Travorium
A travel discount membership whose member rates genuinely beat retail on some hotels and lose to it on others - sold by a company that does not perform the travel, under a contract that names a separate fulfillment company the current site footer no longer mentions.
The member’s contract names Leisure Loyalty, Inc. as the company that actually handles every booking - and no points-redemption schedule is published anywhere, so the flagship “$1 a night, 70–90% off” claim cannot be priced by anyone before they pay.
Can you actually make money with Travorium?
No. The company's own income disclosure settles it before anything else needs saying. Over 88% of members earn nothing. And the promoted configuration, Platinum membership plus the partnership, costs $1,989.90 in the first year and $1,719.95 every year after, against published average annual earnings of $24 at Partner and $240 at Silver Director.
Follow that ladder up. Titanium Director averages $600 and Platinum Director averages $1,200. Every one of the first four partner ranks is a net loss on the company's own figures, before a single expense, and the disclosure states plainly that its numbers do not reflect any expenses a Partner may incur. The designed break-even sits at rank 3 of 16: Platinum Director pays $4.45 a day, which is $135 a month, which is the Platinum dues to the cent. The first rank whose disclosed average beats the annual cost is 1 Star Director at $5,412.
Look at what actually pays, too. Every commissionable event in this plan is a subscription. A member who books a $3,000 cruise through the platform generates no additional commissionable volume for anyone. The Ambassador Pool is defined as 3% of new membership sales, so the top of the plan is funded out of new enrollments by definition. And the word retail appears zero times in the Policies and Procedures.
Parts of this are genuinely well built and they should be counted. The compensation plan and the income disclosure are both public, unlocked and dated, and the disclosure states the zero-earner rate on its own face. There is a real 14-day full refund on the enrollment fee written into the binding contract with a defined process. The subscription is month-to-month with no minimum term and no termination penalty. And the rank ladder does require actual customers, four at 1 Star Director rising to nine at 4 Star.
Platinum enrollment, then $135 a month in dues, plus a separate $99.95 annual partnership fee to earn - $1,989.90 in year one for the promoted configuration
- A published points-redemption schedule. The flagship offer is $1 a night and 70 to 90% off, and with no redemption table anywhere, nobody can price it before they have paid to see it.
- Commission that follows the travel rather than the subscription. As written, a partner is paid for selling access and paid nothing when the member books, which is the reverse of how a travel business earns.
- A zero-earner rate published for partners, not only for members. The disclosure gives that figure for members who remain active customers; the share of paying partners who earn nothing has never appeared in any document.
- A reinstatement fee that is not larger than the joining fee. Ninety days of arrears opens a seven-day window to pay $395 on a Platinum account, against $269.95 to join in the first place, and missing that window cancels the account permanently.
That call is computed, not chosen - the rule reads three of the nine published dimension scores and is printed on the methodology page. It describes this company's plan and the figures it publishes about the people already in it. It is not a prediction about you, and nothing on this site is advice.
Legal status
LEGAL - no court or regulator has found Travorium or Paid 2 Save Network, LLC to be a pyramid scheme, and there is no adverse finding of any kind in the public record located. There is no FTC complaint, consent order or civil penalty action; no state Attorney General action, assurance of voluntary compliance or cease-and-desist; no self-regulatory case; no matches for either name in a federal and state court records database; and no entry on any national financial-regulator warning list. Travorium does appear on the FTC’s published October 2021 list of recipients of the Notice of Penalty Offenses Concerning Money-Making Opportunities - a mass-mailed notice of pre-existing law sent to more than a thousand recipients, on which the FTC states in terms that inclusion "is NOT an indication that it has done anything wrong." Two caveats belong beside the clean record. The member agreement imposes confidential single-arbitrator arbitration in Riverside County, California with a class-action waiver, so private disputes are invisible by design; and a claimed SEC warning circulating in third-party commentary could not be substantiated at all - no SEC action, alert, litigation release or administrative proceeding naming Travorium, Paid 2 Save Network or David Hart was located, and it appears to be a conflation with the 2021 FTC notice.
Confidence: Medium
Primary sources fetched directly where possible. Everything we could not verify is listed at the bottom of this page by name.
Follow the money
A California travel membership club sold through independent participants on a binary compensation plan, offering three subscription tiers - Silver at $69.95 then $52.50 a month, Titanium at $149.95 then $75, Platinum at $269.95 then $135 - with a separate $99.95 annual partnership fee for anyone who wants to earn. The trademark registration describes the business accurately: "administration of a customer loyalty program which provides points redeemable for discounts on travel" and "membership club services." It is a loyalty-points club, not a travel agency, and that is the right frame for assessing the "wholesale travel" language.
Several things here are genuinely better than the category norm and they should be said plainly and first. The full compensation plan is published openly, dated, in three languages, with no login - many operators will not do that, and it is the single most useful thing a company can do for a prospect. An income disclosure is public and unlocked, and it states on its own face that over 88% earn nothing. The $99.95 partnership fee is low and genuinely unbundled: a person can buy the travel product without the income opportunity and the opportunity without the product, and there is no starter kit, no inventory, no qualifying order and no autoship. There is a real 14-day full refund written into the binding contract. Pricing has been stable for at least two years. Rank qualification requires stated numbers of actual customers. And when the member rates were tested against mainstream retail sites, two of the four checkable comparisons showed a real discount - $86.99 a night on a Paris hotel where retail runs $135–$211, and $84.75 a night on Las Vegas four-star inventory where averages run $127–$204. The product is not vapor.
The structural finding is who the member is actually dealing with, and it comes from the member’s own contract. The Membership Plan Terms and Conditions define a "Fulfillment Company" and name it - Leisure Loyalty, Inc. - stating that "All reservations and purchases of travel services by Members are handled directly by Fulfillment Company through our booking engine." That company is not an affiliate or subsidiary. It is an independent Arizona-registered white-label platform vendor that describes itself as "a third party supplier" whose platform is "offered to your customer under your branding – not our own", and it holds its own Florida seller-of-travel registration. So: Paid 2 Save Network, LLC owns the brand outright and takes the member’s money as merchant of record for the subscription; a separate company performs the travel as operator of record; and Travorium’s contract then states that it "RETAINS NO OWNERSHIP INTEREST, MANAGEMENT, OR CONTROL" of suppliers, "assumes no liability" for a supplier’s failure to perform, releases the Fulfillment Company by name, caps aggregate liability at the fees the member has paid, and takes a waiver of California Civil Code §1542. If the hotel is not there on arrival, the member’s recourse against the brand is capped at their own subscription payments, and their recourse against the company that actually made the booking is undefined because they have no contract with it. The prior-generation Travorium site named that company and its seller-of-travel number in the footer; the current footer names only Paid 2 Save Network, LLC. The most important structural fact about the product became less prominent, not more.
The money side is short and it comes from the company’s own documents. Platinum plus partnership is $1,989.90 in year one. The disclosed average annual earnings are $24 at Partner, $240 at Silver Director, $600 at Titanium Director and $1,200 at Platinum Director - four consecutive net losses - and the first rank whose disclosed average exceeds the annual cost of participation is 1 Star Director at $5,412, which requires 250 personal CSV, 1,200 team BV, 600 BV in each leg and four customers. The plan’s own designed break-even sits at rank 3 of 16, where Platinum Director’s $4.45 a day works out at $135 a month, exactly the Platinum dues to the cent. Meanwhile every commissionable event is a subscription: Silver 35 BV, Titanium 50 BV, Platinum 80 BV, and nothing at all for the travel a member books. The Ambassador Pool is 3% of "new membership sales" and the Lifestyle Bonus requires 100 CSV of new sales every month, so the plan is funded by inflow and resets on renewals. And the word "retail" appears zero times in the Policies and Procedures - no 70% rule, no consumption cap, no volume audit, no buy-back.
Then the points, which are the flagship and the least testable part of the offer. Members earn one point per dollar of enrollment fee and two per dollar of monthly dues, so a point costs exactly $0.50 through dues. A "$1 a night" Getaway is not cheap; it is prepaid, and its real price is cash plus points consumed at fifty cents each plus resort fees. But no redemption schedule is published anywhere a non-member can reach it, so nobody outside can calculate the exchange rate between points and nights before subscribing. Points expire at 24 months, are forfeited in full on cancellation and after 90 days of arrears, cannot be transferred or cashed, and Getaways may be booked only once every 90 days - capping consumption at four a year and making accumulate-then-forfeit the default for anyone who leaves. A $395 reinstatement fee, larger than the $269.95 joining fee, guards the whole arrangement.
The distribution as the company prints it
Travorium’s own Income Disclosure Statement. The document carries no date, no participant counts and no medians, and it never states the share of paying partners who earned nothing. Read the wording precisely: it says members who "remain active customers", not participants.
| Product | Price | Pays |
|---|---|---|
| Silver membership $699.95 in year one for a hotel discount portal with no travel points and no access to Getaways or World Tours - the two products the marketing is built around. The tier most likely to be mis-sold. Note a drafting failure: the binding contract promises all members two points per dollar of dues, while the enrollment table gives Silver none. |
$69.95 then $52.50/mo monthly |
35 BV |
| Titanium membership $1,049.95 in year one. 150 travel points a month, i.e. points bought at exactly $0.50 each. Adds World Tours and Resort Getaways access. |
$149.95 then $75/mo monthly |
50 BV |
| Platinum membership $1,889.95 in year one. 270 points a month at $0.50 each, plus "Buy Down to Lowest Rate" and the "$1/Night Resort Stays" headline. This is the tier the compensation plan is built around and the one promoted to prospects. |
$269.95 then $135/mo monthly |
80 BV |
| Partnership program (the income opportunity) Marked down from $129.95, non-refundable, renews annually and manually. Buys a replicated site, training, back-office reporting and plan eligibility, and expressly "does not include any travel benefits." Genuinely low and genuinely unbundled - a real positive. Non-renewal forfeits all participant rights "irrevocably", with a 60-day grace period on a declined administrative fee. |
$99.95/yr annual |
— |
| Travel points One point per dollar of enrollment fee, two per dollar of dues. No redemption schedule is published anywhere public, so what a point buys is unknown before purchase. Expire at 24 months, non-transferable, no cash value, forfeited entirely on cancellation or 90 days of arrears, usable only on the Getaways and World Tours platform, and bookings must be 90 days apart. |
$0.50 each via dues, $1.00 via enrollment fee accrued monthly |
— |
| Reinstatement fee Payable inside a seven-day window after 90 days from the last successful payment; after that the account is "permanently cancelled and cannot be reinstated" and all points are gone. $395 exceeds the $269.95 joining fee. A separate, unquantified "reactivation fee" applies to a single missed monthly payment. |
$395 Platinum / $215 Titanium as needed |
— |
| Business transfer Selling, inheriting or placing a Travorium business in trust is permitted only at 2 Star Director or above, after 24 months, with 70% of business volume built personally in the enroller tree, and with the company’s approval. The sponsorship line itself is declared company trade secret, licensed to the participant on a revocable basis. |
$500 one-time |
— |
| Trip Incentive (the promotional "free trip") Accommodation "valued up to $350 USD nightly" with - creditably - "NO timeshare presentations required." The recipient pays unquantified "recovery fees", taxes and tourism fees plus resort fees of $5–$13 a night in Orlando and $16–$38 in Las Vegas, must activate within 7 days, and the activation is "FINAL & NON-REFUNDABLE and NON-TRANSFERABLE." One BBB complaint records $600 of additional charges on such a trip. |
$0 plus fees one-time |
— |
Who runs it, and what they ran before
The company states he has "30+ Years Experience", "pioneered the mobile car washing industry in Southern California during the 1990s" and "received recognition from Inc Magazine." No element of that biography could be corroborated - it names no company, no year and no award, and no listing, article or entry associated with him was located. It should be read as an unsupported biographical assertion, not a track record. What is traceable is better for him than the usual pattern in this category: the predecessor business did not collapse, was not subject to any enforcement action that could be located, and was simply rebranded. Its BBB profile remains open with an A+ rating and no accreditation sought - a private ratings body’s assessment, not a governmental finding. No regulatory action, fraud judgment or criminal proceeding against him was located in any jurisdiction.
Named as co-founder on the company’s own about page. No independent biography, prior venture or professional record could be located, and no adverse record of any kind was found. Listed here because the co-founder of the operating business is a material disclosure and because the surname is the point: this is a family operation, and the composition of the leadership slate is itself a governance fact.
Three of the six named leaders share the founder’s surname - a V.P. Member Services and a V.P. Director of Operations alongside the founder. There is no independent board, no disclosed outside investor, no non-family senior executive, no named CFO, no general counsel and no chief compliance officer anywhere in the company’s public materials. The consequence is visible in the documents themselves: the Policies and Procedures that govern every participant’s advertising conduct have an effective date of 13 August 2020 and are, on their face, a Kazakhstan-jurisdiction template partially search-replaced for the United States - eleven surviving references to the law of the Republic of Kazakhstan in operative clauses, income-claim examples denominated in tenge, a clause forbidding the use of Kazakh state symbols, a requirement that a US applicant hold an IIN and register as an "Individual Entrepreneur", a citation to a non-existent US statute "On Advertising", MySpace listed as a current channel, two unfilled "[local equivalents of Craigslist]" placeholders, and a document that breaks off mid-sentence. A company that received an FTC notice in October 2021 and has not since reviewed that instrument does not have a functioning compliance review.
The member’s own Membership Plan Terms and Conditions define a "Fulfillment Company" and name it: Leisure Loyalty, Inc., stating that "All reservations and purchases of travel services by Members are handled directly by Fulfillment Company through our booking engine." It is not a Travorium subsidiary or affiliate. It is an independent Arizona-registered white-label platform vendor - Arizona file number F21961208, Wyoming domicile, formed 14 August 2017, business description "Software Travel Program", with a conventional four-officer slate of directors and officers and its own Florida seller-of-travel registration - which describes itself in its own words as "a third party supplier" whose platform is "offered to your customer under your branding – not our own." It is named here because it is named in the member’s binding contract, because it is the party that actually books the travel, and because a member is entitled to know who their counterparty is. Nothing adverse about that company was found; the opacity is not in either business individually but in the seam between them, and the member stands on that seam.
Registered address
Murrieta / Temecula, California, USA
Family-controlled and privately held, with no audited or reviewed accounts, no member or partner counts, and no commission-pool disclosure of any kind. The only revenue series available is a direct-selling trade portal’s modeled estimate - $0 in 2020, $2M, $5M, $7M, $10M by 2024, and $10M again in 2025, a 0% change - which is not a company figure and not audited, and whose shape matters more than its level: a subscription business funded by new enrollments with a flat top line is one whose inflow has stopped growing. The same page states a commission payout of 35% for 2025. Corporate disclosure is scattered across generations of domains with different legal entities in different footers, and the brand has never been aligned with the legal entity in public-facing material: a member reading the marketing sees Travorium, while the entity taking the card payment is Paid 2 Save Network, LLC, disclosed in the footer and in PDFs behind the enrollment flow. There is a Spanish entity (P2S TRAVEL (ESP) SL, Madrid) and a properly registered Kazakh travel-agency entity in Almaty with the founder named as director - the latter being the correct and transparent way to enter a market. Third-party reporting and the company’s own Russian-language recruitment site indicate that Central Asia, not the United States, is where the growth effort is concentrated.
The veteran's checklist
Eight questions that decide whether this is a business or a transfer mechanism. Same eight, every review.
| Question | Answer |
|---|---|
| Who legally owns it? |
WATCH
Paid 2 Save Network, LLC, a privately held California company doing business as Travorium, family-controlled from Murrieta and Temecula, with a Madrid entity and an Almaty entity. No audited accounts; the revenue series is a trade portal’s estimate, not a company figure.
|
| Who actually books your travel? |
RED
Not Travorium. The member agreement names Leisure Loyalty, Inc. as the "Fulfillment Company" handling all reservations - an independent white-label platform vendor with its own Florida seller-of-travel registration. The current site footer no longer mentions it; the prior-generation footer did.
|
| What does it really cost? |
CONCERN
Platinum is $269.95 then $135 a month, which is $1,889.95 in year one, plus $99.95 a year for the partnership - $1,989.90 all in, and $1,719.95 a year thereafter. Reinstatement after 90 days of arrears is $395, more than the joining fee.
|
| Published income disclosure? |
CONCERN
Yes, public and unlocked, and it states over 88% of members earn $0 - but it is undated, has no participant counts, no medians and no time-at-rank, prints "<0%" for three ranks, and never discloses the share of paying partners who earned nothing.
|
| Can you price the flagship offer before you buy? |
RED
No. Points cost exactly $0.50 each through dues, but no points-redemption schedule is published anywhere and both booking engines sit behind member authentication. The "$1 a night, 70–90% off" claim is unpriceable from outside.
|
| Do the member rates actually beat retail? |
WATCH
Sometimes. Paris at about $87 a night and Las Vegas at about $85 genuinely beat typical retail. Brussels did not: $273.34 a night against $189–$275 observed, beside an inflated "retail" reference of $363.18.
|
| Can you get your money back? |
WATCH
A real 14-day full refund on the enrollment fee, cancellation any time with no minimum term. But monthly dues and the partnership fee are non-refundable, all points are forfeited on cancellation, and canceling also cancels travel already booked and paid for.
|
| Merchant play or miner play? |
CONCERN
Miner. Every commissionable event is a subscription - Silver 35 BV, Titanium 50 BV, Platinum 80 BV - and the travel a member books earns nothing. The Ambassador Pool is 3% of new membership sales, and the word "retail" appears zero times in the rulebook.
|
What has to be true for you to get paid
| To cover | You need |
|---|---|
| Hold the promoted configuration for one year | $1,989.90 $269.95 Platinum enrollment + 12 × $135 dues + $99.95 partnership fee |
| Cover your own Platinum dues from the plan | rank 3 of 16 Platinum Director pays $4.45/day = $135/month, exactly the dues, on 240 personal CSV |
| Earn more than the year costs, on the disclosed averages | 1 Star Director disclosed average $5,412 against $24 / $240 / $600 / $1,200 at the four ranks below |
| Justify the membership on hotel savings alone | ~26 member-rate nights a year $1,620 of annual dues ÷ about $63 a night of saving in the one comparison that fully held |
Read this twice
Two arithmetics run in parallel here and a prospect needs both. The member arithmetic: Platinum dues are $1,620 a year, so the membership needs roughly $1,620 of genuine annual saving before it adds any value at all. At the Paris example’s saving of about $63 a night - the cleanest case in the whole price test, where the company’s reference price was fair and the member rate genuinely beat retail - that is about 26 hotel nights every year at member rates, with no failed bookings and no inflated reference prices. For a household taking one or two trips a year the membership is very unlikely to pay for itself on hotel savings, and the "60% Avg. Savings" headline does not change that, because a percentage of a small base is a small number. The participant arithmetic comes entirely from the company’s own documents. Platinum plus partnership is $1,989.90 in year one and $1,719.95 thereafter. The disclosed averages are $24 at Partner, $240 at Silver Director, $600 at Titanium Director and $1,200 at Platinum Director, all of them below the annual cost, and the disclosure states that its figures "do not reflect any expenses a Partner may incur." The plan’s designed break-even sits at rank 3 of 16 and is exact to the cent: Platinum Director’s $4.45 a day is $135 a month, which is the Platinum dues. Above that, 1 Star Director at a disclosed $5,412 is the first rank that clears the cost of participation, and it needs 250 personal CSV, 1,200 team BV, 600 BV in each leg and four customers. Higher still, Ambassador needs about 376 Platinum memberships - roughly $710,000 of annual member spend in one organization - to pay one person $50,400. Two honest caveats. The $99.95 partnership fee is low and unbundled, and there is no kit, no inventory and no autoship, so the downside for someone who tries this and stops quickly is smaller than in most structures on this site. And the 14-day full refund on the enrollment fee is real. But the disclosure never states what share of paying partners earned nothing, which is the one number that would let a prospect calibrate any of this.
Run your own numbers
Drag the sliders. Nothing here is stored or sent.
Commission on a retained membership subscription, against the membership and the $99.95 partner fee spread monthly - Platinum plus partnership runs $1,989.90 in the first year. Nothing pays on booked travel; the top pool is funded from 3% of new membership sales. The word “retail” does not appear once in the Policies and Procedures. Calibrate against the company’s own undated disclosure: more than 88% of members earn $0, and the averages at the first four partner ranks are $24, $240, $600 and $1,200 a year. Your own subscription cost of $105/mo is included.
What it costs to replace this yourself
This is proprietary work and it is the most useful thing in the report, so it is published in full and in both directions. Live member-side pricing could not be obtained - both booking engines sit behind member authentication and no points-redemption schedule is published - so instead the price comparisons Travorium itself publishes in its own October 2024 partner presentation were tested against mainstream retail travel sites for the same property and the same stay length. If a savings claim is honest, its reference price should sit inside the observable open-market range. Two limits, stated plainly: the deck gives no travel dates for any example, so exact date-matching was impossible and hotel pricing is seasonal; conclusions are drawn only where the gap is too large for seasonality to explain. Retail figures are current-period averages and ranges from mainstream booking sites, not same-date quotes.
| What they sell you | What you'd use instead | Your cost |
|---|---|---|
| Brussels, Hilton Grand Place, 6 nights - member $273.34/night, "retail" reference $363.18 | Same property, four mainstream retail booking sites | $189–$275/night |
| Paris, Hôtel Bienvenue, 6 nights - member $86.99/night, reference $150.51 | Same property, five mainstream retail sites | $135–$211 typical |
| Paris, same property, cheapest observed retail | A flexible shopper on the open market, no subscription | $64–$99/night |
| Las Vegas, 4-star, 4 nights - member $84.75/night, reference $282.25 | Las Vegas four-star averages across five retail sources | $127–$204/night |
| Las Vegas, routine low end of the same market | Same inventory, booked retail on flexible dates | from $82/night |
| New York, "5-Star Hotel", 4 nights - "retail" reference $187.25/night | Genuine New York five-star rates, three sources | $731–$1,209/night |
| Orlando studio, 7 nights - $7.00 cash after points, reference $899 | Same week priced honestly: cash + points at $0.50 + resort fees | ~$447–$503 (estimated) |
| Platinum dues - $1,620 a year for the right to book | Booking the same hotels on the open market | $0 |
| "110% Best Value Guarantee" | Reading the terms before relying on it | terms not locatable publicly |
| Total as sold $1,989.90 in year one for access |
Total, built yourself $0 in subscription, against roughly $50–$120 a night of genuine saving where the discount is real |
Price-to-value
The claim partially survives, and the honest verdict has to be given in both directions. Paris and Las Vegas member rates genuinely beat typical retail - that is a real finding in the company’s favor and it is why product does not score lower. But the reference prices are inflated in two of four checkable cases, which manufactures the headline saving; the "up to 60%" figure is not achieved even on the company’s own numbers in Paris, where the claimed saving is 42.2%; and Las Vegas works out at about 45% against a median benchmark rather than the 70% implied. The star classifications are unreliable - a Brussels "5-Star Hilton" is four-star on a mainstream site, and a New York "5-Star" is benchmarked four to six times below any credible five-star rate. Brussels is the finding that matters most: the member pays $273.34 a night against $189–$275 observed on four independent retail sites, sitting beside a "retail" comparison figure of $363.18 that is above everything observable. Six nights at the member rate is $1,640.05; the same six nights at a typical $205 is $1,230. A member paying $135 a month for access overpaid a non-member by roughly $410 on that booking. And a last point on the FAQ’s claim that members book "with no markup": there are at least two intermediaries between the member and the hotel, and a subscription is a markup with a different payment schedule.
Three operators, five horizons
Probability of cumulative net profit
Hover any point for median, top decile and bottom quartile.
Travel-only member
Platinum, no partnership, two trips a year, uses the discounts genuinely
| Horizon | P(profit) | Median |
|---|---|---|
| 3 mo | 11% | −$650 |
| 6 mo | 14% | −$1,000 |
| 1 yr | 15% | −$1,450 |
| 3 yr | 14% | −$3,800 |
| 5 yr | 13% | −$6,100 |
Part-time partner
10 hrs/wk, Platinum plus the $99.95 partnership, a handful of personal sales
| Horizon | P(profit) | Median |
|---|---|---|
| 3 mo | 6% | −$800 |
| 6 mo | 8% | −$1,300 |
| 1 yr | 10% | −$1,900 |
| 3 yr | 12% | −$4,800 |
| 5 yr | 12% | −$7,600 |
Full-time builder
30+ hrs/wk, chasing 1 Star and 2 Star Director, events and travel spend
| Horizon | P(profit) | Median |
|---|---|---|
| 3 mo | 3% | −$1,600 |
| 6 mo | 5% | −$2,900 |
| 1 yr | 8% | −$5,200 |
| 3 yr | 11% | −$12,000 |
| 5 yr | 12% | −$18,000 |
Methodology note. These are modeled outcome ranges, not claims, and not predictions about any individual. ANCHORED to published figures: the tier pricing of $69.95/$52.50, $149.95/$75 and $269.95/$135; the $99.95 annual partnership fee; the year-one totals of $1,889.95 for Platinum alone and $1,989.90 with the partnership; the income disclosure’s statement that over 88% of members earn $0 and its rank averages of $24, $240, $600, $1,200 and $5,412 at the first five partner ranks; the plan’s Direct Sales Bonus of $2.50–$5.00 on Titanium and $5.00–$10.00 on Platinum; the flat rank residuals from $1.75 to $3,200 a day; the requirement of 100 CSV of new sales monthly for the Lifestyle Bonus; the $395 and $215 reinstatement fees; and the price test’s finding of roughly $50–$120 a night of genuine saving where the discount was real. MODELED by us: the share of each cohort in cumulative profit at each horizon, because the company publishes no participant counts, no medians, no time-at-rank and no partner-level $0 rate; the expense side beyond the published subscription and fee items; and the cohort definitions, which the company does not segment. Three calibration notes, two of which cut in the company’s favor. First, the travel-only member cohort is the one with a real path to a positive outcome and it does not depend on recruiting anyone: a household genuinely taking 26 or more hotel nights a year at member rates can clear the dues, which is why that cohort shows the highest share in profit at one year. Second, the downside is smaller than in most structures graded here, because there is no kit, no inventory, no autoship and a real 14-day refund - someone who tries this and stops within two weeks loses very little. Third, the medians are negative at every horizon in every cohort because the company’s own disclosure puts four consecutive partner ranks below the annual cost of participation, and because points accumulated and then forfeited on exit are a real cash loss that no rank table shows.
Where you are actually allowed to promote this
Platform policy reads, not verifications. Check every one before you spend a dollar - enforcement changes faster than the written policy does.
Red flags and green flags
Red flags
151The member’s counterparty for the actual product is a different company
2And that disclosure has become less prominent, not more
3Liability for the product is disclaimed and capped at fees paid
4The flagship offer cannot be priced by anyone before they pay
5On one of the company’s own published comparisons the member pays more than the open market
6The income disclosure is undated, count-free and median-free, and prints "<0%" for three ranks
7Three company documents give three different earnings figures for one rank
8Every commissionable event is a subscription, and travel earns nothing
9The word "retail" appears zero times in the Policies and Procedures
10Prepaid points are forfeited in full on cancellation, at 24 months, and after 90 days of arrears
11A $395 reinstatement fee that exceeds the $269.95 joining fee
12Canceling the membership cancels travel already booked and paid for
13The plan is unilaterally amendable and continuing to work is treated as consent
14A forex line was concealed from consumers while being the most heavily incentivised item in the plan
15The demand signal is promoter-generated and partly people checking for a scam
Green flags
101The full compensation plan is published openly, dated, in three languages, with no login
2The income disclosure is public, unlocked, and states the $0 rate on its face
3The policy requiring that disclosure to be handed over is genuinely strict
4The partnership fee is low and genuinely unbundled
5A real 14-day full refund, and a month-to-month subscription with no minimum term
6Rank qualification requires actual customers, and bonus buying is prohibited in the right words
7The member’s access does not depend on the person who enrolled them
8Real member price advantage does exist on mid-market hotels
9Low complaint volume, every complaint answered, and honest statutory language
10A clean enforcement record, and local incorporation rather than offshore structuring
We would like to be wrong about this
Upward
- Publish the points-redemption schedule - how many points every Getaway and World Tour costs - publicly and before purchase. This is the single highest-leverage disclosure available and nothing else lifts the ptv ceiling, because it converts the flagship offer from unverifiable to testable.
- Name the Fulfillment Company on the member-facing site, in the FAQ and at the point of sale rather than only in a PDF behind the enrollment flow, with its seller-of-travel registration and a stated escalation path if a booking fails - restoring the disclosure the prior-generation site carried in its footer.
- Disclose the percentage of paying partners who earned $0, with absolute participant counts at every rank, a stated reporting year, medians beside averages and time-at-rank; reconcile the deck, the plan and the disclosure so that one rank has one number; and rewrite the Policies and Procedures for the jurisdictions they actually govern.
Downward
- Evidence that the concealed forex line, or any successor, involves pooled funds, managed accounts, profit-sharing or a promised return on participant capital - which would move sec sharply and justify a hard cap rather than a confirmatory ceiling.
- Confirmation that revenue or new-enrollment volume actually fell while the Ambassador Pool and residual obligations continued, or disclosure of a partner-level $0 rate materially above the published 88% member figure.
- Further price testing showing that the Brussels result is typical rather than exceptional - member rates routinely at or above mainstream retail - or any regulatory step past notice, such as an FTC complaint, a state Attorney General assurance of voluntary compliance, or a self-regulatory inquiry.
Grade is D at 4.25. A real travel discount with real savings on some hotels, sold by a company that does not perform the travel, on a plan where the only commissionable product is the subscription.
Say the good parts first, because they are real and they are why this is not lower. The compensation plan is published in full, dated, in three languages, with no login - that is more than most operators graded here will do. The income disclosure is public and unlocked and puts the 88% figure in its own narrative text. The $99.95 partnership fee is low and genuinely unbundled from the travel membership, so a person can buy one without the other; there is no kit, no inventory, no qualifying order and no autoship, and nothing to load. There is a real 14-day refund on the enrollment fee, the subscription is month-to-month, and pricing has not moved in two years. Rank qualification requires actual named counts of customers. And when the member rates were tested against mainstream retail sites, Paris came in at about $87 a night where the same property runs $135–$211, and Las Vegas four-star at about $85 against averages of $127–$204. Those are genuine discounts on genuine inventory.
The structural finding is who the member is contracting with, and it is in the member’s own agreement. The Membership Plan Terms and Conditions define a "Fulfillment Company" and name Leisure Loyalty, Inc., stating that all reservations and purchases of travel services "are handled directly by Fulfillment Company through our booking engine." That company is an independent Arizona-registered white-label platform vendor with its own Florida seller-of-travel number, which describes itself as "a third party supplier" whose platform is branded "not our own." So the brand takes the subscription and a separate company performs the travel - and the same agreement then disclaims any liability for a supplier’s failure to perform, releases the Fulfillment Company by name, caps total liability at the fees the member has paid, and takes a waiver of California Civil Code §1542. A member whose hotel is not there on arrival has a capped claim against a company that did not book it and no contract at all with the company that did. And the disclosure moved the wrong way: the prior-generation site named that company in its footer, while the current footer names only Paid 2 Save Network, LLC. Nothing in this is unlawful. All of it is information a person is entitled to have before their card is charged.
Then the numbers, all of them the company’s own. Platinum plus partnership is $1,989.90 in year one. The disclosed averages at the first four partner ranks are $24, $240, $600 and $1,200 - every one below the annual cost - and the plan’s designed break-even sits at rank 3 of 16, where Platinum Director’s $4.45 a day is exactly the $135 of monthly dues. Every commissionable event is a subscription; travel bookings earn nothing; the Ambassador Pool is 3% of new membership sales; the Lifestyle Bonus resets monthly against fresh sales; and the word "retail" appears zero times in the rulebook, which means there is no 70% rule, no consumption cap and no buy-back. Over that sits the part nobody outside can check: the flagship is priced in points that cost exactly $0.50 each through dues, and no redemption schedule is published anywhere, so the "$1 a night, 70–90% off" claim is unpriceable until after you have paid. Two of four checkable reference prices were inflated, and on Brussels the member paid $273.34 a night against $189–$275 on the open market. That is the case for D.
Price the points before you subscribe, and ask in writing
A point costs $0.50 through monthly dues and $1.00 through the enrollment fee - that much is in the contract. What a point buys is not published anywhere. Before paying, ask for the redemption schedule in writing: how many points a seven-night Orlando studio consumes, how many a World Tour costs, and whether that rate can change. The terms already warn that "retail pricing may increase closer to the travel date, requiring more travel points." If the answer does not arrive as a number, you have learned the most important thing about the product.
Test the savings on your own two trips before you subscribe, not after
Take the two destinations you will actually visit next year, price them on three mainstream retail sites on your real dates, and write the numbers down. Then ask whether the member rate beats them by more than $1,620 a year in aggregate. On the tested comparisons the answer was yes in Paris and Las Vegas and no in Brussels, where the member rate sat at or above what a non-member pays. It takes twenty minutes and it is the only version of this exercise that uses your travel pattern rather than someone else’s slide.
Get the fulfillment company and the escalation path in writing
Your contract names Leisure Loyalty, Inc. as the party that handles every booking, and your recourse against the brand is capped at the fees you have paid. Before subscribing, ask who you call when a reservation fails, which company’s seller-of-travel registration and bond covers your booking, and what happens if the fulfillment relationship changes. Ask the same question about the $395 reinstatement fee and the points you would forfeit on cancellation, because those are the two numbers that decide how expensive an exit is.
If you want to sell travel, sell travel
Ordinary affiliate programs at mainstream retail travel sites and hotel chains pay on the booking - the thing the customer actually wanted - with no subscription, no rank ladder, no partnership fee, no pre-approval regime, no one-year non-solicit and no exclusivity clause. The search intent around hotel price comparison, points and loyalty economics is enormous and permanent, and honest sourced comparison content is a merchant business you own. Here, by contrast, the commission is on the subscription, the travel earns nothing, and the customer book you build is declared the company’s trade secret and licensed back to you revocably.
Nine dimensions, weighted
Dimension profile
Further from center is better. Hover any point.
Hard caps that bind here
The lowest binding cap wins, regardless of the weighted arithmetic.
What we read
Every source below links to the document itself. Tier 1 is a primary record - the company’s own plan, policy or disclosure, a court filing, a regulator’s decision or an SEC filing. Tier 2 is a self-regulatory or secondary regulator record, tier 3 reporting or academic work, tier 4 an open-market price comparison. Where a document can be moved or withdrawn, an archived copy is linked beside it. If a link is dead when you try it, that is a correction we want.
- Travorium Membership FAQ - tier pricing, the 14-day full-refund window from the enrollment date, the cancellation process through the back office, the 24-month travel-point expiry, and the World Tour cancellation schedule
Travorium Membership Plan Terms and Conditions, last updated 30 October 2025 - the "Fulfillment Company" definition naming Leisure Loyalty, Inc.; limitation of liability, the fees-paid liability cap, the release naming the Fulfillment Company and the California Civil Code §1542 waiver; the $395 / $215 reinstatement fees; the 14-day enrollment refund and cancellation process; points accrual at 1 per dollar of enrollment fee and 2 per dollar of dues; California CST# 2141868 with a $100,000 Old Republic Surety bond and Florida ST42358
Not established by this document: The Membership Plan Terms and Conditions document itself (last updated 30 October 2025), which carries the Fulfillment Company definition, the fees-paid liability cap, the California Civil Code s.1542 waiver, the $395/$215 reinstatement figures and the CST#/ST# disclosures, is not published at any retrievable URL: travorium.com/documentation/ serves only income-disclosure-en.pdf, and every candidate filename tested returned 404. The FAQ and help-center articles above are the company's own public restatement of the same refund, cancellation and points terms. The two seller-of-travel registers are POST-driven search forms with no addressable per-registrant page, so the register itself is linked rather than the entry.
- 'What is the refund policy?' - the 14-day enrollment refund, and the statement that the partnership (license) fee and monthly membership fees are non-refundable
- 'What is the Membership Cancellation Fee?' - the reinstatement fees payable after the 89th day of inactive status (Platinum $260 and Titanium $140 plus the monthly membership fee) and the 7-day reinstatement request window
- 'What are the Terms concerning the Travel Points?' - points credited on payment, non-transferable, no cash value, forfeited past 89 days of inactivity or on cancellation, and expiring in 24 months
- California Attorney General Seller of Travel register - public 'Seller Search', the register in which CST# 2141868 would appear
- Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services - Sellers of Travel program, the register in which ST42358 would appear
- Travorium Compensation Plan, English, dated 29 September 2025 (PDF) - the 16-rank ladder with CSV/BV and per-leg requirements and daily pay from $1.75 to $3,200, product volumes of 35/50/80 BV, the binary lesser-leg structure with the 50% volume rule and the 62.5% maximum payout rule, the Ambassador Pool at 3% of new membership sales, and the statement 'Commissions are paid on sales to customers and not recruiting'
Travorium Compensation Plan, English, dated 29 September 2025 (with Spanish and French revisions of 6 October 2025) - the 16-rank ladder with CSV, BV, per-leg and customer-count requirements and daily pay from $1.75 to $3,200; product volumes of 35 / 50 / 80 BV; the binary lesser-leg structure, the 50% volume rule and the 62.5% payout cap; the Direct Sales Bonus schedule; the Ambassador Pool at 3% of new membership sales; the Lifestyle Bonus requiring 100 CSV of new sales monthly; and the statement "Commissions are paid on sales to customers and not recruiting"
- Travorium Compensation Plan chart (web version) - the full rank table from Silver Director to Executive Chairman with LTV, total BV, daily pay and monthly pay
- Ambassador Bonuses page - the Ambassador Global Pool at 3% of new membership sales, share allocation by rank and the Power Up Bonus qualification rules
- Travorium Income Disclosure Statement (undated PDF) - the statement that over 88% of members remain active customers earning no income, the average annual earnings by rank table, and the note that the figures do not reflect any expenses a Partner may incur
Travorium Income Disclosure Statement (undated) - over 88% of members recorded as customers earning $0; average annual earnings from $24 at Partner to $648,000 at 5 Star Ambassador; ">1%" for nine consecutive ranks; "<0%" for Presidential Ambassador, Chairman and Executive Chairman; and the statement that the figures "do not reflect any expenses a Partner may incur"
- Travorium enrollment page - Silver $69.95 + $52.50/mo, Titanium $149.95 + $75/mo, Platinum $269.95 + $135/mo, the tier feature matrix, and the $99.95 partnership fee marked down from $129.95 with the 'does not include any travel benefits' carve-out
travorium.com enrollment, FAQ, about and getaways pages - tier pricing of $69.95/$52.50, $149.95/$75 and $269.95/$135; the $99.95 partnership fee marked down from $129.95 and its "does not include any travel benefits" carve-out; the tier feature matrix including "$1/Night Resort Stays"; the "65+ Countries", "10k+ Happy Members" and "60% Avg. Savings" claims; the "no markup" claim; and the current footer naming only Paid 2 Save Network, LLC with CST# 2141868-50
- Travorium Membership overview - the 'save up to 60% off retail pricing' claim, the 110% Best Value Guarantee and the monthly travel-points mechanic
- Travorium Partnership page - the business-opportunity framing, the income streams described and the link to the Income Disclosure
- Travorium home page - the '65+ Countries' and '$1 per night' resort claims and the site footer
- Prior-generation Travorium site (2024.travorium.com) - the earlier Ambassador Bonuses page and site chrome carrying the previous footer
The prior-generation Travorium site footer, naming Leisure Loyalty, Inc. with Florida Seller of Travel Ref. No. ST40079 at 3100 W Ray Rd Ste 200, Chandler, Arizona; Leisure Loyalty’s own services page describing it as "a third party supplier" whose white-label platform is offered "under your branding – not our own"; and its Arizona corporate filing (file number F21961208, Wyoming domicile, formed 14 August 2017, business description "Software Travel Program", officer slate, annual report filed 25 June 2025)
Not established by this document: The Arizona Corporation Commission eCorp filing for Leisure Loyalty (file number F21961208, Wyoming domicile, formed 14 August 2017) could not be retrieved: ecorp.azcc.gov produces no addressable per-entity URL in search results. The Florida record above is a different, separately filed Leisure Loyalty entity and is cited as such, not as a substitute. Leisure Loyalty's own services page describing it as 'a third party supplier' offering its platform 'under your branding' was not resolvable to a specific sub-page URL.
- Leisure Loyalty, Inc. corporate site - the white-label loyalty-platform description
- Florida Division of Corporations, Detail by Entity Name - LEISURE LOYALTY INC, document P15000076408, FEI/EIN 46-2795163, filed 14 September 2015, status ACTIVE, last event REINSTATEMENT 9 October 2017
- Travorium partner presentation, 13 October 2024 (PDF) - the rank-by-rank monthly earnings ranges labeled 'THIS IS NOT AN INCOME CLAIM', the 'Platinum Sales Per Side' table putting Ambassador at 188 each side, and the $79.95 partnership price then in force
Travorium partner presentation, 13 October 2024 - the five published price comparisons for Brussels, Paris, Las Vegas, New York and Orlando with stated retail and member prices; the "Platinum Sales Per Side" rank table putting Ambassador at 188 each side; the "over 20,000 new customers in 2024" and "12-year-old operation" claims; and the monthly earnings-range table by rank labeled "This is not an income claim"
- Travorium partner presentation, 12 June 2025 (PDF) - the later version of the same deck with the $99.95 annual partnership fee and the rank earnings tables
- List of October 2021 Recipients of the FTC's Notices of Penalty Offenses Concerning Money-Making Opportunities (PDF) - the list on which Travorium appears, headed 'The fact that a company is on this list is NOT an indication that it has done anything wrong'
FTC published list of October 2021 recipients of the Notice of Penalty Offenses Concerning Money-Making Opportunities, on which "Travorium" appears and on which the FTC states that inclusion "is NOT an indication that it has done anything wrong"; searches of FTC enforcement actions, state Attorney General actions, the self-regulatory decisions listing, a federal and state court records database and national financial-regulator warning lists, all returning no matches
- FTC press release, 26 October 2021 - 'FTC Puts Businesses on Notice that False Money-Making Claims Could Lead to Big Penalties'
- Notice of Penalty Offenses Concerning Money-Making Opportunities (PDF) - the substantive notice itself
- FTC enforcement page, Penalty Offenses Concerning Money-Making Opportunities - the administrative decisions underlying the notice
- Better Business Bureau business profile - Travorium, Temecula CA, travel services, not BBB accredited, file opened 7 April 2023, business started 8 November 2019, management David Hart (Founder/CEO)
BBB profiles and complaint file - a private ratings body, which states that it does not verify third-party information. Two profiles for one business: Travorium (Temecula, travel services, file opened April 2023, business start 8 November 2019, eight complaints closed in three years, all answered) and Paid 2 Save Network (Murrieta, social media marketing, A+, not accredited, file opened February 2015). The complaint file covers points valued at roughly $1,600 lost to silent 24-month expiry, a cancellation communicated by WhatsApp treated as outside the 14-day window, $600 of extra charges on a "free" vacation, and $210 of non-refundable banquet tickets
Not established by this document: The second BBB profile for Paid 2 Save Network (Murrieta, social media marketing, A+, not accredited, file opened February 2015) did not surface at a retrievable URL in any search performed, so only the Travorium profile is cited.
- BBB complaint file for Travorium - the complaints on 24-month travel-point expiry, refused reservation refunds and commission-card disputes, with the company's responses
- 'Travorium Review: Paid 2 Save continues with new name' - independent MLM review of the rebrand, the tier pricing, the compensation-plan retail-volume gap and the FX Trader line
Mainstream retail travel sites used for the price test on matched properties and stay lengths (KAYAK, momondo, HotelsCombined, Agoda, Hotels.com, Booking.com, Tripadvisor and Budget Your Trip), covering Hilton Brussels Grand Place, Hôtel Bienvenue in Paris, Las Vegas four-star inventory and New York five-star rates; a direct-selling trade portal’s modeled revenue estimates of $0 in 2020 rising to $10M in 2024 and flat in 2025 with a stated 35% commission payout; a commercial keyword tool’s US in-country volume for the brand term, "travorium scam" at 3,380 a month and "travel club" at 4,789; Trustpilot (1,086 reviews, 4.8, business-claimed profile); and trade and critical coverage including a 2016 and a 2024 review of the business, an independent Platinum cost analysis, an OSINT analysis, and a French-language first-person exit account
Not established by this document: The price-test quotes on KAYAK, momondo, HotelsCombined, Agoda, Hotels.com, Booking.com, Tripadvisor and Budget Your Trip are session-scoped aggregator results with no stable per-property, per-date URL, and none appeared verbatim in any search result. The direct-selling trade portal's modeled revenue series ($0 in 2020 to $10M in 2024), the commercial keyword tool's volume data and the Trustpilot profile (1,086 reviews, 4.8) likewise could not be resolved to URLs. All are left uncited rather than constructed.
What we could not get
- The seller-of-travel registrations themselves. California CST# 2141868 with its $100,000 Old Republic Surety bond, Florida ST42358 (the brand) and Florida ST40079 (the fulfillment company) could not be found in the California Attorney General or Florida state registers - those lookups are form-driven and were not retrievable. Every number here comes from the company’s own published documents, and a reader relying on them for a purchase decision should verify them directly with the two states.
- Any audited or reviewed financial statements. None exist publicly. The 2020-to-2025 revenue series, the flat 2025 and the 35% commission payout are a trade publication’s modeled estimates, not company figures and not audited. Also unavailable: total member count, partner count, retention, churn, total commissions paid, the ratio of participant to non-participant volume, and the number of members holding a paid $99.95 partnership - which is the single number that would settle the compliance question.
- The founder’s published biography. "30+ Years Experience", pioneering "the mobile car washing industry in Southern California during the 1990s" and "recognition from Inc Magazine" name no company, no year and no award, and no element could be corroborated. Treated here as an unsupported biographical assertion rather than a track record. Also unverified: whether the operating LLC is currently in good standing with the California Secretary of State, and the identity of the back-office software vendor.
- Whether the "FX Trader" forex line still operates. It is absent from the September 2025 compensation plan and the current enrollment page, but the training sheet, the video pages and the country lists remain publicly hosted and the company has made no statement either way. Its historic 70 BV, the Bitcoin-only enrollment countries and the commissions paid into a third-party trading account are documented; its present existence is not.
- The relationship behind the older "Legacy" booking site. It resolves to the same IP address as a third-party white-label travel-club platform domain, which is verified at the DNS level only. The commercial arrangement - whether any contract exists, and with whom - is disclosed by nobody and is not asserted here. The platform vendor is deliberately not named for that reason. What follows from the DNS finding alone is limited but real: the "exclusive booking engine" is at least twice removed from the brand on the invoice.
- Live member-side pricing and the points-redemption schedule. Both booking engines sit behind member authentication and no redemption table is published anywhere, so the price test uses the company’s own published comparisons rather than live member quotes, and the reconstructed Orlando economics rest on an assumed points consumption that is not a company figure. Also not locatable: the full terms of the "110% Best Value Guarantee", World Tour ticket prices, travel dates for any of the company’s comparisons, and a Sydney property named in the same deck.
- What the brief actively disproved or could not support, which is part of the finding rather than a gap in it. A widely repeated claim that the predecessor business’s "activities were officially banned" has no supporting record and is almost certainly false - the entity still trades as the parent. A claimed February 2022 liquidation in the Paris commercial register could not be corroborated in any French register or publication. A claimed SEC warning does not exist: no SEC action, alert, litigation release or administrative proceeding was located, and it appears to be a conflation with the 2021 FTC notice. Claimed Delaware and Puerto Rico entities could not be found; the verified non-Californian entities are Spanish and Kazakh. Anonymous trade-portal accounts of downlines being "cut" or reassigned remain uncorroborated, though they describe an outcome the contract permits.
- Two figures that circulate in misleading form. The "88% of participants earn nothing" framing is a misquotation: the disclosure says members who "remain active customers", and the partner-level $0 rate is never published. And the ~23,733 monthly search figure is a commercial keyword tool’s US in-country estimate - not Google data and not a measured count - from a dataset that reports US volume above its own global figure of 21,584 for the same term, so roughly 20,000–24,000 a month is the defensible range and the third significant figure is not meaningful.
Not advice
This is independent analysis for decision-making, not legal, financial or investment advice. Allegations reported by third parties should be verified against primary court and regulatory records before any decision.
Researched by Claude. Reviewed by an editor.
Every report is researched and written by Claude, Anthropic’s AI assistant, from the company’s own plan documents, policies, terms and regulatory file - then reviewed before publication by Rob Fore, who checks the sources and the stage-label on every allegation.
- Nine weighted dimensions, published with their weights
- The editor checks the evidence and cannot change the number - the build rejects any page whose grade does not reconcile to its own arithmetic
- Every affiliate position we hold is disclosed on the report it touches
- No company has paid for a grade, and no report carries an affiliate link
Looking at something else?
Enter any company name or website. If a report exists it opens instantly; if not, we start one.
Travorium - frequently asked
QIs Travorium a scam?
QHow much does Travorium cost?
QHow much do Travorium partners actually earn?
QWho actually handles Travorium bookings?
QDo Travorium travel points actually save you money?
Author, editor and publisher
This report was researched and written by Claude, Anthropic’s AI assistant, working from primary documents - Travorium’s own compensation plan, its policies and procedures, its terms of service, its income disclosure statement where one exists, and its regulatory and self-regulatory file. It was scored against nine weighted dimensions that are published in full, with their weights, on the methodology page.
Before publication it was reviewed by Rob Fore, who checks every source link, every figure against the document it came from, and every allegation against its stage-label - an investigation is not a finding, a warning letter is not an enforcement action, and a filed claim is not a verdict.
The editor does not set the grade. The published score is the weighted composite of the nine dimension scores, and the build refuses to emit a page where the two disagree by more than 0.06. A grade moves when the evidence moves it and not otherwise.
Rob Fore has marketed online since 1996, wrote Online MLM Marketing (2014), and is CEO of Listech Inc, the Nevada corporation that publishes this site. He holds affiliate positions in companies graded here - including LiveGood, which this site grades D, SendOutCards, which it grades C−, and the Home Business Academy, which it grades B−. Those positions are disclosed on the reports they touch, and changed nothing on this page.
About the author and our conflicts · Contact the editor · Corrections: corrections@opportunitygrade.com
Tell me if this grade changes
Travorium is graded D as of July 30, 2026. Grades move when the evidence moves - a new income disclosure, a regulatory action, a rewritten compensation plan. Leave your address and you will get one email if this one does.
One email when the grade moves, and nothing else. We will never use your address to promote an income opportunity of any kind, we do not sell, rent or share the list, and it is stored on our own infrastructure rather than with any company graded here. Unsubscribe removes everything.
Corrections
Every factual claim on this page is sourced, and the ones we could not stand up are named in the unable to verify list above. If something here is wrong, we want to know, and we would rather hear it from Travorium than from a reader.
Write to corrections@opportunitygrade.com. Point at the specific sentence and send the document that contradicts it - a plan document, a filing, an income disclosure, a policy page. We will check it against the primary source, correct the page if it is wrong, and say in the report that it was corrected and when. A grade moves if the evidence moves it.
This address reaches a person, not a form. We do not require a takedown demand, an NDA or a lawyer to accept a correction, and we do not remove a report because a company disputes its conclusion - only because the underlying facts turn out to be wrong.