Equis Financial, LLC
Genuinely $0 to join, with a free technology stack and a clean regulatory file - attached to a $74 lead that is resold four more times, a 70% entry contract against an open market of 90–110%, and a modeled median agent running about −$599 a month.
Nothing is taken from you at the door - the money leaves through the lead invoice instead, at $74 a lead against a break-even close rate of 15.5% in a channel that closes 8–15%.
Can you actually make money with Equis Financial?
Yes, with conditions, and the honest headline is that nothing is taken from you at the door. No joining fee, no application fee, no starter kit, no product purchase, no inventory and no monthly platform charge - verified across the corporate site, the public training center, three review platforms and two industry forums. New agents receive $25 of lead credit and a discount on a first purchase. Every commission dollar originates with a carrier, on a policy an underwritten customer actually pays premium on.
The money leaves through the lead invoice instead. Break-even on the company's own fresh $74 direct-mail lead requires a 15.5% close rate, and the sourced industry close band for direct mail runs 8% to 15%. The break-even sits above the top of the range. On the $85 exclusive mortgage-protection mailer it is 17.9%. A standard lead is also rented rather than bought: a $74 lead becomes $7 after thirty days without a sale, then $4, then $2, then fifty cents, resold to other agents in the same organization.
The contract level is the other half. Entry is 70% where an independent brokerage or a direct carrier appointment pays a comparable new agent 80% to 90%, and an experienced one 90% to 110%, with promotion on production alone. Here the published route above the second or third rung is recruiting, and the plan's largest number is a recruiting number: the Builder Bonus ceiling is $50,000 a month against $5,000 for personal production. No income disclosure of any kind exists to test any of it against.
On sourced inputs - the company's own $1,000 average annualised premium, its 70% entry contract, its $49 lead price, a 10% close, an 85% issue rate and a 20% chargeback provision - the modeled median agent buying eight leads a week runs at roughly minus $599 a month. The same agent on an open-market contract at 100%, self-mailing leads at $27 apiece, models at about plus $564. That is a difference of some $1,163 a month for identical work in the same market.
no joining fee, no kit, no product purchase, no platform fee - and $25 of free lead credit; roughly $460 to actually launch, then lead spend every week thereafter
- You buy the lead types priced at market and leave the ones that are not. Internet questionnaires at $16, live transfers at $55 and aged leads under $7 sit at or below open-market pricing; fresh direct mail and exclusives are where the problem lives.
- You know what an open-market contract pays before you accept 70%. On $2,940 of monthly issued premium the gap between the entry contract here and a comparable independent appointment is roughly $882 a month gross.
- You can carry a commission advance without it becoming a debt. Seventy-five percent is advanced on approval in a channel where chargebacks concentrate in the first nine months, and an unpaid debit balance follows you to the next company.
- You understand that sponsoring somebody makes you their creditor. The company's own lead page states that unpaid lead invoices may transfer to upline managers, so a recruit who stops paying leaves the bill with whoever signed them up.
That call is computed, not chosen - the rule reads three of the nine published dimension scores and is printed on the methodology page. It describes this company's plan and the figures it publishes about the people already in it. It is not a prediction about you, and nothing on this site is advice.
Legal status
LEGAL - and the regulatory file is genuinely clean, which must be said before anything else. We searched state insurance-department enforcement records including the NAIC consumer state-enforcement index and the Texas Department of Insurance disciplinary-order repository, federal and state court dockets, FTC and state attorney-general actions, FINRA, the self-regulatory DSSRC case archive and the Better Business Bureau. There is no administrative order, no cease-and-desist, no consent order, no assurance of voluntary compliance, no class action, no TCPA suit, no misclassification claim, no FINRA matter, no self-regulatory case and no criminal proceeding against Equis Financial or against any of its three named principals. The only litigation on the record was brought BY the company: a federal breach-of-contract complaint against nine former agents in the Western District of North Carolina, 1:24-cv-00177, filed 21 June 2024 and voluntarily dismissed without prejudice by the company itself five days later on 26 June 2024; and a North Carolina state-court action against a former top-three partner agency, whose pleadings we could not read because the docket aggregator returned 403. Both are filed claims. Neither is a finding, and no defendant in either was found to have done anything. The completeness caveat belongs here too: fifty state insurance departments publish in fifty formats and several docket services blocked automated access, so this is a thorough search rather than an exhaustive one.
Confidence: Medium
Primary sources fetched directly where possible. Everything we could not verify is listed at the bottom of this page by name.
Follow the money
A US life-insurance independent marketing organization founded in 2015, operating out of Asheville, North Carolina with a registered address in Lynchburg, Virginia, and owned since May 2020 by Integrity Marketing Group. It contracts 1099 independent agents, appoints them with third-party carriers, sells them leads, and pays them a percentage of first-year target premium that rises with where they sit on a contract ladder - 70% at entry, up to 120% on personal production and up to 140% at agency level. Product lines are mortgage protection, final expense, living benefits, indexed universal life, annuities and Medicare.
The "$0 to join" claim is true, and it is the most honest headline claim in this whole sector - concede it fully before anything else. We looked for a joining fee, an application fee, a starter kit, a product-purchase requirement, a monthly platform charge and mandatory paid training across the corporate site, the public training center, three review platforms and two industry forums. There is none. Training is free, the Integrity technology suite - lead purchasing, quoting, e-Application, agent dashboard - is provided free, and a new agent receives $25 of free lead credit and a 30% discount on a first lead purchase. Nothing is taken from the recruit as a condition of entry, and that alone puts this file above most of what this site grades.
Then the real cost, which arrives through a different door. Before writing a single policy an agent pays for a pre-licensing course (the routed provider charges $199), a state exam ($40–$150), fingerprinting ($15–$100), a license application ($20–$200) and the first errors-and-omissions payment ($59.17 down on the monthly plan, or $375 paid annually) - roughly $460 on the monthly route, roughly $775 if E&O is paid up front. That is not a ruinous number and the report will not pretend otherwise. It is the smallest of the three cost buckets. The buy-in that matters is lead spend, it is recurring, and it starts in week one.
The lead price sheet is the document that tells a reader more about this channel than anything else on this page, and the company publishes it. A brand-new direct-mail "A" lead costs $74. If the agent who bought it has not closed it in thirty days, the same record is reclassified A1 and resold at $7, then B at $4, then C at $2, then D at $0.50 - the same household monetised five times, four of them to other agents in the same organization, while the first agent’s $74 is gone. An independent review puts it plainly: the company "re-sells all leads. You’re essentially renting the lead for a short period of time." An exclusive mortgage-protection mailer costs $85, and the exclusive tier exists precisely because the standard tier is not exclusive. Self-mailed, the same exclusive, never-resold lead costs $20–$35 all-in.
Set the two halves together and the grade explains itself. The entry contract is 70% of first-year target premium where an independent brokerage pays a comparable new agent 80–90% and an experienced one 90–110%. Promotion above the second or third rung requires recruiting. The company’s own Builder Bonus ceiling of $50,000 a month is ten times its Producer Bonus ceiling of $5,000. On the company’s own $1,000 average policy, at eight $49 leads a week and a 10% close, the modeled median agent is at about −$599 a month; the same production at an open-market 100% contract on self-mailed leads models at about +$564. There is no income disclosure to test any of it against. Nothing here is illegal, nothing here is a pyramid, and the carriers really do pay - the problem is that the arithmetic, on the company’s own published prices, does not close for the typical participant.
Where $1,000 of first-year target premium goes at the entry contract
Modeled from published figures: the 70% entry contract, the 120% personal and 140% agency ceilings on the company’s own homepage, and the channel norm of 5–25 override points per hierarchy rung. Percentages are of first-year target premium, and they exceed 100% because the carrier funds distribution above 100% of first-year premium and recovers it from renewal-year margin. The split above the writing agent is modeled, not disclosed.
| Product | Price | Pays |
|---|---|---|
| Fresh direct-mail "A" lead The headline SKU on the company’s own published price sheet, and the number that decides the file. Break-even on it requires a 15.5% lead-to-issued-and-persisting close rate at the entry contract; the sourced industry direct-mail close band is 8–15%. |
$74 per lead |
— |
| Exclusive mortgage-protection direct mail The most expensive lead on the menu, and the tier that exists because the standard tier is resold. The self-mailed equivalent - exclusive, never resold - costs $20–$35 all-in at $613 per thousand pieces and a 2% response rate. |
$85 per lead |
— |
| Fresh IVR "A" lead / exclusive final expense The workhorse price used in the modeling throughout this report. Eight a week is $1,697 a month. A newly licensed agent reported paying $41 on a discounted tier. |
$49 per lead |
— |
| The aging ladder - A1, B, C, D What your $74 lead becomes after thirty days without a sale, then sixty more, then again. Note the arithmetic nobody advertises: a $7 lead closing at 5% costs $140 per sale, against $617 per sale for a $74 lead closing at 12%. The cheap end of the ladder is the better buy and the incentive runs the other way. |
$7 / $4 / $2 / $0.50 per lead, resold |
— |
| Social Media IUL leads - Diamond / Titanium The evidence that indexed universal life is actively pushed into a largely inexperienced 1099 force rather than reserved for experienced advisers. IUL sits in a category where 29% of permanent policies lapse within three years. |
$30 / $15 per lead |
— |
| Call Campaign - life insurance live transfer Genuinely competitive. The open market runs $35–$75 for final expense and $75–$110 for life live transfers, so this tier is at or below market. The internet questionnaire lead at $16 and the aged tiers are likewise fairly priced. The problem is confined to fresh direct mail and exclusives. |
$55 per connected call |
— |
| Errors and omissions cover, branded portal $1m per claim, $2m aggregate, $0 deductible on life, accident-and-health and disability, underwritten by BCS Insurance Company (A.M. Best "A"). The monthly plan takes a $59.17 down payment including a $25 admin fee. Competitively priced and a fair deal. |
$375/yr new, $440/yr experienced annual or $34.17–$39.58 monthly |
— |
| Pre-licensing course, routed provider The provider the company routes new agents to; its registration form is a listed document on the training site. Market range for the same course is $100–$300, and the state exam fee is not included. |
$199 one-time |
— |
Who runs it, and what they ran before
Served in the U.S. Air Force before entering the insurance industry in 1982, became a top producer in life, health and estate planning and earned a President’s Club award through Jefferson Pilot Life. Co-founded Equis in 2015 and, on Integrity’s own bio, has since been "fully committed to his role as mentor and educator." Based in Rockford, Michigan. No regulatory action, administrative order, fraud judgment or criminal proceeding against him could be located in any source reviewed.
Twenty-five years and more in sales and marketing. Began in professional lawn care, where he was one of the top three salespeople nationwide for fifteen consecutive years, before moving into insurance; his stated specialisms are business management, recruiting and customer acquisition. Based in Dayton, Ohio. Nothing adverse could be located against him either. The recruiting specialism is not a criticism - it is simply worth reading alongside the finding that promotion up the contract ladder is gated on recruiting.
Entered insurance part-time in 1980 while at Liberty University on a baseball scholarship and full-time in 1982, and was promoted to Regional Vice President within ten months at his first company. In 2002 he co-founded what Integrity’s own bio calls a large national coalition of insurance agents - the bio declines to name it, and we could not identify it from any primary source, so this report names nothing. Joined Equis in 2016, a year after founding, and has been chief executive for a decade. On the 2020 sale he said publicly: "Joining Integrity was the easiest decision I’ve made in 40 years in this industry. We took Equis as far as we were capable of taking it." He holds an 86% approval rating across 273 Glassdoor reviews. No state insurance-department order, no enforcement action and no criminal proceeding naming him could be located.
The continuity is real and unusual in this channel: the same chief executive for ten years, both co-founders still in post on the 2026 About page, and a prior venture from 2002 that still operates rather than a collapsed predecessor. There is no graveyard here and the report will not manufacture one. The stage-labeled deductions are three. First, the 2020 sale to a private-equity-backed roll-up, which moved the principals’ economics from agency profit to platform enterprise value. Second, a federal breach-of-contract complaint filed by the company against nine named former agents on 21 June 2024 and voluntarily dismissed by the company without prejudice on 26 June 2024 - five days. Third, a North Carolina state-court action brought by the company against a former top-three partner agency, whose file we could not read. Both are filed claims by the company, not findings against anyone, and no defendant was adjudicated to have done anything. The operative fact for a prospective agent is narrower and fairer than the headline: this organization has demonstrated a willingness to litigate against people who leave.
Registered address
Lynchburg, Virginia, USA - operational base Asheville, North Carolina
The corporate picture is a subsidiary picture, and a prospective agent should understand it before signing. Equis has been owned by Integrity Marketing Group since 19 May 2020; the three principals became Integrity Managing Partners and, per Integrity’s own release, all Equis employees became owners in Integrity through the transaction. Integrity is itself private-equity backed - Harvest Partners is described as its largest institutional investor, HGGC remains significant, and Silver Lake announced a $1.2 billion minority investment on 9 December 2021, at which point Integrity reported 5,500 employees and a network of more than 420,000 agents and advisors. None of that is wrongdoing; institutional ownership brings compliance obligations an independent agency does not carry. But it changes the alignment. The founders’ economic upside now sits in Integrity’s enterprise value, which is driven by aggregate premium flow and agent count. No audited financial statement, credit rating or leverage figure could be obtained for Integrity, which is privately held and files no public accounts. And Equis’s own last public production figure is the "over $100 million" of annualised premium quoted at the 2020 acquisition - six years without an update, against no published agent headcount at all.
The veteran's checklist
Eight questions that decide whether this is a business or a transfer mechanism. Same eight, every review.
| Question | Answer |
|---|---|
| Who legally owns it? |
WATCH
Equis Financial, LLC, founded 2015, operated from Asheville, North Carolina with a registered address in Lynchburg, Virginia. Owned since 19 May 2020 by Integrity Marketing Group, a private-equity-backed distribution roll-up whose investors include Harvest Partners, HGGC and Silver Lake. No audited accounts are public at any level.
|
| What does it really cost? |
CONCERN
$0 to join - no fee, no kit, no product purchase, and $25 of free lead credit. Roughly $460 to launch (pre-licensing $199, exam, fingerprinting, license, first E&O payment). Then leads: $74 fresh direct mail, $85 exclusive, $49 IVR. Eight a week at $49 is $1,697 a month, every month.
|
| Published income disclosure? |
CONCERN
None. We searched the corporate site page by page, the public training-document index, both acquisition press releases, the group partner page and targeted web search. No insurance marketing organization is required to publish one - but this one publishes a $50,000-a-month bonus maximum and no distribution at all.
|
| Regulatory action against the company, ever? |
OK
None found. No state insurance-department order, no cease-and-desist, no consent order, no assurance of voluntary compliance, no FTC or state attorney-general action, no class action, no TCPA suit, no FINRA matter, no self-regulatory case, no criminal proceeding - against the company or any of its three principals. Fifty state departments publish in fifty formats, so this is thorough rather than exhaustive.
|
| What about the lawsuits against former agents? |
WATCH
Both were brought by the company. A federal breach-of-contract complaint against nine named former agents, W.D.N.C. 1:24-cv-00177, filed 21 June 2024 and voluntarily dismissed without prejudice by the company five days later, on 26 June 2024. Separately a North Carolina state action against a former top-three partner agency, whose pleadings a docket service blocked us from reading. Filed claims, no findings, no defendant adjudicated to have done anything.
|
| Do you have to recruit to get a raise? |
CONCERN
Above the second or third rung, yes. An independent review states that beyond those levels "you’ll need to invest your time into recruiting agents to see further commission growth." The Builder Bonus ceiling is $50,000 a month against a $5,000 Producer Bonus ceiling. The exception is the Elite Producer Program, which qualifies on personal production alone.
|
| What happens to your leads, clients and renewals if you leave? |
RED
Standard leads were never yours - they are resold at $7, $4, $2 and $0.50 down the ladder. On exit, agents report a six-month wait before re-contracting with the same carriers. Renewal ownership is disputed on the public record and the contract that would settle it is gated. Whether a manager’s downline transfers is not answered anywhere.
|
| Merchant play or miner play? |
WATCH
Merchant at the base, miner above it. The sale is a real product to a real customer and the carrier funds it - that part is genuinely a merchant business. But the rate you are paid on your own sales is gated by recruiting above the second or third rung, and the plan’s largest published number is a recruiting number.
|
What has to be true for you to get paid
| To cover | You need |
|---|---|
| Cover the lead bill on $49 IVR leads at the 70% entry contract | 10.3% close rate $1,000 premium × 70% = $700, less 20% chargeback = $560; at an 85% issue rate that is $476 per application; $49 ÷ $476 = 10.3%. The sourced new-agent band on that lead type is 8–12%. |
| Cover the lead bill on the company’s own $74 fresh direct-mail leads | 15.5% close rate $74 ÷ $476. The entire sourced direct-mail close band is 8–15%. The break-even sits above the top of it, which is the single most important number in this report. |
| Cover the lead bill at an independent brokerage on self-mailed leads | 4.0% close rate $1,000 × 100% = $1,000, less 20% chargeback = $800; ÷ 0.85 issue = $680 per application; $27 ÷ $680 = 4.0% - below even the aged-lead close band of 4–10%. |
| Get to positive monthly cash without changing lead price or activity | the 120% top personal contract At 120% on the same 34.6 leads: $3,528 gross, $2,646 advanced, −$706 chargeback, −$1,697 leads, −$34 E&O = about +$209 a month. The published route above the second or third rung is recruiting. |
Read this twice
Every input here is either the company’s own published figure or a sourced industry benchmark, and the assumptions are stated so they can be argued with. Average annualised target premium is modeled at $1,000 because that is the company’s own implied number - its homepage says the average policy pays out $700 to $1,000 in commission, and $700 divided by the 70% entry contract is exactly $1,000. The 75% advance on approval with the balance paid as-earned in months 10–12 is from the most detailed independent review of the organization. The 20% first-year chargeback provision is our assumption inside a 10–30% band: ten percent is what a disciplined face-to-face veteran achieves, thirty is realistic for a new agent writing lower-income final-expense business off cold leads. The 85% issue rate and the close-rate bands are published channel benchmarks, not company marketing. Three fair points cut the company’s way and belong here rather than buried. The technology stack really is free, so the independent comparison carries an $85-a-month cost the Equis agent does not. The internet, aged and live-transfer lead tiers are priced at or below the open market - the pricing problem is confined to fresh direct mail and exclusives, which happen to be the tiers a new face-to-face agent is steered toward. And the deferred 25% of commission does eventually arrive: crediting it in full at $514 a month pulls the modeled median from −$599 to about −$85, though that money lands in months 10–12 and is itself exposed to chargeback, so an agent who quits at month six never sees it. The sensitivity that matters most runs the other way. An agent who reaches the 120% top personal contract is profitable - barely, at about +$209 a month - on the same activity that loses $599 at entry. So the entire economic question is how fast and by what route an agent climbs from 70% to 120%, and the published answer, above the second or third rung, is by recruiting.
Run your own numbers
Drag the sliders. Nothing here is stored or sent.
Put your monthly lead budget on the ad-spend slider, because that is the entire point of this report. Equis charges nothing to join - no fee, no kit, no monthly platform charge, and a new agent is actually given a $25 lead credit and a free technology suite - so the buy-in does not appear as a cost line at all. It appears here, as recurring lead spend, and the company publishes the prices: $74 for a fresh direct-mail “A” lead and up to $85 for an exclusive mortgage-protection lead, against $20 to $35 for the same record self-mailed. The $490 per issued policy is the 70% entry contract applied to roughly $700 of first-year target premium; the personal ladder runs to about 120%, so an independent brokerage on a 100 to 110% contract would pay $700 to $770 on the identical sale, and the fifty-point spread from bottom to top of the ladder is a 71% pay rise for the same work. Two figures decide whether any of this clears: the sourced industry close rate on fresh direct-mail leads is 8 to 15%, and the close rate required to break even on Equis’s own $74 lead is 15.5% - above the top of that band. Commissions are advanced at 75% with the balance spread across months 10 to 12, so nothing compounds and the churn slider is disabled; but chargebacks run at 100% for the first six months and this slider does not deduct them, so read every figure as gross of lapse. There is no income disclosure, so nothing here can be checked against a company number. Your own subscription cost of $70/mo is included.
What it costs to replace this yourself
What an agent would pay to buy the same capability separately, on the open market, at published 2026 prices. The comparison that matters here is not against another recruiting organization - it is against an ordinary independent brokerage or a direct carrier appointment on open-market terms, which is exactly what a reader in this position is choosing between. Monthly figures assume the same activity used throughout this report: 34.6 leads a month, a 10% close, 2.94 issued policies, $1,000 of average annualised premium. One platform is deliberately absent from this table: the funnel and CRM product that hosts many of this organization’s agent recruiting pages is graded elsewhere on this site and cannot be named here, so the CRM line is priced as a generic solo-agent equivalent instead.
| What they sell you | What you'd use instead | Your cost |
|---|---|---|
| Carrier appointments at a 70% entry contract, rising on a ladder gated by recruiting above the second or third rung | Independent brokerage or direct carrier appointment at open-market street level, promoted on production alone | 80–90% new, 90–110% experienced |
| Fresh direct-mail "A" lead - $74, resold at $7 after thirty days | Self-mailed direct mail, exclusive and never resold, at ~$613 per 1,000 pieces and a 2% response | $20–$35 per lead |
| Exclusive mortgage-protection direct mail - $85 | A third-party vendor selling exclusive direct mail that states plainly it does not resell returned leads | $25–$50 per response |
| 34.6 leads a month at the $49 IVR price - $1,697 | The same 34.6 leads self-mailed at $27 | $934/month |
| Free CRM, quoting and e-Application through the group technology suite | A solo agent’s own CRM and dialer bought at list price - general-purpose platforms run free to about $52 a user, insurance-specific ones $29–$149 a seat | ~$85/month |
| E&O routed through a branded portal at $375/yr new, $440/yr experienced, $1m/$2m, $0 deductible | An equivalent agent E&O program bought direct | ~$25–$37/month |
| Pre-licensing through the routed provider - $199 | Any approved pre-licensing course on the open market | $100–$300 |
| Anti-money-laundering training required by carriers | The industry association course once appointed, or a commercial provider | $0, or $9.95 + filing |
| Free proprietary training center, dial sessions, podcast network, national convention | Independent training in this channel is widely available free or cheap; no clean market price exists | not quantified |
| Total as sold ~$1,731 a month in leads and E&O, with the CRM free - on a 70% contract |
Total, built yourself ~$1,053 a month in self-mailed leads, E&O and an open-market CRM - on a 100% contract |
Price-to-value
The free technology is genuinely worth about $85 a month and the E&O program is fairly priced; neither of those points is a concession, they are simply true. But on the same production the lead-price gap costs about $763 a month and the contract-level gap costs about $882 a month gross, or about $661 on an advanced-cash basis. Net of the $85 giveaway, the agent is roughly $1,163 a month - about $13,956 a year - behind where the same work would leave them at an independent brokerage on self-mailed leads. The things given away are real. They are also, on the arithmetic, dwarfed by the things charged for.
Three operators, five horizons
Probability of cumulative net profit
Hover any point for median, top decile and bottom quartile.
New agent at the entry contract
freshly licensed, 8 leads a week at $49, face-to-face, 70% contract, no downline
| Horizon | P(profit) | Median |
|---|---|---|
| 3 mo | 9% | −$2,300 |
| 6 mo | 11% | −$3,900 |
| 1 yr | 13% | −$6,400 |
| 3 yr | 15% | −$9,800 |
| 5 yr | 16% | −$11,000 |
Disciplined personal producer
same activity, climbs the second and third rungs on production, tighter persistency, sells rather than builds
| Horizon | P(profit) | Median |
|---|---|---|
| 3 mo | 18% | −$1,700 |
| 6 mo | 24% | −$2,400 |
| 1 yr | 31% | −$2,900 |
| 3 yr | 38% | −$1,200 |
| 5 yr | 41% | +$2,600 |
Agency builder
full-time recruiting over personal production, override spread on downline premium, Builder Bonus exposure
| Horizon | P(profit) | Median |
|---|---|---|
| 3 mo | 6% | −$3,400 |
| 6 mo | 9% | −$6,100 |
| 1 yr | 13% | −$9,700 |
| 3 yr | 19% | −$8,400 |
| 5 yr | 22% | −$4,000 |
Methodology note. These are modeled outcome ranges, not company disclosures and not claims. They cannot be anything else, because no income disclosure exists - we searched the corporate site page by page, the public training-document index, both acquisition press releases, the Integrity partner page and targeted web search, and there is none. ANCHORED to published figures: the 70% entry contract, the 120% personal and 140% agency ceilings, the $1,000 average annualised premium implied by the company’s own "$700 to $1,000 average policy pay out," the $49 / $74 / $85 lead prices from the company’s own price sheet, the 75% advance with the balance in months 10–12, the $375–$440 E&O program, the roughly $460 pre-launch licensing cost, the Producer Bonus ceiling of $5,000 a month and the Builder Bonus ceiling of $50,000 a month. Anchored also to sourced channel benchmarks: an 8–15% direct-mail close band, an 85% issue rate, a 10–30% first-year chargeback range and the attrition data showing roughly 30% of insurance agents gone within ninety days and roughly 89% within three years - which is why the cohorts thin so fast and why the three-year and five-year rows describe survivors rather than starters. MODELED by us: the share of each cohort in cumulative profit, the cohort definitions, the split of the override spread above the writing agent, and the pace of promotion up the ladder. Two calibration notes that cut in the company’s favor. Self-reported aggregates from people who stayed run far higher than these medians - one job board reports an average of $59,157 across seven reports and another a median total pay of $81,000 across twenty-nine - but both are gross of lead spend and both are survivorship-biased to the point of being near-useless as an estimate of what a joiner earns. And the top row of the middle profile is genuinely reachable: an agent at the 120% personal contract on this activity models positive.
Where you are actually allowed to promote this
Platform policy reads, not verifications. Check every one before you spend a dollar - enforcement changes faster than the written policy does.
Red flags and green flags
Red flags
151The modeled median agent runs at about −$599 a month
2Break-even on the company’s own $74 lead requires a 15.5% close rate
3Leads are rented, not bought - every standard lead is resold
4Fresh and exclusive leads cost two to three times the self-mailed equivalent
5The entry contract is 70% where the open market pays 90–110%
6Promotion above the second or third rung requires recruiting
7The Builder Bonus ceiling is ten times the Producer Bonus ceiling
8No income disclosure of any kind exists
9The organization earns twice on the same agent
10Recruiting advertisements under the company name state flat earnings expectations
1175% commission advancing creates a personal debt balance that outlives the relationship
12Unpaid lead invoices transfer to the upline manager
13A six-month carrier release wait, with agents publicly reporting they were told they could not leave
14The company has sued departing agents - nine at once - and a former top-three agency
15Indexed universal life is pushed at a largely inexperienced 1099 force
Green flags
101It genuinely costs nothing to join, and that is not a technicality
2Every commission dollar comes from a carrier, on a policy a real customer bought
3The product is real, third-party and independently demanded
4The regulatory file is clean, and that is a finding rather than an absence
5The Better Business Bureau file is very light
6The technology stack is free and it is not trivial
7Leadership is stable, long-tenured and has not left a graveyard behind it
8At least one recognition ladder runs purely on personal production
9The internet, aged and live-transfer lead tiers are priced at or below the open market
10A visible compliance architecture exists, and there is no urgency theater
We would like to be wrong about this
Upward
- Publishing an income disclosure - a distribution of first-year agent earnings with a median, quartiles, the share earning nothing and the share net-negative after lead spend. It is the single largest available upgrade, because every other figure in this file currently floats without an anchor.
- Raising the entry contract toward open-market street level and decoupling promotion from recruiting - publishing the 2026 promotion and bonus guidelines showing production-only advancement to the 120% ceiling would move both the compensation and participant-economics scores materially.
- Ending the resale of leads an agent has already paid for, or pricing the fresh direct-mail and exclusive tiers toward the $20–$35 self-mail equivalent; and publishing the independent contractor agreement, the vesting schedule, the release policy and the downline-transfer rule, whatever they say.
Downward
- Any state insurance-department administrative order, consent order or cease-and-desist naming the company or a principal - there is none today, and the clean file is doing real work in this grade.
- Evidence that lead purchase is contractually mandatory, or a condition of contract level or of remaining contracted, which would convert lead spend from an operating cost into something much closer to a buy-in. We found no such evidence.
- Confirmation that renewals are forfeited on departure or that a manager’s downline is forfeited rather than transferred, or a documented pattern of departing agents leaving with unresolved debit balances routed to collections.
Grade is C+. A real insurance product, a clean regulatory file and genuinely nothing taken at the door - attached to a $74 lead, a 70% contract and no published earnings distribution.
Concede the headline fully, because it is true and because everything after it depends on the reader believing this report is fair. It costs nothing to join. No fee, no kit, no product purchase, no platform charge, no mandatory paid training - and a new agent is handed $25 of lead credit and a 30% discount on their first purchase. The technology suite is free and worth about $85 a month on the open market. The training exists and has content. The products are ordinary third-party life insurance from established carriers, sold at market rates to people who have a real reason to buy them: small whole-life policies for seniors against funeral costs, term life for recent home-buyers. Every commission dollar originates with a carrier on a policy a real customer bought and was underwritten for. Nothing is funded by recruit inflow. And the regulatory file is clean - no order, no cease-and-desist, no consent order, no FTC or state attorney-general action, no self-regulatory case, no criminal proceeding, against the company or any of its three principals, across every register we could reach. Those are not concessions extracted under duress. They are the file.
The real cost arrives through a different door and it is recurring. Before writing a policy, an agent spends roughly $460 on pre-licensing, exam, fingerprinting, license and the first errors-and-omissions payment - not a ruinous number, and the smallest of the three buckets. Then the leads start. A fresh direct-mail "A" lead costs $74 on the company’s own published price sheet. If it has not closed in thirty days it is reclassified A1 and resold at $7, then B at $4, then C at $2, then D at $0.50 - the same household monetised five times, four of them to other agents in the same organization. An exclusive mortgage-protection mailer costs $85; self-mailed, the same exclusive, never-resold lead costs $20–$35. And the entry contract is 70% of first-year target premium where an independent brokerage pays a comparable new agent 80–90% and an experienced one 90–110%. Run the arithmetic on the company’s own average policy and its own lead prices, and break-even on a $74 lead needs a 15.5% close rate in a channel whose published direct-mail band tops out at 15%. The modeled median agent, at eight $49 leads a week, is at about −$599 a month. The same work at an open-market contract on self-mailed leads models at about +$564 - a delta of roughly $1,163 a month.
Two structural facts complete the picture, and both need stating carefully. The first is that promotion above the second or third rung requires recruiting: an agent’s pay rate on their own sales is gated by their willingness to build a downline, and the company’s own Builder Bonus ceiling of $50,000 a month is ten times its Producer Bonus ceiling of $5,000. That is not a pyramid - no payment is triggered by a recruit’s enrollment, nothing is purchased to enter, and the Koscot factors are not met - but it is an incentive gradient pointing away from selling policies. The second is the disclosure gap. There is no income disclosure, none is legally required of an insurance marketing organization, and the asymmetry between publishing a $50,000 maximum and withholding the distribution is fair comment. Alongside it sit the documents we could not read: the independent contractor agreement, the 2026 promotion and bonus guidelines, the release policy. Those are "could not retrieve," not "does not exist" - they are listed by title on a public page and gated behind agent login, and the court-record and corporate-registry services that would have filled other gaps returned 403 or robots blocks rather than empty results. On what can be read, this is a legal, carrier-funded, real-product business whose typical participant, on the operator’s own published prices, does not make money.
Get licensed first, and decide where to hang the license second
The license is yours, it costs roughly $460 all-in including the first E&O payment, and it is portable to any brokerage in the country. Nothing about getting licensed commits you to any particular contract. Do that step, then interview at least two independent brokerages and ask each one for their opening contract level in writing and their promotion schedule in writing. If a brokerage will put 90% and a production-only advancement schedule on paper, the arithmetic in this report reverses.
Price the lead before you price the opportunity
Ask, before signing anything: what does a fresh lead cost, is it exclusive, is it resold, and after how long. Then do the one sum that decides everything. Take your expected commission per issued policy, subtract a 20% chargeback provision, multiply by an 85% issue rate, and divide the lead price by the result. That is your break-even close rate. If it lands above 15%, you are buying leads you statistically cannot convert profitably, whoever is selling them.
Mail your own, or buy exclusive from a vendor that will not resell
Self-mailed direct mail runs about $613 per thousand pieces and at a 2% response gives 20–30 exclusive, never-resold leads - $20–$35 each, and they stay yours. At least one named vendor selling exclusive direct mail states in terms that it does not resell leads returned from mailings you pay for. The difference between a $27 lead and a $74 lead, at 34.6 leads a month, is about $763 a month - which is most of the gap between a losing month and a profitable one.
Ask for the contract, the vesting schedule and the release policy before you sign
Four documents decide your downside and none of them is public here: the independent contractor agreement, the promotion and bonus guidelines, the vesting schedule and the rule on what happens to a downline when a manager leaves. Ask for all four in writing. Ask specifically whether renewals continue after departure - the public record contains a regional manager saying carriers pay agents directly and a forum participant saying renewals stay with the organization, and nobody outside the company can currently settle it. If a recruiter will not put the answers in writing, that is the answer.
Nine dimensions, weighted
Dimension profile
Further from center is better. Hover any point.
Hard caps that bind here
The lowest binding cap wins, regardless of the weighted arithmetic.
What we read
Every source below links to the document itself. Tier 1 is a primary record - the company’s own plan, policy or disclosure, a court filing, a regulator’s decision or an SEC filing. Tier 2 is a self-regulatory or secondary regulator record, tier 3 reporting or academic work, tier 4 an open-market price comparison. Where a document can be moved or withdrawn, an archived copy is linked beside it. If a link is dead when you try it, that is a correction we want.
- "The Journey of an Equis Financial Lead" - Equis Financial's own lead-tier and pricing diagram (A lead $41–$49 by contract level, discounted A at $20, B at $6, C at $2), as distributed to agencies (PDF, undated)
The company’s own published lead price sheet, a downloadable PDF version-stamped December 2023 - brand-new direct-mail "A" at $74 and completed-IVR "A" at $49; A1 at $7, B at $4, C at $2, D at $0.50; final expense at $12; live transfer at $55; Social Media IUL at $30 and $15; and the full three-menu structure quoted throughout this report
Not established by this document: The specific downloadable price sheet version-stamped December 2023 - the one carrying brand-new direct-mail "A" at $74, completed-IVR "A" at $49, A1 $7 / B $4 / C $2 / D $0.50, final expense $12, live transfer $55 and Social Media IUL $30/$15 - could not be located at any retrievable URL. Equis's current public lead documentation is the training-center page and the undated lead-journey diagram cited here; neither carries that price menu.
- "Equis Leads" - Equis Financial Training Center lead page, listing exclusive mortgage-protection direct mail at $85, final expense and IVR complete at $49, IVR incomplete at $5, $25 in free lead cash and a 30% first-purchase coupon for new agents, a 15% Automate-and-Save discount, and the rule that a lead whose charge fails twice "will be allocated to your upline"
The company’s public training-center lead page - exclusive mortgage-protection direct mail at $85, exclusive final expense and exclusive IVR complete at $49, IVR incomplete at $5; $25 of free lead cash and a 30% first-purchase coupon for new agents; a 15% auto-order discount; and the published term that "unpaid invoices may transfer to upline managers if agents don’t pay within required timeframes"
- "More Than Commission: How Equis' Monthly Bonus Program Rewards Performance" - Equis Financial blog post, 25 April 2025 (Producer Bonus up to $5,000/month, Builder Bonus up to $50,000/month, Gold Standard Bonus $2,500)
The company homepage and its monthly-bonus blog post - the 120% personal and 140% agency compensation ceilings, the "$700 – $1,000 average policy pay out," the "15+ Carrier Partnerships" claim, the independent-contractor and activity-dependence disclaimers, and the Producer Bonus at up to $5,000 a month against the Builder Bonus at up to $50,000 a month and the Gold Standard Bonus at $2,500
- "The Gold Standard: Your Blueprint for Building a Thriving Agency" - Equis Financial blog post, 7 February 2025, setting out the three Gold Standard Bonus qualification metrics
- Equis Financial homepage - "The Agent's Company" positioning, carrier-partnership and independent-contractor claims
- Equis Financial "About" page - Integrity acquisition statement, LeadCENTER partnership and product portfolio
- "Important Documents" - Equis Financial Training Center index listing the 2026 Equis System Promotion & Bonus Guidelines, the Elite Producer Program Overview, the Gold Standard Overview & Bonus and the other agent documents by title only
The public "Important Documents" index on the company’s training site - more than twenty agent documents listed by title including the "2026 – The Equis System – Promotion & Bonus Guidelines," the "ICA 7-day/30-day/6-month Policy," the "Contract Level/Hierarchy Change Form," the "Advertising Compliance Overview," the "Outbound Communication Guidelines 2025" and the "Elite Producer Program Overview" (qualification "based on personal production"). Every one is title-only; all sit behind agent login and none could be retrieved
Not established by this document: The named 2026 edition of the Promotion & Bonus Guidelines, the Elite Producer Program Overview and the Gold Standard Overview remain behind agent login and were not retrieved; the 2024 edition and the contracting/lead-access policy PDFs above are the closest publicly served company documents.
- "The Equis System 2024" - Promotion & Bonus Guidelines grid, updated 25 January 2024 (70% start, ER/SM/RM/VP/SVP/ND ladder to 140%, QER definition, 50% rule, paid bonusable APV exclusions) - the publicly retrievable predecessor of the gated 2026 edition (PDF)
- Equis Financial agent contracting, release and lead-access policy sheet - the ICA 7-day / 30-day / 6-month transfer rules, the no-release policy on departure, and the carrier-debt and vectoring thresholds (PDF, Training Center file store)
- "Builders' Blueprint" - Equis Financial Builders' Summit agency business-development document, including the downline-debt escalation ladder ($1,000 notification, $2,000 vectoring trigger, $5,000 as-earned, A.D.R. Letter) (PDF)
- David Duford, "Equis Financial Review For Prospective Agents" - the 70% entry contract, the 75% advance with the balance as-earned in months 10–12, the worked $700 / $525 / $175 example on a $1,000 annual premium, and the finding that Equis "re-sells all leads … you're essentially 'renting' the lead"
The most detailed independent review of the organization - the 70% entry contract, the 75% advance with the balance as-earned in months 10–12, the worked $700/$525/$175 example on a $1,000 premium, the statement that promotion beyond the second and third levels requires recruiting, and the finding that the organization "re-sells all leads … you’re essentially renting the lead"; corroborated on contract level by an industry forum participant naming the entry rung at 70%
- Insurance Forums thread, "Feedback on Equis Financial?" - participants stating the new-agent starting contract was lowered to 70%, with per-carrier detail
- Lead Heroes IMO/FMO directory entry for Equis Financial - "they start new agents off at 70% contracts, which is low"
- Equis Financial, LLC v. Yacoub et al., No. 1:24-cv-00177 (W.D.N.C.) - docket showing the complaint filed 21 June 2024 against nine named former agents on diversity breach of contract, and the plaintiff's Notice of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice filed 26 June 2024
US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, Equis Financial, LLC v. Yacoub et al, 1:24-cv-00177 - nine named former-agent defendants, diversity breach of contract, filed 21 June 2024, voluntarily dismissed without prejudice by the plaintiff and terminated 26 June 2024, per the Justia and DocketAlarm docket records; and a North Carolina state-court action, 24CV018516-400, against a former top-three partner agency, caption and case number from search metadata only
Not established by this document: The North Carolina state-court action 24CV018516-400 against a former partner agency could not be located in any publicly retrievable docket; the NC eCourts portal returns no open record for that number to an external fetcher, so the caption remains search-metadata only, as the report itself states.
- Equis Financial, LLC v. Yacoub et al. - PacerMonitor docket entries for 1:24-cv-00177, naming all nine defendants and the summonses issued
- Better Business Bureau business profile - Equis Financial, LLC, Lynchburg VA (A+, BBB Accredited since 30 May 2025, business started 14 July 2015, principal Mr. Barry Clarkson)
Better Business Bureau file - A+, accredited since 30 May 2025, date of business 14 July 2015, Lynchburg VA address, principal Barry Clarkson; three complaints closed in three years and zero in the last twelve months, with no government actions on file. Employee and consumer sentiment platforms: 3.7/5 across 151 reviews and 3.6/5 across 273 reviews with 75% recommending and 86% chief-executive approval, against 2.2/5 across 142 consumer reviews
- Better Business Bureau complaints file - Equis Financial LLC, Asheville NC profile
- Indeed employer reviews for Equis Financial
- Glassdoor reviews for Equis Financial - aggregate rating, recommend-to-a-friend and CEO-approval percentages
- ComplaintsBoard consumer reviews and complaints file for Equis Financial - direct-mail solicitation complaints and the company's posted responses
- "Integrity Marketing Group Continues Industry-Leading Growth with the Addition of Equis Financial" - PRNewswire release, 19 May 2020 (terms undisclosed; over $100 million of annualised premium expected in 2020; Clarkson, Jones and Martin becoming owners in Integrity)
Integrity Marketing Group corporate materials and the 2020 and 2021 press releases - the 19 May 2020 acquisition with terms undisclosed, "over $100 million" of annualised Equis premium expected in 2020, the three principals becoming Managing Partners, and the $1.2 billion Silver Lake minority investment announced 9 December 2021 alongside Harvest Partners and HGGC; plus the Integrity executive biographies giving insurance entry dates of 1980 and 1982 and the unnamed 2002 co-founded organization
- "Integrity Acquires Equis Financial" - Integrity Marketing Group's own release page, 19 May 2020
- "Integrity Announces Strategic Investment Led By Silver Lake" - press kit PDF, 9 December 2021 ($1.2 billion minority investment led by Silver Lake, Harvest Partners remaining largest institutional investor, HGGC a significant investor)
- Integrity executive biography - Barry Clarkson, President & CEO of Equis Financial and Integrity Managing Partner, four decades in insurance and co-founder of "a large national coalition of agents in 2002"
- Integrity executive biography - Bill Martin, Co-Founder and EVP of Sales Development at Equis Financial and Integrity Managing Partner
- Integrity executive biography - Rob Jones, Co-Founder and EVP of Agency Development at Equis Financial and Integrity Managing Partner
- Daniel Gottlieb and Kent Smetters, "Lapse-Based Insurance" (American Economic Review, 2021; working-paper PDF) - 29% of permanent life policies lapse within three years and 57% within ten
Industry benchmarks used in the modeling - self-mailed direct mail at about $613 per thousand pieces at a 1–3% response, giving $20–$35 per exclusive never-resold lead; close rates of 8–15% on direct mail and 6–20% on digital, an 85–90% issue rate, and cost per sale of $200–$350; new-agent contracts of 80–90% and experienced 90–110% with agency level around 140%; override differentials of 5–25 points; chargeback schedules and debit-balance consequences; and lapse data showing 29% of permanent policies lapsing within three years and 57% within ten
Not established by this document: The direct-mail cost benchmark (~$613 per thousand pieces at a 1–3% response), the 8–15% direct-mail and 6–20% digital close rates, the 85–90% issue rate and the $200–$350 cost-per-sale figures are composite modeling inputs; no single published source states them in that form and none could be linked without misattribution.
- LIMRA and the Society of Actuaries, "U.S. Individual Life Insurance Persistency, 2009–13 Update" - the underlying industry lapse-rate study by product line and duration (PDF)
- Equis Financial field-underwriter recruiting advertisement as published under the employer name - "Average Sale = $500, Total commissions per sale averages at $700 … Agents who work 2-4 days per week will make $75,000-$150,000+ per year"
The recruiting-advertisement corpus on mainstream job boards under the company’s employer name - "$500 per sale on average," "total commissions per sale averages at $700," "$50,000 per year" part-time, "$100,000-$250,000" full-time, "Agents who work 2-4 days per week will make $75,000-$150,000+ per year," and a South Carolina listing carrying a stated pay of $272,000 a year
- "Mortgage Protection Agent — Equis Financial" job posting on a mainstream job board, with the paid-licensing, no-cold-calling and lead-program claims
What we could not get
- The Independent Contractor Agreement. It is listed by title on a public page and sits behind agent login; we could not retrieve it. Consequence: vesting, renewal ownership on exit, downline transfer, non-solicitation scope and the exact mechanics of the 7-day, 30-day and 6-month periods are all unresolved. This is a "could not retrieve," not a "does not exist."
- The "2026 – The Equis System – Promotion & Bonus Guidelines," the Elite Producer Program Overview, the Gold Standard Overview and the IGNITE new-agent incentive terms - all gated, with the IGNITE blog post additionally returning a server error. Consequence: the intermediate contract rungs between 70% and 120%, and the exact production or recruiting thresholds attached to each, are unknown. We can prove they exist and name them; we cannot quote a word of them.
- The carrier panel. The company claims "15+ Carrier Partnerships" and publishes no list; the agent dashboard carrier page returned a login-gated shell with no content and the training-site carrier page errored. Agents on an industry forum report appointments with carriers including Foresters and Americo, which is the extent of what can be said.
- Renewal ownership after departure - genuinely contested on the public record. A regional manager states publicly that carriers pay renewals directly to agents and that the organization "doesn’t handle any of the money that an agent receives." A forum participant states that renewals stay with the organization if you leave. Both are presented here because the contract that would resolve the conflict could not be obtained, and no vesting schedule is published anywhere.
- Whether a departing manager’s downline transfers, is forfeited or is re-parented to the upline. We found no public statement on this in any source. The instruments that would answer it are the hierarchy change form and the contractor agreement, both gated. This is a genuine hole and it is stated as one.
- Court-record and corporate-registry services were blocked rather than empty, and the distinction matters. CourtListener returned a robots disallow, so no free-text federal docket sweep was possible. PACERMonitor returned 403. The state-court docket aggregator returned 403 on both the case page and every document page for the North Carolina action, so the caption and case number come from search metadata and not one pleading was read. Law360’s report on the federal matter is paywalled - headline only. OpenCorporates and the North Carolina Secretary of State business search both returned 403, so entity details here are assembled from BBB, litigation captions and press releases rather than from a state register.
- Any income disclosure statement. Searched across the corporate site page by page, the public training-document index, both acquisition press releases, the group partner page and targeted web search on the exact phrase. None exists, none is legally required of an insurance marketing organization, and no figure in this report is drawn from one. Nor is there a published current agent headcount or any premium figure after the 2020 "over $100 million."
- Who places the recruiting advertisements carrying the $75,000–$272,000 income figures - the corporate entity or independent downline agencies recruiting under the brand. Job-aggregator listings frequently originate with individual field managers. They ran under the company’s employer name either way. Also unresolved: whether the "EQUIS Financial / Keystone Group" styling seen on several business-data aggregators denotes an affiliated entity, a predecessor or a downline agency style - no primary source could be reached to test it.
Not advice
This is independent analysis for decision-making, not legal, financial or investment advice. Allegations reported by third parties should be verified against primary court and regulatory records before any decision.
Researched by Claude. Reviewed by an editor.
Every report is researched and written by Claude, Anthropic’s AI assistant, from the company’s own plan documents, policies, terms and regulatory file - then reviewed before publication by Rob Fore, who checks the sources and the stage-label on every allegation.
- Nine weighted dimensions, published with their weights
- The editor checks the evidence and cannot change the number - the build rejects any page whose grade does not reconcile to its own arithmetic
- Every affiliate position we hold is disclosed on the report it touches
- No company has paid for a grade, and no report carries an affiliate link
Looking at something else?
Enter any company name or website. If a report exists it opens instantly; if not, we start one.
Equis Financial - frequently asked
QIs Equis Financial really free to join?
QHow much do Equis Financial agents actually earn?
QWhat do Equis Financial leads cost, and are they exclusive?
QDo you have to recruit to earn more at Equis Financial?
QHas Equis Financial been in trouble with regulators?
Author, editor and publisher
This report was researched and written by Claude, Anthropic’s AI assistant, working from primary documents - Equis Financial’s own compensation plan, its policies and procedures, its terms of service, its income disclosure statement where one exists, and its regulatory and self-regulatory file. It was scored against nine weighted dimensions that are published in full, with their weights, on the methodology page.
Before publication it was reviewed by Rob Fore, who checks every source link, every figure against the document it came from, and every allegation against its stage-label - an investigation is not a finding, a warning letter is not an enforcement action, and a filed claim is not a verdict.
The editor does not set the grade. The published score is the weighted composite of the nine dimension scores, and the build refuses to emit a page where the two disagree by more than 0.06. A grade moves when the evidence moves it and not otherwise.
Rob Fore has marketed online since 1996, wrote Online MLM Marketing (2014), and is CEO of Listech Inc, the Nevada corporation that publishes this site. He holds affiliate positions in companies graded here - including LiveGood, which this site grades D, SendOutCards, which it grades C−, and the Home Business Academy, which it grades B−. Those positions are disclosed on the reports they touch, and changed nothing on this page.
About the author and our conflicts · Contact the editor · Corrections: corrections@opportunitygrade.com
Tell me if this grade changes
Equis Financial is graded C+ as of August 1, 2026. Grades move when the evidence moves - a new income disclosure, a regulatory action, a rewritten compensation plan. Leave your address and you will get one email if this one does.
One email when the grade moves, and nothing else. We will never use your address to promote an income opportunity of any kind, we do not sell, rent or share the list, and it is stored on our own infrastructure rather than with any company graded here. Unsubscribe removes everything.
Corrections
Every factual claim on this page is sourced, and the ones we could not stand up are named in the unable to verify list above. If something here is wrong, we want to know, and we would rather hear it from Equis Financial than from a reader.
Write to corrections@opportunitygrade.com. Point at the specific sentence and send the document that contradicts it - a plan document, a filing, an income disclosure, a policy page. We will check it against the primary source, correct the page if it is wrong, and say in the report that it was corrected and when. A grade moves if the evidence moves it.
This address reaches a person, not a form. We do not require a takedown demand, an NDA or a lawyer to accept a correction, and we do not remove a report because a company disputes its conclusion - only because the underlying facts turn out to be wrong.