Disclosure
The editor of this site, Rob Fore, holds an affiliate position in LiveGood. He does not set scores: this report’s grade is the weighted composite of its nine published dimension scores, and the build rejects any page where those two disagree. Our full conflict-of-interest statement, including every position held, is on the About page.
Can you actually make money with LiveGood?
No. Not as a business. I hold a position in this company, so read that answer twice.
As a purchase it is defensible, and I will say so plainly: the supplements are real, they are cheap, and if you want them at that price then buy them and enjoy them. What does not hold up is the earning side. 80% of your $49.95 join fee goes straight up the chain to somebody else, and nothing in rank advancement requires a retail sale anywhere. A membership sold to a customer and a membership sold to a recruit count identically. When the money arrives because people joined rather than because anybody bought a product, you are not building a customer base. You are building a queue.
And the arithmetic is public, which is the useful part. Forty retained members underneath you just to cover your own $9.95 a month. The advertised $2,047.50 needs 8,190 people paying every month, forever, inside your matrix. There is no income disclosure anywhere for this company, so nobody can check what a single participant earns, and the self-regulatory body has been through here twice on the same claim.
then $9.95/mo to stay commission-eligible
- An income disclosure. Any of it - a median, a distribution, the share earning nothing. Until one exists, no earnings figure attached to this company can be checked by anybody.
- Rank advancement that counts customers instead of memberships. While the ranks count headcount, the plan is paying for headcount, whatever the marketing says it rewards.
- A join fee that does not hand 80% to the person above you. That single number is the clearest signal of what the plan is actually built to reward.
That call is computed, not chosen - the rule reads three of the nine published dimension scores and is printed on the methodology page. It describes this company's plan and the figures it publishes about the people already in it. It is not a prediction about you, and nothing on this site is advice.
Legal status
LEGAL BUT VULNERABLE - pyramid exposure unresolved, because the company withholds the one number that would settle it.
Confidence: Medium-High
Primary sources fetched directly where possible. Everything we could not verify is listed at the bottom of this page by name.
Follow the money
This is a $9.95/month discount-club subscription with a 2×15 forced matrix bolted to it, wrapped in a supplement catalog that is real, cheap, and almost entirely irrelevant to how you get paid.
Follow the money. Affiliates earn $25 when someone joins as both member and affiliate for $49.95 - $5 on the membership and $20 on the affiliate sign-up fee - plus bonus commissions up to ten levels deep, and thereafter 2.5% per filled matrix position on monthly $9.95 membership fees. Product volume pays you almost nothing: you earn on retail-price purchases and a one-time 10% customer-acquisition bonus, but nothing recurring on member-price product orders from your downline.
Translated: the company keeps the product margin, and the field is paid to sell memberships and sign-ups. That is not a supplement business with an affiliate program. It is a subscription-recruitment business with a supplement catalog attached to make the subscription look like something.
Where your $49.95 enrollment goes
The Fast Start ladder pays 50/10/5/5/3/2/2/1/1/1 across ten levels
| Product | Price | Pays |
|---|---|---|
| Membership The actual product. Everything else is a catalog attached to it. |
$9.95 /mo |
$0.2488/mo per matrix position |
| Affiliate sign-up fee This fee is itself commissionable. That is the whole legal problem in one line. |
$40 one-time |
$20 to you, $12 up the chain |
| Organic Super Greens 67¢ a serving. Genuinely competitive with open retail, not just with MLM peers. |
$19.95 30 servings |
retail spread only |
| Multivitamin / D3-K2 / Magnesium White-label contract manufacture. COAs published. No recurring commission at member pricing. |
~$12.50–12.95 each |
retail spread only |
| Influencer (retail) Bonus The only real retail incentive starts at $2,500 in personally enrolled retail volume per month. A mirage for 99% of the field. |
$2,500/mo volume gate |
+10% |
Who runs it, and what they ran before
Bio claims 20+ years of successful supplement companies and names none of them. Prior chain: Home Wealth University, MyWorldPlus, ProWealthSolutions, Pro Builder, Rejuvenate Worldwide, Skinny Body Care (abandoned 2018, sold to Valentus 2019). One JAMS arbitration and one federal trademark complaint - outcomes UNVERIFIED.
Founder/CEO of Stiforp, which BehindMLM characterised as a pyramid scheme in 2011. Later AliveMax (website offline December 2022, reason unknown) and co-founder of Globallee. This is the specific fact pattern the D-cap exists for.
Palm Beach Atlantic. Real credential, named on the site with a photograph.
Registered address
1201 Jupiter Park Dr. Unit 5, Jupiter, FL 33458
A real US commercial address in a Florida industrial park - not a virtual office, not an offshore registration, not a mail drop. Verifiable jurisdiction is a genuine positive and it is recorded as one.
The veteran's checklist
Eight questions that decide whether this is a business or a transfer mechanism. Same eight, every review.
| Question | Answer |
|---|---|
| Who legally owns it? |
WATCH
LiveGood, Inc. USA. Ben Glinsky named as CEO on the site. Beneficial ownership breakdown UNVERIFIABLE.
|
| Where is it incorporated? |
WATCH
Operating from Jupiter, FL. State of incorporation UNVERIFIABLE this session.
|
| Regulatory action, ever? |
CONCERN
No FTC, SEC or state AG action found. Two DSSRC self-regulatory inquiries, 2024 and 2025.
|
| Published income disclosure? |
RED
None locatable - despite the P&P requiring affiliates to present one with any income claim.
|
| Customers to break even? |
RED
Forty retained matrix members just to cover your own $9.95.
|
| Do I own the list? |
RED
No. Customer and affiliate information remains the sole property of the Company.
|
| Can they fire me and keep my residuals? |
RED
Presumed yes. UNVERIFIABLE - termination and arbitration provisions could not be extracted.
|
| Merchant play or miner play? |
RED
Miner play, unambiguously. You would be selling a $50 matrix position to people who want to sell $50 matrix positions.
|
What has to be true for you to get paid
| To cover | You need |
|---|---|
| Cover your own $9.95 membership | 40 retained matrix members $9.95 ÷ $0.2488 |
| Cover a $100/mo tool stack | ~440 retained matrix members every month, forever |
| The advertised $2,047.50 | 8,190 retained matrix members 2¹+…+2¹² filled and paying |
| The Diamond figure ($16,383.50) | 65,534 retained matrix members in one person's matrix |
Read this twice
Forty people paying every month just to cover your own fee. That is the real entry hurdle, and it is why the Fast Start $25 is the only commission most participants ever see - it takes 2.5 months of your own membership to break even on each one.
Run your own numbers
Drag the sliders. Nothing here is stored or sent.
2.5% of $9.95 per filled matrix position per month. Fast Start is one-time and excluded. Your own subscription cost of $9.95/mo is included.
What it costs to replace this yourself
There is nothing to replace - you cannot DIY a discount club. What you can do is buy comparable third-party-tested SKUs at open retail and skip the $119.40 a year.
| What they sell you | What you'd use instead | Your cost |
|---|---|---|
| Super Greens, 30 srv - $19.95 | Generic third-party-tested greens blend | $20–30 |
| Multivitamin, 30 srv - ~$12.95 | Store-brand or NOW-tier multi | $10–18 |
| D3-K2 (MK-7), 60 ct - ~$12.50 | NOW / Thorne-tier D3-K2 | $12–25 |
| Magnesium complex, 60 ct - ~$12.50 | Doctor's Best / NOW magnesium | $10–20 |
| + $9.95/mo membership | No membership required | $0 |
| Total as sold $119.40/yr membership + product |
Total, built yourself $0/yr membership + product |
Price-to-value
Under 1x on the products, which is genuinely good - and infinite on the membership, which is the whole point. The discount only pays if you buy two to three items every month, forever.
Three operators, five horizons
Probability of cumulative net profit
Hover any point for median, top decile and bottom quartile.
Part-timer
10 hrs/wk, no ads, warm market
| Horizon | P(profit) | Median |
|---|---|---|
| 3 mo | 30% | −$60 |
| 6 mo | 40% | −$30 |
| 1 yr | 45% | +$40 |
| 3 yr | 30% | −$120 |
| 5 yr | 25% | −$250 |
Full-timer
40 hrs/wk, $1,000/mo ads, from zero
| Horizon | P(profit) | Median |
|---|---|---|
| 3 mo | 3% | −$2,400 |
| 6 mo | 5% | −$4,300 |
| 1 yr | 8% | −$6,400 |
| 3 yr | 15% | −$4,000 |
| 5 yr | 18% | −$1,500 |
Established operator
~25,000 engaged list, $2,500/mo ads
| Horizon | P(profit) | Median |
|---|---|---|
| 3 mo | 55% | +$1,800 |
| 6 mo | 60% | +$3,500 |
| 1 yr | 55% | +$2,000 |
| 3 yr | 40% | −$4,000 |
| 5 yr | 35% | −$9,000 |
Methodology note. MODELED from comp-plan mechanics and comparable-program base rates. No published IDS exists to calibrate against. The whole model rests on one unpublished number - monthly retention. At 90% retention you hold 10× your monthly enrollments; at 50% you hold 2×. A 5x swing on a figure the company has never disclosed in four years.
Where you are actually allowed to promote this
Platform policy reads, not verifications. Check every one before you spend a dollar - enforcement changes faster than the written policy does.
Red flags and green flags
Red flags
121Two DSSRC inquiries - and the second found a repeat of the identical claim
2LiveGood refused to commit to the remedies
3The company still publishes the number it disciplines affiliates for repeating
4Unqualified disease claims on livegood.com product pages
580% of the affiliate sign-up fee is paid to the upline chain
6The retail-vs-participant ratio is still unpublished after four years
7A rebrand chain and an officer with a documented pyramid behind him
8No income disclosure statement locatable
9"Free powerline / spillover / earn without referring" is the primary acquisition mechanic
10Three-week revocable pre-approval on your own marketing materials
11Product names carried over from a company that was sold
12Internal inconsistency on the guarantee
Green flags
101Ownership disclosed on the company's own website, with photographs and roles
2Real US jurisdiction, real commercial address
3No autoship, no minimum purchase, no qualifying volume
4Genuinely low, honest product pricing
5Full retail pricing is public without joining
6Third-party testing with published Certificates of Analysis
7No passive-return component and no securities exposure
8Four years of continuous operation with an expanding real product line
9The company did act on DSSRC findings, partially
10The terms and conditions tell the truth
We would like to be wrong about this
Upward
- Publication of a real income disclosure with median earnings, distribution by rank and expenses - plus the company-wide retail-vs-participant revenue split.
- Retail-customer requirements baked into rank advancement, plus a documented 10-customer rule and buyback policy.
- Removal of the $2,047.50 figure and the $30,000-matching illustration from the pay plan page, and removal of the disease-claim testimonials from product pages.
Downward
- A DSSRC compliance inquiry with a government referral attached, or any FTC / state AG action.
- Documentation that the JAMS arbitration or the federal trademark matter resulted in an adverse finding against Glinsky.
- Evidence that recruited affiliates constitute the overwhelming majority of paying members.
Grade is D. No playbook. Here is what to do with these resources instead.
LiveGood claims over a million registered members across 200+ countries. Assume even 5% are actively trying to build. That is 50,000 people who paid $49.95 to get in, are being told to recruit, have no product-volume incentive, have no viable paid-traffic channel, are prohibited or banned on Google, Meta and TikTok, cannot use their own marketing materials without a three-week approval queue, and need forty retained members just to cover their own $9.95. They have a $25-per-head front end and no way to fill it.
That is the most under-served, highest-intent, most desperate lead-generation market in direct sales right now. And they are already your customer.
Why you keep the asset in every case: your list, your domains, your rankings, your customer relationships, your billing. If LiveGood draws a DSSRC compliance escalation, or cuts the plan the way the entry fee doubled in December 2022, your business does not blink - your market just migrates to the next matrix and you sell them leads there. Every one of these offers survives LiveGood's death. A downline does not.
Genealogy and biz-opp leads targeted at LiveGood builders
Global, English-speaking, matrix-dependent, traffic-starved. A $97–297/mo lead subscription against a customer already spending $50–500/mo trying to solve exactly this.
A LiveGood-specific tool stack
Funnel templates, email sequences, a matrix/retention tracker, a compliance-clean claims library - the thing their own three-week approval queue makes impossible. $47–97/mo, sold as a tool, not an opportunity. Highest-margin, lowest-risk item on the list.
"Compliance-safe LiveGood marketing" as a paid product
Every affiliate repeating $2,047.50 carries personal 16 CFR 255 liability and does not know it. A $197 course plus a done-for-you disclosure kit - and you can advertise it on Google and Meta, because compliance training is not a business opportunity.
Done-with-you funnel builds
$497 setup + $197/month. Their $25 front end cannot fund this. Their hope can. Price accordingly and qualify hard.
Nine dimensions, weighted
Dimension profile
Further from center is better. Hover any point.
Hard caps that bind here
The lowest binding cap wins, regardless of the weighted arithmetic.
What we read
Every source below links to the document itself. Tier 1 is a primary record - the company’s own plan, policy or disclosure, a court filing, a regulator’s decision or an SEC filing. Tier 2 is a self-regulatory or secondary regulator record, tier 3 reporting or academic work, tier 4 an open-market price comparison. Where a document can be moved or withdrawn, an archived copy is linked beside it. If a link is dead when you try it, that is a correction we want.
- LiveGood Affiliate Compensation Plan - "Earn Income 7 Ways": $25 weekly Fast Start on each $49.95 member+affiliate signup, 10 levels of Fast Start overrides, 2x15 matrix paying 2.5% per $9.95 membership position (company's own page)
livegood.com - /payPlan, /ourTeam, /organicSuperGreens; T&C and Policies & Procedures PDFs (snippets)
Not established by this document: Two naming points the report should state precisely. (1) The income disclosure page exists but is empty: LiveGood publishes the table structure and no data, so the existence question resolves "yes, and it discloses nothing." (2) The Florida registry entity is LIVEGOOD SUPPLEMENTS INC, incorporated 16 April 2021 - a year before the 2022 founding date the company and DSSRC both give. No Florida or other-state entity registered under the exact name "LiveGood, Inc. USA" (the name DSSRC uses and the name in the site's own copyright line) could be located; that name appears to be a trading style rather than a registered entity. The livegood.com WHOIS creation date remains unverified - privacy-protected WHOIS has no stable citable record.
- LiveGood Policies and Procedures (PDF) - code of conduct, including clause 1(c) requiring members to "make it clear that success in the Company's compensation plan is based on product purchases rather than sponsoring"
- LiveGood Terms and Conditions (PDF), as of 18 May 2022
- LiveGood Income Disclosure page - a six-column table (rank, number of affiliates, percentage, monthly high/low/average check, annualised average check) published with the headers filled in and zero data rows
- LiveGood Our Team - CEO Ben Glinsky and Director of Product Development Ryan Goodkin, PharmD (company's own marketing page)
- LiveGood Organic Super Greens product page - $19.95 member price against the OrganiFi ($69.99) and Skinny Greens ($99.95) comparators LiveGood itself selects (company's own marketing page)
- LiveGood FAQ - the company's own explanation of Powerline versus matrix placement and of spillover
- LIVEGOOD SUPPLEMENTS INC - Florida Division of Corporations entity record, document number P21000037066, FEI/EIN 86-3645131, filed 16 April 2021, status ACTIVE; President Benjamin Glinsky, VP Ryan Goodkin, registered agent Peter L. Bonneau CPA, Jupiter FL
- DSSRC Case #210-2025: Monitoring Inquiry – LiveGood, Inc. USA - 18 earnings claims and six product performance claims; nine "as much as $2,047.50 a month" posts left publicly accessible; LiveGood's Company Statement held insufficient for failing to commit to DSSRC's recommendations (closed 7 April 2025)
bbbprograms.org - DSSRC Case #210-2025 (full text) and Case #148-2024 press releases
Not established by this document: The 2025 decision refers at footnote 16 to "a 2023 inquiry with the Company" in which the same $2,047.50 claim was raised. That earlier inquiry has no separate published case page - Case #148-2024 is the file that closed it (opened 2023, closed February 2024) - so the report should not describe it as a distinct third case.
- "Direct Selling Self-Regulatory Council Recommends LiveGood Discontinue Certain Earnings and Health-Related Product Claims" - DSSRC press release, 13 May 2025
- DSSRC Case #148-2024: Monitoring Inquiry – LiveGood, Inc. USA - three earnings claims and five product performance claims; LiveGood's position that "can earn up to $2,047.50 per MONTH" is not an earnings claim; closed 13 February 2024
- Case #210-2025: Monitoring Inquiry – LiveGood, Inc. USA - full decision text as a fixed PDF (copy archived by TINA.org)
- Case #148-2024: Monitoring Inquiry – LiveGood, Inc. USA - full decision text as a fixed PDF (copy archived by TINA.org)
- "LiveGood Review: Ben Glinsky returns with discount supps" - BehindMLM, 19 August 2022, with the December 2022 and January 2023 comp-plan update notes
behindmlm.com - LiveGood review plus 409-comment thread
- "LiveGood pyramid scheme investigation in New Zealand" - BehindMLM, 13 March 2026, noting LiveGood has never publicly disclosed the ratio of $9.95 memberships held by promoters versus genuine retail customers
- LiveGood reviews on Trustpilot (livegood.com) - 794 reviews, TrustScore 4.1, with the negative tail concentrated on undelivered orders, unauthorised subscription charges and refunds credited to account balance rather than card
trustpilot.com/review/livegood.com (pages 1–7); bbb.org Live Good Inc complaints
Not established by this document: Correction to the prose. There is no BBB business profile for LiveGood Inc. USA / LiveGood Supplements Inc of Jupiter, Florida that could be located. The only bbb.org profile returned by searches for "Live Good" complaints is "Live Good Products" of Atlanta, Georgia (bbb.org/us/ga/atlanta/profile/vitamins-and-supplements/live-good-products-0443-28146130), whose nine complaints all concern livegoodproducts.com, a Georgia herbal-tea seller trading as Gala Wholesale - a different, unrelated business. Citing it against LiveGood would be a substitution error and it has deliberately been left out. bbb.org is in any case robots-disallowed to automated fetches, so the Trustpilot and PissedConsumer figures above are marked "listed": they come from search-result page metadata, not a confirmed page load.
- LiveGood reviews on PissedConsumer - 2.8/5 across a small registered-user sample, complaints concentrated on membership cancellation
- Master Strategies LLC and AAM Investments LLC v. RJ Worldwide LLC d/b/a Skinny Body Care and Benjamin Glinsky, JAMS Case No. 1100084132 - Arbitrator's Final Award, 14 November 2018: $352,000 against Glinsky and RJ Worldwide jointly and severally as reasonable royalty for trademark infringement, $25,000 to AAM Investments, and a permanent injunction against use of the "Skinny Fiber" mark from 1 March 2019
jusmundi.com - Master Strategies LLC v. RJ Worldwide LLC / Glinsky, JAMS final award Nov 14 2018 (blocked by bot detection)
Not established by this document: The prose recorded this award as "blocked by bot detection." It is not: the full text is retrievable at the Jus Mundi URL above and the outcome - which the prose lists as unverified - is now documented, including the disposition of the parallel federal trademark proceeding via TTABVUE. The underlying district-court complaint referenced on Scribd is behind a challenge page and was not used.
- SKINNY FIBER, U.S. Trademark Serial No. 77789980 / Registration No. 3757347, owned by Master Strategies LLC - USPTO status record (registered and renewed)
- TTABVUE record for Master Strategies LLC - RJ Worldwide, LLC's petition to cancel the SKINNY FIBER registration was withdrawn 23 April 2019 and denied with prejudice on 26 April 2019, five months after the JAMS award
- Jon M. Taylor, "The Case (for and) against Multi-level Marketing," Chapter 7: MLM's Abysmal Numbers - public comment filed in the FTC Business Opportunity Rule proceeding R511993 and hosted on ftc.gov; source of the finding that fewer than 1% of MLM participants profit after expenses (PDF)
Jon M. Taylor, "The Case (for and) against Multi-level Marketing," published on ftc.gov - 99%+ of participants lose money after expenses
Not established by this document: The document is hosted on ftc.gov but is a third-party public comment in a rulemaking docket, not an FTC finding. Describing it as "published on ftc.gov" is accurate; describing it as an FTC conclusion would not be, and the report should carry that distinction on the face of the link text.
- "ComCom investigating potential pyramid scheme operating throughout New Zealand" - Commerce Commission media release, 12 March 2026: the scheme "promotes a business opportunity involving health supplements platform LiveGood" and "carries the hallmarks of a pyramid scheme"
Searches returning nothing of substance: LiveGood FTC, SEC, cease and desist, state attorney general, class action. Silence here counts in the company's favor.
Not established by this document: This entry must be rewritten before publication. The prose states that searches for regulator action returned nothing and that "silence here counts in the company's favour." That is no longer true and, on the record above, was already untrue when written. The New Zealand Commerce Commission opened a Fair Trading Act pyramid-scheme investigation into LiveGood promotion on 13 October 2025 and publicised it on 12 March 2026; two Proposition 65 notices of violation naming LiveGood Supplements Inc. and Benjamin Glinsky personally were filed with the California Attorney General in September 2025 and amended in May 2026. Separately, the searches the prose describes as returning nothing do hold for the specific agencies named: no FTC action, no SEC action, no U.S. state attorney general enforcement action and no class action against LiveGood was located, and that narrower negative finding is the only one the report can defend.
- Case register entry: LiveGood and The Official Diamond Rush - investigation under Fair Trading Act 1986 ss 24 and 40A(1), case PRJ0048681, opened 13 October 2025, outcome "yet to be determined"
- Proposition 65 60-Day Notice 2025-03557 - Environmental Health Advocates, Inc. v. LiveGood Supplements Inc., alleging undisclosed lead exposure from LIVEGOOD Organic Super Reds, served 12 September 2025 (Attorney General's docket entry)
- 60-Day Notice of Violation and Certificate of Merit, AG No. 2025-03557 - full text served on LiveGood Supplements Inc. c/o Benjamin Glinsky (PDF)
- Amended 60-Day Notice of Violation, AG No. 2026-02337 - amends notice 2025-03557 to add HWU Training Corp, LLC as a noticed manufacturer, served 15 May 2026 (PDF)
- "Commerce Commission warns of suspected Hawke's Bay pyramid scheme" - RNZ, reporting Deputy Chair Anne Callinan's statement
What we could not get
- Existence and contents of any LiveGood income disclosure statement
- Retail-vs-participant revenue ratio - the number that decides the pyramid question
- Corporate registration jurisdiction and date; livegood.com WHOIS creation date
- Outcome of the JAMS arbitration and the federal trademark complaint
- Whether participants in any Glinsky or Khazan prior venture were made whole
- Commission minimum thresholds, chargeback reserves, forfeiture-on-termination provisions
- Assignability of an affiliate position; contact-data export rights
- Whether the reported 1M+ member figure has ever been audited
Not advice
This is independent analysis for decision-making, not legal, financial or investment advice. Allegations reported by third parties should be verified against primary court and regulatory records before any decision.
Researched by Claude. Reviewed by an editor.
Every report is researched and written by Claude, Anthropic’s AI assistant, from the company’s own plan documents, policies, terms and regulatory file - then reviewed before publication by Rob Fore, who checks the sources and the stage-label on every allegation.
- Nine weighted dimensions, published with their weights
- The editor checks the evidence and cannot change the number - the build rejects any page whose grade does not reconcile to its own arithmetic
- Every affiliate position we hold is disclosed on the report it touches
- No company has paid for a grade, and no report carries an affiliate link
Looking at something else?
Enter any company name or website. If a report exists it opens instantly; if not, we start one.
LiveGood - frequently asked
QIs LiveGood a pyramid scheme?
QHow many members do you need to break even at LiveGood?
QAre LiveGood products actually good value?
QWhat did the DSSRC find about LiveGood?
Author, editor and publisher
This report was researched and written by Claude, Anthropic’s AI assistant, working from primary documents - LiveGood’s own compensation plan, its policies and procedures, its terms of service, its income disclosure statement where one exists, and its regulatory and self-regulatory file. It was scored against nine weighted dimensions that are published in full, with their weights, on the methodology page.
Before publication it was reviewed by Rob Fore, who checks every source link, every figure against the document it came from, and every allegation against its stage-label - an investigation is not a finding, a warning letter is not an enforcement action, and a filed claim is not a verdict.
The editor does not set the grade. The published score is the weighted composite of the nine dimension scores, and the build refuses to emit a page where the two disagree by more than 0.06. A grade moves when the evidence moves it and not otherwise.
Rob Fore has marketed online since 1996, wrote Online MLM Marketing (2014), and is CEO of Listech Inc, the Nevada corporation that publishes this site. He holds affiliate positions in companies graded here - including LiveGood, which this site grades D, SendOutCards, which it grades C−, and the Home Business Academy, which it grades B−. Those positions are disclosed on the reports they touch, and changed nothing on this page.
About the author and our conflicts · Contact the editor · Corrections: corrections@opportunitygrade.com
Tell me if this grade changes
LiveGood is graded D as of July 26, 2026. Grades move when the evidence moves - a new income disclosure, a regulatory action, a rewritten compensation plan. Leave your address and you will get one email if this one does.
One email when the grade moves, and nothing else. We will never use your address to promote an income opportunity of any kind, we do not sell, rent or share the list, and it is stored on our own infrastructure rather than with any company graded here. Unsubscribe removes everything.
Corrections
Every factual claim on this page is sourced, and the ones we could not stand up are named in the unable to verify list above. If something here is wrong, we want to know, and we would rather hear it from LiveGood than from a reader.
Write to corrections@opportunitygrade.com. Point at the specific sentence and send the document that contradicts it - a plan document, a filing, an income disclosure, a policy page. We will check it against the primary source, correct the page if it is wrong, and say in the report that it was corrected and when. A grade moves if the evidence moves it.
This address reaches a person, not a form. We do not require a takedown demand, an NDA or a lawyer to accept a correction, and we do not remove a report because a company disputes its conclusion - only because the underlying facts turn out to be wrong.