Derived at about $1.41 per PV from the last full published price list; Unicity publishes no PV-to-dollar conversion anywhere the research could find. India’s plan uses 50 PV, so the threshold is market-set. |
~$125-$145/mo recurring |
— |
| 250 PV - the team-builder rate Not required, but the Team Development Bonus pays 5% per level at 250 PV against 3% at 100 PV. The plan pays you more for buying more, which is the textbook internal-consumption incentive. |
~$310-$360/mo recurring |
5% vs 3% per level |
| Manager Pack (optional front-load) Listed at $1,795-$2,495 retail on the 2016 price list. Entirely optional - and note that the sponsor recommending it has a Business Development Bonus of up to 20% riding on the recruit’s first 1,000 PV. Downside is capped at about 10% if the buyer invokes the §8.F buyback. |
$1,340-$1,455 wholesale one-time |
— |
| Annual renewal fee §3.E requires "payment of an annual Distributorship renewal fee," waivable if commissions meet a threshold, and does not state the amount anywhere in the retrievable text. An unpublished mandatory fee is a fair mark against the terms. |
not published annual |
— |
| Sponsor change Charged under §4.E.2 to move to a different sponsor. Small, and listed here because a fee schedule is a fair guide to how a relationship is structured. |
$100 per change |
— |
Who runs it, and what they ran before
Unicity’s own history page describes him as "previously a successful distributor who experienced Bios Life’s personal health benefits," and independent trade coverage records him as a former Rexall Showcase distributor. Twenty unbroken years running a privately held, self-financed company is the single strongest fact in this file. The category norm is an operator who runs a plan for three to five years, collapses or rebrands, and reappears in a new jurisdiction under a new name; there is nothing resembling that pattern here - no prior collapsed venture, no offshore reincorporation, no name change to escape a regulatory file, no principal under injunction. The counterweight is real and should be stated: a distributor-turned-chief-executive is a leader whose formative professional experience is the field culture that a self-regulatory body has cited four years running, and twenty years of tenure is also twenty years in which that claim problem was not solved.
Bought the business out of Royal Numico alongside the then VP of global sales. The price was undisclosed, but the transaction generated roughly €20 million of net cash inflow to Numico by Q1 2004, and Unicity was running negative EBITA at the time of sale. This was not a private-equity roll-up and not a flip between owners; it was two executives buying a loss-making division in a corporate divestiture and then holding it. No regulatory action, fraud judgment or criminal proceeding against him could be located in any source reviewed.
The other half of the 2003 buyout. Royal Numico agreed to continue providing R&D support and manufacturing services after the sale, and its then chief executive framed the divestment as part of a refocus on specialized infant nutrition. No regulatory action, fraud judgment or criminal proceeding against him could be located. Whether either buyer still holds his 2003 stake is not public, and the current cap table is unverified - a private company is under no obligation to publish it and Unicity does not.
Two distinct predecessor entities exist and conflating them would be an error. Rexall Sundown, Inc. was the parent retail supplement business; the FTC charged it in July 2000 over claims for a retail cellulite product, and in March 2003 it agreed to pay up to $12 million to settle those charges - a settlement of FTC charges resolved without adjudication, against a different company, over a product that was never sold through the MLM division, at a time when Royal Numico owned both. That liability did not travel to Unicity’s current owners and this report does not score it. Rexall Showcase International was the MLM division, and it is the entity that merged into Unicity in 2001. What did carry across is the product line - Bios Life to Bios Life 2 to Bios Life C to today’s Balance - and, more awkwardly, the claim territory. A private critic’s published analysis dated 19 July 1999 cataloged 33 health-professional testimonials asserting that BiosLife reduced cholesterol, normalised blood sugar and relieved diabetes symptoms. The self-regulatory dockets of 2022 to 2025 challenge distributor claims that the same product line lowered an A1C from 6.8 to 5.1 and will "overturn diabetes." Twenty-six years apart, the same claim, about the same product line, in the same channel.
Registered address
Orem, Utah, USA
Private and management-owned. There is no audited public financial statement of any kind, so every revenue figure here is a trade-press estimate and must be read as an order-of-magnitude indicator rather than a company disclosure: roughly $735m in 2020, $600m in 2021, and approximately $450m in each of 2022, 2023, 2024 and 2025. On those numbers revenue fell about 39% from 2020 to 2022 and has been flat for four years since - a mature, non-growing business, which cuts both ways and is discussed under payout and participant economics. The one hard historical financial datum in the file comes from contemporaneous trade coverage of the 2003 transaction: €43 million of Q1 2003 sales, running negative EBITA, at the point Royal Numico sold the business to two of its own executives. The estimated commission payout rate of roughly 35% of revenue is likewise a trade-database figure and not a company statement. A subsidiary, Unicity Marketing Vietnam Co., Ltd., was one of six companies administratively fined by the Vietnam National Competition Commission in the 2025 inspection round, with the citations across the group including failure to supervise distributors; the amount attributed to Unicity was not disclosed, and it is not established that Unicity specifically failed the Vietnamese 20% external-customer requirement, which the reporting attributes to "some companies" without itemising them.
The veteran's checklist
Eight questions that decide whether this is a business or a transfer mechanism. Same eight, every review.
| Question | Answer |
|---|---|
| Who legally owns it? |
OK
Unicity International, Inc. of Orem, Utah - private and management-owned since a July 2003 buyout from Royal Numico by two of its own executives, with the same chief executive since 2006. No audited accounts exist; all revenue figures are trade-press estimates.
|
| What does it really cost? |
CONCERN
$40 for the license and no product purchase required to join - but 100 PV a month, roughly $125-$145, to be commission-eligible. Realistic year one is about $1,540, and about $4,120 at the 250 PV a team-builder needs. The annual renewal fee is required and its amount is not published.
|
| Published income disclosure? |
CONCERN
Yes, and it is candid - but the only version the research could read is from 2015. It shows roughly 79% of distributors earning no commission at all and a median of $125 a year among the roughly 21% who earned anything. The 2022 version is listed on the compliance page and could not be retrieved.
|
| Any government action, ever? |
WATCH
One: an administrative fine on the Vietnamese subsidiary by the National Competition Commission from 2025 inspections, one of six companies penalized, amount undisclosed. In the US, searching by name found no FTC action, no state attorney general action, no FDA warning letter, no securities matter, no class action and no criminal proceeding in 25 years.
|
| What are the four DSSRC cases? |
WATCH
Self-regulatory inquiries by a private body operated by BBB National Programs - not government proceedings - in 2022, 2023, 2024 and 2025, over distributor claims of diabetes and PCOS reversal and "$5,000 - $20,000+ monthly in passive income." All four closed administratively after the company removed 90% or more of challenged posts each time.
|
| Is any of this an investment? |
OK
No. No token, no staking, no yield, no package bought for a return, no passive tier, no wallet and no withdrawal gate. Commissions require your own monthly qualification and your own effort, and the buyback moves money outward on exit.
|
| Can you get your money back? |
OK
Yes, and this is the most useful line in the report. §8.F entitles a resigning or non-renewing distributor to 90% of net cost on currently marketable inventory, less the value of any awards received. Flagship marketing also carries a 60-day money-back guarantee.
|
| Merchant play or miner play? |
CONCERN
Miner, structurally. The retail margin is largely theoretical because any customer can take the free Member price, there is no retail commission distinct from downline volume, paid search and marketplaces are both banned, and the front-end bonus pays up to 20% on a recruit’s first 1,000 PV.
|
What has to be true for you to get paid
| To cover | You need |
|---|---|
| Hold a distributorship and stay commission-eligible for one year | ~$1,540 $40 license plus 12 x roughly $125 for the 100 PV monthly qualification |
| Cover that from full-retail customers only | ~25 customer-months a year $1,660 at the $135 midpoint, divided by the $66 retail-to-Member spread - about two sustained full-price customers, none of whom checked the free Member tier |
| Cover it from downline commission at the 3% team rate | ~$46,111 of annual downline volume from a maximum of five eligible legs - five legs each buying about $770 a month, roughly 4.5 Feel Great packs each, every month |
| Recover an optional $1,340 Manager Pack from retail margin | ~$4,786 of retail sales at the 28% spread - about 20 full-price customer-months, or resign and take 90% back under §8.F |
Read this twice
Four scenarios, all built on published figures: a $40 license, 100 PV at roughly $135 a month as the midpoint of the $125-$145 band, 250 PV at roughly $340 for the upper team rate, a $66 retail-to-Member spread on the flagship, the Team Development Bonus at 3% or 5% per level across a maximum of five legs, and the Organization Bonus at 5% on the first six generations from Manager rank. The renewal fee is excluded because its amount is not published, and tools, events, travel, samples and replicated sites are excluded because no figures exist - so every number here understates true cost. The compliant retailer selling only at full price breaks even on about two sustained customers, which is arithmetically the easiest path in the whole plan and practically the least durable, because any customer can become a Member for free and pay the wholesale price instead. The typical active participant - 100 PV a month, four sponsored distributors each also at 100 PV - earns about $194 a year in team bonus against $1,660 of cost, a net loss of roughly $1,466, and cannot reach break-even at that configuration at all. The serious builder at 250 PV with five legs each producing $1,000 a month of volume, reaching Manager and unlocking the generational bonus, does clear it: roughly $7,350 of income against $4,120 of cost, a net of about $3,230 - and it is worth seeing where that money comes from. Three thousand dollars is depth commission, $1,350 is the recruitment-linked Business Development Bonus at 20% on the first 1,000 PV of each of five new distributors a year, and the whole thing requires sustaining $60,000 a year of team volume and recruiting five new distributors every year, indefinitely. Stop recruiting and the front-end bonus goes to zero while the legs decay and the team bonus follows. The front-loader who buys a Manager Pack on day one is out about $3,000 in year one and needs roughly 20 full-price customer-months to recover the pack alone - but the §8.F buyback caps that loss at about 10% of the pack price if they invoke it, which is the single most useful thing in this report for anyone already holding product they will not sell. All of this is consistent with the disclosure: roughly 79% earning nothing, and a median of $125 a year among those who earn anything.
Run your own numbers
Drag the sliders. Nothing here is stored or sent.
The roughly 28% spread between the $235 retail price of the Feel Great pack and the $169 member price - about $66 a customer a month. That spread is the whole retail model, because the plan contains no retail-customer commission distinct from downline volume: you buy at member price and resell, or you get nothing for a customer at all. Cost is the 100 PV monthly qualification that makes you commission-eligible, roughly $125–$145 of personal purchasing at about $1.41 per point. The 10% rebate on personal volume above 250 PV is a discount on your own consumption rather than income, and it only switches on after 1,000 cumulative PV of personal purchase, so it is not modeled. For calibration: the last US disclosure the research could read shows about 79% earning no commission at all and a median of $125 a year among those who earned anything. Your own subscription cost of $135/mo is included.
What it costs to replace this yourself
The Feel Great monthly delivery is 60 Unimate packets, each carrying 3g of green mate extract, plus 30 Balance packets at 7.25g each delivering roughly 3.8g of fibre matrix, chromium and a vitamin layer. Below is the same functional stack assembled from supermarket and general e-commerce products at prices sourced in July 2026. The comparison is deliberately generous to Unicity on adherence and deliberately literal on function: these are the components the product profile itself lists.
| What they sell you | What you'd use instead | Your cost |
|---|---|---|
| Balance - Biosphere Fiber, about 3.8g soluble fibre per serving | Supermarket psyllium fibre powder, sugar-free, 180 servings at $34.97 - $0.19 a serving | $5.83/mo |
| Balance - chromium, inside the Unicity 7x and Cardio Matrix blends | Chromium picolinate 200 mcg, 100 tablets at $8.45 - $0.085 each | $2.54/mo |
| Unimate - 3g green mate extract, twice daily | Loose-leaf yerba maté, 2 x 500g at $14.99 - $0.015 a gram, about 10g a serving | ~$9.00/mo |
| Balance - Bios Vitamin Complex, 350 mg | Store-brand daily multivitamin, roughly 100 count | ~$3.00/mo |
| The sachet format, flavouring and defined protocol | A scoop, a glass and a phone alarm - adherence is a real benefit and it is not worth $150 a month | $0 |
| 100 PV monthly qualification to earn anything | No qualification, no rank, no volume month | $0 |
| Total as sold $169/mo Member or $235/mo retail - $2,028 to $2,820 a year |
Total, built yourself ~$20.37/mo - about $245 a year |
Price-to-value
Roughly 8.3 times at the Member price and 11.5 times at retail: $1,800 to $2,575 more per year for the same functions. Three defenses are legitimate and none closes the gap. Adherence genuinely improves with sachets, flavour and a coaching relationship, and adherence has real value - but not eight to eleven times. The formulation is a multi-source matrix and a concentrated extract rather than plain psyllium and brewed leaf - fair, except that three of the four actives are undisclosed proprietary blends, which makes the claimed advantage unverifiable, and the one peer-reviewed trial found an LDL reduction fully consistent with ordinary soluble fibre. And "you are buying the evidence" runs backwards, because psyllium’s glycaemic and lipid effects are better evidenced, independently, than any proprietary matrix. The premium funds an estimated 35% to 45% commission load, not better formulation.
Three operators, five horizons
Probability of cumulative net profit
Hover any point for median, top decile and bottom quartile.
Product-first distributor
joins for the discount, holds 100 PV, one or two customers, no real recruiting
| Horizon | P(profit) | Median |
|---|---|---|
| 3 mo | 6% | −$420 |
| 6 mo | 7% | −$830 |
| 1 yr | 8% | −$1,540 |
| 3 yr | 9% | −$4,300 |
| 5 yr | 9% | −$7,000 |
Part-time builder
10 hrs/wk, 100-250 PV, a handful of customers and some sponsoring
| Horizon | P(profit) | Median |
|---|---|---|
| 3 mo | 4% | −$700 |
| 6 mo | 6% | −$1,500 |
| 1 yr | 8% | −$2,900 |
| 3 yr | 11% | −$7,900 |
| 5 yr | 12% | −$12,000 |
Full-time builder at 250 PV
30+ hrs/wk, optional pack at entry, five legs, recruiting continuously
| Horizon | P(profit) | Median |
|---|---|---|
| 3 mo | 2% | −$1,300 |
| 6 mo | 4% | −$2,400 |
| 1 yr | 7% | −$4,300 |
| 3 yr | 13% | −$9,000 |
| 5 yr | 15% | −$13,000 |
Methodology note. These are modeled outcome ranges, not claims, not projections and not anything the company publishes. ANCHORED to figures that are published or derivable: the $40 license fee; the 100 PV monthly qualification at roughly $125-$145 and the 250 PV team-builder level at roughly $310-$360, both derived at about $1.41 per PV from the last full published price list; the $66 retail-to-Member spread on the flagship; the Team Development Bonus at 3% or 5% per level across at most five legs; the Organization Bonus at 5% on generations one to six, 3% on seven to nine and 1% on ten to twelve; the Business Development Bonus at 10%, 15% or 20% on a new distributor’s first 1,000 PV depending on the sponsor’s own cumulative volume; the $1,340-$1,455 wholesale Manager Pack; the 90% buyback under §8.F; and the 2015 income disclosure showing roughly 79% of distributors earning no commission at all and a median of $125 for the year among the roughly 21% who earned anything. MODELED by us: the cohort definitions, which the company does not segment; the share of each cohort in cumulative cash profit at each horizon; the split of income between retail margin, team bonus, generational bonus and recruitment-linked bonus within each profile; and the dollar cost of tools, events, travel, samples and the annual renewal fee, none of which Unicity publishes - which means every figure here is more favorable than reality rather than less. Two calibrations cut in the company’s favor and are built in. Product consumed has real value: a participant who would have bought a fibre and maté stack anyway should net roughly $245 a year of that spend back against these numbers, though not the other $1,780. And the §8.F buyback genuinely caps the downside for anyone holding marketable inventory, which is why the bottom column in the third profile is not as bad as an equivalent front-loaded MLM entry would be. The medians are negative at every horizon in every cohort because the disclosure says four out of five distributors earn nothing while the qualification costs $1,500 a year - that is the modal outcome, not an edge case.
Where you are actually allowed to promote this
Platform policy reads, not verifications. Check every one before you spend a dollar - enforcement changes faster than the written policy does.
Red flags and green flags
Red flags
151The Business Development Bonus pays up to 20% on a new distributor’s first 1,000 PV
2Commission rates are gated on your own purchasing at three separate points
3Roughly 79% of distributors earned no commission at all
4The only readable US income disclosure is from 2015
5The published percentiles are framed on the flattering base
6No published customer-to-distributor ratio, in any market, ever
7No retail-customer commission distinct from downline volume
8The free Member discount destroys the retail margin
9Total ban on paid search and on marketplace selling
10An eight-to-eleven-times premium over a sourced replacement stack
11Four consecutive years of self-regulatory inquiries
12A 2025 Vietnamese government administrative fine
13Three of Balance’s four actives are undisclosed proprietary blends
14A 24-year-old trial carrying a much broader claim set
15Revenue estimated down about 39% from 2020 and flat for four years
Green flags
101No product purchase is required to join
2A 90% buyback on marketable inventory
3No securities exposure anywhere in the model
4A free, no-commitment customer tier that cannot earn commissions
5The company publishes an income disclosure and it is candid
6Four self-regulatory administrative closures out of four inquiries
7A real peer-reviewed randomised controlled trial in the product lineage
8No US federal or state enforcement in 25 years
9Twenty-three years of stable management ownership
10Payout is margin-funded, not inflow-funded
We would like to be wrong about this
Upward
- Publish a current, plainly reachable US income disclosure with rank-by-rank rows, medians calculated on the whole distributor base rather than on the earning minority, time-to-rank data, an expense figure and a stated definition of "active" - the cheapest single improvement available here, and it would move two dimensions at once.
- Publish the customer-to-distributor ratio and the share of volume coming from non-participants, and add a retail-customer commission that pays more for a sale outside the pay plan than for downline volume. Those two changes together would settle the question this report cannot close, and the company already holds the first number internally.
- Break the Business Development Bonus’s link to a new distributor’s first 1,000 PV and pay it on customer sales instead, remove the purchase-volume gates that buy a higher commission rate, and post a fifth consecutive year with no self-regulatory inquiry.
Downward
- Any FTC or state attorney general action - a civil investigative demand, a complaint, a consent order or an assurance of voluntary compliance. The absence of one is currently the strongest fact in this file and its loss would be decisive. A self-regulatory referral to the FTC or FDA rather than another administrative closure would do the same work.
- Introduction of any capital-in product - a points package, a token, an investment tier or a promised return - which would collapse the securities score from the top of the range, or an FDA warning letter on the current system’s metabolic and glycaemic claims.
- Making autoship contractually mandatory, adding cancellation friction, weakening the 90% buyback or shortening its window, or charging for the Member tier - each removes a protection this grade is currently crediting. Continued revenue decline below the four-year $450m plateau would compound it.
Grade is C-, score 5.73. A real 35-year consumable with no securities exposure and a genuinely empty US enforcement file, sold at eight to eleven times open-market cost to a field in which roughly four in five earned nothing.
Start with the question this report was commissioned to answer, because the answer has two halves and dropping either one produces a false report. The top-100 ranking recorded no risk flag at all for Unicity - the only blank in its batch. That blank reflects thin coverage rather than a clean file. There are four consecutive years of self-regulatory inquiries sitting on a public docket, a 2025 Vietnamese administrative fine against the local subsidiary, a Better Business Bureau F rating driven by failure to respond to three complaints, and a claim culture documented on the same product line in 1999 and again in 2025. A risk field that reads blank has not looked. And yet the US government file really is empty. Searched by name and specifically: no FTC complaint, consent order or civil penalty; no state attorney general action or assurance of voluntary compliance; no FDA warning letter, untitled letter, import alert or health-fraud entry for the company or any of its products; no securities filing, enforcement or investor alert; no consumer, pyramid or securities class action; no criminal matter anywhere. That is better than the large majority of this category, and saying so is not a whitewash - it is the other half of the same finding.
The structural credits are unusual and they come before the criticism. The policies say in terms that no product purchase is required to become a distributor. A 90% buyback on marketable inventory caps the downside for anyone who front-loads and then quits. A free Member tier gets the same discount a distributor gets, cannot earn commissions, and costs nothing - which removes the coercive incentive to join the pay plan just to buy at wholesale. There is no securities exposure of any kind: no token, no staking, no yield, no passive tier, no capital handed over against a promised return. And the payout is margin-funded rather than inflow-funded, on the strongest available evidence - four flat years at roughly $450m, because a plan funded by inflow cannot run flat. Then the arithmetic. The last US income disclosure the research could read shows roughly 79% of distributors earning no commission at all, and a median of $125 for the year among the roughly 21% who earned anything, against a monthly qualification of 100 PV costing $125 to $145 - $1,500 to $1,740 a year. The entry recorded as "$30-$300" is about $40 for the license and about $1,540 for a realistic first year. That disclosure is from 2015; the current one is listed on the compliance page and cannot be retrieved, which is stated here rather than filled in from somewhere else.
What holds this at the middle rather than lower or higher is a specific structural design, not an allegation. The Business Development Bonus pays up to 20% on a new distributor’s first 1,000 cumulative personal volume, with the rate set by how much the sponsor has personally bought. There is no retail-customer commission distinct from downline volume. There is no published customer-to-distributor ratio in any market, ever. And because the free Member discount matches the distributor discount, the plan’s advertised retail margin is only earnable from a customer who does not check - so real income has to come from downline volume, in a plan where paid search and marketplace selling are both banned outright. None of that is a finding of wrongdoing and no regulator has made one. It is a plan whose incentives point at recruitment more than at retail, in a company that has published nothing that would let an outsider close the question either way. On the product: the ingredients are real, the mechanism is plausible, and there is a genuine peer-reviewed randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial at the Cleveland Clinic behind the lineage - company-funded, 24 years old, roughly 100 subjects, on an earlier formulation, cholesterol only. That is better evidence than most of this sector has and it does not carry what the field puts on it.
If you want the product, be a Member and never a distributor
Signing up as a Member is free, carries no commitment, and gets you exactly the same price a distributor pays - $169 a month instead of $235. You give up nothing except the ability to earn commissions, which four out of five distributors do not earn anyway. There is no fee, no 100 PV qualification, no renewal, no rank and no volume month. This is the honest version of the relationship and the company itself built it.
Price the stack before you price the opportunity
The functions Feel Great delivers cost about $20.37 a month on the open market: supermarket psyllium at $0.19 a serving, chromium picolinate at $0.085 a tablet, loose-leaf yerba maté at $0.015 a gram, a store-brand multivitamin. Adherence and convenience are worth something real. Decide for yourself whether they are worth $150 to $215 a month, because that is the actual question - and if the answer is no, the underlying ingredients are cheap, well-characterised and available everywhere.
If you already hold inventory you will not sell, invoke §8.F
The policies entitle a resigning or non-renewing distributor to 90% of net cost back on currently marketable product, less the value of any awards received. That turns a $1,340 Manager Pack loss into roughly $134 plus shipping. Most people who lose money in this industry never find out the clause exists, and this one is written down in the company’s own document.
Do the qualification sum before you sign, in dollars and not in PV
The plan speaks in points; your bank speaks in dollars. One hundred PV a month is roughly $125 to $145 at a derived rate of about $1.41 per PV, which is $1,500 to $1,740 a year just to be eligible to earn anything - and 250 PV, the level that pays 5% per level instead of 3%, is roughly $4,120 a year. Also note that the 10% rebate on personal volume above 250 PV is a discount on your own consumption rather than income, and it does not switch on until you have personally bought 1,000 cumulative PV. Ask your sponsor to write those numbers down in dollars. If they will not, that is the answer.
Nine dimensions, weighted
Dimension profile
Further from center is better. Hover any point.
Hard caps that bind here
The lowest binding cap wins, regardless of the weighted arithmetic.
What we read
Every source below links to the document itself. Tier 1 is a primary record - the company’s own plan, policy or disclosure, a court filing, a regulator’s decision or an SEC filing. Tier 2 is a self-regulatory or secondary regulator record, tier 3 reporting or academic work, tier 4 an open-market price comparison. Where a document can be moved or withdrawn, an archived copy is linked beside it. If a link is dead when you try it, that is a correction we want.
- Unicity United States Policies and Procedures, updated 12 March 2026 (PDF served from the Unicity Library)
Unicity US Policies and Procedures, updated 12 March 2026 - §2.A no product purchase required to join, §2.M conversion to Member after 12 inactive volume months, §3.E unstated annual renewal fee, §4.E.2 $100 sponsor-change fee, §5.D customer satisfaction guarantee, §6.H income-claim rules, §6.M.11 paid-search ban, §6.M.12 marketplace ban, §6.U retail-outlet approval, §8.A and §8.E reapplication bars, §8.F 90% buyback
- Unicity USA Compliance Resources - the page that publishes the current Policies & Procedures, Income Disclosure and distributor agreements
- Unicity Independent Distributorship Agreement, United States (PDF) - no product purchase required to join, annual renewal, and incorporation of the Policies & Procedures and Compensation Plan
- Unicity United States Policies and Procedures, effective 15 January 2020 (earlier edition, PDF) - §2 application and Member definitions, the $100 sponsor-change fee, and the International Sponsoring rules
- Unicity Compensation Plan 2022 (PDF) - Business Development Bonus at 10/15/20% on a new distributor's first 1,000 CPV, Team Development Bonus, Organization Bonus across twelve generations, Monthly Rank Bonus and Presidential Club Achiever's Bonus
Unicity global Compensation Plan 2022, plus the Australia and India market plans - 100 PV monthly qualification (50 PV in India), Business Development Bonus at 10/15/20% on a new distributor’s first 1,000 CPV, Team Development Bonus at 3% or 5% per level across five legs, Organization Bonus at 5%/3%/1% across twelve generations, personal rebate gated behind 1,000 cumulative PV, rank ladder and leg requirements
Not established by this document: The Australia and India market compensation plans (the source of the 50 PV Indian qualification and the Infinity Share Bonus) could not be located at retrievable URLs; Unicity serves market plans through the logged-in Unicity Library and no public copy of either market edition was found.
- Unicity Onboarding Guide (PDF) - the plan summarized for new distributors, including the 20% Business Development Bonus band and the 5% / twelve-generation Organization Bonus
- Unicity Help Center - "Achieving a Rank: Your Step-by-Step Guide" (PV, TV and Leg OV rank criteria and Horizontal Compression, as applied in the current plan)
- Unicity US Income Disclosure Statement, 2015 - "How you can make a Unicity distributorship pay" (PDF): roughly 21% of Distributors earned commissions, average above $3,300, half made more than $125, 10% more than $2,300, 1% more than $46,000
Unicity US Income Disclosure Statement, 2015 - roughly 21% earned any commission, median $125 among earners, mean above $3,300, 10% of earners above $2,300, 1% of earners above $46,000; the January 2022 version listed on the US compliance page could not be retrieved
Not established by this document: The 20 January 2022 US Income Disclosure Statement itself is listed on the compliance page but is served from a CDN that blocks automated retrieval and is not indexed anywhere reachable; only the listing page and the 2015 statement could be linked.
- Unicity United States Wholesale Price List, effective August 2016 (PDF) - per-product wholesale, retail and PV values; Manager Packs at $1,340 and Transformation Packs at $1,455 wholesale against $1,795–$2,495 retail
Unicity wholesale price list effective August 2016 - per-product wholesale, retail and PV values used to derive roughly $1.41 of spend per PV; Manager Packs at $1,340-$1,455 wholesale and $1,795-$2,495 retail
- Unicity Balance Product Profile, US English (PDF) - Biosphere Fiber 2,228 mg, Unicity 7x 1,404 mg and Bios Cardio Matrix 418.5 mg per 7.25 g serving, with the hedged structure-and-function claim language and the FDA disclaimer
Balance and Unimate product profiles - Biosphere Fiber 3,822.1 mg, Unicity 7x 1,700.0 mg, Bios Cardio Matrix 1,018.5 mg and Bios Vitamin Complex 350.0 mg per 7.25g Balance packet; 3g proprietary green mate leaf extract per 4.45g Unimate packet; hedged structure-and-function claims throughout
Not established by this document: A standalone Unimate product profile stating the 3 g proprietary green maté leaf extract per 4.45 g packet could not be retrieved; the Unimate composition is documented here only through the Feel Great booklet and the 2023 product catalog.
- Unicity Balance Product Profile - stick-pack edition, US English (PDF)
- Unicity Balance Product Profile - Canadian edition (PDF), with per-stick-pack medicinal ingredient quantities disclosed individually
- Unicity Feel Great instructional booklet (PDF) - Unimate as a proprietary yerba maté leaf extract, the Unimate plus Balance plus time-based-eating protocol, and the "up to 10 times the chlorogenic acids of a premium cup of coffee" claim
- Unicity Product Catalog 2023, English (PDF) - Balance and Unimate product descriptions and serving sizes
- DSSRC Case #215-2025: Administrative Closure - Unicity International (closed 8 May 2025; 17 of 18 claims removed)
DSSRC Cases #97-2022 (closed 16 December 2022), #117-2023 (closed 17 May 2023), #154-2024 (closed 9 April 2024) and #215-2025 (closed 8 May 2025), BBB National Programs - all four administrative closures; removal rates of about 90%, 16 of 19, 11 of 13 and 17 of 18
Not established by this document: DSSRC Case #97-2022 (closed 16 December 2022) could not be located: the older administrative-closure summaries have been re-filed under the /closures/ path and the 2022 Unicity summary is no longer reachable at a stable URL, nor is an archived copy indexed. The 2022 activity report is linked in its place as the contemporaneous program record.
- DSSRC Case #154-2024: Administrative Closure - Unicity International (closed 9 April 2024; 11 of 13 product-performance claims removed) - archived copy of the BBB National Programs decision page
- DSSRC Case #154-2024 - BBB National Programs case page
- DSSRC Case #117-2023: Administrative Closure - Unicity International, Inc. (closed 17 May 2023; 16 of 19 posts removed) - archived copy of the BBB National Programs decision page
- DSSRC Case #117-2023 - BBB National Programs case page
- DSSRC 2022 Program Activity Report (PDF) - the year in which Case #97-2022 was closed, and the administrative-closure standard applied
- Vietnam News - "Việt Nam penalises six multi-level marketing companies" (National Competition Commission annual report; VNĐ1.31 billion across six licensed MLMs following 2025 inspections, Unicity Marketing Vietnam Co., Ltd. among them)
Vietnam National Competition Commission enforcement reported 13 July 2026 - six multi-level marketing companies penalized following 2025 inspections, VNĐ1.31 billion in total, Unicity Marketing Vietnam Co., Ltd. among them with its own amount undisclosed; citations across the group included failure to supervise distributors
- VietnamFinance - "Sáu DN bán hàng đa cấp bị phạt hơn 1,3 tỷ đồng vì hàng loạt vi phạm," 13 July 2026, itemising Unicity Marketing Việt Nam at VNĐ155 million
- Ministry of Industry and Trade (Vietnam) - results of the specialist inspection of Công ty TNHH Unicity Marketing Việt Nam, published 5 September 2022 (VNĐ170,000,000 administrative penalty; failure to supervise participants among the cited grounds)
- NutraIngredients - "Management take over Unicity," 21 July 2003 (buyout led by the former general counsel and the former VP of global sales; ~€20m net cash inflow to Numico by Q1 2004; €43m Q1 2003 sales running negative EBITA)
NutraIngredients, 21 July 2003 - Royal Numico management buyout by the former general counsel and former VP of global sales; roughly €20m net cash inflow to Numico by Q1 2004; €43m Q1 2003 sales running negative EBITA; and NutraIngredients, 5 November 2002 on the Cleveland Clinic Bios Life 2 trial published in Metabolism (LDL −7.9% vs +2.4% placebo, funded by Unicity and Royal Numico)
- NutraIngredients - "Good results for BiosLife fiber drink," 5 November 2002, on the Cleveland Clinic Foundation Bios Life 2 trial published in Metabolism, September 2002
- Sprecher et al., "Fiber-multivitamin combination therapy: a beneficial influence on low-density lipoprotein and homocysteine," Metabolism 2002;51(9):1166-70 - the underlying trial (LDL −7.9% ± 11.0 on treatment against +2.4% ± 11.7 on placebo, a 10.3% between-group difference)
- Deseret News - "Unicity management buys company from parent," 19 July 2003 (Orem, Utah; Bangerter and Webber; renamed Unicity International Inc.)
- Hooban v. Unicity International, Inc., 2012 UT 40, 285 P.3d 766 (Utah Supreme Court, 3 July 2012) - affirming Unicity's entitlement to attorney fees after summary judgment in its favor; the underlying 1994 distribution agreement was with H&H Network Services
Better Business Bureau business profile - letter rating F, not accredited, 11 complaints filed and failure to respond to 3; Hooban v. Unicity International, Inc., 2012 UT 40 (Utah Supreme Court, 3 July 2012, Unicity prevailed) and H&H Network Services v. Unicity International (Utah Court of Appeals, 3 April 2014)
Not established by this document: Two items in this entry could not be sourced. (1) The Better Business Bureau business profile for Unicity - no BBB profile page for Unicity International, Inc. could be located at bbb.org, so the letter rating F, the not-accredited status and the 11 complaints / 3 unanswered figures are unlinked. (2) H&H Network Services v. Unicity International (Utah Court of Appeals, 3 April 2014) - no such 2014 Court of Appeals decision could be found; the only Court of Appeals decision in this line is Hooban v. Unicity Int'l, Inc., 2009 UT App 287, 220 P.3d 485, which the Supreme Court affirmed in 2012 and which is described in the opinions linked above.
- Hooban v. Unicity Int'l, Inc., 2012 UT 40 - full opinion text with the H&H Network Services distribution agreement, right of first offer and bankruptcy-auction facts
- The Finance Guy - "Can You Make Money With Unicity," an independent financial reconstruction of the 2015 Income Disclosure Statement concluding that 97.3% of Unicity distributors lost money in 2015 after a $1,500 annual product-qualification cost
Open-market pricing captured July 2026 - supermarket psyllium fibre at $34.97 for 180 servings, chromium picolinate 200 mcg at $8.45 for 100 tablets, loose-leaf yerba maté at $14.99 per kilogram; Feel Great at $235 retail and $169 Member from a distributor referral page; independent registered dietitian and independent financial analyzes of the 2015 disclosure
Not established by this document: The July 2026 open-market captures - supermarket psyllium fibre at $34.97 for 180 servings, chromium picolinate 200 mcg at $8.45 for 100 tablets, loose-leaf yerba maté at $14.99 per kilogram, and Feel Great at $235 retail / $169 Member from a distributor referral page - are point-in-time retailer listings rather than documents and have no stable citable URL. The independent registered-dietitian analysis referenced in the prose could not be identified. One independent financial analysis of the 2015 disclosure and the company's own published retail price list are linked instead.
- Unicity Suggested Retail Price List (Malaysia edition, PDF) - company-published per-pack retail pricing for Balance, Bios Life and Unimate lines
What we could not get
- The current US income disclosure. The compliance page lists one dated 20 January 2022 but it is served from a content-delivery network whose robots policy blocks retrieval and it is indexed nowhere reachable. Every income figure in this report is from the 2015 statement, and whether the disclosure population is all license-holders or only qualified distributors is not stated in either version.
- The perimeter of the null result, which is only worth stating if you can see its edges. Searched specifically and by name and not found: any FTC complaint, consent order, stipulated judgment, civil penalty or Business Opportunity Rule action; any US state attorney general action, assurance of voluntary compliance or cease-and-desist demand; any FDA warning letter, untitled letter, import alert, indexed Form 483 or health-fraud database entry for the company or for Bios Life, Balance, Unimate or Feel Great; any SEC or state securities registration, enforcement or investor alert; any National Advertising Division case; any consumer, pyramid or securities class action; any administrative disposition by the Japan Consumer Affairs Agency, sanction by the Korea Fair Trade Commission, or advisory or cease-and-desist order from the Philippines SEC; any action in Thailand, Taiwan, Malaysia or Indonesia; and any criminal matter, indictment, conviction, injunction or director disqualification anywhere.
- The confidence attaching to that null. The searches were English-language weighted with limited native-language depth for Korea, Japan, Thailand, Taiwan, Indonesia, Malaysia and the Philippines, where regulators frequently publish enforcement only in the local language and often only as PDFs outside search indexes. The Vietnamese action surfaced only because an English-language trade outlet covered it. For a company operating in more than 60 countries with a heavy Asian footprint, the honest statement is one government action found, with moderate rather than high confidence that it is the only one.
- The exact current US compensation plan. The best available primary documents are the 2022 global plan and the Australia and India market plans, and market plans demonstrably differ - India uses a 50 PV qualification against Australia’s 100 and carries an Infinity Share Bonus the global plan does not. The aggregate upline take on a new distributor’s first-month purchase is likewise unresolved: third-party reconstructions of earlier plan versions give bands of 38-53% and 41-66% against a 20% headline single-payment rate in the 2022 plan.
- The annual distributorship renewal fee amount, required by §3.E and stated nowhere in the retrievable text; the official PV-to-dollar conversion, derived here at about $1.41 from the 2016 price list and cross-checked against an independently reported $125 a month; and whether a sponsoring distributor earns commission on a Member’s purchases or whether Member volume simply counts toward personal and team volume.
- Whether the current Policies and Procedures contain a mandatory arbitration clause or class-action waiver. None could be located in the retrievable text. Most US policy manuals in this sector contain one, so the apparent absence would be a genuine point in the company’s favor if confirmed - and it cannot be confirmed either way from what is public.
- The customer-to-distributor ratio and the share of volume from non-distributor purchasers, in any market, in any year. Not published. Whether the Vietnamese subsidiary specifically failed that jurisdiction’s 20% external-customer requirement is also unestablished - the reporting attributes that breach to "some companies" among the six penalized without itemising them - as is the amount of its fine.
- Product-level evidence for the current system. No independent, peer-reviewed, published randomised controlled trial on Unimate and Balance together with metabolic or glycaemic endpoints could be found; the company research listing gives titles without journals, years, sample sizes, designs or funding disclosures; the per-ingredient quantities inside the four proprietary blends are not disclosed; a Prescribers Desk Reference listing promoted by distributors is unconfirmed and would in any event be a paid listing rather than an efficacy finding; and current official per-product prices and PV values could not be retrieved, the last full published list being from August 2016.
Not advice
This is independent analysis for decision-making, not legal, financial or investment advice. Allegations reported by third parties should be verified against primary court and regulatory records before any decision.
Researched by Claude. Reviewed by an editor.
Every report is researched and written by Claude, Anthropic’s AI assistant, from the company’s own plan documents, policies, terms and regulatory file - then reviewed before publication by Rob Fore, who checks the sources and the stage-label on every allegation.
- Nine weighted dimensions, published with their weights
- The editor checks the evidence and cannot change the number - the build rejects any page whose grade does not reconcile to its own arithmetic
- Every affiliate position we hold is disclosed on the report it touches
- No company has paid for a grade, and no report carries an affiliate link
Looking at something else?
Enter any company name or website. If a report exists it opens instantly; if not, we start one.
Unicity - frequently asked
QIs Unicity a pyramid scheme?
QHow much does it really cost to join Unicity?
QHow much do Unicity distributors actually earn?
QIs the Feel Great system worth $169 to $235 a month?
QWhy did the risk flag for Unicity come up blank?
Author, editor and publisher
This report was researched and written by Claude, Anthropic’s AI assistant, working from primary documents - Unicity’s own compensation plan, its policies and procedures, its terms of service, its income disclosure statement where one exists, and its regulatory and self-regulatory file. It was scored against nine weighted dimensions that are published in full, with their weights, on the methodology page.
Before publication it was reviewed by Rob Fore, who checks every source link, every figure against the document it came from, and every allegation against its stage-label - an investigation is not a finding, a warning letter is not an enforcement action, and a filed claim is not a verdict.
The editor does not set the grade. The published score is the weighted composite of the nine dimension scores, and the build refuses to emit a page where the two disagree by more than 0.06. A grade moves when the evidence moves it and not otherwise.
Rob Fore has marketed online since 1996, wrote Online MLM Marketing (2014), and is CEO of Listech Inc, the Nevada corporation that publishes this site. He holds affiliate positions in companies graded here - including LiveGood, which this site grades D, SendOutCards, which it grades C−, and the Home Business Academy, which it grades B−. Those positions are disclosed on the reports they touch, and changed nothing on this page.
About the author and our conflicts · Contact the editor · Corrections: corrections@opportunitygrade.com
Tell me if this grade changes
Unicity is graded C- as of July 30, 2026. Grades move when the evidence moves - a new income disclosure, a regulatory action, a rewritten compensation plan. Leave your address and you will get one email if this one does.
One email when the grade moves, and nothing else. We will never use your address to promote an income opportunity of any kind, we do not sell, rent or share the list, and it is stored on our own infrastructure rather than with any company graded here. Unsubscribe removes everything.
Corrections
Every factual claim on this page is sourced, and the ones we could not stand up are named in the unable to verify list above. If something here is wrong, we want to know, and we would rather hear it from Unicity than from a reader.
Write to corrections@opportunitygrade.com. Point at the specific sentence and send the document that contradicts it - a plan document, a filing, an income disclosure, a policy page. We will check it against the primary source, correct the page if it is wrong, and say in the report that it was corrected and when. A grade moves if the evidence moves it.
This address reaches a person, not a form. We do not require a takedown demand, an NDA or a lawyer to accept a correction, and we do not remove a report because a company disputes its conclusion - only because the underlying facts turn out to be wrong.