All reviews
Home / Reviews / MAKE Wellness
Peptide supplements · Unilevel MLM

MAKE Wellness (Upper Level Health, LLC)

The peptide branding is the hook and the regulatory scare - but the actual actives are oral plant and yeast hydrolysates that carry no unapproved-drug exposure. The problem is $1,200 a year of subscription against a median of $86.82.

Reviewed July 28, 2026 Founded Prelaunch August-November 2024 · trading entity business start date 23 April 2024 Confidence: Medium
DGRADE
4.7/10
Weighted composite

SAFER THAN IT SOUNDS, STILL UNDERWATER

Free to join, no injectables, no scheduled compounds and a real buyback - attached to a subscription that costs fourteen times what the typical affiliate earns.

The question you came with

Can you actually make money with MAKE Wellness?

NO No - not on the numbers this company publishes

No, and the company's own disclosure is where that lands. Median annual earnings for the 93.458% of affiliates below Leader rank was $86.82. Some 44.29% were paid nothing at all in 2025, the year the company reported $102 million of revenue, and only 6.54% ever reach Leader, the rank at which the plan starts paying meaningfully. Set that beside the $100 a month that unlocks the product credits the plan is built around, and the ratio at the median is roughly fourteen dollars out for one back.

The retail-looking part of the plan does not require a retail sale. There is a $1,500 customer-volume gate, which reads like a safeguard, but orders placed by enrolled Direct Affiliates count identically to orders placed by customers, so every customer-flavoured requirement can be satisfied inside the network. A meaningful share of what is paid also arrives as store credit rather than cash: the $100 monthly subscription unlocks up to $200 of credit, redeemable only against more product.

Now the part that cuts against the headline, and it matters. The peptide branding invites an unapproved-drug conclusion and the products do not support it. Every SKU is oral, sachet or capsule or gummy, and every active is a plant or yeast peptide hydrolysate. None of the compounds on FDA's 503A Category 2 list appears in any formula. Entry is genuinely free with no kit and no tool fee, unopened resalable product comes back at 90% within twelve months, paid advertising is banned outright, and no regulator has acted against the company.

What it costs to be in
$0

genuinely free to enrol - but $100/month of personal subscription unlocks the product credits the plan is built around

What would have to change
  • A customer-volume gate that customers have to satisfy. While orders from enrolled Direct Affiliates count the same as orders from customers, the $1,500 requirement measures nothing that reaches a non-participant.
  • Compensation paid in money rather than in credit against more product. Store credit buys more of what an affiliate is already buying; it does not pay a bill and it never leaves the ecosystem.
  • A compensation plan that stops moving. It has been rewritten four times in eighteen months and the launch-era bonuses have expired, so nobody who joined on the original slides is operating under the economics they were shown.
  • A median that clears the subscription. The company publishes $86.82 below Leader rank against $1,200 a year, and it deserves credit for publishing it, but that is the number this file turns on.

That call is computed, not chosen - the rule reads three of the nine published dimension scores and is printed on the methodology page. It describes this company's plan and the figures it publishes about the people already in it. It is not a prediction about you, and nothing on this site is advice.

$86.82
Median annual earnings below Leader rank
the 93.458% of affiliates who never reach it
44.29%
Affiliates who earned $0 in 2025
the company’s own published figure
$1,200/yr
Subscription to unlock product credits
$100 a month, paid in credit not cash
0
Category 2 or scheduled peptides in any product
every active is an oral plant or yeast hydrolysate

Legal status

LEGAL - no FTC action, state attorney general action, consent order, FDA warning letter, import alert or class action against the company or the trading entity could be located. The file contains one self-regulatory earnings-claim case (DSSRC #204-2025, closed 20 March 2025) which the company resolved by removing every challenged claim. Separately, litigation between the founders and their former employer was filed in Utah in October 2023 with no located disposition; that is a dispute between private parties, not a regulatory matter.

Confidence: Medium

Primary sources fetched directly where possible. Everything we could not verify is listed at the bottom of this page by name.

What this actually is

Follow the money

A Utah company selling oral peptide-branded supplements through independent affiliates on a shallow five-generation unilevel plan, launched in late 2024 by a founding team recruited almost entirely from one previous direct-selling company.

Deal with the peptide question first, because it is the reason most people arrive at this page and the honest answer is not the alarming one. Every product in the range is taken by mouth - sachets, capsules and gummies - and the actives are peptide hydrolysates derived from fava beans and brewer’s yeast, including a patented branded ingredient supplied by a named ingredient company, with self-affirmed GRAS status and a dose matching the published clinical work. None of the compounds on FDA’s Category 2 bulk-substances list appear anywhere in the range, and none of the research-chemical peptides that attract enforcement attention appear either. There is no injectable, no scheduled substance and no unapproved-new-drug exposure. That finding cuts strongly in the company’s favor and it is worth being unambiguous about it.

The compensation structure is also, by the standards of this site, restrained. Five generations of unilevel at 1% to 8%, no binary, no matching bonus, no infinity pool, and a genuine $1,500 customer-volume gate before an affiliate’s own purchases count toward qualification. Entry is free and it is really free - no kit, no enrollment fee, no mandatory website charge. There is a 90% buyback on unopened product within twelve months and a three-day cooling-off period. Paid advertising is banned outright, which is a real control on the claim inflation that generates most of this industry’s regulator files.

Then read the disclosure the company publishes itself. Some 93.458% of affiliates never reach Leader rank, and the median annual earnings of that group is $86.82. Just over 44% earned nothing at all in 2025. Against that sits the $100-a-month personal subscription required to unlock the product credits the plan is built around - $1,200 a year - and a structure in which a meaningful share of what is earned arrives as store credit rather than cash. The single defect that ties the plan back to the category norm is quieter: enrolled Direct Affiliate orders count identically to customer orders, so every retail-flavoured requirement can be satisfied without one sale ever reaching a non-participant.

Where affiliates landed in 2025

MAKE Wellness’s own published earnings disclosure. Percentages of all affiliates; earnings are gross, before the expenses the disclosure itself lists.

44% 49%
Earned nothing at all (44.29%)Earned something but never reached Leader - median $86.82 (49.17%)Reached Leader rank or above (6.54%)
ProductPricePays
Affiliate enrollment
Genuinely free: no kit, no enrollment fee, no mandatory website or tool charge in the policies. During the 2024 prelaunch a personal purchase was originally required; that condition was withdrawn after public criticism.
$0
Personal subscription to unlock credits
The functional cost of the business - $1,200 a year. It is not required to remain an affiliate; it is required to be eligible for up to $200 a month of product credit, which is scrip rather than cash.
$100+/mo
recurring
CALM
Was $49.99 in November 2024 - a 20% increase inside eighteen months of launch.
$59.99
per 30 servings
unilevel 1-8%
HYDRATED
Was $49.99. The cheapest entry to the range.
$54.99
per 30 servings
unilevel 1-8%
FOCUSED
Was $59.99 - up 16.7%.
$69.99
per 30 servings
unilevel 1-8%
ENERGIZED
Was $79.99. Marketed as a jitter-free stimulant alternative.
$89.99
per 30 servings
unilevel 1-8%
LEAN
Was $89.99. The weight-adjacent SKU, and the one most likely to attract claim problems in the field.
$99.99
per 30 servings
unilevel 1-8%
FIT
Was $119.99. Carries the patented fava-bean hydrolysate at a stated 2.4g dose matching the published clinical work on that ingredient - the strongest evidence position in the range.
$129.99
per 30 servings
unilevel 1-8%
Background check

Who runs it, and what they ran before

JP
Justin Prince
Founder

A top field leader at his previous direct-selling company, from which he was terminated on 12 October 2023. That company then sued him and his holding entity in the Fourth District Court of Utah, alleging a deliberate effort to solicit its salesforce and use its proprietary information to build a competitor; he had sued first, claiming he was instructed to distribute the material at issue. No disposition of either action could be located, and no allegation in either has been proven. His former company collapsed on 12 April 2025 with no notice to its distributors and its remains were sold within six weeks - MAKE Wellness’s early field was drawn substantially from that same population.

JS
Justin Serra
Co-founder and Chief Executive Officer

Senior vice president of global sales and marketing at the same former employer, terminated on the same day as Prince and named in its complaint as a co-conspirator rather than as a defendant. As with Prince, nothing has been proven and no outcome could be located.

TH
Truman Hunt
Executive Chairman of the Board

Chief executive of a large listed direct-selling company from 2003 to December 2016. During that tenure the company settled a securities class action for $47 million arising from allegations that it operated an illegal pyramid scheme in China, was fined by Chinese authorities in 2014, and in September 2016 paid $765,688 to the SEC - disgorgement, interest and a civil penalty - to resolve books-and-records and internal-controls charges arising from a donation made to a charity connected to a senior official after a Chinese regulatory investigation. The company neither admitted nor denied the SEC findings. No action was brought against Hunt personally.

TW
Tyler Whitehead and Dr. Mark R. Bartlett
Co-founder / Chief Scientific Officer

Whitehead is a former chief executive of one large direct-selling brand and a former president of another, with board roles at industry trade bodies. Bartlett spent roughly thirty years in nutritional science at two established supplement companies. The team is genuinely experienced - that is the honest read, and it cuts both ways. They know how to build a nine-figure direct-selling business in eighteen months, and their collective résumé also includes a company that vanished overnight and a company that paid $47 million over pyramid allegations abroad.

Registered address

Utah, USA
The trading entity is Upper Level Health, LLC, a Utah limited liability company. Public records are thin and partly inconsistent - the BBB profile describes the business as an S corporation while the entity name is an LLC, and no Utah filing number could be confirmed. No audited accounts exist. The 2025 revenue figure of roughly $102 million is a company statement corroborated by a trade ranking; the widely repeated $20 million figure for 2024, which makes the growth story, is a third-party estimate rather than a reported number.

Compensation plan

What has to be true for you to get paid

To coverYou need
Hold an affiliate account $0
no enrollment fee, no kit, no mandatory tool charge
Be eligible for product credits $100/mo
personal subscription order = $1,200 a year
Open the unilevel $1,500 customer volume
though enrolled Direct Affiliate orders count the same as customer orders
Cover the $1,200 subscription from commissions ~14x the median outcome
against $86.82 median annual earnings below Leader rank

Read this twice

The honest framing of this business is that its cost structure is better than the category and its outcomes are not. Entry is genuinely $0 - no kit, no fee, no mandatory website - and there is no contractual monthly quota to remain an affiliate. Everything hinges on one voluntary decision: whether to run the $100-a-month personal subscription that makes you eligible for up to $200 a month of product credit. That framing is deliberately attractive, and it deserves two pieces of scrutiny. The first is that the credit is scrip. It buys more product; it does not pay rent, and it does not appear in a bank account. The second is the disclosure. MAKE Wellness publishes the number itself: the median annual earnings of the 93.458% of affiliates below Leader rank is $86.82, and 44.29% earned nothing at all. Against $1,200 of subscription, the median participant is running roughly fourteen dollars out for every dollar in, before shipping, events or anything else - and the disclosure explicitly lists those expenses as not deducted. There is a real caveat in the company’s favor: this is a purchase, not a fee, and someone who would take the supplements regardless is only paying the price premium rather than the whole sum. But the $1,500 customer-volume gate has a hole in it - orders from enrolled Direct Affiliates count identically to orders from customers - so the requirement that reads like a retail safeguard can be satisfied entirely inside the network.

Run your own numbers

Drag the sliders. Nothing here is stored or sent.

-
Cumulative net, after costs
Retained retained subscription customers -
Commission that month -
Total commissions earned -
Total you paid in -
Net -

About 20% on a customer spending roughly $90/month. Cost is the $100 personal subscription that unlocks product credits - it is not required to hold an account, so set it aside mentally if you stay on the free tier. Paid advertising is banned outright, so the ad-spend slider should stay at zero. Published median for the 93.458% below Leader rank: $86.82 a year. Your own subscription cost of $100/mo is included.

Your money

What it costs to replace this yourself

The comparison that matters here is not against injectable peptides - there are none in this range - but against the same class of oral branded-ingredient supplements sold without a compensation plan attached. Comparator prices are open-market ranges for products carrying equivalent branded actives at equivalent doses, presented as bands because formulations differ.

What they sell youWhat you'd use insteadYour cost
FIT - $129.99 for 30 servingsBranded fava-bean peptide hydrolysate at a clinical dose~$35-60
LEAN - $99.99 for 30 servingsOpen-market metabolic support with disclosed actives~$25-45
ENERGIZED - $89.99 for 30 servingsCaffeine-free energy formulation, disclosed amounts~$20-35
CALM - $59.99 for 30 servingsMagnesium glycinate plus adaptogen blend~$15-30
HYDRATED - $54.99 for 30 servingsElectrolyte and amino sachets, comparable count~$18-30
Three-product stack on subscription - ~$260/moEquivalent open-market stack~$70-130
$100/mo subscription to unlock product creditsBuying only what you would take anyway$0-60
Total as sold
~$1,200-3,120 a year
Total, built yourself
~$400-950 a year

Price-to-value

Roughly a two-to-three-times premium, which is moderate by the standards of this category rather than extreme. What you are buying at the top of that band is a genuine branded ingredient with published clinical work behind it and a dose that matches it - that is real, and better documented than most. What you are not buying is independent evidence on the finished products, because proprietary blends prevent you from checking what is in the other SKUs, and the flagship’s supporting data is described as an internal study. The subscription is the line that decides everything: if you would take these supplements anyway, the premium is the whole cost. If you are buying them to stay eligible for credits, the premium is the least of it.

Odds of profit

Three operators, five horizons

Probability of cumulative net profit

Hover any point for median, top decile and bottom quartile.

0% 25% 50% 75% 100%3 mo6 mo1 yr3 yr5 yr 29% 19% 17%
Free-tier affiliate - enrols at $0, no subscription, shares occasionallySubscribed builder - $100/mo subscription, part-time, warm market and organic socialFull-time affiliate - 30+ hrs/wk, multi-product stack, events, no paid ads permitted

Free-tier affiliate

enrols at $0, no subscription, shares occasionally

HorizonP(profit)Median
3 mo 34% $0
6 mo 33% $0
1 yr 32% +$10
3 yr 30% +$25
5 yr 29% +$40

Subscribed builder

$100/mo subscription, part-time, warm market and organic social

HorizonP(profit)Median
3 mo 9% −$280
6 mo 12% −$540
1 yr 15% −$1,000
3 yr 18% −$2,900
5 yr 19% −$4,600

Full-time affiliate

30+ hrs/wk, multi-product stack, events, no paid ads permitted

HorizonP(profit)Median
3 mo 4% −$900
6 mo 8% −$1,700
1 yr 12% −$3,000
3 yr 16% −$7,400
5 yr 17% −$11,000

Methodology note. ANCHORED to MAKE Wellness’s own 2025 earnings disclosure: that 44.29% of affiliates earned nothing; that 93.458% never reached Leader rank; and that the median annual earnings of that sub-Leader group was $86.82 - which is why no cohort here shows a majority in cumulative profit at any horizon. Anchored also to the published cost side: $0 entry with no kit and no mandatory tool fee, the $100-a-month subscription that unlocks up to $200 a month in product credit, published product prices, the five-generation 1%-to-8% unilevel, and the $1,500 customer-volume gate. MODELED by us: the entire expense side beyond the subscription, because the disclosure lists expense categories - events, insurance, product for personal use or promotion, tools, marketing materials, meals, travel - without a dollar figure; the share of each cohort in cumulative profit; and the cohort definitions. Note one structural quirk that shapes the table: because entry is genuinely free and there is no contractual monthly quota, the free-tier cohort is the only one on this site that sits close to break-even at the median - it is very hard to lose money if you never turn the subscription on. That is a real credit to the design. It is also why the subscription decision, and not the enrollment decision, is the one that matters.

Go-to-market

Where you are actually allowed to promote this

Platform policy reads, not verifications. Check every one before you spend a dollar - enforcement changes faster than the written policy does.

Channel
Status
Notes
Paid advertising of any kind
PROHIBITED OUTRIGHT
The policies state that affiliates may not buy paid ads on social platforms, on other websites, or in any other form of mass media. Read as a business constraint this is severe; read as a consumer-protection control it is one of the strongest in the category, because paid claim amplification is how most income-claim files in this industry begin.
Income claims
ALLOWED WITH STRICT CONDITIONS
Any figure quoted must be accurate, based on actual experience, expressed as a monthly or annual amount, accompanied by the percentage of earners who achieve it and the compensation summary, and labeled gross before expenses. That is above sector standard on paper. DSSRC Case #204-2025 nevertheless found seven non-compliant claims on company property; all seven were removed.
Health and medical claims
PROHIBITED
Affiliates may not make medical claims or imply any product is designed or approved to treat a disease. Structure-function claims require the FDA disclaimer. This is the right rule, and it is the rule most at risk in a field selling something branded as a peptide.
Amazon, eBay and other marketplaces
PROHIBITED - BUT THE BRAND IS THERE
The policies bar affiliates from selling through online channels including the major marketplaces, and bar wholesaling to resellers. Yet MAKE-branded product is listed on the largest US marketplace. Whether those listings are corporate brand-registry stock or diverted product could not be confirmed - either way the affiliate is locked out of a channel the brand itself occupies.
Organic social and personal sharing
ALLOWED - EFFECTIVELY THE ONLY CHANNEL
Sharing on personal pages is permitted and must direct to company sites; unsolicited email must comply with CAN-SPAM. With paid ads banned and marketplaces banned, an affiliate’s realistic customer-acquisition surface is their own social graph - which is exactly the structure that pushes new participants toward recruiting friends and family rather than acquiring strangers.
Non-compete on departure
BROAD
Affiliates may not sell or promote "Competing Products," defined to include peptide-based supplements and nutritional products generally, or contract with competing companies. Confidentiality survives termination. That definition covers most of the sector a departing affiliate would move into.
Termination and forfeiture
TOTAL
On termination the former affiliate loses all commissions and all downline rights. The company may terminate on 30 days’ notice or immediately for material breach. Set against that, new enrollees get a three-day cooling-off period and the buyback is genuinely good.
Returns and buyback
90% WITHIN 12 MONTHS
Unopened resalable product returned within twelve months is refunded at 90%, with original shipping excluded and upline bonuses clawed back on returns. This meets or exceeds the typical state MLM buyback statute and is a real protection, particularly with a $0 entry.
Disputes
AAA ARBITRATION, SALT LAKE COUNTY
Binding arbitration under AAA commercial rules with mandatory mediation for claims over $10,000, exclusive jurisdiction and venue in Salt Lake County, Utah, and a small-claims carve-out. The small-claims carve-out is worth noting - it is not always present.
The evidence

Red flags and green flags

Red flags

14
1The median affiliate below Leader rank earned $86.82 for the year
MAKE Wellness’s own 2025 disclosure, covering 93.458% of the field. Against a $1,200-a-year subscription to unlock the product credits the plan is built around, that is roughly fourteen dollars out for every dollar back at the median.
244.29% of affiliates earned nothing at all in 2025
Also the company’s own figure. Nearly half the field received no compensation of any kind in the year the company reported $102 million of revenue.
3Only 6.54% ever reach Leader rank
The threshold at which the plan begins to pay meaningfully. More than nine in ten affiliates never cross it, in a company that had been trading for barely a year at the time of measurement.
4Direct Affiliate orders satisfy the customer-volume gate
The $1,500 customer-volume requirement reads like a retail safeguard, but orders placed by enrolled Direct Affiliates count identically to orders placed by customers. Every retail-flavoured gate in the plan can therefore be met without a single sale reaching a non-participant.
5A meaningful share of compensation is paid in product credit, not cash
The $100-a-month subscription unlocks up to $200 a month of credit, redeemable only against more product. Credit buys more of what you are already buying; it does not pay a bill, and it does not leave the ecosystem.
6The founding trio left their previous employer under termination and litigation
Terminated on 12 October 2023; the former employer sued in Utah in October 2023 alleging a deliberate effort to solicit its salesforce and use proprietary information to build a competitor. One founder had sued first. Nothing has been proven in either action and no disposition could be located - but the fact pattern is a downline walked out of one company into another.
7That former employer then collapsed without notice, and its field became this one
It shut down on 12 April 2025 with no warning to distributors, six weeks after issuing an accelerated-growth press release, and its remains were sold by late May. MAKE Wellness’s early field was drawn substantially from that population - meaning a large share of this company’s participants have now been through one sudden closure.
8The executive chairman previously ran a company that settled $47m over pyramid allegations
A securities class action arising from allegations of an illegal pyramid scheme in China, settled during his tenure, alongside a 2014 Chinese fine and a $765,688 SEC resolution in 2016 on books-and-records and internal-controls charges, neither admitted nor denied. No action was brought against him personally.
9Prices rose 8% to 20% across the range within eighteen months of launch
CALM from $49.99 to $59.99, FOCUSED from $59.99 to $69.99, ENERGIZED from $79.99 to $89.99, LEAN from $89.99 to $99.99, FIT from $119.99 to $129.99. Affiliates who built their pitch on the launch prices are now selling a different offer.
10The compensation plan has been rewritten four times in eighteen months
And the heavy launch-era promotional bonuses - including one paying $103,000 - have expired. Anyone who joined on the original slides is operating under materially different economics, and the plan has not been stable long enough for anyone to model a multi-year outcome.
11Seven earnings claims removed after a self-regulatory challenge
DSSRC Case #204-2025, closed 20 March 2025, challenged claims including "Uncapped Earnings…up to 40%!" on company property. All seven were removed and the case closed cooperatively - but they were published in the first place, by a company that had been trading for months.
12No peer-reviewed evidence on the finished products
The branded fava-bean ingredient has published clinical work behind it at the stated dose, which is genuinely more than most. But the flagship product’s own supporting data is described as an internal study, and proprietary blends prevent a buyer from verifying whether other SKUs deliver a studied dose at all.
13Termination forfeits everything and the non-compete is broad
All commissions and all downline rights are lost on termination, and the non-compete reaches "peptide-based supplements" and nutritional products generally - a definition wide enough to cover most of the sector a departing affiliate would move into.
14Public records on the entity are thin and internally inconsistent
No Utah filing number could be confirmed, the BBB profile describes an S corporation while the entity is an LLC, and the $20 million 2024 revenue figure that makes the growth story is a third-party estimate rather than a reported number.

Green flags

9
1No unapproved-drug exposure - and this is the headline finding
Every SKU is oral: sachet, capsule or gummy. Every active is a plant or yeast peptide hydrolysate. None of the compounds FDA placed on its 503A Category 2 list in September 2023 appear in any formula, and none of the research-chemical peptides that draw enforcement attention appear either. The word "peptide" in the branding does not carry the regulatory freight it implies, and a fair review has to say so.
2Entry is genuinely free, with no kit and no mandatory tool fee
Confirmed in the policies as well as the marketing: no enrollment fee, no required purchase, no monthly website charge. The prelaunch condition requiring a personal purchase was withdrawn after public criticism. Someone can hold an affiliate account indefinitely at zero cost, which very few companies on this site allow.
3A total ban on paid advertising
Severe as a business constraint, excellent as a control. Paid amplification of income and health claims is the mechanism behind most of the regulator files in this industry, and MAKE has removed it entirely rather than policing it after the fact.
4The income-claims rule is above sector standard on paper
Any earnings figure must be accompanied by the percentage of earners who achieve it, plus the compensation summary, and be labeled gross before expenses. That is the disclosure regulators have been asking this industry for, written into the policies.
5A 90% buyback within twelve months, plus a three-day cooling-off period
Unopened resalable product returned within a year is refunded at 90%, shipping excluded. Combined with a $0 entry, the maximum realistic loss for someone who changes their mind early is small - which is not true of most companies graded here.
6A shallow plan with no binary and no matching bonus
Five generations of unilevel at 1% to 8%. No binary legs to balance, no infinity pool, no matching override stacked on top. Structurally cheaper to fund and far less prone to the runaway top-heaviness that makes these plans unsustainable.
7Real branded ingredients with published clinical work behind them
A patented fava-bean peptide hydrolysate from a named ingredient supplier, self-affirmed GRAS, at a 2.4 gram dose matching the published study on that ingredient. That is a materially better evidence position than a proprietary blend with a trademark and a story.
8The self-regulatory case was resolved by full compliance
All seven challenged earnings claims were removed and DSSRC Case #204-2025 closed on 20 March 2025 without escalation or referral. Fast, complete remediation is the behavior you want to see, and it is not universal.
9No regulator action of any kind
No FTC action, state attorney general action, consent order, FDA warning letter, import alert, or class action against the company could be located. For a company selling a peptide-branded supplement line, an empty FDA file is a meaningful result rather than a formality.
What would move this grade

We would like to be wrong about this

Upward

  • Publishing the share of product volume purchased by non-affiliate customers, and closing the gate so that Direct Affiliate orders no longer count toward the $1,500 customer-volume requirement.
  • A stable compensation plan held unchanged for two consecutive years, with a full rank-by-rank income table including expense data, and compensation paid in cash rather than product credit.
  • Peer-reviewed clinical work on the finished products rather than an internal study, plus full disclosure of active amounts in place of proprietary blends across the whole range.

Downward

  • Any injectable, sublingual or nasal SKU, or any FDA 503A Category 2 compound entering a formula - either would move this file to F immediately, regardless of anything else.
  • An FDA warning letter, import alert or FTC action, or a second self-regulatory case on the same earnings-claim categories.
  • A further compensation-plan rewrite that cuts payouts to existing affiliates, or an earnings disclosure showing the sub-Leader median falling below the current $86.82.
The better trade

Grade is D. The peptide scare is not the story - the story is $1,200 a year against a published median of $86.82.

Most people arrive at a page about this company expecting an unapproved-drug problem, and the honest finding is that there is not one. Every product is oral, and every active is a peptide hydrolysate derived from fava beans or brewer’s yeast, including a patented branded ingredient with published clinical work behind it at a matching dose. Nothing on FDA’s Category 2 bulk-substances list appears in any formula. There is no injectable, no research chemical, no scheduled compound, and no FDA letter in the file. Add a genuinely free entry with no kit, a 90% twelve-month buyback, a three-day cooling-off period, a shallow five-generation plan with no binary, and a flat ban on paid advertising, and the structural design of this business is better than most of what gets graded here.

The problem is what the company’s own disclosure says happens to people. Some 93.458% of affiliates never reach Leader rank, and the median annual earnings of that group - nine in ten of everybody - is $86.82. Just over 44% earned nothing at all. Against that sits the $100-a-month subscription that unlocks the product credits the plan is designed around: $1,200 a year, paying out at the median roughly one dollar for every fourteen spent, with a chunk of what does come back arriving as store credit rather than cash. And the retail safeguard that should limit this has a hole in it, because orders from enrolled Direct Affiliates count identically to customer orders when satisfying the $1,500 volume gate.

The remaining weight in the file is the founding team, and it has to be stated carefully because nothing has been proven against anyone. The three operating founders were terminated by their previous employer in October 2023 amid litigation in both directions over walking a salesforce out of one company and into a new one; no disposition of either action could be located. That former employer then collapsed with no notice in April 2025, and much of its field is now here - meaning a large share of this company’s participants have already lived through one overnight closure. The executive chairman previously led a company that settled a $47 million securities class action over pyramid allegations abroad and paid $765,688 to the SEC on books-and-records charges, neither admitted nor denied. That is a team that knows exactly how to build a nine-figure business in eighteen months. Whether it is a team that builds one that lasts is the open question, and the plan being rewritten four times in that same period does not settle it.

1

Stay on the free tier and prove demand before you subscribe

Enrollment costs nothing and there is no monthly quota to hold an account. The $100 subscription is a separate, voluntary decision that unlocks credit rather than cash. Sell to actual customers first; if they reorder without you nudging them, the subscription question answers itself. If they do not, you have learned it for $0.

2

Ask what share of volume comes from non-affiliate customers

The $1,500 customer-volume gate is satisfiable with orders from enrolled Direct Affiliates, which makes the published figure much less informative than it looks. The number that actually matters - what proportion of product moves to people who are not in the plan - is not published, and asking for it is a fair question with a revealing answer either way.

3

If you want the ingredient, buy the ingredient

The patented fava-bean hydrolysate is a real, branded, clinically studied material and it is sold by other brands at roughly a third of the price. Buying it directly costs nothing in credits, nothing in subscription and nothing in downline politics - and you can read the full supplement facts instead of a proprietary blend.

4

Sell education, not enrollment, into the peptide category

Public confusion between oral peptide hydrolysates and injectable research chemicals is enormous, and it is where most of the harm in this space actually happens. Clear, sourced, claim-safe content on what is and is not regulated - and what FDA has actually said - is a merchant business with real demand, and it does not require a subscription or a downline.

There is no unapproved drug in these products. There is a $1,200 subscription against a published median of $86.82.
Scorecard

Nine dimensions, weighted

Comp structure & KoscotDoes the plan pay for recruitment or for sales to real customers?
20%
4.0
The structure is unusually shallow for the category - a unilevel paying five generations at 1% to 8%, no binary, no matching bonus - and there is a real $1,500 customer-volume gate before personal purchases count toward qualification. The defect is what satisfies that gate: orders placed by enrolled "Direct Affiliates" count identically to orders placed by customers, so every retail-flavoured requirement in the plan can be met entirely inside the network without a single sale to a non-participant.
Securities exposureAny passive return on capital? Howey, staking, tokens, withdrawal friction.
15%
9.0
No investment contract, no passive-return promise, no token, no equity offering and no securities-regulator involvement of any kind could be located. Compensation is paid on product movement. The only residual note is the positional framing of the launch-era Founders Bonus, which has since expired.
Ownership & track recordWho runs it, what did they run before, and what happened to it.
15%
3.0
The founding trio left their previous employer under termination and litigation in October 2023; that employer collapsed without notice in April 2025. The executive chairman ran a company that settled a $47 million securities class action over pyramid allegations in China and paid $765,688 to the SEC on books-and-records charges. No allegation against any principal has been proven and no individual has been sanctioned - but for a company eighteen months old with no audited accounts, prior conduct is most of what a reader has to go on.
Product reality & demandWould a rational buyer purchase this if no income offer existed?
12%
6.0
Real branded ingredients with real documentation: a patented fava-bean peptide hydrolysate supplied by a named ingredient company, self-affirmed GRAS status, and a 2.4 gram dose matching the published clinical work on that ingredient. Consumer demand for the category is genuine. What is missing is any peer-reviewed study on the finished products themselves - the flagship’s evidence is described as an internal study - and proprietary blends obscure whether the clinical dose is actually delivered in every SKU.
Participant economicsReal cost in, realistic money out, and whether they publish the numbers.
10%
2.0
MAKE Wellness publishes an earnings disclosure and it is damning: 93.458% of affiliates never reach Leader rank, and their median annual earnings are $86.82. Some 44.29% earned nothing at all in 2025. Set against the $100 a month - $1,200 a year - required to unlock the product credits the plan is built around, and a chunk of what is earned arrives as store credit rather than cash.
Price-to-valueWhat the same capability costs on the open market.
8%
3.0
$55 to $130 for thirty servings of fava-bean and brewer’s-yeast peptide hydrolysates, against roughly $20 to $40 for comparable branded-ingredient products on the open market. Prices rose 8% to 20% across the range between November 2024 and 2026, within eighteen months of launch, and proprietary blends prevent a buyer from checking whether the clinically studied dose is present.
Payout sustainabilityCan the company fund the plan out of margin, or only out of inflow?
8%
6.0
A shallow five-generation plan with no binary and no matching bonus is structurally cheaper to fund than the category norm, and $102 million of first-full-year revenue is real inflow. The reservations are that the plan has been rewritten four times in eighteen months, and that the heavy launch-era promotional bonuses - one paying $103,000 - have now expired, which changes the arithmetic for anyone who joined on those slides.
Marketing conductIncome claims, regulator run-ins, hype, deadline stacking.
7%
4.0
DSSRC Case #204-2025, closed 20 March 2025, challenged seven earnings claims including "Uncapped Earnings…up to 40%!" appearing on company property; MAKE removed all seven and the case closed. Set against that is a total ban on paid advertising in the policies, which is a genuine structural control on exactly the claim inflation that gets this industry into trouble, and a written income-claims rule requiring the percentage of earners who achieve any figure quoted.
Operator terms & exitWho owns the customer, what you forfeit, how hard it is to leave.
5%
3.0
Termination forfeits all commissions and all downline rights outright. The non-compete reaches every "peptide-based supplement" and nutritional product, which is broad enough to cover most of the sector a departing affiliate would move to, and confidentiality survives termination. Disputes go to AAA arbitration venued in Salt Lake County with mandatory mediation above $10,000. The genuine bright spot is a 90% buyback on unopened resalable product returned within twelve months, plus a three-day cooling-off period.
Weighted composite
4.70
D

Dimension profile

Further from center is better. Hover any point.

Comp structure& Koscot 4.0 Securitiesexposure 9.0 Ownership &track record 3.0 Product reality& demand 6.0 Participanteconomics 2.0 Price-to-value 3.0 Payoutsustainability 6.0 Marketingconduct 4.0 Operator terms& exit 3.0

Hard caps that bind here

Cap at C+ participant economics. The company’s own disclosure puts the median annual earnings of the 93.458% of affiliates below Leader rank at $86.82, against a $1,200-a-year subscription to unlock the product credits the plan is designed around. That is roughly fourteen dollars out for every dollar back at the median, and no amount of structural cleanliness elsewhere lifts a file past the middle band when the operator’s own number says that.
No unapproved-drug cap applies this needs stating plainly because the marketing invites the opposite conclusion. Every product in the range is oral - sachet, capsule or gummy - and every active is a plant or yeast peptide hydrolysate. None of the compounds on FDA’s 503A Category 2 list appear in any formula, and none of the research-chemical peptides that draw enforcement attention appear either. The peptide framing is a marketing choice, not a regulatory exposure. The trigger to watch is any injectable or sublingual SKU, or any Category 2 compound entering a formula - either would move this file immediately.

The lowest binding cap wins, regardless of the weighted arithmetic.

Sources consulted

What we read

Every source below links to the document itself. Tier 1 is a primary record - the company’s own plan, policy or disclosure, a court filing, a regulator’s decision or an SEC filing. Tier 2 is a self-regulatory or secondary regulator record, tier 3 reporting or academic work, tier 4 an open-market price comparison. Where a document can be moved or withdrawn, an archived copy is linked beside it. If a link is dead when you try it, that is a correction we want.

  1. MAKE Wellness 2025 Earning Disclosure Statement - "2025 Typical Gross Earnings of MAKE Wellness Affiliates" (PDF; 44.29% of affiliates had no earnings, 93.458% below Leader at $86.82 average, expense categories not deducted)
    Income disclosureTier 1Upper Level Health, LLC dba MAKE Wellness · 2025archived copy

    MAKE Wellness Earnings Disclosure Statement, 2025 - 44.29% of affiliates earned $0; 93.458% never reached Leader rank; median annual earnings below Leader of $86.82; expense categories listed as not deducted

  2. MAKE Wellness Policies and Procedures for Affiliates (PDF) - defines the Company as "Upper Level Health, LLC, a Utah limited liability company operating as the d/b/a Make Wellness"; income-claim conditions, health-claim prohibition, buyback and cooling-off terms
    Policies & proceduresTier 1Upper Level Health, LLC dba MAKE Wellness · 2024-09-01archived copy

    MAKE Wellness Policies & Procedures, 1 September 2024 edition - total paid-advertising ban, marketplace prohibition, income-claim conditions, health-claim prohibition, broad non-compete, 90% twelve-month buyback, three-day cooling-off, AAA arbitration in Salt Lake County

  3. MAKE Wellness Compensation / Commissions overview (makewellness.com/content/docs/compensations.pdf) - Premier Affiliate qualification, Circle Sales Bonus $500 guarantee, $75 product credit, Direct Premier Guarantee
    Compensation planTier 1Upper Level Health, LLC dba MAKE Wellness · 2025-03-17archived copy

    MAKE Wellness compensation overview (makewellness.com/content/docs/compensations.pdf) - five-generation unilevel at 1%-8%, $1,500 customer-volume gate, $100 monthly subscription unlocking up to $200 in product credit, Premier tier

  4. MAKE Wellness "ClearPath" Compensation Overview, document version 6/2026 V5 (PDF) - leadership title ladder, Pay Volume thresholds, Pay Volume commission percentages 10% down to 1%, Team Bonus table and minimum-earnings guarantees
    Compensation planTier 1Upper Level Health, LLC dba MAKE Wellness · 2026-06archived copy
  5. MAKE Wellness official storefront home page - retail pricing for CALM $59.99, HYDRATED $54.99, FOCUSED $69.99, ENERGIZED $89.99, LEAN $99.99 and FIT $129.99
    Open-market comparisonTier 4Upper Level Health, LLC dba MAKE Wellnessarchived copy

    MAKE Wellness product pages and shop listings, 2026 - CALM $59.99, HYDRATED $54.99, FOCUSED $69.99, ENERGIZED $89.99, LEAN $99.99, FIT $129.99; November 2024 comparison prices from contemporaneous review coverage

    Not established by this document: The November 2024 comparison prices cited from contemporaneous review coverage are not separately linked; the live storefront pages above carry the 2026 prices only.

  6. MAKE Wellness Peak Performance Collection product listing (MAKEshop item 63) - $504.94 one-time, $454.45 subscribe-and-save, with the six constituent product prices
    Open-market comparisonTier 4Upper Level Health, LLC dba MAKE Wellnessarchived copy
  7. FDA, "Certain Bulk Drug Substances for Use in Compounding That May Present Significant Safety Risks" - the 503A/503B Category 2 list, including the 29 September 2023 entries for GHRP-2, GHRP-6, ipamorelin acetate and kisspeptin-10 with the agency's stated safety rationale
    RegulatorTier 1U.S. Food and Drug Administration · 2023-09-29archived copy

    FDA 503A bulk drug substances lists - Category 2 additions of 29 September 2023 (GHRP-2, GHRP-6, ipamorelin, kisspeptin-10) and the nominated-then-withdrawn status of BPC-157, TB-500, GHK-Cu, KPV and epitalon; none appear in any MAKE formulation

  8. FDA, "Interim Policy on Compounding Using Bulk Drug Substances Under Section 503A of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act" - Guidance for Industry defining Categories 1, 2 and 3 of the interim 503A bulks list (PDF)
    RegulatorTier 1U.S. Food and Drug Administration, CDER (copy hosted by the ECA Academy)archived copy
  9. Reed Smith LLP, "FDA removes certain peptide bulk drug substances from Category 2 of the interim 503A bulks list" - the 20 September 2024 removal of AOD-9604, CJC-1295, ipamorelin acetate, thymosin alpha-1 and Selank following nominator withdrawal, and the October/December 2024 PCAC referrals
    ReportingTier 3Reed Smith LLP, published via Lexology · 2024-10-01archived copy
  10. DSSRC Case #204-2025: Administrative Closure - MAKE Wellness, closed March 2025 (seven challenged earnings claims including "Uncapped Earnings … up to 40%!", all removed)
    Self-regulatoryTier 2BBB National Programs, Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council · 2025-03-20archived copy

    BBB National Programs, DSSRC Case #204-2025, closed 20 March 2025 - seven challenged earnings claims including "Uncapped Earnings…up to 40%!", all removed

  11. DSSRC Case #204-2025 decision, full text (PDF copy published by TINA.org)
    Self-regulatoryTier 2BBB National Programs, Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council (copy published by Truth in Advertising, Inc.) · 2025-03-20archived copy
  12. Justin K. Prince v. Modere, Maple Mountain Enterprises, Z Capital et al. - complaint filed in the Fourth Judicial District Court, Utah County, Utah, dated 17 October 2023 (full text published by Business For Home)
    Court recordTier 3Fourth Judicial District Court, Utah County, Utah (complaint text published by Business For Home) · 2023-10-17archived copy

    Utah Fourth District Court filings reported October 2023 concerning the founders and their former employer; contemporaneous trade reporting on that employer’s closure on 12 April 2025 and subsequent sale

  13. BehindMLM, "Top earner Justin Prince sues Modere after termination" - reporting the Fourth District Court of Utah filing
    ReportingTier 3BehindMLM · 2023-10-25archived copy
  14. BehindMLM, "Justin Prince sued for 'sabotaging and crippling' Modere" - Modere's counter-complaint in the Fourth District Court of Utah
    ReportingTier 3BehindMLM · 2023-10-26archived copy
  15. Direct Selling News, "Modere Announces Closure After 23 Years," 11 April 2025
    ReportingTier 3Direct Selling News · 2025-04-11archived copy
  16. Nutraceuticals World, "Shaklee Acquires Rights to Modere Products after MLM Shuts Down" - the subsequent sale of substantially all of Modere's business
    ReportingTier 3Nutraceuticals World · 2025-05-27archived copy
  17. In the Matter of Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc., SEC Administrative Proceeding File No. 3-17556, Exchange Act Release No. 78884 - Order Instituting Cease-and-Desist Proceedings, 20 September 2016 (disgorgement $431,088, prejudgment interest $34,600, penalty $300,000)
    RegulatorTier 1U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission · 2016-09-20archived copy

    SEC administrative proceeding 3-17556, 20 September 2016 ($765,688 total, neither admitted nor denied) and the $47m securities class settlement over China pyramid allegations, both relating to the executive chairman’s former employer

  18. SEC press summary, "SEC Charges Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. with FCPA Violations," Administrative Proceeding File No. 3-17556, 20 September 2016 ($765,688 total)
    RegulatorTier 1U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission · 2016-09-20archived copy
  19. Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. Form 8-K, 22 February 2016 - $47 million settlement term sheet in In re Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. Sec. Litig., No. 2:14-cv-00033-JNP-BCW (D. Utah), the China pyramid-allegation securities class action
    SEC filingTier 1U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, EDGAR (Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc., CIK 1021561) · 2016-02-22archived copy
  20. Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. Form 8-K, 20 September 2016 - disclosure of the SEC resolution and the $765,688 payment, neither admitted nor denied
    SEC filingTier 1U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, EDGAR (Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc., CIK 1021561) · 2016-09-20archived copy
  21. DSN Global 100 for 2026 (based on 2025 revenue) - MAKE Wellness at rank 41 with $102M, alongside Bravenly Global at $102M; published list
    ReportingTier 3Direct Selling News list, as published by Business For Home · 2026-04-21archived copy

    Direct Selling News Global 100, 2026 edition - $102m 2025 revenue, rank #41; BBB business profile for the trading entity

  22. Direct Selling News, "Bravo Growth Award | MAKE Wellness" - DSN's own award citation reporting $104M revenue in the first full year
    ReportingTier 3Direct Selling News · 2026-06-25archived copy
  23. Better Business Bureau business profile, Make Wellness, 169 W 2710 South Cir Ste 202A, St George, Utah - file opened 30 December 2024, business started 23 January 2024, type of entity Limited Liability Company, alternate name Upper Level Health, LLC
    Company documentTier 3Better Business Bureau · 2024-12-30archived copy
Unable to verify

What we could not get

  • The Utah filing number for Upper Level Health, LLC, and the LLC-versus-S-corporation discrepancy between the entity name and the BBB profile
  • The $20 million 2024 revenue figure underpinning the growth story - it is a third-party estimate, and the $102 million 2025 figure is unaudited
  • The outcome of the October 2023 litigation between the founders and their former employer, in either direction
  • The percentage tiers in the Circle Sales bonus, the per-generation percentages and the rank qualification volumes - no complete published table could be obtained
  • The split of product volume between enrolled affiliates and non-affiliate customers - the decisive Koscot number, and it is not published
  • The proportion of total compensation paid as product credit rather than cash
  • The actual milligram content of the branded hydrolysate in each SKU, and the supplement facts and price for the RESTORED product
  • The identity of the seller behind the MAKE-branded marketplace listings, event ticket costs, and whether the company holds any direct-selling trade-association membership

Not advice

This is independent analysis for decision-making, not legal, financial or investment advice. Allegations reported by third parties should be verified against primary court and regulatory records before any decision.

Who writes this

Researched by Claude. Reviewed by an editor.

Every report is researched and written by Claude, Anthropic’s AI assistant, from the company’s own plan documents, policies, terms and regulatory file - then reviewed before publication by Rob Fore, who checks the sources and the stage-label on every allegation.

  • Nine weighted dimensions, published with their weights
  • The editor checks the evidence and cannot change the number - the build rejects any page whose grade does not reconcile to its own arithmetic
  • Every affiliate position we hold is disclosed on the report it touches
  • No company has paid for a grade, and no report carries an affiliate link
Read the About page

Looking at something else?

Enter any company name or website. If a report exists it opens instantly; if not, we start one.

Try:
Common questions

MAKE Wellness - frequently asked

QAre MAKE Wellness peptides legal, or are they unapproved drugs?
They are legal, and this is the most important correction a reader needs. Every product in the range is oral - sachet, capsule or gummy - and every active is a peptide hydrolysate derived from fava beans or brewer’s yeast, including a patented branded ingredient with self-affirmed GRAS status and published clinical work at the stated 2.4 gram dose. None of the compounds FDA added to its 503A Category 2 list in September 2023 appear in any formula, and none of the research-chemical peptides that draw enforcement attention - the injectables people usually mean when they say "peptides" - appear either. There is no FDA warning letter, no import alert and no enforcement action in the file. The regulatory risk that the branding implies does not exist in this product line as currently formulated. It would exist immediately if the company launched an injectable or sublingual SKU, or added a Category 2 compound.
QHow much do MAKE Wellness affiliates actually earn?
The company publishes this and the numbers are the reason for the grade. In 2025, 44.29% of affiliates earned nothing at all. Some 93.458% never reached Leader rank, and the median annual earnings for that group - more than nine in ten of everybody - was $86.82. All figures are gross: the disclosure explicitly lists events, insurance, product for personal use or promotion, tools, marketing materials, meals and travel as costs that are not deducted. Set against the $100-a-month subscription required to unlock the plan’s product credits, the median participant is spending roughly $1,200 to earn roughly $87.
QIs MAKE Wellness free to join?
Yes, genuinely. The policies confirm there is no enrollment fee, no mandatory purchase, no required starter kit and no monthly website or tool charge, and someone can hold an affiliate account indefinitely at zero cost. During the August-November 2024 prelaunch the original terms did require a personal purchase; that condition was withdrawn after public criticism and replaced with an earlier selling start for people who bought a Founder’s Box. The functional cost of the business today is a separate, voluntary decision: a personal subscription of $100 or more a month makes you eligible for up to $200 a month in product credit - credit that buys more product rather than paying out as cash.
QIs MAKE Wellness a pyramid scheme?
No regulator or court has found it to be one, and no FTC action, state attorney general action, consent order or class action could be located. The plan is unusually shallow for the category - a five-generation unilevel paying 1% to 8%, with no binary, no matching bonus and no infinity pool - and there is a $1,500 customer-volume gate before an affiliate’s own purchases count toward qualification. The specific structural criticism is that this gate has a hole in it: orders placed by enrolled Direct Affiliates count identically to orders placed by genuine customers, so the requirement that reads like a retail safeguard can be satisfied entirely inside the network without one sale reaching a non-participant. The share of volume going to non-affiliate customers is not published.
QWho is behind MAKE Wellness?
The trading entity is Upper Level Health, LLC, a Utah company with a business start date of 23 April 2024. The founding team came almost entirely from one previous direct-selling company: the founder and the chief executive were both terminated by it on 12 October 2023, and litigation followed in both directions over the alleged solicitation of its salesforce - nothing in either action has been proven and no disposition could be located. That former employer then shut down with no notice to distributors on 12 April 2025, and much of its field had already moved here. The executive chairman previously ran a large listed direct-selling company that, during his tenure, settled a $47 million securities class action over allegations of an illegal pyramid scheme in China and paid $765,688 to the SEC to resolve books-and-records charges, neither admitted nor denied. No action was brought against him personally.
Who wrote this report

Author, editor and publisher

C
Written by Claude AI
Reviewed by Rob Fore · Published by Listech Inc · July 28, 2026

This report was researched and written by Claude, Anthropic’s AI assistant, working from primary documents - MAKE Wellness’s own compensation plan, its policies and procedures, its terms of service, its income disclosure statement where one exists, and its regulatory and self-regulatory file. It was scored against nine weighted dimensions that are published in full, with their weights, on the methodology page.

Before publication it was reviewed by Rob Fore, who checks every source link, every figure against the document it came from, and every allegation against its stage-label - an investigation is not a finding, a warning letter is not an enforcement action, and a filed claim is not a verdict.

The editor does not set the grade. The published score is the weighted composite of the nine dimension scores, and the build refuses to emit a page where the two disagree by more than 0.06. A grade moves when the evidence moves it and not otherwise.

Rob Fore has marketed online since 1996, wrote Online MLM Marketing (2014), and is CEO of Listech Inc, the Nevada corporation that publishes this site. He holds affiliate positions in companies graded here - including LiveGood, which this site grades D, SendOutCards, which it grades C−, and the Home Business Academy, which it grades B−. Those positions are disclosed on the reports they touch, and changed nothing on this page.

About the author and our conflicts  ·  Contact the editor  ·  Corrections: corrections@opportunitygrade.com

Stay with it

Tell me if this grade changes

MAKE Wellness is graded D as of July 28, 2026. Grades move when the evidence moves - a new income disclosure, a regulatory action, a rewritten compensation plan. Leave your address and you will get one email if this one does.

One email when the grade moves, and nothing else. We will never use your address to promote an income opportunity of any kind, we do not sell, rent or share the list, and it is stored on our own infrastructure rather than with any company graded here. Unsubscribe removes everything.

Right of reply

Corrections

Every factual claim on this page is sourced, and the ones we could not stand up are named in the unable to verify list above. If something here is wrong, we want to know, and we would rather hear it from MAKE Wellness than from a reader.

Write to corrections@opportunitygrade.com. Point at the specific sentence and send the document that contradicts it - a plan document, a filing, an income disclosure, a policy page. We will check it against the primary source, correct the page if it is wrong, and say in the report that it was corrected and when. A grade moves if the evidence moves it.

This address reaches a person, not a form. We do not require a takedown demand, an NDA or a lawyer to accept a correction, and we do not remove a report because a company disputes its conclusion - only because the underlying facts turn out to be wrong.

Other published reports

Every report is written to stand alone. Graded on the same nine weighted dimensions and the same six legal tests. Twelve of 107, spread across the grade bands.

See all 107 published reports →